
IRS
CommunityGovernment Services


Ask the community...
Hey everyone! I'm planning to start a small 501c3 nonprofit organization that will be membership-based but with minimal income (practically zero). I was reading through the IRS Form 1023-EZ instructions and noticed this interesting point: "Note. Most organizations seeking exemption from federal income tax under section 501(c)(3) are required to complete and submit an application. However, the following types of organizations may be considered tax exempt under section 501(c)(3) even if they do not file Form 1023 or Form 1023-EZ. * Churches, including synagogues, temples, and mosques. * Integrated auxiliaries of churches and conventions or associations of churches. * Any organization that has gross receipts in each taxable year of normally not more than $5,000." I'm specifically looking at that third bullet point. If I incorporate as a nonprofit in my state and expect to stay under that $5,000 threshold, do I still need to do anything with the IRS to get official 501c3 status? Will this exemption automatically be connected to our EIN? Or is this just saying we won't be taxed like a regular business? Any insights from those who've been through this process would be super helpful!
So my mortgage guy told me something that seems really weird and I need to know if it's legit or if I messed up. He said that when I deduct business miles on my self-employment taxes, my "verified income" for mortgage purposes actually INCREASES by $0.26 for every mile I claim. Like if I made $50,000 on paper but wrote off 10,000 miles, my income would be considered $52,600 by the bank ($50,000 + $2,600). I was desperate to get approved for my home loan, so I amended my 2022 taxes to include a bunch of business miles. Now that I've had time to think about it, this seems super sketchy. My loan officer said this only works with lenders who look at income after deductions, but I'm wondering if this is actually a normal thing mortgage people do or if I've potentially done something incorrect on my taxes. Should I just file another amendment and remove all the mileage deductions? I'm really starting to worry I've made a mistake here. Has anyone else heard of this practice or am I right to be concerned?
I'm shocked at what loan officers tell people to do! When I was applying for my mortgage, mine suggested I deposit cash gifts in my account and just say it was income. When I refused, he stopped returning my calls. Definitely talk to a CPA about fixing your tax return. It's not worth committing tax fraud for a mortgage. Plenty of legitimate lenders work with self-employed people without requiring shady tactics.
This is a really concerning situation, and I'm glad you're questioning it now. As others have mentioned, while legitimate depreciation add-backs are a real thing in mortgage underwriting, what your loan officer suggested crosses into fraud territory. The key issue is that you can ONLY claim business mileage for miles you actually drove for legitimate business purposes. If you amended your return to include fictional miles just to boost your mortgage-qualifying income, that's tax fraud regardless of how mortgage lenders might treat the depreciation component. I'd strongly recommend: 1. Consult with a CPA immediately about your amended return 2. If you claimed miles you didn't actually drive, file another amendment to correct it 3. Consider finding a new mortgage lender - one that doesn't suggest illegal tactics There are legitimate ways to present self-employment income favorably to lenders without breaking tax laws. A good mortgage broker should know the difference between proper income analysis and fraud. Your current loan officer has put both of you at risk with this advice. Better to delay your home purchase than face potential IRS penalties, mortgage fraud charges, or having to explain falsified tax documents later. The housing market will still be there when you get your finances properly sorted.
I've been trying to figure out how to handle my foreign investments on this tax season's return and I'm completely lost with form 8621. I have some international index funds in my portfolio that apparently qualify as PFICs (Passive Foreign Investment Companies) and I just found out I need to file separate 8621 forms for each fund. The part I'm most confused about is how to handle the management fees I paid to my financial advisor for these investments. Are these fees deductible when reporting PFICs? Do they offset any of the income or do I need to report them separately? I have about 7 different funds that would qualify as PFICs with a total value around $42,000, and I paid approximately $1,200 in management fees last year specifically for these investments. My advisor isn't familiar with these forms either, so I'm not getting much help there. Any guidance would be appreciated!
Watch out for the time involved in filling out multiple 8621 forms! I had 9 PFICs last year and it literally took me about 2 hours PER FORM to complete correctly. That's like 18 hours just for one tax form! If your time is worth anything, consider having a professional handle these. I learned my lesson and switched most of my international investments to US-based international funds (like Vanguard's VEU or VXUS) that invest internationally but don't trigger PFIC rules since they're US companies.
This is actually super smart advice. I looked into it after similar PFIC headaches and found that many major US brokerages offer international exposure through US-based ETFs specifically to avoid these PFIC filing requirements. You get basically the same investment exposure without the tax form nightmare.
Exactly! It's what tax professionals call "tax-efficient investing." My mistake was buying the foreign funds directly instead of through US-based vehicles. My new approach gives me nearly identical investment exposure (sometimes the exact same underlying assets) but with dramatically simplified tax reporting. For anyone dealing with this PFIC headache, seriously consider restructuring your international investments for next year.
