IRS

Can't reach IRS? Claimyr connects you to a live IRS agent in minutes.

Claimyr is a pay-as-you-go service. We do not charge a recurring subscription.



Fox KTVUABC 7CBSSan Francisco Chronicle

Using Claimyr will:

  • Connect you to a human agent at the IRS
  • Skip the long phone menu
  • Call the correct department
  • Redial until on hold
  • Forward a call to your phone with reduced hold time
  • Give you free callbacks if the IRS drops your call

If I could give 10 stars I would

If I could give 10 stars I would If I could give 10 stars I would Such an amazing service so needed during the times when EDD almost never picks up Claimyr gets me on the phone with EDD every time without fail faster. A much needed service without Claimyr I would have never received the payment I needed to support me during my postpartum recovery. Thank you so much Claimyr!


Really made a difference

Really made a difference, save me time and energy from going to a local office for making the call.


Worth not wasting your time calling for hours.

Was a bit nervous or untrusting at first, but my calls went thru. First time the wait was a bit long but their customer chat line on their page was helpful and put me at ease that I would receive my call. Today my call dropped because of EDD and Claimyr heard my concern on the same chat and another call was made within the hour.


An incredibly helpful service

An incredibly helpful service! Got me connected to a CA EDD agent without major hassle (outside of EDD's agents dropping calls – which Claimyr has free protection for). If you need to file a new claim and can't do it online, pay the $ to Claimyr to get the process started. Absolutely worth it!


Consistent,frustration free, quality Service.

Used this service a couple times now. Before I'd call 200 times in less than a weak frustrated as can be. But using claimyr with a couple hours of waiting i was on the line with an representative or on hold. Dropped a couple times but each reconnected not long after and was mission accomplished, thanks to Claimyr.


IT WORKS!! Not a scam!

I tried for weeks to get thru to EDD PFL program with no luck. I gave this a try thinking it may be a scam. OMG! It worked and They got thru within an hour and my claim is going to finally get paid!! I upgraded to the $60 call. Best $60 spent!

Read all of our Trustpilot reviews


Ask the community...

  • DO post questions about your issues.
  • DO answer questions and support each other.
  • DO post tips & tricks to help folks.
  • DO NOT post call problems here - there is a support tab at the top for that :)

Jamal Wilson

•

I see you have both an 810 freeze and 570 pending action code - that's a double hold situation that unfortunately means your refund is stuck until the IRS completes their review. The good news is your credits are already calculated and scheduled to post on 4/16-4/17, so once the review clears, your refund should process quickly. With the EIC and those credit amounts, the IRS is likely doing income verification. Keep checking your transcript weekly for a 571 code (which releases the 570) or any updates to the 810 freeze. The wait is frustrating but your refund isn't lost, just delayed while they verify everything matches up.

0 coins

I've been through this exact situation before! The combination of codes 810 and 570 means your return is in what we call "manual review status." The IRS flagged it for additional verification - likely because of the substantial EIC and credits totaling over $14,000. Here's what helped me during my wait: 1) Check your transcript every Friday morning when they update, 2) Don't call the IRS unless it's been over 120 days from your 570 date (they'll just tell you to wait), and 3) Make sure all your documents are ready in case they send a correspondence requesting verification. The timeline is typically 6-16 weeks from the 570 date for EIC reviews. Your cycle code suggests you should see movement by late April/early May. I know the wait is brutal, but hang in there - once it clears, you'll get your full refund amount!

