


Ask the community...
Just to make sure we're all on the same page here - are we talking about claiming her as a qualifying relative dependent, not a qualifying child dependent? Because the rules are different for each, right? For a qualifying relative, her gross income must be less than $4,700 (for 2023), but Social Security benefits generally don't count toward this amount unless she has significant other income. Did I understand your situation correctly?
You're absolutely correct - you do NOT report her SSDI on your tax return. Her disability income remains her income, not yours. The fact that you're claiming her as a dependent doesn't change whose income it is. As long as she meets the qualifying relative tests (gross income under $4,700 excluding SSDI, and you provide more than half her support), you're compliant. Keep good records of your support expenses - housing, food, medical costs, utilities, etc. - in case you need to prove the support test later. The IRS is pretty clear on this in Publication 501, but I understand why it can be confusing at first!
This is really helpful clarification! I'm new to this dependency situation and was worried I'd made a mistake. Just to confirm my understanding - when you say "keep good records of support expenses," should I be tracking everything down to grocery receipts and utility bills? I want to make sure I'm documenting the right things in case the IRS ever questions the support test calculation.
One thing nobody has mentioned yet - you should check if the trust document specifies whether the trustee has discretion over distributions. Some trusts are set up as "simple trusts" that MUST distribute all income, while others are "complex trusts" where the trustee can retain income. If the trust document requires all income to be distributed, then there might be a problem with how the trustee is handling things. If it's discretionary, then unfortunately what you're experiencing is normal, albeit frustrating.
Thanks for mentioning this. I checked the trust documents again and it does specify that it's a "complex trust" where the trustee has discretion over distributions. It looks like they're reinvesting most of the farm income into new equipment and land improvements. I've emailed the trustee to ask if they can at least distribute enough to cover the tax liability since this first year caught us by surprise. Hoping they'll work with us on this for future years!
That's good that you checked! Complex trusts do create this tax situation, but a reasonable trustee should understand the cash flow problems this creates for beneficiaries. Many trusts have specific provisions for "tax distributions" exactly for this reason. Even if there's no formal provision requiring it, trustees typically want to maintain good relationships with beneficiaries and will often try to accommodate reasonable requests like covering tax liabilities. Document your actual tax impact to show them exactly what you're facing.
Has anyone dealt with the situation where the trust income varies WILDLY from year to year? Our family farm trust had a terrible year in 2023 (drought) and then an amazing year in 2024 with crop prices soaring. The K1 income is 5x higher this year than last! Makes tax planning impossible!!
Quarterly estimated tax payments are your friend here. With agricultural income that fluctuates, you can use the "annualized income installment method" on Form 2210. This lets you calculate each quarterly payment based on actual income to date rather than projecting the same income all year. Helps avoid penalties when income is uneven.
Thanks for that tip! I had no idea about the annualized income installment method. That would definitely help with our situation since our farm income is so seasonal (huge in harvest months, minimal or negative in planting season). Do you know if the trustee can make distributions on a similar quarterly schedule to help with the estimated tax payments? Right now they just do one annual distribution which obviously doesn't help with quarterly tax obligations.
Based on your March filing timeline and the July 1 "as of" date change, you're actually making good progress! That date movement typically indicates your amendment has been assigned to a specific reviewer - it's like getting a number at the DMV, you're in the queue now. For dependent amendments where someone else previously claimed the child, the IRS runs additional verification through their Dependent Database system. This adds about 4-6 weeks to the normal 16-week processing time. Since you filed in March and it's been about 4 months, you're probably looking at another 6-8 weeks for completion. Unfortunately, there's no way to expedite dependent-related amendments - they have to go through the manual review process. The good news is that the system movement you're seeing suggests no major red flags so far. A few things to watch for: - Check your mail regularly for any CP notices requesting additional documentation - The "Where's My Amended Return" tool should show more detailed status updates as it progresses - If you hit 20+ weeks with no resolution, that's when you can contact the Taxpayer Advocate Service The waiting is frustrating when you're trying to plan financially, but the movement you're seeing is actually a positive sign that things are proceeding normally through the system!
@Sofia Torres This is exactly the kind of detailed breakdown I was hoping to find! Your explanation about the Dependent Database verification makes perfect sense - I had no idea there was a separate system they had to check when someone else previously claimed the dependent. The DMV analogy is spot on and actually makes me feel better about where I am in the process. I ve'been checking the Where "s'My Amended Return tool" religiously but it s'been pretty vague with just processing "status." Good to know that more detailed updates should start appearing as it moves through the system. I m'definitely going to be more diligent about checking my mail - I ve'been so focused on the online tracking that I might have missed something important. The 20+ week threshold for Taxpayer Advocate Service is good to know too, gives me a clear timeline for when I can escalate if needed. Thanks for the realistic timeline estimate of 6-8 more weeks. It s'frustrating but at least now I can adjust my financial planning accordingly instead of hoping it ll'be resolved next week!
