IRS

Can't reach IRS? Claimyr connects you to a live IRS agent in minutes.

Claimyr is a pay-as-you-go service. We do not charge a recurring subscription.



Fox KTVUABC 7CBSSan Francisco Chronicle

Using Claimyr will:

  • Connect you to a human agent at the IRS
  • Skip the long phone menu
  • Call the correct department
  • Redial until on hold
  • Forward a call to your phone with reduced hold time
  • Give you free callbacks if the IRS drops your call

If I could give 10 stars I would

If I could give 10 stars I would If I could give 10 stars I would Such an amazing service so needed during the times when EDD almost never picks up Claimyr gets me on the phone with EDD every time without fail faster. A much needed service without Claimyr I would have never received the payment I needed to support me during my postpartum recovery. Thank you so much Claimyr!


Really made a difference

Really made a difference, save me time and energy from going to a local office for making the call.


Worth not wasting your time calling for hours.

Was a bit nervous or untrusting at first, but my calls went thru. First time the wait was a bit long but their customer chat line on their page was helpful and put me at ease that I would receive my call. Today my call dropped because of EDD and Claimyr heard my concern on the same chat and another call was made within the hour.


An incredibly helpful service

An incredibly helpful service! Got me connected to a CA EDD agent without major hassle (outside of EDD's agents dropping calls – which Claimyr has free protection for). If you need to file a new claim and can't do it online, pay the $ to Claimyr to get the process started. Absolutely worth it!


Consistent,frustration free, quality Service.

Used this service a couple times now. Before I'd call 200 times in less than a weak frustrated as can be. But using claimyr with a couple hours of waiting i was on the line with an representative or on hold. Dropped a couple times but each reconnected not long after and was mission accomplished, thanks to Claimyr.


IT WORKS!! Not a scam!

I tried for weeks to get thru to EDD PFL program with no luck. I gave this a try thinking it may be a scam. OMG! It worked and They got thru within an hour and my claim is going to finally get paid!! I upgraded to the $60 call. Best $60 spent!

Read all of our Trustpilot reviews


Ask the community...

  • DO post questions about your issues.
  • DO answer questions and support each other.
  • DO post tips & tricks to help folks.
  • DO NOT post call problems here - there is a support tab at the top for that :)

Sofia Price

β€’

Has anyone used one of those tax relief companies that advertise on the radio for an OIC? They claim they can settle for "pennies on the dollar" but I'm wondering if they're worth the fees they charge.

0 coins

Alice Coleman

β€’

STAY AWAY from those companies! I made that mistake and paid $3,500 upfront to a "tax relief" firm. They did absolutely nothing I couldn't have done myself and actually caused delays by submitting incomplete paperwork. Many of these places just take your money and do the bare minimum.

0 coins

I'm currently in the middle of my OIC process (submitted about 4 months ago) and wanted to share what I've learned so far since you're just getting started. The biggest thing that's helped me is staying incredibly organized with a dedicated filing system for every single document. I created separate folders for initial application materials, correspondence with the IRS, financial documentation, and backup copies of everything. This has been a lifesaver when they've requested additional info. One thing I wish I'd known upfront - the IRS can take 6-24 months to process your offer, and during that time you MUST stay current on all new tax obligations. If you fall behind on estimated payments or filing requirements while your OIC is pending, they'll automatically reject your offer. I almost learned this the hard way. Also, don't let the anxiety get to you too much. Yes, it's intimidating dealing with the IRS directly, but if you're thorough with your documentation and honest about your financial situation, the process is more straightforward than it seems. The IRS agents I've spoken with have actually been professional and helpful when I've had questions. Good luck with your application! Feel free to ask if you have specific questions about the forms - I'm still fresh on all the details.

0 coins

Questions about Inherited IRA Distribution and Form 8606 Requirements

My father-in-law passed away about 8 months ago, and my husband received a portion of his IRA (split between him and his three brothers). Instead of rolling it over, my husband took his share as a cash distribution. The financial institution that managed my father-in-law's account handled the calculations and sent us a 1099-R for the distribution, which we'll need to report on our taxes. I was using TurboTax to prepare our return, and everything was fine until I got to the part about the IRA distribution. When it asked if this was an inherited IRA, I tried both options. If I select "No," the software seems happy and moves on. But if I select "Yes," it starts asking about basis and things get confusing. It then tells me I need to complete Form 8606. If I indicate my father-in-law had no basis, the software suddenly shows a massive refund which can't possibly be right. If I say he did have a basis, it gets even more complicated. Honestly, I have zero information about what contributions my father-in-law made to this IRA during his lifetime or whether they were pre-tax or after-tax. The Form 8606 that TurboTax is telling me to complete doesn't seem relevant to our situation since we took a lump sum distribution rather than transferring it to another IRA. We're fine with paying the taxes on this inheritance - we expected that. But I'm confused about whether Form 8606 is actually required in our case since we didn't roll anything over. Can someone help clarify this?

Ravi Patel

β€’

Has anyone noticed that tax software seems to get confused with inherited IRAs? I've used three different programs over the years and they ALL struggle with this scenario. I wish they would update their interfaces to make these questions clearer for situations like this!

