IRS

Can't reach IRS? Claimyr connects you to a live IRS agent in minutes.

Claimyr is a pay-as-you-go service. We do not charge a recurring subscription.



Fox KTVUABC 7CBSSan Francisco Chronicle

Using Claimyr will:

  • Connect you to a human agent at the IRS
  • Skip the long phone menu
  • Call the correct department
  • Redial until on hold
  • Forward a call to your phone with reduced hold time
  • Give you free callbacks if the IRS drops your call

If I could give 10 stars I would

If I could give 10 stars I would If I could give 10 stars I would Such an amazing service so needed during the times when EDD almost never picks up Claimyr gets me on the phone with EDD every time without fail faster. A much needed service without Claimyr I would have never received the payment I needed to support me during my postpartum recovery. Thank you so much Claimyr!


Really made a difference

Really made a difference, save me time and energy from going to a local office for making the call.


Worth not wasting your time calling for hours.

Was a bit nervous or untrusting at first, but my calls went thru. First time the wait was a bit long but their customer chat line on their page was helpful and put me at ease that I would receive my call. Today my call dropped because of EDD and Claimyr heard my concern on the same chat and another call was made within the hour.


An incredibly helpful service

An incredibly helpful service! Got me connected to a CA EDD agent without major hassle (outside of EDD's agents dropping calls – which Claimyr has free protection for). If you need to file a new claim and can't do it online, pay the $ to Claimyr to get the process started. Absolutely worth it!


Consistent,frustration free, quality Service.

Used this service a couple times now. Before I'd call 200 times in less than a weak frustrated as can be. But using claimyr with a couple hours of waiting i was on the line with an representative or on hold. Dropped a couple times but each reconnected not long after and was mission accomplished, thanks to Claimyr.


IT WORKS!! Not a scam!

I tried for weeks to get thru to EDD PFL program with no luck. I gave this a try thinking it may be a scam. OMG! It worked and They got thru within an hour and my claim is going to finally get paid!! I upgraded to the $60 call. Best $60 spent!

Read all of our Trustpilot reviews


Ask the community...

  • DO post questions about your issues.
  • DO answer questions and support each other.
  • DO post tips & tricks to help folks.
  • DO NOT post call problems here - there is a support tab at the top for that :)

Savannah Weiner

β€’

Curious about the property services side - are there any Section 179 deduction implications when using YouTube earnings to purchase equipment for an unrelated business? I'm in a similar situation where one business is funding equipment purchases for another.

0 coins

Levi Parker

β€’

This is actually an interesting tax planning opportunity. Since all the LLCs are disregarded entities flowing to the same partnership tax return, Section 179 deductions can be taken regardless of which LLC purchased the equipment. The limit applies to the taxpayer (the partnership), not each individual LLC. So if the property services LLC buys equipment using funds transferred from YouTube earnings, the partnership can take the Section 179 deduction against all business income, including YouTube revenue. Just make sure to document that the equipment is actually used for business purposes in the property services operation.

0 coins

This is a great discussion on multi-entity structures! One thing I'd add from my experience with similar setups is the importance of maintaining arm's length transactions between your LLCs. Even though they're all disregarded entities for tax purposes, you still want to document that any services or fund transfers between entities are at fair market rates. For example, if your holding company is providing management services to the YouTube LLC, document what those services are and that any management fees charged are reasonable compared to what you'd pay an outside company. Same goes for any loans between entities - use proper loan documents with market interest rates. Also, since you mentioned substantial income ($175k), consider whether making an S-Corp election for any of these entities might save on self-employment taxes. With that level of income, the salary vs. distribution optimization could be significant, but you'd need to weigh that against the added complexity of payroll compliance. The key is having a legitimate business purpose for your structure beyond just tax planning. Sounds like you do with the different industries, but make sure that's well-documented in your operating agreements and business records.

0 coins

Roger Romero

β€’

Really appreciate this detailed breakdown! The arm's length transaction point is something I hadn't fully considered. Since I'm essentially moving money between my own entities, it's easy to forget that the IRS still wants to see market-rate documentation. Quick question on the S-Corp election - if I elect S-Corp status for just the holding company, would that create complications since the YouTube and PropertyServices LLCs are disregarded entities owned by it? Or would I need to make the election for all entities to keep things clean? With $175k in income, the self-employment tax savings could definitely be worth the payroll complexity.

