


Ask the community...
This thread has been incredibly helpful! I'm dealing with a similar situation with my 22-year-old son who's in his senior year of college. He's taking 12 credits (full-time at his school), I pay his tuition and rent, and he works about 15 hours a week making around $8,000 annually. One thing I wanted to add that I learned from my tax preparer last year - make sure you understand how the American Opportunity Tax Credit interacts with claiming your child as a dependent. You can only claim the education credit if you're also claiming them as a dependent. So even if the dependency exemption itself doesn't save you much in taxes, the education credits (up to $2,500 per student) can be substantial. Also, for those tracking support expenses, don't forget to include the fair market value of housing if your child lives at home with you. The IRS has guidelines for calculating this - it's usually based on what it would cost to rent a similar room in your area. This can significantly boost your support calculation if your child is living at home rent-free. Has anyone had experience with how this works when your child graduates mid-year? My son graduates in May, so I'm wondering if that affects his student status for the full tax year or just the months he was enrolled.
Great point about the education credits! That's definitely something people overlook when deciding whether to claim a dependent. Regarding your son graduating mid-year, the good news is that student status is determined by whether they were enrolled full-time for at least 5 months during the tax year, not whether they were enrolled for the entire year. Since your son will be enrolled from January through May (5 months), he should still qualify as a full-time student for the entire 2025 tax year. The fair market value housing tip is really smart too. I hadn't thought about calculating that for kids living at home. Do you happen to know if there's a specific IRS publication that explains how to calculate fair market rental value? That could really help boost the support percentage for parents whose kids moved back home after college. Also, just want to confirm - once he graduates in May and potentially starts working full-time, that won't affect his dependent status for 2025 since the tests are based on the situation during the tax year when he was still a qualifying student, right?
This has been such an informative discussion! As a tax professional, I wanted to add a few clarifications that might help others in similar situations. First, regarding the "5 months full-time student" rule - it's important to note that this refers to any 5 months during the tax year, and they don't have to be consecutive. So even if your child takes a semester off but was full-time for fall and spring semesters, they likely still meet this test. Second, I see some confusion about income limits. For qualifying children (under 24 and full-time students), there is NO income limit that disqualifies them from being your dependent. The $5,000 limit only applies to qualifying relatives. However, if your child's income is high enough that they're required to file their own return, make sure you coordinate so both of you don't claim the same person. One thing that hasn't been mentioned much is the "tie-breaker" rules when multiple people could potentially claim the same dependent. If parents are divorced or separated, there are specific rules about which parent gets to claim the child that go beyond just who provides more support. Also, keep in mind that some states have different rules than federal, so if you live in a state with income tax, double-check their dependency requirements as well. For anyone still unsure about their specific situation, I'd recommend consulting with a qualified tax professional rather than relying solely on online tools, especially for complex family situations.
Thank you for this professional perspective! This really helps clarify some of the confusion in this thread. I have a quick follow-up question about the tie-breaker rules you mentioned for divorced parents. My ex-husband and I have joint custody of our 20-year-old daughter who's in college. She splits time pretty evenly between our houses during breaks, but her permanent address is listed as mine for school purposes. We both contribute to her support - I pay tuition and he covers her car/insurance. Do you know which parent would have the stronger claim for the dependency exemption in this situation? We've been alternating years claiming her, but I want to make sure we're doing this correctly according to IRS rules rather than just our informal agreement. Is there an official way divorced parents should handle this, or does our alternating arrangement work as long as we coordinate properly? Also, I really appreciate your point about state tax differences - I hadn't considered that our state might have different rules than federal. I'll definitely look into that!
I'm so sorry you're dealing with this - it's incredibly frustrating when you do everything correctly and still get caught up in IRS processing issues. Based on what everyone has shared here, you're definitely taking the right approach with the dual submission method. One additional tip from my own experience: when you write your explanation letter, include a specific request for written confirmation that your S-corp election will be effective retroactively from your original intended date. This is crucial because it prevents any confusion during future tax filings about when your election actually took effect. Also, make sure to keep detailed records of every interaction going forward - dates, times, agent names or ID numbers, and what was discussed. If this gets escalated or you need to involve the Taxpayer Advocate Service later, having a complete paper trail will be invaluable. The good news is that this is clearly an IRS processing error, not anything you did wrong. With your fax confirmation and the proper documentation approach everyone has outlined, you should be able to get this resolved without penalties. Stay persistent but patient - sometimes it takes a few weeks for their systems to properly process the resubmission. You've got this! The fact that you're being so thorough with documentation and following up appropriately shows you're handling it exactly right.
This whole thread has been incredibly eye-opening! I had no idea that IRS "losing" faxed documents was such a common problem. As someone new to dealing with business tax issues, I really appreciate everyone sharing their experiences and solutions. The consistent advice about doing both certified mail AND e-fax seems like the safest approach, even though it feels like overkill. Better to be redundant than sorry, especially when dealing with something as important as S-corp election deadlines. One thing I'm taking away from all these responses is how important it is to document absolutely everything - not just the initial submission, but every phone call, every follow-up attempt, and every piece of correspondence. It sounds like creating that paper trail is just as important as the actual form submission itself. For anyone else reading this who might be facing similar issues, it's really reassuring to know that this isn't necessarily a reflection of doing something wrong - sometimes it's just the reality of dealing with IRS processing systems. The key seems to be staying organized, persistent, and not taking "no" for an answer when you have proof of timely submission.
