Can't reach IRS? Claimyr connects you to a live IRS agent in minutes.
Claimyr is a pay-as-you-go service. We do not charge a recurring subscription.
Using Claimyr will:
- Connect you to a human agent at the IRS
- Skip the long phone menu
- Call the correct department
- Redial until on hold
- Forward a call to your phone with reduced hold time
- Give you free callbacks if the IRS drops your call
If I could give 10 stars I would
If I could give 10 stars I would If I could give 10 stars I would Such an amazing service so needed during the times when EDD almost never picks up Claimyr gets me on the phone with EDD every time without fail faster. A much needed service without Claimyr I would have never received the payment I needed to support me during my postpartum recovery. Thank you so much Claimyr!
Really made a difference
Really made a difference, save me time and energy from going to a local office for making the call.
Worth not wasting your time calling for hours.
Was a bit nervous or untrusting at first, but my calls went thru. First time the wait was a bit long but their customer chat line on their page was helpful and put me at ease that I would receive my call. Today my call dropped because of EDD and Claimyr heard my concern on the same chat and another call was made within the hour.
An incredibly helpful service
An incredibly helpful service! Got me connected to a CA EDD agent without major hassle (outside of EDD's agents dropping calls ā which Claimyr has free protection for). If you need to file a new claim and can't do it online, pay the $ to Claimyr to get the process started. Absolutely worth it!
Consistent,frustration free, quality Service.
Used this service a couple times now. Before I'd call 200 times in less than a weak frustrated as can be. But using claimyr with a couple hours of waiting i was on the line with an representative or on hold. Dropped a couple times but each reconnected not long after and was mission accomplished, thanks to Claimyr.
IT WORKS!! Not a scam!
I tried for weeks to get thru to EDD PFL program with no luck. I gave this a try thinking it may be a scam. OMG! It worked and They got thru within an hour and my claim is going to finally get paid!! I upgraded to the $60 call. Best $60 spent!
Ask the community...
- DO post questions about your issues.
- DO answer questions and support each other.
- DO post tips & tricks to help folks.
- DO NOT post call problems here - there is a support tab at the top for that :)
Join the conversation
Join the conversation
Sergio Neal
I recommend checking your state tax agency websites too. Colorado's Department of Revenue website has specific information for remote workers. And btw, you're lucky Texas doesn't have state income tax, or you could be dealing with double taxation between two states!
TurboTax actually has a pretty good multi-state filing option that can help sort this out. I had a similar issue last year working remotely for a Michigan company while living in Illinois.
StarStrider
This is definitely a red flag that needs immediate attention. As others have mentioned, using the company's address instead of your home address on your W-2 is incorrect and can create serious tax complications. Beyond just the address issue, you need to verify immediately whether they're withholding taxes for Texas or Colorado. Since Texas has no state income tax, if they're not withholding for Colorado, you could be facing a significant tax bill when you file. Colorado requires taxes on income earned while physically working in the state, regardless of where your employer is located. I'd recommend taking these steps right away: 1. Contact HR/payroll to request both a corrected W-2 (W-2C) with your proper address AND correction of state tax withholding going forward 2. Review all your paystubs to see which state taxes have been withheld 3. If no Colorado taxes were withheld, start calculating and setting aside money for what you'll owe 4. Consider making an estimated tax payment to Colorado to avoid underpayment penalties The sooner you address this, the better. Don't let them brush this off as "just administrative" - it has real tax consequences for you.
This is excellent comprehensive advice! I'm in a similar situation with a remote job and hadn't even thought to check which state taxes were being withheld. Just looked at my paystubs and sure enough, they're withholding for the wrong state. Quick question - when you mention making an estimated tax payment to avoid penalties, is there a specific deadline for that? And roughly what percentage of income should someone expect to owe if no state taxes were withheld all year? Trying to figure out how much I need to set aside.
Join the conversation
Just wanted to add my experience as someone who went through this exact situation with Modo casino two years ago. The most important thing I learned is to be really thorough with your record-keeping from the start - I wish I had kept a detailed gambling log with dates, amounts, and outcomes for each session. One thing that hasn't been mentioned yet is that if you're planning to continue gambling, consider setting up a separate bank account just for gambling activities. This makes tracking much easier and creates a clear paper trail for the IRS. Also, some banks will let you categorize transactions, which can help with organization. For your current situation with the $3,700 in winnings and $2,800 in losses, definitely get that detailed transaction history from Modo. When I requested mine, they provided a spreadsheet that broke down every single bet, which was incredibly helpful for tax preparation. The customer service rep even explained how to interpret the different columns in the report. One last tip - if you do decide to itemize, consider having a tax professional review your return, especially for your first time dealing with gambling income. The rules can be tricky and an error could trigger an audit. Better to spend a little extra upfront than deal with IRS headaches later.