0 coins

Amina Sy

β€’

This is such a timely discussion! I've been using TurboTax online for the past few years without really thinking about the security implications. After reading through all these insights, I'm seriously considering switching to desktop software for next year's filing. The point about data persistence vs. temporary transmission really resonates with me. I had no idea that desktop software only sends data temporarily during e-filing while online versions keep everything stored on their servers. That's a significant difference I never considered. I'm also intrigued by some of the tools mentioned here like taxr.ai for analyzing security practices. Has anyone else tried similar services to evaluate their tax software's security? I'd love to hear more experiences before making the switch. One question for the cybersecurity expert who commented - do you think the security landscape for tax software will change significantly in the coming years, or are we likely to see the same basic tradeoffs between convenience and data control?

0 coins

Nia Thompson

β€’

I'm glad this discussion is helping people think more critically about their tax software choices! As someone new to this community, I've been following along and learning a lot. From what I've gathered reading through everyone's experiences, it seems like the desktop vs. online decision really comes down to your personal risk tolerance and technical comfort level. The cybersecurity expert's point about professional security teams managing online platforms vs. individual computer security is particularly interesting - I hadn't considered that my own computer might actually be the weak link. I'm curious about something though - for those who've switched from online to desktop (or vice versa), was the transition difficult? I'm thinking about making a change but wondering about things like importing previous year data or learning a new interface. Any insights would be appreciated! Also, has anyone looked into whether there are any IRS resources that explain the security requirements for authorized e-file providers? It might be helpful to understand the baseline standards all these companies have to meet.

0 coins

Great question about the transition experience! I actually made the switch from TurboTax Online to their desktop version two years ago after a friend's account got compromised (not through a breach, but because they reused passwords). The transition was surprisingly smooth. Most desktop software can import your prior year data even if it was filed online - you just need to download a copy of your previous return from the online platform first. The interfaces are usually very similar since companies want to maintain consistency across their products. For IRS security requirements, you can find information about their "Authorized e-file Provider" standards on the IRS website under Publication 3112. It outlines the minimum security and operational requirements that all e-file providers must meet, including encryption standards, data protection protocols, and audit requirements. One thing I didn't expect was that desktop software actually feels more secure psychologically - there's something reassuring about having your tax files locally and only connecting when you're ready to file. Though as the cybersecurity expert pointed out, that might just be a false sense of security if your personal computer isn't well-protected! The main downside I've found is that you lose some of the automatic syncing features with bank accounts and previous year imports that online versions offer, but for me the trade-off in data control is worth it.

0 coins

Thanks for sharing your transition experience! That's really helpful to know that the switch can be smooth. I'm particularly interested in your point about Publication 3112 - I had no idea the IRS published their security requirements for e-file providers. That seems like essential reading for anyone trying to make an informed decision about tax software. The psychological aspect you mentioned is interesting too. I think there's definitely something to be said for feeling like you have more control over your data, even if the actual security difference might be more nuanced than it appears. One follow-up question - when you import prior year data from online to desktop, does that process involve uploading your information to their servers again temporarily? I'm trying to understand if there are any points where desktop users might inadvertently expose their data to the same risks as online users during the setup process. Also, for anyone else reading this who's made similar switches - did you notice any differences in customer support quality between the online and desktop versions of the same software?

0 coins

Malik Jenkins

β€’

I've been through this exact scenario! Last year I had a 1099-B with a $52 net loss from some tech stocks that didn't pan out. I initially thought about skipping it too because my tax software wanted to charge extra, but I'm glad I didn't. Here's the reality check: the IRS gets a copy of your 1099-B automatically from your brokerage. Their computer systems are designed to match up all the tax documents they receive with what you report on your return. If there's a mismatch, you'll likely get a letter asking about it months later - and dealing with that is way more annoying than just reporting it correctly from the start. A few practical suggestions: First, check if you qualify for the IRS Free File program - many of their partner software options handle investment forms at no extra cost if your income is under the threshold. Second, look into FreeTaxUSA or Cash App Taxes as alternatives - both handle 1099-B forms without charging premium fees like the big name software does. Don't forget that capital losses are actually valuable! That $43 loss reduces your taxable income now, and any unused portion carries forward indefinitely to offset future capital gains. So if you have better luck trading next year, that loss could save you money on taxes then. Bottom line: report it, use free or cheaper software, and sleep well knowing you won't get any surprise letters from the IRS later.