This is such a frustrating but unfortunately common issue with the IRS! I went through something very similar with my LLC's S-corp election about 18 months ago. The stress of thinking you missed the deadline when you actually filed on time is awful. Here's what I learned from my experience: the dual approach of certified mail AND fax that the IRS agent recommended is absolutely the way to go. Don't just pick one method - do both. I made the mistake of only re-faxing initially, and guess what? They "lost" that one too! When I finally did both methods simultaneously, I got my acceptance letter within about 5 weeks. The key things that I think helped were: 1. Being very specific in my explanation letter about the original filing date and emphasizing it was within the 75-day window 2. Including the phrase "reasonable cause under IRC Section 1362(b)(5)" (someone mentioned this earlier and it's spot on) 3. Requesting written confirmation that the election would be retroactive to my intended effective date 4. Following up with a call to the Business Entity Control department (not general customer service) about 3 weeks after sending The whole situation taught me that the IRS fax systems are honestly pretty unreliable, especially for important documents like Form 2553. For any future business filings, I now always use multiple submission methods from the start. Hang in there - you did everything right, and with proper documentation and persistence, this will get resolved without penalties. The proof of your timely fax submission is your protection!
One thing nobody mentioned - make sure you check if you qualify for the 0% long-term capital gains rate! If your total taxable income (including the capital gains) falls below $44,625 for single filers or $89,250 for married filing jointly in 2025, your long-term capital gains might be taxed at 0%. I didn't realize this my first year investing and overpaid my taxes. Had to file an amendment to get my money back.
Is that 0% rate only for federal taxes though? I live in California and I think they tax all capital gains as regular income at the state level regardless of how long I held the assets. So I might still owe state taxes even if my federal long-term rate is 0%, right?
You're absolutely right about California! The 0% federal rate only applies to federal taxes. California (and most other states) don't have preferential rates for long-term capital gains - they tax all capital gains as ordinary income at your regular state tax rate. So even if you qualify for the 0% federal rate, you'd still owe California state taxes on those gains at whatever your marginal state tax rate is. It's one of those frustrating situations where federal and state tax treatment can be completely different for the same income.
Just wanted to add another perspective as someone who's been dealing with capital gains for a few years now. The confusion you're experiencing is totally normal - the way Schedule D flows into Form 1040 isn't intuitive at first glance. One thing that really helped me understand this was looking at the actual tax calculation worksheets (even if you're using software). The Qualified Dividends and Capital Gain Tax Worksheet literally shows you line by line how your regular income gets taxed at ordinary rates, then your long-term gains get "stacked on top" and taxed at the preferential rates. Also, don't forget about the Net Investment Income Tax (NIIT) if your income is above certain thresholds. That's an additional 3.8% tax on investment income that applies regardless of whether your gains are short-term or long-term. It caught me off guard my first year with significant capital gains. The system really does work correctly once you understand the flow: Schedule D ā Form 1040 Line 7 ā Tax calculation worksheet ā Different rates applied automatically. Your software (or the IRS if filing by paper) handles all the complex calculations behind that simple line on Form 1040.
Thank you so much for mentioning the Net Investment Income Tax! I had no idea about that 3.8% additional tax. What are those income thresholds you mentioned? I'm trying to estimate my total tax liability and want to make sure I'm not missing anything. Also, does the NIIT apply to both short-term and long-term gains, or just one type? This is exactly the kind of detail that makes me nervous about doing my own taxes for the first time with investment income.
One thing I'd add to all this great advice - don't forget about the actual mechanics deduction vs. standard mileage rate choice! You mentioned using the standard rate, which is usually simpler, but make sure you're not leaving money on the table. For your situation as an independent contractor with regular trips to one client, the standard mileage rate (65.5 cents per mile for 2023) is probably your best bet since it's straightforward and you don't have to track actual vehicle expenses. Just remember that once you choose the standard mileage rate for a vehicle, you generally have to stick with it for the life of that vehicle - you can't switch to actual expense method later. Also, since you mentioned this is the same route every time, consider using a mapping service like Google Maps to get the exact mileage once, then multiply by your number of round trips. This gives you a defensible, consistent distance calculation that the IRS would likely find reasonable. Just make sure to note in your log which mapping service you used and the date you calculated the distance. The fact that you're being cautious and only wanting to claim what you can properly document puts you in a good position. Most audit issues come from people who get aggressive with deductions they can't substantiate.