Lola Perez
ā¢This is really solid advice about setting up a separate bank account for gambling! I wish I had thought of that before I started. Right now all my gambling transactions are mixed in with my regular spending, which is making it harder to track everything properly. Quick question about the tax professional recommendation - do you think it's worth the cost even for relatively small amounts like what the original poster is dealing with? I'm in a similar situation with about $4,200 in winnings and I'm trying to decide if I should just use TurboTax or spring for a CPA. The gambling tax rules do seem more complicated than regular income reporting. Also, when you got your transaction history from Modo, did it clearly separate the wins from losses, or did you have to calculate the net result for each session yourself?
Chloe Harris
ā¢For amounts around $4,200, I'd say a tax professional is probably worth it for your first year dealing with gambling income, especially if you're not completely comfortable with the itemizing vs. standard deduction calculation. A good CPA will typically charge $200-400 for a return with gambling income, and they can often find deductions or catch issues that save you more than their fee. Plus, having it done correctly the first time gives you a template for future years if you continue gambling. The Modo transaction history was really well organized - it had separate columns for "Amount Wagered," "Amount Won," and "Net Result" for each session. So I could easily see that on a particular date I might have wagered $500, won $200, for a net loss of $300 on that session. This made it much easier to calculate my total losses for the year without having to do session-by-session math myself. The report also included timestamps and game types, which helped when I was trying to match up transactions with my bank statements. Overall, their reporting was more detailed than I expected from an online casino.
I've been following this discussion and wanted to share some additional perspective as someone who's dealt with online gambling taxes for several years now. A few key points that might help: First, regarding the documentation - while getting transaction history from Modo is definitely the best approach, don't panic if some of your records aren't perfect. The IRS understands that many taxpayers don't keep meticulous gambling logs, especially casual players. Your bank statements showing deposits/withdrawals, combined with whatever casino records you can obtain, will generally be sufficient if you're consistent and reasonable in your reporting. Second, for anyone considering whether to itemize - remember that gambling losses are subject to the 2% AGI threshold along with other miscellaneous deductions. This means you can only deduct gambling losses that exceed 2% of your adjusted gross income. So if your AGI is $50,000, you'd need more than $1,000 in gambling losses before you can start deducting them. Finally, keep in mind that casual gambling is treated differently than professional gambling for tax purposes. If you're just playing occasionally for entertainment (which sounds like your situation), you're subject to the itemizing limitations we've discussed. But if the IRS ever determined you were gambling as a business or profession, the rules change significantly - though that's unlikely to apply to most recreational players. The bottom line is that yes, you'll owe taxes on some portion of your winnings, but with proper documentation and the right filing strategy, you can minimize the impact. Don't let the complexity scare you away from reporting correctly - it's always better to be above board with the IRS.
Join the conversation
This is a great question that trips up a lot of investors! The good news is that your $250 loss is NOT permanently disallowed - it gets added to the cost basis of your replacement shares (LOT A in your case). Here's how it works: Your LOT A shares originally had a basis of $20/share ($2,000 total). With the wash sale adjustment, that basis increases to $22.50/share ($2,250 total). So when you eventually sell LOT A, you'll get the benefit of that $250 loss through either a larger loss or smaller gain. One important thing to note: since LOT A was purchased on Day 0 and the wash sale occurred on Day 1000, those shares are already long-term. This means your disallowed short-term loss effectively becomes part of a long-term position, which changes the character of the loss from short-term to long-term when you eventually realize it. The key is that you must eventually sell those replacement shares to get the tax benefit. If you hold LOT A indefinitely, you won't realize that loss for tax purposes. This is why some traders strategically plan their year-end sales to optimize their tax situation while being mindful of wash sale rules.
