IRS

Can't reach IRS? Claimyr connects you to a live IRS agent in minutes.

Claimyr is a pay-as-you-go service. We do not charge a recurring subscription.



Fox KTVUABC 7CBSSan Francisco Chronicle

Using Claimyr will:

  • Connect you to a human agent at the IRS
  • Skip the long phone menu
  • Call the correct department
  • Redial until on hold
  • Forward a call to your phone with reduced hold time
  • Give you free callbacks if the IRS drops your call

If I could give 10 stars I would

If I could give 10 stars I would If I could give 10 stars I would Such an amazing service so needed during the times when EDD almost never picks up Claimyr gets me on the phone with EDD every time without fail faster. A much needed service without Claimyr I would have never received the payment I needed to support me during my postpartum recovery. Thank you so much Claimyr!


Really made a difference

Really made a difference, save me time and energy from going to a local office for making the call.


Worth not wasting your time calling for hours.

Was a bit nervous or untrusting at first, but my calls went thru. First time the wait was a bit long but their customer chat line on their page was helpful and put me at ease that I would receive my call. Today my call dropped because of EDD and Claimyr heard my concern on the same chat and another call was made within the hour.


An incredibly helpful service

An incredibly helpful service! Got me connected to a CA EDD agent without major hassle (outside of EDD's agents dropping calls – which Claimyr has free protection for). If you need to file a new claim and can't do it online, pay the $ to Claimyr to get the process started. Absolutely worth it!


Consistent,frustration free, quality Service.

Used this service a couple times now. Before I'd call 200 times in less than a weak frustrated as can be. But using claimyr with a couple hours of waiting i was on the line with an representative or on hold. Dropped a couple times but each reconnected not long after and was mission accomplished, thanks to Claimyr.


IT WORKS!! Not a scam!

I tried for weeks to get thru to EDD PFL program with no luck. I gave this a try thinking it may be a scam. OMG! It worked and They got thru within an hour and my claim is going to finally get paid!! I upgraded to the $60 call. Best $60 spent!

Read all of our Trustpilot reviews


Ask the community...

  • DO post questions about your issues.
  • DO answer questions and support each other.
  • DO post tips & tricks to help folks.
  • DO NOT post call problems here - there is a support tab at the top for that :)

Amina Bah

•

Has anyone used TurboTax for reporting this kind of stuff? I'm trying to figure out where to even enter these "services instead of rent" scenarios and it's not obvious at all.

0 coins

I use TurboTax and for this situation, you'd just enter the full rent amount as income on Schedule E, then add the value of services (like lawn mowing) as a separate expense under "repairs and maintenance" or whatever category is appropriate. TurboTax doesn't have a specific field for "payment in kind" - you just handle each side of the transaction separately.

0 coins

Maya Diaz

•

This thread has been incredibly helpful! I've been struggling with similar rental income questions and the explanations here finally made it click for me. One thing I'd add from my experience - make sure to keep really detailed records of these arrangements. When my tenant started doing yard work in exchange for reduced rent, I created a simple log documenting the date, work performed, and value. This saved me during an audit last year when the IRS wanted to verify the "fair market value" of the services. Also, for anyone dealing with utility payments like the water bill example, I found it helpful to set up a separate tracking system. I record the full rent amount as income, then track each utility payment the tenant makes on my behalf as both an additional income item and corresponding expense. It keeps everything transparent and makes tax time much less stressful. The key insight from this discussion is that the IRS wants to see the full economic value of the rental arrangement, not just the net cash flow. Once you understand that principle, all these scenarios start to make sense.

0 coins

This is such great advice about keeping detailed records! I'm just getting started as a landlord and hadn't thought about the documentation aspect. When you say you track the "fair market value" of services, how do you actually determine that? For example, if my tenant agrees to do landscaping work, do I need to get quotes from landscaping companies to establish the value, or is there a simpler way to document it? Also, your point about tracking utilities as both income and expense makes total sense now. I was getting confused trying to figure out the "net" effect, but separating them out seems much cleaner for record-keeping purposes.