This is really helpful advice about the standard mileage rate vs. actual expense method! I had no idea that once you choose standard mileage, you're locked into it for that vehicle. That's definitely something to consider upfront. Your suggestion about using Google Maps to calculate the exact distance once and then multiplying by trips is smart - it creates a consistent, defensible methodology. I'm curious though, if my route occasionally varies due to road closures or traffic, should I note those exceptions in my log, or is it acceptable to use the standard route distance consistently as long as it's reasonable? Also, do you happen to know if there are any restrictions on using the standard mileage rate for independent contractors who work primarily with one client? I've heard conflicting information about whether that might be considered "commuting" in some situations.
Great questions! For route variations due to traffic or road closures, you don't need to document every single deviation as long as your standard route distance is reasonable and representative of your typical travel. The IRS understands that routes can vary slightly, and using a consistent methodology (like the Google Maps distance) shows good faith effort at accurate record-keeping. However, if you regularly take a significantly longer route for business reasons (maybe to stop at a supply store), you should document that pattern separately since it would justify higher mileage claims. Regarding the independent contractor/one client situation - this is actually a common misconception! The key factor isn't how many clients you have, but where your "principal place of business" is located. Since you work from home processing materials, your home qualifies as your principal place of business. This means trips from home to your client's location are legitimate business miles, not commuting miles, regardless of how many clients you serve. The IRS has specifically addressed this in Revenue Ruling 99-7. Even if you only have one client, as long as your home is your principal place of business (which it sounds like it is), you can use the standard mileage rate for those trips. The "commuting" restriction only applies when you're traveling from home to your regular workplace where you perform most of your work.
I appreciate seeing all this detailed advice! As someone who's been through a similar situation, I want to emphasize one crucial point that hasn't been mentioned yet - make sure you're tracking your odometer readings at the beginning and end of each tax year. The IRS wants to see your total annual mileage broken down into business and personal use. So even if you have perfect records of your business trips, you'll still need to know your total mileage for the year to calculate the business use percentage. I learned this the hard way when I realized I had great business trip records but no way to prove what percentage of my total driving was business-related. A simple solution is to take a photo of your odometer on January 1st and December 31st each year, and maybe once mid-year as a backup. This gives you the total annual mileage baseline that the IRS expects to see on your Schedule C. Also, since you mentioned using Excel to organize everything - consider adding a column for cumulative business miles. This makes it easy to see patterns and ensures your claimed deduction matches your calculated total. Having that internal consistency in your records goes a long way toward demonstrating credibility if you're ever questioned.
NebulaNinja
The real issue here that nobody has mentioned is properly documenting your time! If you get audited and claim REPS, the IRS will want to see detailed logs of how you spent those 750+ hours. I learned this the hard way. Keep a detailed diary or use a time-tracking app specifically for your real estate activities. Document date, time spent, and exactly what you did. This includes time spent as a realtor if you're claiming those hours toward your REPS qualification.
0 coins
Javier Gomez
ā¢What kind of documentation worked for you? I've been using a Google spreadsheet but wondering if that's enough if I get audited.
0 coins
Alina Rosenthal
ā¢A Google spreadsheet can work, but make sure it's detailed enough. I'd recommend including columns for date, start/end times, specific property address (if applicable), type of activity (showing properties, managing rentals, administrative work, etc.), and detailed description of what you did. For your realtor activities, track time spent on listings, showings, client meetings, market research, continuing education, etc. For rental management, log property visits, tenant communications, maintenance coordination, financial review time, etc. The key is being specific - instead of "worked on rentals 3 hours," write something like "reviewed monthly financials for Oak St property, coordinated HVAC repair with contractor, responded to tenant maintenance requests." This level of detail shows the IRS you're serious about tracking and weren't just making up numbers after the fact.
0 coins
Clay blendedgen
Based on what you've described, you likely DO qualify for REPS, but your accountant is right that it's more complicated than it initially appears. Your realtor hours absolutely count toward the 750+ hour requirement - that's established case law. The IRS considers all real estate activities together for this test. So between your full-time realtor work and managing those 2 local properties, you should easily meet the hour threshold. However, the material participation requirement is evaluated separately for each property or group of properties. This is where the grouping election mentioned by others becomes crucial. You can elect to treat all your rental properties as a single activity on Form 8582. Once grouped, you only need to materially participate in the group as a whole, not each individual property. Even with property managers, you likely spend time on oversight activities - reviewing financial reports, approving major repairs, making strategic decisions about rent increases or tenant screening, etc. All of this counts toward material participation hours if properly documented. I'd suggest getting a second opinion from a CPA who specializes in real estate taxation. Many general accountants aren't familiar with the nuances of REPS and grouping elections. The tax savings potential here is significant enough to warrant consulting with a specialist.
0 coins
Rudy Cenizo
ā¢This is really helpful advice! I'm new to understanding REPS but have been considering it for my own situation. One question - when you make the grouping election on Form 8582, is this something you can do retroactively for previous tax years, or does it only apply going forward? I'm wondering if there's a way to amend returns if you didn't make the election initially but should have. Also, how do you find CPAs who specialize in real estate taxation? Is there a specific credential or designation to look for? My current accountant seems to be more of a generalist and I'm starting to think I need someone with deeper real estate expertise.
0 coins