0 coins

Javier Cruz

•

This is super helpful, thank you! Question about checking the transcript - do you recommend checking on IRS.gov or is there a better way to monitor for updates? Also, did you end up getting any correspondence from the IRS during your review or did it just update automatically on the transcript? I'm trying to figure out if I should be watching my mail too šŸ“¬

0 coins

This thread has been incredibly helpful! I run a small plumbing business and drive a Ford F-250 (definitely over 6,000 lbs GVWR) to job sites daily. I use it about 75% for business - hauling tools, pipe, water heaters, and driving to emergency calls. I've been claiming standard mileage for the past three years, but after reading everyone's experiences here, it sounds like Section 179 could save me significantly more money. The truck was a major investment for my business, and I had no idea I could potentially deduct the full purchase price in one year rather than spreading it out. One thing I'm curious about - for trades like plumbing where you're responding to emergency calls at all hours, does the IRS scrutinize the business use percentage more closely? Sometimes I get calls at 9 PM for burst pipes and have to drive straight from home. I always log these as business trips, but want to make sure that's appropriate. Also, does anyone know if the tools and equipment I permanently store in the truck bed (pipe threader, drain snake, etc.) factor into the business use justification at all, or is it purely based on mileage? Going to definitely discuss this with my CPA, but this community insight is invaluable. Thanks to everyone for sharing your real-world experiences!

0 coins

Amara Okafor

•

Hey StardustSeeker! Your plumbing business is actually an ideal candidate for Section 179 - the F-250 definitely qualifies weight-wise and 75% business use is well above the threshold. Regarding emergency calls from home, those absolutely count as legitimate business trips! The IRS recognizes that many service businesses operate 24/7 and emergency responses are core business activities. The fact that you're responding to customer calls for plumbing emergencies clearly demonstrates business necessity, regardless of the time. Just make sure to document the business purpose (emergency call, customer name/address) in your mileage logs. For the tools and equipment stored in your truck - while they don't directly factor into the mileage calculation, they actually strengthen your overall business use justification! Having dedicated business equipment permanently stored in the vehicle demonstrates that it's primarily a business asset rather than personal transportation. This supports your business use percentage if it's ever questioned. The combination of emergency response capability, tool storage, and material hauling makes your truck an essential business asset. With that significant investment and high business use percentage, Section 179 will likely save you much more than standard mileage. Trades businesses like plumbing have some of the strongest justifications for vehicle deductions since the truck is literally essential for your ability to serve customers. Definitely worth exploring with your CPA!

0 coins

As a small business owner who recently discovered Section 179, I can confirm this strategy is legitimate and incredibly powerful when used correctly. I run a marketing consultancy and purchased a Chevy Tahoe (over 6,000 lbs GVWR) last year for client meetings and transporting presentation equipment. The key things I learned through the process: 1. Documentation is absolutely critical - I use a digital mileage app that timestamps every trip and allows me to categorize business vs personal use immediately 2. The "primarily business use" requirement (>50%) needs to be maintained throughout the depreciation period, not just the first year 3. Consider your long-term business plans - if there's any chance your business use might drop significantly, the recapture rules can create unexpected tax bills later 4. State tax treatment varies significantly from federal rules, so definitely research your state's specific requirements For anyone considering this, I'd recommend being conservative with your business use percentage estimates and keeping meticulous records from day one. The tax savings can be substantial, but the IRS takes vehicle deductions seriously and you want to be bulletproof if questioned. Has anyone here dealt with the recapture situation after their business use dropped? Would love to hear how that process actually works in practice.

0 coins

Diego Rojas

•

Thanks for sharing your experience, Olivia! Your points about documentation and maintaining business use are spot on. I'm actually new to understanding Section 179 but have been reading through this entire thread with great interest. As someone just starting to explore this strategy, I'm curious about your mention of digital mileage apps - do you have any specific recommendations? I've been doing everything manually but it sounds like automation would be much more reliable and thorough. Also, regarding the recapture rules you mentioned - is there any flexibility if business use drops temporarily (like during a slow season) but then picks back up? Or is it based on the full tax year percentage regardless of fluctuations? This community has been incredibly educational for understanding these complex tax strategies. The real-world experiences from actual business owners are so much more valuable than generic tax advice!