0 coins

Andre Rousseau

β€’

This is really helpful - I appreciate everyone sharing their actual experiences rather than just theoretical advice! The point about the IRS computer systems automatically matching documents makes total sense. I hadn't thought about it from that angle, but of course they would have automated systems flagging mismatches. I'm definitely going to look into the Free File program first since that seems like the most straightforward solution. If my income doesn't qualify, FreeTaxUSA sounds like a solid backup option based on what multiple people have recommended here. The carry-forward aspect of capital losses is something I completely overlooked too. Even though $43 seems tiny now, it could actually be useful if I make some better investment decisions next year. Thanks for taking the time to share your experience - this thread has been way more helpful than trying to parse through IRS publications on my own!

0 coins

I went through this exact situation two years ago with a $67 loss from some penny stocks that went south. Trust me, you absolutely need to report that 1099-B even though it's just $43. The IRS has sophisticated matching systems that automatically flag when tax documents they receive don't show up on your return. I learned this the hard way when I tried to skip reporting a small loss thinking "who would notice?" - got a CP2000 notice about 8 months later asking why my 1099-B wasn't included. No penalties since it was a loss, but I had to file an amended return and explain the discrepancy. Way more hassle than just doing it right the first time. For the software cost issue, definitely check out the IRS Free File program if your income qualifies. I used it the following year and got access to professional tax software that handled all investment forms at zero cost. You just have to make sure you access it through irs.gov and not the software company's own website. Also remember that capital losses are actually valuable - they offset other capital gains and carry forward indefinitely if you don't use them all in one year. That $43 loss today could save you money on taxes if you have gains down the road. Don't throw away that potential future benefit just to avoid a software fee!

0 coins

This has been such a comprehensive discussion! As a newcomer to both S Corps and HSAs, I'm grateful for all the detailed guidance shared here. One aspect I'd like to add from my recent experience: when setting up your HSA with Fidelity, make sure to specifically request their "employer-sponsored" HSA setup rather than their individual HSA. Even though you're a single-member S Corp, the employer-sponsored version gives you better integration options with payroll providers like ADP and cleaner reporting for tax purposes. I also learned that Fidelity can provide you with a "contribution authorization form" that includes all the routing and account details formatted specifically for payroll systems. This saved me from any transcription errors when setting up the deductions with my payroll provider. The tax benefits really are compelling - between the FICA savings and the pre-tax treatment, you're looking at significant savings. Plus, the triple tax advantage of HSAs (deductible going in, tax-free growth, tax-free withdrawals for qualified expenses) makes this one of the best tax-advantaged accounts available. Thanks to everyone who shared their experiences and expertise!

0 coins

That's a fantastic tip about requesting the "employer-sponsored" HSA setup with Fidelity, @Natasha Romanova! I hadn't realized there was a difference between their individual and employer-sponsored versions. This could save a lot of headaches during the payroll integration process. The contribution authorization form detail is also really helpful - having the routing information properly formatted for ADP sounds like it would eliminate potential errors that could delay the first contribution. Your point about the triple tax advantage really drives home why HSAs are such a powerful tool, especially when combined with the S Corp structure for additional FICA savings. It's amazing how much tax efficiency you can achieve when everything is set up correctly. This entire thread has been incredibly valuable for understanding the nuances of HSA contributions through S Corp payroll. Thanks for adding those practical implementation details!

0 coins

Harper Collins

β€’

This thread has been incredibly helpful! I'm in a very similar situation - just formed my single-member S Corp and got an HDHP this year. After reading through all the responses, I'm convinced that the payroll method is definitely the way to go for the FICA tax savings. One thing I'm curious about that I haven't seen mentioned - does the timing of when you start making HSA contributions through payroll affect your ability to maximize the annual contribution limit? For example, if I start the payroll deductions in May, can I still contribute the full $4,150 for 2025, or do I need to prorate it based on when I started? Also, I'm using Gusto for payroll instead of ADP - has anyone had experience setting up HSA contributions through Gusto? I'm hoping the process is similar to what's been described for ADP. The documentation requirements mentioned by @Jamal Harris are really eye-opening. I want to make sure I have everything properly documented from the start to avoid any issues down the road. Better to be over-prepared than caught off guard in an audit!