0 coins

YES! I had this exact problem with FreeTaxUSA last year. It kept asking me questions that didn't seem relevant to my situation and gave me completely different results depending on how I answered. I finally gave up and paid a professional.

0 coins

I went through this exact same situation two years ago when my grandmother passed away and left me part of her IRA. The tax software confusion is real - I think the issue is that these programs are designed primarily for regular IRA distributions, not inherited ones. One thing that helped me was understanding that the "basis" question is really asking whether the original owner ever made contributions with money that was already taxed (after-tax contributions). Most traditional IRAs are funded entirely with pre-tax dollars, so there's usually no basis to worry about. The key is to look at your 1099-R form carefully. If Box 2a (taxable amount) equals Box 1 (gross distribution), then there's no basis and the entire amount is taxable. If Box 2a is less than Box 1, that might indicate some after-tax contributions were made. Since you confirmed with the financial institution that there were no after-tax contributions, you should be fine selecting "inherited IRA = Yes" and "basis = No" and then manually correcting any weird refund calculations the software produces. The important thing is that you report it as an inherited distribution so it's properly coded on your return.

0 coins

Sophia Carter

β€’

This is really helpful! I'm new to dealing with inherited IRAs and had no idea about the Box 1 vs Box 2a comparison on the 1099-R. That's a much clearer way to understand whether there's basis to worry about than trying to decipher the tax software questions. I'm curious - when you say "manually correcting any weird refund calculations," how exactly do you do that in the software? Do you just override the amounts it calculates, or is there a specific way to handle it? I'm worried about making a mistake that could trigger an audit.

0 coins

Complex Tax Questions on PTP K-1s - Handling Sales, Repurchases, and UBTI Implications

I've been investing in several publicly traded partnerships (PTPs) and have received K-1s for them over the past few years. I'm trying to better understand how certain scenarios affect the reporting on these K-1s, particularly around the ordinary income on line 1 and unrelated business taxable income (UBTI) on line 20V. I have three specific scenarios I'm trying to figure out: 1. If I sell some or all shares of a PTP and don't repurchase within the same tax year, how does that impact the reporting on line 1 and line 20V for the final K-1 I receive? 2. What happens if I sell shares of a PTP but then rebuy within the same tax year? Does this affect the line 1 ordinary income and line 20V UBTI amounts differently than a complete exit? 3. How is the tax treatment handled if the PTP owner dies? Does it matter whether the PTPs are held in a taxable account versus an IRA? From my research and experience, I've noticed that when no trades are made to PTP holdings during a year, the ordinary income (K-1 line 1) and UBTI (K-1 line 20V) seem directly related to the capital account. On a per-share basis, both UBTI and income appear lower when the capital account is higher (or less negative). I've heard conflicting information about this, so I'd appreciate clarification. For context, I receive 1065 K-1s but have never been on the issuing side. Any insights on one or all of these questions would be tremendously helpful!

Mohammed Khan

β€’

One often overlooked issue with PTPs is how suspended losses affect your situation when selling. If you've received K-1s with losses that were suspended due to passive activity or at-risk rules, those suspended losses become deductible when you completely dispose of your interest. But for your scenario #2 (sell and rebuy), you technically haven't fully disposed of your interest for tax purposes if you rebuy within the same year. This means those suspended losses remain suspended despite the sale transaction. For the UBTI reporting on line 20V, death transfers can be especially confusing. Technically, the UBTI character passes through to the heir, but the step-up in basis can reduce future UBTI by giving you a higher basis to offset against UBTI income.

0 coins

Gavin King

β€’

I thought suspended losses were released when you sell regardless of whether you rebuy later. Like each transaction stands on its own? My accountant told me this was one advantage of partnership interests over S-Corps.

0 coins

You're partially right, but it depends on the specific type of suspended losses. For passive activity losses, you generally do get to deduct them when you completely dispose of your entire interest in the activity. However, if you sell and then rebuy the same partnership within the same tax year, the IRS might view this as not being a complete disposition, especially if it appears to be part of a planned series of transactions. At-risk limitations work differently - those suspended losses are released when you dispose of your interest, but they're calculated based on your at-risk amount at the time of disposition. The timing of a rebuy within the same year could affect this calculation. Your accountant is right that partnership interests generally have more favorable suspended loss rules compared to S-Corp stock, but the sell/rebuy scenario creates some gray areas that aren't always clear-cut. The key is whether the IRS views your transactions as a genuine disposition or just a temporary restructuring of the same economic interest.