0 coins

I've been dealing with a very similar situation for the past two years with friends from the UK, Canada, and Australia who send me money through PayPal F&F. Reading through this discussion has been incredibly reassuring! What really helped me was realizing that the IRS distinction is straightforward: are you receiving money as genuine reimbursements/gifts between friends, or are you actually conducting business? In my case, like Miguel's, it's clearly the former - splitting costs for our shared gaming server, occasional reimbursements when I ship them things they can't get locally, and sometimes small gifts for birthdays or holidays. I started keeping a simple spreadsheet last year after getting anxious about this exact issue. Just three columns: Date, Amount, Purpose. Takes me 30 seconds per transaction but gives me complete peace of mind. Entries look like "March 15, $45, James-UK reimbursement for group Spotify subscription" or "April 3, $67, Sarah-Canada shipping cost for specialty coffee she requested." The key insight from this thread that resonates most with me is that legitimate friend-to-friend cost sharing is exactly what personal transfers are meant for. The PayPal reporting changes and thresholds everyone worries about are targeting actual business activities, not people splitting Netflix costs with their international friend groups. Miguel, based on your description of gaming expenses and snack shipping with actual friends, you're handling this perfectly appropriately. Just keep some basic documentation showing the context, and you'll be fine!

0 coins

Brianna, your spreadsheet approach is brilliant! I love how simple yet comprehensive it is - just Date, Amount, Purpose covers everything you need without overcomplicating things. Your example entries are perfect too, showing exactly the kind of context that would demonstrate these are legitimate personal transfers. What really resonates with me from your comment (and this whole discussion) is how normal these international friend transactions have become with online gaming communities and global social connections. It's reassuring to see so many people dealing with the same situation and getting consistent guidance that genuine cost-sharing between actual friends isn't something to stress about tax-wise. Your point about the 30-second documentation approach is spot-on - it's enough to create a clear record without making it feel like a burden every time a friend reimburses you for shared expenses. I think I was initially overthinking this and worried about creating some complex accounting system, but your method shows how straightforward it can be. Thanks for sharing your practical experience! It's helpful to hear from someone who's been successfully managing this situation for a couple of years with that simple documentation system.

0 coins

Chris King

•

This thread has been incredibly helpful! I'm in almost the exact same situation - friends from Germany, Japan, and the UK occasionally send me money through PayPal F&F for our shared gaming subscriptions and when I help them get items that aren't available in their countries. Reading through everyone's experiences has really put my mind at ease. The consistent message that the IRS looks at the substance of transactions (genuine friend reimbursements vs. business income) rather than which PayPal button was clicked makes perfect sense. What I found most valuable were the practical documentation approaches people shared - from simple phone notes to basic spreadsheets tracking date/amount/purpose. I already have most of the context in our Discord chats anyway, so it's really just about being a bit more organized about keeping records. Miguel, your situation with gaming costs and snack shipping sounds exactly like what personal transfers are designed for. Based on all the advice here from people who've consulted tax professionals, you should be fine. The amounts you mentioned ($200-300 every few months) across multiple friends for legitimate shared expenses clearly fall into the non-taxable personal transfer category. Thanks to everyone who shared their experiences and made what initially seemed like a confusing tax question much clearer!

0 coins

This is such a helpful thread! I'm dealing with a similar situation with my consulting practice. One thing I learned the hard way is to also check if the states where your remote employees work have any specific registration requirements beyond just income tax filing. For example, some states require you to register as a "foreign entity" doing business in their state if you have employees there, even if you're just an LLC from another state. This can involve additional fees and annual reports that are separate from your tax filings. Also, don't forget about potential local taxes! Some cities and counties have their own business taxes or licensing requirements that might apply to businesses with employees working within their jurisdiction. It's not just about state-level compliance. I'd recommend creating a compliance calendar once you figure out all the filing requirements across the different states. Multi-state tax compliance can get overwhelming fast if you don't stay organized!