Zara Khan
ā¢Thanks for the clear explanation! This is really helpful. I'm curious about the timing aspect - since you mentioned that LOT A becomes long-term, does the wash sale rule affect the holding period at all? Or does LOT A keep its original purchase date of Day 0 for determining long-term vs short-term treatment when I eventually sell it? Also, are there any strategies you'd recommend for avoiding wash sales in the first place when using tax-sensitive accounting methods? It seems like this method might make you more prone to wash sales since it prioritizes selling losses first.
Great question about holding periods! LOT A keeps its original purchase date of Day 0 for determining long-term vs short-term treatment. The wash sale rule doesn't reset the holding period of the replacement shares - it only adjusts the basis and potentially the holding period of the disallowed loss itself. So when you eventually sell LOT A, it will still be treated as long-term (since it was held more than a year from Day 0), but the $250 loss that gets incorporated into its basis will also be treated as long-term at that point. For avoiding wash sales with tax-sensitive methods, here are a few strategies: 1. Wait 31 days before repurchasing the same security after a loss sale 2. Consider buying a similar but not "substantially identical" security (like a different company in the same sector) 3. Use ETFs that track the same index but from different providers 4. Plan your loss harvesting earlier in the year so you have more flexibility with timing The tax-sensitive method can indeed make you more prone to wash sales since it does prioritize losses, so extra planning is definitely worthwhile!
I've been dealing with wash sales for years as an active trader, and one thing that really helped me was setting up a spreadsheet to track all my positions across different accounts. The cross-account wash sale issue that someone mentioned is absolutely real and can catch you off guard. One strategy I use is the "parking" method - instead of immediately repurchasing the same stock after a loss sale, I'll buy a similar ETF or a stock in the same sector for 31+ days, then switch back if I want. For example, if I sell AAPL at a loss, I might buy QQQ or MSFT temporarily to maintain similar market exposure without triggering the wash sale. Also, be extra careful with dividend reinvestment plans (DRIPs). If you have automatic dividend reinvestment turned on and it buys shares within 30 days of your loss sale, that can trigger a wash sale too. I learned this one the hard way when my "clean" loss harvesting got messed up by a $12 dividend reinvestment I forgot about. The basis adjustment works exactly as others described, but tracking it manually across multiple securities and years can get messy quickly. Good record keeping is essential!
CyberNinja
ā¢This is incredibly helpful advice! I never thought about DRIPs potentially triggering wash sales - that's such a sneaky gotcha that could mess up careful tax planning. The "parking" strategy sounds smart too. Do you have any specific recommendations for similar ETFs that work well for this? For instance, if I'm holding individual tech stocks, would switching between QQQ and VGT be different enough to avoid the substantially identical rule, or do I need to go broader like VTI? Also, I'm curious about your spreadsheet setup - do you track this manually or have you found any tools that can automatically pull in data from multiple brokerages? Managing this across several accounts sounds like a lot of work but seems essential for anyone doing active tax loss harvesting.
Great point about DRIPs! I had no idea those could trigger wash sales too. For the "parking" strategy with tech stocks, I've had good success with these pairings: - Individual tech stocks ā QQQ or VGT (both should be different enough) - QQQ ā VGT (these track different indexes so definitely safe) - Individual stocks ā broader market ETFs like VTI or SPY - Large cap growth ā small cap value ETFs for maximum differentiation The key is making sure the securities aren't "substantially identical." Individual stocks vs ETFs are almost always safe, and ETFs that track different indexes (even in similar sectors) should be fine. For tracking across accounts, I use a combination of approaches: - Manual CSV downloads from each brokerage monthly - A Python script I wrote that parses the files and flags potential wash sales - Portfolio tracking tools like Personal Capital for the big picture view The manual work is tedious but I've found it's worth it. Missing just one cross-account wash sale can cost you hundreds in lost tax benefits. Plus, the discipline of tracking everything has made me a much more strategic trader overall. Have you run into the IRA wash sale issue mentioned earlier? That's another nasty gotcha where losses can be permanently disallowed.