This thread has been incredibly helpful! I'm in a similar boat with about $35,000 spread across 5 different European ETFs that I now realize are PFICs. Based on what everyone's shared here, I think my best strategy is to: 1. Use one of the tax tools mentioned (probably taxr.ai) to help with the immediate 8621 filing requirements for this year 2. Contact the IRS directly using Claimyr if I run into specific calculation questions the software can't handle 3. Start transitioning my international exposure to US-based international funds like VEU or VXUS to avoid this nightmare next year One question though - if I sell my current PFIC investments this year to switch to US-based alternatives, will that create additional complications for my 8621 forms? Or should I wait until after I file this year's taxes to make the switch? The management fee issue is frustrating but sounds like there's not much we can do about that anymore. At least now I understand it doesn't factor into the PFIC calculations themselves.
Finally got through to the TurboTax support team today and they confirmed they've received my tax payment funds. It's pending with a release date of March 26th and they even provided a trace number. But isn't it strange that when I log into my actual TurboTax account, there's absolutely no record of this payment? The account still shows I haven't paid anything at all. I mean, I guess I feel somewhat better knowing the payment is in their system somewhere, but why wouldn't it show up in my own account? Shouldn't that be the first place it appears? Do I just sit tight until the 26th and hope everything magically updates itself? Between work deadlines and getting the kids to activities, I really don't have time for this payment runaround.
The EXACT same thing happened to me!! I was so angry I took screenshots of everything. My payment was "pending" for $1,243 but my account showed $0 paid! I was panicking thinking I'd get hit with late payment penalties or something. But it did finally update on the exact day they said it would. The whole time I was thinking "how can a company that literally specializes in FINANCIAL SOFTWARE have such a terrible payment tracking system??" ๐คฌ So frustrating but at least you know you're not alone in this mess!
I'm going through this exact same situation right now! My payment shows as pending with TurboTax support but my account dashboard still shows $0 paid. It's so stressful when you're dealing with tax payments and the system seems broken. Reading everyone's experiences here is really reassuring though - sounds like this is unfortunately just how their system works. The trace number definitely seems to be the key proof that everything is actually fine. Thanks for posting this Dylan, it's helping a lot of us who are in the same boat! I'll definitely be saving that trace number and waiting for my pending date.
Just saw my 810 freeze code was removed from my transcript. Called the IRS and they said they sent some letter to the 'higher ups' and I should get a call within 30 days or they'll release my refund. Anyone else dealt with this? Getting tired of waiting tbh.
Theyre not gonna call u back in 30 days lol. But the good news is that usually means theyre about to release it anyway
Had the exact same thing happen to me last month! My 810 got removed and they gave me the whole "higher ups will call in 30 days" speech. Didn't get a call but my refund hit my account on day 18. Just keep checking your transcript for movement - once that 810 is gone you're basically in the clear. Hang in there!
@Hunter Brighton I had called the number Friday of the fraud department, he told me he didnโt know why it was on an 810 freeze and would have it removed. Iโve checked my transcripts still not removed.
Paolo Bianchi
One thing to consider is state requirements. I formed a small 501c3 in Texas in 2023 that falls under the $5k exception. While federal filing of 1023-EZ wasn't technically required, our state still required proof of 501c3 status for state tax exemptions (sales tax, franchise tax, etc). Without the IRS determination letter, we had to pay state taxes that effectively erased our small budget. Also, when applying for our bank account, they required the IRS determination letter - no exceptions. My advice: just file the 1023-EZ. It costs $275 (as of 2025) and saves a ton of headaches. We ended up filing 6 months after formation and regretted not doing it immediately.
0 coins
Yara Assad
I had the exact same issue in Michigan! The state wouldn't grant our property tax exemption without the IRS determination letter. We also found that potential donors (even small ones) would ask for our determination letter before giving. It's one of those things where technically you're exempt, but practically you need the paperwork to prove it.
0 coins
Paolo Bianchi
That's exactly it - there's the technical rule and then there's the practical reality. Most institutions you'll deal with don't understand the $5,000 exemption rule and will just ask for your determination letter. They don't care about the technical exception. Michigan's property tax requirement is similar to what we faced with sales tax exemption. We had to pay sales tax on all our supplies for the first 8 months until we got our determination letter, which ended up costing more than the 1023-EZ filing fee.
0 coins
Olivia Clark
Has anyone experienced any audit issues by NOT filing the 1023-EZ? Like if you stay under $5k for a few years but then grow, does the IRS ever come back and question your earlier years?
0 coins
Olivia Clark
Thanks for sharing that experience - that's exactly the kind of situation I'm worried about. The extra scrutiny sounds stressful. Did they question any specific activities from the previous years or just want to verify you were actually operating as a nonprofit?
0 coins
Savannah Weiner
They wanted to verify we were legitimately operating as a nonprofit during those years - specifically asking for documentation of our charitable activities, board meeting minutes, and proof that no private parties benefited from our operations. They also scrutinized our financial records to confirm we actually stayed under the $5,000 threshold each year and weren't just underreporting income. The whole process took about 6 months longer than typical 1023-EZ applications because of the additional back-and-forth. While we got approved in the end, it definitely made me wish we'd just filed from day one to avoid all that extra documentation and stress.
0 coins