0 coins

Sasha Ivanov

•

This is such a great point about foreign entity registration! I hadn't even considered that aspect when I was researching this for my client. It's already complicated enough figuring out the income tax nexus rules, and now there's a whole other layer of compliance to think about. Do you happen to know if there are any good resources that compile these foreign entity registration requirements by state? Or is it just a matter of checking each state's Secretary of State website individually? The compliance calendar idea is brilliant - I can already see how easy it would be to miss deadlines when you're dealing with multiple states that all have different requirements and due dates. Also, the local tax consideration is something I definitely need to look into. I know my client's Kentucky employee works from Louisville, so I should probably check if there are any city-level requirements there too. Thanks for sharing your experience - it's really helpful to hear from someone who's actually navigated this maze before!

0 coins

Ethan Clark

•

I've been following this discussion and wanted to add something that might help - don't overlook the apportionment factor calculations when you're determining how much tax will actually be owed in each state. Even though having remote employees creates nexus, the actual tax liability might be quite small depending on how the income gets apportioned. Most states use a three-factor formula (property, payroll, and sales) or have moved to a sales-factor-only approach. For a service business with remote employees, you might find that very little income actually gets apportioned to the states where the employees work, especially if most of your sales/clients are in Illinois. I'd also suggest looking into whether Illinois has any reciprocity agreements or credits for taxes paid to other states. This can significantly reduce the overall tax burden even when you're required to file in multiple states. One more thing - make sure to document everything about where work is actually being performed. Some states have been getting more aggressive about auditing businesses with remote workers, and having good records about employee work locations and business activities can save you headaches down the road.

0 coins

Ethan Wilson

•

This is really valuable information about apportionment! I'm curious about the documentation aspect you mentioned - what specific types of records should businesses be keeping for remote workers? I'm thinking things like timesheets showing hours worked in each location, but are there other documents that would be important for an audit? Also, do you know if there's a difference in documentation requirements between employees who are permanently remote versus those who might occasionally travel between states for work? The point about Illinois reciprocity agreements is something I definitely need to research further. It would be great if there's a way to minimize the actual tax burden even when filing requirements exist in multiple states.

0 coins

I think everyones missing the elephant in the room. if ur spending 300k+ on a rolls, the tax break shouldn't be the deciding factor!! either u can afford it or u cant. trying to get uncle sam to subsidize ur luxury car is exactly why they tighten these rules.

0 coins

100% agree. This is exactly the kind of tax strategy that makes the news and then causes Congress to change the rules for everyone. Weight limits were intended for work trucks and legitimate business vehicles, not to help someone write off a Rolls.

0 coins

Ethan Clark

•

As someone who's worked in tax preparation for over 15 years, I'd strongly caution against this strategy. While you're technically correct that vehicles over 6,000 lbs GVWR qualify for heavy vehicle treatment, the IRS has gotten increasingly aggressive about challenging luxury vehicle deductions. The "ordinary and necessary" test is subjective and heavily scrutinized for expensive vehicles. Even if you win an audit, the time, stress, and professional fees will likely exceed any tax savings. I've seen clients spend $50,000+ in legal and accounting fees defending $30,000 in tax benefits. Consider this: if your business truly needs a luxury vehicle for client relations, document that business need thoroughly BEFORE purchasing. Get client feedback, industry standards, competitor analysis - anything that shows this vehicle level is expected in your industry. Without that foundation, you're essentially gambling with the IRS. The smart money says buy what you can afford without the tax break, or find a more defensible vehicle that still meets your business needs.

0 coins

Savannah Vin

•

This is really solid advice from someone with actual experience. I'm new to this community but have been researching business vehicle deductions for my consulting firm. Your point about the cost of defending an audit potentially exceeding the tax savings is something I hadn't fully considered. Can you elaborate on what kind of documentation would be most compelling for the "ordinary and necessary" test? Like, would client surveys about vehicle expectations actually hold weight in an audit, or are there specific industry standards the IRS looks for? I'm leaning toward a more modest luxury vehicle now, but want to make sure I'm thinking about this correctly from the start.

0 coins

Prev1...23002301230223032304...5644Next