0 coins

Axel Far

β€’

The relationship between capital accounts and UBTI/income allocation you mentioned is spot-on, and there's actually a specific reason for this. Partnerships are required to allocate items in accordance with partners' interests in the partnership, which is primarily determined by capital account balances under Section 704(b) regulations. When your capital account becomes more negative (through distributions exceeding your basis), your economic interest in future partnership income decreases proportionally. This is why you see lower per-unit income and UBTI when capital accounts are more negative - you're essentially getting a smaller slice of the same pie. For your death scenario question, there's an important distinction many people miss: while the step-up in basis applies to the fair market value of the PTP units, it doesn't directly reset your capital account with the partnership. The partnership maintains its own records of your capital account, which continues to reflect the cumulative income, losses, and distributions. However, for tax purposes, your new stepped-up basis can significantly reduce or eliminate the taxable gain when the inherited PTPs are eventually sold. One practical tip: if you're actively trading PTPs, keep detailed records of your holding periods and corresponding K-1 amounts. The partnerships' quarterly ownership snapshots mean your K-1 might not perfectly match your actual trading activity, and you'll need to be able to support any adjustments on your return.

0 coins

Miguel Ramos

β€’

This is really helpful context about the Section 704(b) regulations and how capital accounts drive the allocation mechanics. I'm curious though - when you mention that the step-up in basis doesn't reset the partnership's capital account records, does this create ongoing complications for heirs? For example, if someone inherits PTP units with a large negative capital account but gets stepped-up basis, would they still be subject to the same proportionally lower income/UBTI allocations going forward? Or does the partnership eventually adjust their capital account tracking to reflect the new economic reality after the step-up? I'm trying to understand if there's a disconnect between what the partnership shows on future K-1s versus the heir's actual tax basis for calculating gains/losses on eventual sale.

0 coins

Have you considered looking into other assistance programs instead of potentially risky tax situations? There are programs specifically designed to help people in your situation while waiting for disability approval. Many states have emergency assistance for families with newborns. Also, there are charities that help with car repairs for people who need transportation for medical reasons. These might be better options than depending on tax strategies that could cause problems later.

0 coins

Dylan Evans

β€’

This! I was in a similar situation and found that my county had a program specifically for car repairs for low-income residents. Saved me almost $800 on transmission work. Definitely worth looking into legit assistance programs.

0 coins

Zainab Omar

β€’

I understand you're in a tough financial situation, especially with a new baby and needing reliable transportation for medical appointments. However, I'd strongly encourage you to be very careful about the dependent claiming situation. From what you've described about your previous experience, it does sound like it may not have been entirely legitimate. The IRS dependent rules are strict - your sister would need to provide MORE than half of your total support for the entire year, and you'd need to meet the income requirements. Given that you mentioned having a baby recently, you might actually qualify for some additional tax credits yourself if you file your own return (like the Child Tax Credit), which could be more beneficial than being claimed as someone else's dependent. Before making any decisions, I'd really recommend getting professional advice. You could use one of the free tax preparation services available to low-income individuals, or even contact the IRS directly to understand your specific situation. The last thing you want is to face penalties or have to pay back benefits later when you're already struggling financially. Have you looked into local assistance programs for new parents or people awaiting disability approval? Many communities have emergency assistance funds specifically for situations like yours.

0 coins

Natalie Khan

β€’

Have you considered asking the company to reclassify you as an employee instead of a contractor? If you were working regular hours at their location using their equipment, you might actually legally be an employee not a contractor. Companies sometimes misclassify workers as contractors to avoid paying employment taxes and benefits. It's actually pretty common in retail. If you were treated like a regular employee in practice, you might have been misclassified. Just something to consider if you're still working there or plan to in the future!

0 coins

Daryl Bright

β€’

This is really good advice. I got misclassified at a job last year. The IRS has a form you can file - SS-8 I think? - to request a determination of worker status. If they rule in your favor, the company has to pay both halves of those FICA taxes instead of you paying self-employment tax.

0 coins

Amina Diallo

β€’

Just wanted to chime in as someone who went through this exact situation a couple years ago! I worked what felt like a regular retail job but got hit with a 1099-NEC at tax time. One thing I wish I'd known earlier - even though you have to file Schedule C and pay self-employment tax, you might qualify for the Qualified Business Income (QBI) deduction under Section 199A. This can give you up to a 20% deduction on your self-employment income, which helps offset some of that extra tax burden. Since your income was only $2,100, you should definitely qualify (the income limits are much higher). Most tax software will calculate this automatically once you enter your Schedule C info, but it's worth double-checking that it's being applied. Also, definitely track ANY expenses related to this work - even small things like work shirts, phone usage, or gas for work trips add up. I missed out on probably $200-300 in deductions my first year because I didn't think they mattered. Every little bit helps when you're dealing with that 15.3% self-employment tax on top of regular income tax!

0 coins

AstroAce

β€’

This is super helpful advice! I had no idea about the QBI deduction - that could really help offset some of the self-employment tax hit. My tax software didn't mention anything about it when I was putting in my info, so I'll definitely need to double-check that it's being calculated. You're absolutely right about tracking expenses too. I was so focused on the big picture that I didn't think about smaller things like the work polo shirt I had to buy or the extra phone usage when my manager would text about schedule changes. Even if it's only saving me $50-100, that's still money in my pocket! Thanks for the realistic perspective on what to expect with the tax burden. It's reassuring to hear from someone who actually went through this situation successfully.

0 coins

Prev1...19281929193019311932...5643Next