0 coins

Dylan Cooper

β€’

Great question about timing, @Harper Collins! The good news is that HSA contribution limits are based on the full calendar year, not when you start contributing. So even if you begin payroll deductions in May, you can still contribute the full $4,150 for 2025 (assuming individual coverage). You'd just need to calculate higher per-paycheck deductions to catch up and reach your annual limit by year-end. Regarding Gusto, I haven't used them personally but I've heard from other S Corp owners that their HSA integration is actually quite smooth - some say even easier than ADP. Gusto should be able to handle the pre-tax payroll deductions and proper W-2 reporting (Box 12, code W) just like any major payroll provider. You're absolutely right about the documentation - having everything properly set up from day one is so much easier than trying to fix issues later. The peace of mind alone is worth the extra effort upfront. Plus, clean records make tax filing much simpler when you're dealing with the various forms and schedules that come with S Corp ownership.

0 coins

Paolo Longo

β€’

Great question about prioritizing next steps after the LLC formation and property transfer! From my recent experience, I'd definitely recommend this order: 1. **Business bank account** - This is critical and should be your first priority. You'll need the EIN (which you should get immediately after LLC formation) to open the account. Start running all rental income and expenses through this account right away. 2. **Insurance updates** - Contact your insurance company ASAP to update the policy with the LLC as the named insured. This is crucial for maintaining coverage and avoiding any gaps in protection. 3. **Update automatic payments** - Property taxes, insurance premiums, HOA fees, etc. Make sure these are coming from the LLC account and reflect the correct owner name. 4. **Tenant notification** - If you have existing tenants, send them a formal notice about where to send rent payments (new LLC bank account) and update them on the ownership change. 5. **Update lease agreements** - For any renewals or new tenants, make sure the LLC is listed as the landlord. The business banking setup was actually easier than I expected - most banks have streamlined processes for single-member LLCs. The insurance update took about 15 minutes over the phone. Getting these core items handled quickly ensures you maintain proper separation and protection from day one!

0 coins

Jamal Harris

β€’

This prioritized checklist is incredibly helpful! I'm saving this for when I move forward with my LLC setup. The order makes perfect sense - getting the business banking established first ensures you have the foundation for proper financial separation, then protecting that with updated insurance coverage. I hadn't thought about needing to formally notify existing tenants about the ownership change and new payment instructions. That's definitely something I would have overlooked initially. Do you recommend sending that notification via certified mail to make sure there's a paper trail, or is regular mail/email sufficient for documenting the change? The 15-minute insurance update gives me hope that this won't be as administratively burdensome as I was worried about. It sounds like most of the heavy lifting is in the initial setup phase, and then it's pretty straightforward ongoing management. Thanks for breaking down those immediate next steps so clearly!

0 coins

Mateo Sanchez

β€’

As someone who's been through this exact transition, I can definitely confirm that transferring your rental property to a single-member LLC is the way to go! I made this move with my investment condo about two years ago and it's been seamless from a tax perspective. The "disregarded entity" status means you literally continue doing everything exactly the same - Schedule E, passive loss limitations, mortgage interest deductions, all of it stays identical. The IRS treats it as if the LLC doesn't exist for tax purposes, so there's zero additional complexity or forms to file. What I love most is getting that liability protection without any tax headaches. Before the LLC, I was always worried about personal exposure if something happened with the rental. Now I sleep better knowing there's that corporate veil protecting my personal assets, but my tax situation is still as simple as when I owned the property directly. The setup process is straightforward too - just make sure to get an EIN for opening the business bank account, update your insurance to list the LLC as the named insured, and keep all rental finances separate from your personal accounts. The peace of mind is absolutely worth the minimal administrative overhead!

0 coins

Aisha Hussain

β€’

Thanks for sharing your two-year experience with the LLC structure! It's really reassuring to hear from someone who's been operating this way for a while and can confirm the tax simplicity continues long-term. The "disregarded entity" status really does seem like the perfect solution for single-property landlords who want protection without complexity. Your point about sleeping better at night because of the liability protection really resonates with me. I work in a profession where I could be a target for lawsuits, so having that corporate veil between my rental property and personal assets would definitely give me peace of mind. The fact that you've maintained this structure for two years without any tax complications gives me confidence that this isn't just a short-term benefit - it's a sustainable long-term approach. I'm definitely moving forward with setting up the LLC now. Between all the experiences shared in this thread and your confirmation that the benefits continue over time, I'm convinced this is the right move for my situation. Thanks for adding your perspective to this incredibly helpful discussion!

0 coins

Prev1...223224225226227...5643Next