0 coins

Amina Sy

•

For what it's worth, if you end up getting audited, remember that the burden of proof is on the IRS to show why your reported numbers are wrong IF you have some reasonable documentation. They can't just say "we don't believe you" without evidence. I went through an audit last year over some stock sales where I was missing basis documentation. I provided my best reconstruction with explanations and they actually accepted most of it. Only had to pay additional tax on a small portion where I really couldn't substantiate anything. Make sure to keep EVERYTHING - notes, screenshots, emails about transactions, bank statements. If the worst happens, hire a tax pro who specializes in crypto. They've seen it all and know how to deal with the IRS in these situations.

0 coins

That's not quite accurate. The burden of proof for cost basis is generally on the taxpayer, not the IRS. If you can't prove your basis, they can indeed treat your entire proceeds as gain. I've seen it happen.

0 coins

You're absolutely right to be concerned about this - the IRS can and will assess tax on the full $17,500 if you can't substantiate your cost basis. I've seen this happen to clients multiple times. Here's what I'd recommend based on your situation: 1. **Reconstruct everything you can NOW** - Log into every exchange account you still have access to and download complete transaction histories. Even if they didn't send 1099s, most exchanges maintain records you can access. 2. **Your bank statements are crucial** - Those transfers to/from Coinbase establish a clear timeline and amounts. Print them out and organize them chronologically. 3. **Create a detailed methodology document** - Write out exactly how you calculated your $5,500 gain, noting any assumptions or estimates. Be transparent about what you know vs. what you're estimating. 4. **Consider amended reporting if needed** - If you discover your calculations were off during reconstruction, it's better to file an amended return than get caught in an audit with wrong numbers. 5. **File Form 8949 with detailed notes** - Use the description field to explain your methodology for transactions where documentation is limited. The key is demonstrating good faith effort. The IRS is generally more reasonable when you're transparent about limitations in your records rather than trying to hide gaps. Keep all your reconstruction work - if audited, showing your process can make a huge difference in how they treat your case.

0 coins

Aisha Ali

•

Check your bank account, not just the transcript. IRS often deposits earlier than the DDD. My 846 showed 2/15 but money hit my account 2/13. Don't spend it until it's actually there though. Banks sometimes show pending deposits that can change.

0 coins

Congrats on finally getting your DDD! I'm in a similar boat - filed 1/31, accepted same day, and my cycle code also changed from 05 to 03 this year. Still stuck with just the basic codes (150, 806) but no 846 yet. It's encouraging to see other 03 cycle filers getting their DDDs now. Question for you - did you have any 570/971 codes show up before your 846 appeared, or did it go straight from the basic processing codes to the refund? Trying to gauge if I should expect any additional holds or if it might be smooth sailing from here.

0 coins

I'm new to understanding all these transcript codes but I'm curious about your situation too! I filed around the same time (2/2) and also have an 03 cycle code this year. From what I've been reading in this community, it seems like the 570/971 codes aren't necessarily a bad thing - just minor holds that usually resolve automatically. But I'd love to hear from @Freya Christensen whether she had any of those codes before her 846 showed up. Also wondering if the timing between basic codes and the 846 varies much between filers, or if there s'a typical pattern we should expect?

0 coins

This is such a great discussion! I went through the same confusion when my 17-year-old nephew started working last summer. What really helped me understand it was looking at it from a different angle - minors DO benefit from government services that taxes fund, like public schools, infrastructure, emergency services, etc. The representation piece is tricky though. Technically, minors are "represented" through their parents/guardians who vote, and through elected officials who are supposed to consider all constituents. But you're right that it feels weird philosophically. One thing I learned is that the tax system has some built-in protections for minors - like the standard deduction Sofia mentioned, and the fact that most working teens end up getting refunds. It's not perfect, but there is some recognition that their situation is different from adult taxpayers. Have you looked into whether your sister qualifies for any of the education credits when she starts filing in future years? That might help offset some of the "taxation without representation" feeling!