I'm dealing with a very similar situation and your post gives me hope that there's actually movement happening! I filed my 1040-X in late February to add my stepdaughter as a dependent after her biological father agreed to release the claim. The tricky part is that she was claimed by him for 2022 but has been living with us full-time since August 2023. I submitted Form 8332 (Release of Claim to Exemption) along with school records showing our address and medical records from her pediatrician visits throughout 2023. My "as of" date just changed last week to August 15th, so it sounds like we're on similar timelines. Reading through all these responses, it seems like the key is having all your documentation ready and being patient with the Dependent Database verification process. One thing I learned from calling the IRS (after waiting 2 hours on hold) is that they recommend keeping copies of everything you submitted because sometimes they'll request the same documents again during the review process. The agent also mentioned that amendments involving previously claimed dependents can take up to 20 weeks, which aligns with what others have shared here. Hang in there - the fact that you're seeing movement is definitely a positive sign that your case is progressing through the system!
Has anyone used FreeTaxUSA for filing with a single-member LLC and W2 income? I'm trying to avoid the higher fees from TurboTax but not sure if the cheaper options handle Schedule C well.
I've used FreeTaxUSA for the past two years with my W2 job and side LLC. It works great for Schedule C and costs way less than TurboTax. The interface isn't quite as pretty but it asks all the same questions and gets the job done. Federal filing with Schedule C was $0 and state was only $15 last year.
As someone who went through this exact transition two years ago, I'd say start with good tax software first before jumping to a CPA. With $18K in LLC income, you're definitely in manageable territory for self-filing. The key things that made my first year smooth: 1) Keep meticulous records of ALL business expenses (even small ones add up), 2) Set aside about 25-30% of your LLC profits for taxes (you'll owe self-employment tax on top of income tax), and 3) Don't forget about potential quarterly payments for next year. I used TaxAct Business which handled my Schedule C perfectly and cost way less than TurboTax. The software walked me through everything step-by-step, including home office deductions and business use of vehicle if applicable. One thing I wish someone had told me - even though you're a single-member LLC, make sure you're treating it like a real business from a record-keeping standpoint. Separate bank accounts, proper receipts, detailed mileage logs if you drive for business. The IRS scrutinizes Schedule C filers more than W2-only folks, so having everything documented properly is crucial.
Connor Byrne
Something the original post didn't mention is that there are repayment caps for the PTC if your income is under 400% of FPL. So if your income increases but you're still under that threshold, you might not have to repay the full amount of excess advance PTC. For tax year 2025, the caps are: - Under 200% FPL: $650 (single) or $1,300 (all other filing statuses) - 200-300% FPL: $1,700 (single) or $3,400 (all other filing statuses) - 300-400% FPL: $2,800 (single) or $5,600 (all other filing statuses) It's only when you go over 400% FPL that you potentially have to repay the entire thing.
0 coins
Yara Elias
ā¢Does the same apply if you estimated your income way too low at the beginning of the year? Like if I put $30k as my estimate but ended up making $60k?
0 coins
Connor Byrne
ā¢Yes, the repayment caps still apply in that situation. If your actual income is $60k but that still puts you within one of those FPL percentage ranges I mentioned, your repayment would be capped at the corresponding amount. What the IRS looks at is your final income for the year compared to the FPL, not how accurate your initial estimate was. The caps are designed to provide some protection for people whose income increases moderately but stays under 400% FPL.
0 coins
QuantumQuasar
The thing that gets most of my clients is they dont realize that the "affordable" employer coverage rule only applies to the EMPLOYEE coverage cost, not family coverage! So if employee-only coverage costs less than 9.12% of household income (for 2025), the whole family is ineligible for PTC - even if family coverage would cost way more! Its called the "family glitch" and it really hurts families! Some states have workarounds but most dont.
0 coins
Keisha Jackson
ā¢Wow, I had no idea about this! So if my employer offers me insurance at $150/month but covering my spouse and kids would cost $900/month, we still wouldn't qualify for ACA subsidies? That's completely messed up.
0 coins
CosmicCrusader
ā¢@aec17087db47 Unfortunately yes, that's exactly how it works under current rules! The "family glitch" has been a major issue for years. The IRS only looks at whether the employee-only coverage is affordable (under 9.12% of household income for 2025), completely ignoring what it costs to add family members. So in your example, if that $150/month employee coverage is considered affordable based on your income, your entire family loses ACA subsidy eligibility - even though the $900/month family coverage might be completely unaffordable. Some families end up in situations where the employee goes on the employer plan and the spouse/kids go uninsured or pay full price for marketplace coverage. It's one of the most unfair aspects of the ACA that really needs legislative fixes.
0 coins