


Ask the community...
Has anyone noticed that tax software seems to get confused with inherited IRAs? I've used three different programs over the years and they ALL struggle with this scenario. I wish they would update their interfaces to make these questions clearer for situations like this!
I went through this exact same situation two years ago when my grandmother passed away and left me part of her IRA. The tax software confusion is real - I think the issue is that these programs are designed primarily for regular IRA distributions, not inherited ones. One thing that helped me was understanding that the "basis" question is really asking whether the original owner ever made contributions with money that was already taxed (after-tax contributions). Most traditional IRAs are funded entirely with pre-tax dollars, so there's usually no basis to worry about. The key is to look at your 1099-R form carefully. If Box 2a (taxable amount) equals Box 1 (gross distribution), then there's no basis and the entire amount is taxable. If Box 2a is less than Box 1, that might indicate some after-tax contributions were made. Since you confirmed with the financial institution that there were no after-tax contributions, you should be fine selecting "inherited IRA = Yes" and "basis = No" and then manually correcting any weird refund calculations the software produces. The important thing is that you report it as an inherited distribution so it's properly coded on your return.
This is really helpful! I'm new to dealing with inherited IRAs and had no idea about the Box 1 vs Box 2a comparison on the 1099-R. That's a much clearer way to understand whether there's basis to worry about than trying to decipher the tax software questions. I'm curious - when you say "manually correcting any weird refund calculations," how exactly do you do that in the software? Do you just override the amounts it calculates, or is there a specific way to handle it? I'm worried about making a mistake that could trigger an audit.
One often overlooked issue with PTPs is how suspended losses affect your situation when selling. If you've received K-1s with losses that were suspended due to passive activity or at-risk rules, those suspended losses become deductible when you completely dispose of your interest. But for your scenario #2 (sell and rebuy), you technically haven't fully disposed of your interest for tax purposes if you rebuy within the same year. This means those suspended losses remain suspended despite the sale transaction. For the UBTI reporting on line 20V, death transfers can be especially confusing. Technically, the UBTI character passes through to the heir, but the step-up in basis can reduce future UBTI by giving you a higher basis to offset against UBTI income.
I thought suspended losses were released when you sell regardless of whether you rebuy later. Like each transaction stands on its own? My accountant told me this was one advantage of partnership interests over S-Corps.
You're partially right, but it depends on the specific type of suspended losses. For passive activity losses, you generally do get to deduct them when you completely dispose of your entire interest in the activity. However, if you sell and then rebuy the same partnership within the same tax year, the IRS might view this as not being a complete disposition, especially if it appears to be part of a planned series of transactions. At-risk limitations work differently - those suspended losses are released when you dispose of your interest, but they're calculated based on your at-risk amount at the time of disposition. The timing of a rebuy within the same year could affect this calculation. Your accountant is right that partnership interests generally have more favorable suspended loss rules compared to S-Corp stock, but the sell/rebuy scenario creates some gray areas that aren't always clear-cut. The key is whether the IRS views your transactions as a genuine disposition or just a temporary restructuring of the same economic interest.
The relationship between capital accounts and UBTI/income allocation you mentioned is spot-on, and there's actually a specific reason for this. Partnerships are required to allocate items in accordance with partners' interests in the partnership, which is primarily determined by capital account balances under Section 704(b) regulations. When your capital account becomes more negative (through distributions exceeding your basis), your economic interest in future partnership income decreases proportionally. This is why you see lower per-unit income and UBTI when capital accounts are more negative - you're essentially getting a smaller slice of the same pie. For your death scenario question, there's an important distinction many people miss: while the step-up in basis applies to the fair market value of the PTP units, it doesn't directly reset your capital account with the partnership. The partnership maintains its own records of your capital account, which continues to reflect the cumulative income, losses, and distributions. However, for tax purposes, your new stepped-up basis can significantly reduce or eliminate the taxable gain when the inherited PTPs are eventually sold. One practical tip: if you're actively trading PTPs, keep detailed records of your holding periods and corresponding K-1 amounts. The partnerships' quarterly ownership snapshots mean your K-1 might not perfectly match your actual trading activity, and you'll need to be able to support any adjustments on your return.
This is really helpful context about the Section 704(b) regulations and how capital accounts drive the allocation mechanics. I'm curious though - when you mention that the step-up in basis doesn't reset the partnership's capital account records, does this create ongoing complications for heirs? For example, if someone inherits PTP units with a large negative capital account but gets stepped-up basis, would they still be subject to the same proportionally lower income/UBTI allocations going forward? Or does the partnership eventually adjust their capital account tracking to reflect the new economic reality after the step-up? I'm trying to understand if there's a disconnect between what the partnership shows on future K-1s versus the heir's actual tax basis for calculating gains/losses on eventual sale.