Join the conversation
Millie Long
As someone who just went through this exact same situation last tax season, I can definitely relate to the confusion! The FIFO vs average cost method distinction really tripped me up initially too. Just to reinforce what others have said - you're absolutely correct that FIFO is required for individual stocks when you didn't specify which shares to sell. In your Amazon example, the $1,235 cost basis using FIFO is the right approach, giving you an $845 gain rather than the $933 you'd get with average cost method. One thing I learned the hard way is to double-check your broker's online portal or app - sometimes they have more detailed transaction histories available digitally than what they mail with the 1099-B. I found additional dividend reinvestment records that way that I had completely missed in my initial calculations. Also, make sure you're tracking the purchase dates carefully for each lot since they determine whether your gains are short-term or long-term. With FIFO, you might have some shares that qualify for long-term treatment and others that don't, depending on your holding periods. The manual calculation process is definitely painful, but it's taught me to be much more organized about tracking everything throughout the year. Best of luck with your calculations - the IRS just wants to see consistency and documentation, so don't stress too much about perfection!
Yes, I did have to recalculate everything once I found those dividend reinvestment records! In my case, it was about 15-20 small DRIP transactions throughout the year that I had completely overlooked. While each individual reinvestment was small (usually $10-50), they added up to a few hundred dollars in additional cost basis that significantly reduced my taxable gain. The tricky part was that these reinvestments happened at different dates and prices, so I had to insert them into my FIFO queue in chronological order. It completely changed which shares were considered "sold first" when I applied the FIFO method. I ended up using a spreadsheet where I sorted all purchases (including reinvestments) by date, then worked down the list as I accounted for each sale. For the holding periods, I did end up with a mix! Some of my Tesla sales were long-term because I was selling shares I bought over a year ago, but other portions of the same sale were short-term because I had made additional purchases more recently. You have to track each lot separately for both cost basis AND holding period purposes. My advice would be to download a complete transaction history that includes all corporate actions, dividends, and reinvestments before you start calculating. It's much easier to be thorough upfront than to discover missing transactions halfway through your calculations!
This is such a helpful discussion! I'm actually in a very similar situation to the original poster - first time dealing with stock taxes and feeling overwhelmed by all the cost basis calculations. Reading through everyone's experiences has been incredibly reassuring that I'm not the only one struggling with this. @Aisha Abdullah your point about downloading a complete transaction history upfront is so smart - I was just working off my printed 1099-B and probably would have missed dividend reinvestments too. I m'going to log into my broker s'portal right now and get the full transaction export before I start any calculations. The mix of short-term and long-term gains from the same stock position is something I hadn t'considered either. It makes sense with FIFO that you d'be selling your oldest shares first, but tracking the holding periods for each lot separately seems like it could get complicated quickly. I think I m'going to follow the advice from earlier in this thread and start with the Publication 550 manual approach to understand the mechanics, then maybe use one of the automated tools to verify my work. With everyone s'guidance here, this feels much more manageable than it did when I first started reading about cost basis calculations! Thanks to everyone for sharing such detailed experiences - this community is amazing for helping newcomers navigate these complex tax situations.
Ethan Moore
As someone who went through this exact same confusion last year, I completely understand your frustration with the cost basis calculations! Your Amazon example is actually a perfect illustration of why the IRS rules exist - you're correct that FIFO gives you a cost basis of $1,235 ($650 + $585), resulting in a gain of $845. One thing that helped me tremendously was setting up a simple tracking spreadsheet with columns for Date, Shares, Price, and Total Cost. When I sell shares, I just work from the top (oldest purchases) down until I've accounted for all shares sold. This makes the FIFO calculation much clearer visually. A few practical tips from my experience: Make sure to check if your broker has additional transaction details available through their online portal - I found dividend reinvestment records there that weren't on my printed 1099-B. Also, don't forget that each FIFO "lot" you sell may have different holding periods, so some portions of your sale might qualify for long-term capital gains treatment while others are short-term. The manual calculation is definitely tedious, but doing it once really helps you understand the mechanics. For next year, I'd recommend asking your broker about setting up automatic cost basis reporting or considering specific identification if you want more control over which shares to sell. Hang in there - it gets much easier once you have a system in place!
GalaxyGlider
ā¢This is exactly the kind of practical guidance I was hoping to find! Your spreadsheet approach with Date, Shares, Price, and Total Cost columns sounds so much clearer than trying to keep track of everything in my head. I've been staring at my transaction history feeling completely overwhelmed, but breaking it down systematically like you described makes it feel manageable. The point about different holding periods within the same sale is really important - I hadn't fully grasped that FIFO means I could have both short-term and long-term portions of a single stock sale depending on when I originally bought each lot. That definitely complicates the tax calculation, but at least now I know to watch for it. I'm definitely going to check my broker's online portal for additional details before I start calculating. Based on what others have shared here, it sounds like dividend reinvestments and other corporate actions are commonly missed when just working from the printed 1099-B. Thanks for the encouragement about it getting easier with experience! As a newcomer to investment taxes, it's reassuring to hear from someone who successfully navigated this same confusion. I'm feeling much more confident about tackling this systematically now.