0 coins

Sophia Clark

•

Thanks for bringing up the education credits! That's something I hadn't thought about. My sister is planning to go to college in a couple years, so it would be good to know what credits might be available to help offset some of these taxes she's paying now. I'm still not totally convinced by the "represented through parents" argument though. Like, my parents and I definitely don't agree on everything politically, so how can they really represent my sister's interests when voting? It still feels like there should be some kind of exemption or at least reduced tax rates for minors who can't vote. But I guess the practical benefits point makes sense - she does use roads, schools, police protection, etc. Do you know if there are any movements to change this? Like, has anyone actually tried to challenge this in court or push for legislation to exempt working minors from income tax?

0 coins

Jacob Lee

•

Great question about legal challenges! There actually have been a few court cases over the years, though most haven't succeeded. The most notable was probably *Kramer v. Union Free School District* in 1969, which dealt with voting rights and representation, though it wasn't specifically about taxation. More recently, there have been grassroots movements to lower the voting age to 16, partly because of this taxation issue. Some local jurisdictions (like certain cities in Maryland and California) now allow 16-year-olds to vote in local elections. Scotland and a few other countries have lowered their voting ages too. For the education credits - yes! The American Opportunity Tax Credit can provide up to $2,500 per year for the first four years of college. There's also the Lifetime Learning Credit. These can really help offset taxes paid during high school years, though you'll want to research the income limits and requirements. The philosophical debate you're having is actually pretty important - it's one of the reasons some political scientists argue for expanding voting rights to younger people. Your point about disagreeing with your parents politically is especially valid in today's world where generational political divides seem wider than ever.

0 coins

IRS Shows "Verification of Non-Filing" Status 3 Weeks After Accepted February Return - Normal Processing?

I filed my return on February 8th and got acceptance confirmation same day. But when I check my transcript its showing "Verification of Non-Filing Letter." The transcript page shows this letter "states that the IRS does not have a record of a processed tax return as of the letter's date." It specifically mentions two possibilities: "either no tax return was filed for this year or your tax return is still being processed." When I look at the "Available transcripts" section on the IRS website at 6:15, I can clearly see "2024 Verification of Non-Filing Letter [PDF]" listed at the top with an "EN" designation. Below that are several other transcript options including what appears to be another transcript type [PDF], then "2022 Verification of Non-Filing Letter [PDF]" also with an "EN" designation, followed by "2021 Return Transcript [PDF]" with "EN", and finally "Wage & Income" at the bottom of the list. The description for the Verification of Non-Filing Letter explicitly states: "This letter states that the IRS does not have a record of a processed tax return as of the letter's date. Either no tax return was filed for this year or your tax return is still being processed." I also see information about return transcripts explaining they show "tax return as it was originally filed, including associated forms and schedules. Lending institutions offering mortgages often accept return transcripts." Does this mean my return is lost or still processing? I'm really confused about what this means, especially since I got that acceptance confirmation when I filed. Why would it show no record of my processed return? Is this normal at this stage of tax season?

Leo McDonald

•

Same situation here! Filed on 2/6 and seeing the exact same non-filing letter. Was starting to wonder if something went wrong with my e-file but sounds like this is just standard procedure. The IRS really needs to update their wording though - saying "no record of processed return" when they actually DO have your return but just haven't finished processing it is super confusing for us taxpayers. At least now I know to stop obsessively checking every day and just wait it out šŸ˜…

0 coins

Totally agree about the confusing wording! I'm also a newcomer to all this tax stuff and that "no record of processed return" language had me convinced I'd somehow messed up my filing. It's wild that they use the same letter whether you literally never filed OR if you're just waiting in line. You'd think they could have different messages for each situation but I guess that would make too much sense šŸ˜‚ At least we're all in the same boat waiting for processing!

0 coins

Mateo Silva

•

Filed mine on 2/10 and seeing the same thing! At first I thought I'd done something wrong with my e-file since the language is so scary sounding. But reading through these comments is really reassuring - sounds like this is just the standard process and we're all basically waiting in the same digital line. The fact that you got your acceptance confirmation is the important part. I've been checking my transcript obsessively but think I'm going to follow the Friday morning advice and try to chill out about it. Thanks for posting this question because I was definitely stressing about the same exact issue! šŸ¤ž

0 coins

Prev1...25542555255625572558...5644Next