Have you considered looking into other assistance programs instead of potentially risky tax situations? There are programs specifically designed to help people in your situation while waiting for disability approval. Many states have emergency assistance for families with newborns. Also, there are charities that help with car repairs for people who need transportation for medical reasons. These might be better options than depending on tax strategies that could cause problems later.
This! I was in a similar situation and found that my county had a program specifically for car repairs for low-income residents. Saved me almost $800 on transmission work. Definitely worth looking into legit assistance programs.
I understand you're in a tough financial situation, especially with a new baby and needing reliable transportation for medical appointments. However, I'd strongly encourage you to be very careful about the dependent claiming situation. From what you've described about your previous experience, it does sound like it may not have been entirely legitimate. The IRS dependent rules are strict - your sister would need to provide MORE than half of your total support for the entire year, and you'd need to meet the income requirements. Given that you mentioned having a baby recently, you might actually qualify for some additional tax credits yourself if you file your own return (like the Child Tax Credit), which could be more beneficial than being claimed as someone else's dependent. Before making any decisions, I'd really recommend getting professional advice. You could use one of the free tax preparation services available to low-income individuals, or even contact the IRS directly to understand your specific situation. The last thing you want is to face penalties or have to pay back benefits later when you're already struggling financially. Have you looked into local assistance programs for new parents or people awaiting disability approval? Many communities have emergency assistance funds specifically for situations like yours.
Have you considered asking the company to reclassify you as an employee instead of a contractor? If you were working regular hours at their location using their equipment, you might actually legally be an employee not a contractor. Companies sometimes misclassify workers as contractors to avoid paying employment taxes and benefits. It's actually pretty common in retail. If you were treated like a regular employee in practice, you might have been misclassified. Just something to consider if you're still working there or plan to in the future!
This is really good advice. I got misclassified at a job last year. The IRS has a form you can file - SS-8 I think? - to request a determination of worker status. If they rule in your favor, the company has to pay both halves of those FICA taxes instead of you paying self-employment tax.
Just wanted to chime in as someone who went through this exact situation a couple years ago! I worked what felt like a regular retail job but got hit with a 1099-NEC at tax time. One thing I wish I'd known earlier - even though you have to file Schedule C and pay self-employment tax, you might qualify for the Qualified Business Income (QBI) deduction under Section 199A. This can give you up to a 20% deduction on your self-employment income, which helps offset some of that extra tax burden. Since your income was only $2,100, you should definitely qualify (the income limits are much higher). Most tax software will calculate this automatically once you enter your Schedule C info, but it's worth double-checking that it's being applied. Also, definitely track ANY expenses related to this work - even small things like work shirts, phone usage, or gas for work trips add up. I missed out on probably $200-300 in deductions my first year because I didn't think they mattered. Every little bit helps when you're dealing with that 15.3% self-employment tax on top of regular income tax!
This is super helpful advice! I had no idea about the QBI deduction - that could really help offset some of the self-employment tax hit. My tax software didn't mention anything about it when I was putting in my info, so I'll definitely need to double-check that it's being calculated. You're absolutely right about tracking expenses too. I was so focused on the big picture that I didn't think about smaller things like the work polo shirt I had to buy or the extra phone usage when my manager would text about schedule changes. Even if it's only saving me $50-100, that's still money in my pocket! Thanks for the realistic perspective on what to expect with the tax burden. It's reassuring to hear from someone who actually went through this situation successfully.
Sofia Price
Has anyone used one of those tax relief companies that advertise on the radio for an OIC? They claim they can settle for "pennies on the dollar" but I'm wondering if they're worth the fees they charge.
0 coins
Alice Coleman
β’STAY AWAY from those companies! I made that mistake and paid $3,500 upfront to a "tax relief" firm. They did absolutely nothing I couldn't have done myself and actually caused delays by submitting incomplete paperwork. Many of these places just take your money and do the bare minimum.
0 coins
Aiden RodrΓguez
I'm currently in the middle of my OIC process (submitted about 4 months ago) and wanted to share what I've learned so far since you're just getting started. The biggest thing that's helped me is staying incredibly organized with a dedicated filing system for every single document. I created separate folders for initial application materials, correspondence with the IRS, financial documentation, and backup copies of everything. This has been a lifesaver when they've requested additional info. One thing I wish I'd known upfront - the IRS can take 6-24 months to process your offer, and during that time you MUST stay current on all new tax obligations. If you fall behind on estimated payments or filing requirements while your OIC is pending, they'll automatically reject your offer. I almost learned this the hard way. Also, don't let the anxiety get to you too much. Yes, it's intimidating dealing with the IRS directly, but if you're thorough with your documentation and honest about your financial situation, the process is more straightforward than it seems. The IRS agents I've spoken with have actually been professional and helpful when I've had questions. Good luck with your application! Feel free to ask if you have specific questions about the forms - I'm still fresh on all the details.
0 coins