Zoe Dimitriou
This is such a great question! I've been helping coordinate our local VITA program for the past three years, and we absolutely welcome high school volunteers. In fact, some of our most dedicated and tech-savvy volunteers have been teenagers. Most sites will start you in a support role - greeting taxpayers, helping with paperwork, or assisting with document organization. It's actually perfect for learning the ropes! You'll pick up so much about tax preparation just by observing and helping with the intake process. The certification process is the same for everyone, but don't let that intimidate you. The materials are designed to teach you everything from scratch. Many of our high school volunteers find the online training modules easier to navigate than some of the older volunteers do! My biggest tip: reach out to multiple VITA sites in your area. Some are more flexible with younger volunteers than others, and you want to find one that's enthusiastic about having student volunteers. Also, this experience will absolutely stand out on college applications - admissions officers love seeing practical community service that demonstrates real-world skills. Good luck with your search! Feel free to ask if you have any other questions about the volunteer experience.
0 coins
Carmen Vega
ā¢Thanks for sharing your experience as a coordinator! I'm really encouraged to hear that VITA sites are welcoming to high school volunteers. Do you have any recommendations for how to find and contact local VITA sites? I've been searching online but it's hard to find specific contact information for coordinators in my area. Also, when is the best time to reach out - should I wait until closer to tax season or start inquiring now?
0 coins
Eloise Kendrick
ā¢@Carmen Vega Great question! The IRS has a VITA site locator tool on their website irs.gov (that) s'really helpful - just search for VITA "site locator and" you can find programs by ZIP code. You can also contact your local United Way, community colleges, libraries, and churches as they often host VITA sites. Now is actually the perfect time to reach out! Most coordinators start recruiting and planning in the fall for the upcoming tax season. This gives you time to complete training before the busy February-April period. Don t'wait until January - by then, most sites have already finalized their volunteer rosters. When you contact them, mention you re'a motivated high school student interested in gaining real-world experience. Many coordinators specifically value younger volunteers because you tend to be reliable and good with technology. Also ask if they have any partnerships with local high schools - some sites work directly with guidance counselors to recruit student volunteers. Pro tip: If the first site you contact isn t'accepting high school volunteers, ask them to recommend other sites in your area that might be. Coordinators usually know each other and can point you in the right direction!
0 coins
Freya Christensen
This thread has been incredibly helpful! As someone who's been thinking about volunteering with VITA myself (I'm a junior in high school), I wanted to add that I reached out to three different sites in my area last month and got very different responses. One site said they prefer volunteers 18+, another was thrilled to have high school students and immediately sent me training materials, and the third said they'd consider me for a greeter role but wanted to meet with my parents first. So definitely don't get discouraged if the first site you contact isn't enthusiastic - keep trying! I also discovered that some sites partner with high school business or accounting clubs, which might be another way to get involved. My school's FBLA chapter actually does a group volunteer project with our local VITA site each year. It's worth asking your teachers or guidance counselor if they know of any existing partnerships. The training really isn't as scary as it sounds either. I've been working through the online modules and they start with very basic concepts. Having no prior tax knowledge isn't a disadvantage - they assume you're starting from zero. Plus, YouTube has tons of supplementary videos that explain tax concepts if you get stuck on anything in the official materials.
0 coins
Anastasia Fedorov
ā¢This is such valuable advice about reaching out to multiple sites! I'm a sophomore and was feeling discouraged after the first VITA coordinator I contacted said they only take college-age volunteers. Your experience shows it's really worth shopping around to find the right fit. The tip about checking with FBLA or other business clubs is brilliant - I hadn't thought of that approach. I'm going to ask my economics teacher if she knows about any school partnerships. It would be amazing to volunteer alongside classmates who are also interested in finance. Thanks for mentioning that the training starts from zero too. I was worried I'd be behind since I haven't taken any business classes yet, but it sounds like they really do teach you everything you need to know. Did you find any particular YouTube channels especially helpful for supplementing the official training materials?
0 coins