


Ask the community...
Has anyone used FreeTaxUSA for filing dependent returns? My son is working part-time and needs to file, but I don't want to pay the ridiculous fees that TurboTax charges for a simple return.
Another thing to keep in mind - if your daughter had any taxes withheld from her paychecks (which is likely since she earned $4,800), she'll probably get a refund when she files her own return! Many teens don't realize they're entitled to get back most or all of the federal taxes that were withheld since they typically fall into the 0% tax bracket. It's actually a nice little bonus for filing - she gets her money back that the government has been holding all year. Just make sure she has her W-2 form from the coffee shop before you start preparing her return.
Has anyone used H&R Block instead of TurboTax for rental property home offices? I've had similar problems and wondering if switching software would help.
I switched from TurboTax to H&R Block last year specifically because of rental property issues. In my experience, H&R Block has a better interface for Schedule E and handling home office expenses for rental management. It lets you directly enter the expenses under "other expenses" without trying to force you into a self-employment situation. The guidance was clearer too.
I had this exact same issue with TurboTax last year! The key thing to understand is that rental property management expenses go on Schedule E as "other expenses," not through the traditional home office deduction process. Here's what worked for me: Calculate the percentage of your home used exclusively for rental management (office square footage Γ· total home square footage). Then take that percentage and apply it to eligible home expenses like utilities, insurance, mortgage interest, property taxes, repairs, and depreciation. In TurboTax, go to your rental property section, scroll down to "Other Expenses" and manually enter each allocated expense with clear descriptions like "Home office utilities - 15% of total" or "Home office insurance - 15% of total." Don't use the regular home office deduction wizard at all - it's designed for Schedule C self-employment income, not rental properties. This approach keeps everything properly allocated on Schedule E without double-reporting income. Make sure to keep detailed records showing the space is used exclusively for rental management activities, including photos and a log of business activities conducted there.
This is super helpful! I'm new to self-managing rentals and had no idea about the Schedule E approach. Quick question - when you say "exclusively for rental management," does that mean I can't use my home office for anything else at all? I also do some personal financial planning and occasional work-from-home tasks in the same space. Would that disqualify the entire deduction, or can I allocate based on time spent on rental activities vs other uses?
I worked at a collectible shop for years. Unless you've got some really valuable cards or rare comics, most people lose money on this stuff when you factor in inflation. Don't stress too much if most of what you sold was medium-value collectibles. The IRS is looking for major unreported income, not the $50 you made on your old X-Men comics.
This advice seems risky. Are you suggesting just not reporting anything and hoping the IRS doesn't notice? Wouldn't it be better to at least report the sales and document that most were at a loss?
The IRS generally expects you to report capital gains on collectibles, but the good news is that if you truly sold most items for less than you paid (which is common with older collectibles when you factor in inflation), you may not owe much tax at all. For items where you don't have records, the IRS allows you to make a "reasonable estimate" of your cost basis. Look up what similar items sold for when you originally bought them - there are price guides and historical data available for most collectibles from the 90s. Your garage sale items are likely personal-use property sold at a loss, which generally doesn't need to be reported as taxable income. The key distinction is whether you're selling personal items vs. operating a business. Given that eBay may issue you a 1099-K (especially for $3,800 in sales), I'd recommend being proactive about reporting. Document your reasonable basis estimates and be prepared to show you sold most items at a loss. It's much better to report accurately upfront than to have the IRS question unreported 1099-K income later. Consider consulting a tax professional if you're unsure - the peace of mind is often worth the cost, especially since collectibles gains are taxed at higher rates (up to 28%) if you did have significant profits.
This is really helpful advice! I'm in a similar situation where I sold some old Pokemon cards and have no idea what I originally paid for them as a kid. The "reasonable estimate" approach makes sense, but I'm wondering - where exactly do I find reliable historical price data for collectibles from the 90s? Are there specific resources the IRS would consider acceptable for documenting these estimates? I want to make sure I'm doing this right if I do get questioned later.
Just wanted to add my perspective as someone who recently went through this exact process! Got my TAS advocate assigned in late February for UK tax credit issues and my case was resolved last Thursday - total timeline was about 6.5 weeks. **My experience breakdown:** - Week 1: Advocate contacted me within 2 days, very professional initial call - Week 2: Submitted comprehensive documentation package (learned from reading forums like this to be thorough upfront!) - Weeks 3-4: The infamous "silence period" - I was tempted to call daily but resisted after reading similar experiences here - Week 5: Advocate reached out with update that International Function was reviewing treaty calculations - Week 6-7: Quick final review and boom - resolved! **What really helped:** Reading all the detailed timelines in threads like this one! It helped me understand that the waiting periods are normal parts of the process, not signs that my case was forgotten. Also, having all my UK tax documents organized and ready to go from day one definitely streamlined things. **Reality check:** For international cases like yours with tax credit complications, 6-8 weeks seems to be the realistic expectation based on what I've seen here and experienced myself. The 30-45 day estimates are definitely optimistic for expat situations. You're in good hands now with an assigned advocate - it's so much better than being stuck in the general processing queue! The waiting is tough but you're making real progress now.
@Ellie Perry This is such a helpful timeline - thank you for sharing! I literally just got assigned my advocate two days ago for similar UK tax credit issues, so seeing your recent 6.5 week timeline gives me a much more realistic expectation than the official estimates I ve'been finding online. I love that you mentioned learning from forum threads like this to be thorough with documentation upfront - that s'exactly what I m'trying to do now! Quick question: when you say you submitted a comprehensive "documentation package, did" that include things like translated versions of UK documents, or were the original English versions sufficient since they re'already in English? I want to make sure I m'not missing anything obvious. Also, your point about resisting the urge to call daily during the silence period really resonates - I can already feel myself wanting to check in constantly, but it s'reassuring to hear that patience actually paid off in your case. The 6-8 week realistic timeline for international cases seems to be the consistent message from everyone who s'actually been through this recently, which is so much more valuable than the generic official estimates. Thanks for taking the time to share your experience - it really helps newcomers like me feel less anxious about the process ahead!
Based on all these detailed timelines everyone's shared, I wanted to add some perspective as someone who's currently in the middle of this process! I got my TAS advocate assigned about 3 weeks ago for German tax credit complications and FEIE issues, and I'm right in what everyone calls the "black hole" or "silence period" right now. **What I've learned from this thread:** - The 6-8 week timeline for international cases seems to be the realistic expectation (not the optimistic 30-45 days) - Weeks 3-5 of radio silence are completely normal and don't mean your case is forgotten - International Function coordination for treaty verification is what typically causes the longer delays - Having all documentation organized upfront really does help speed things along **My current status:** Had my initial intake call in week 1, submitted everything they requested in week 2, and now I'm in week 3 of complete silence. Reading all these experiences has been incredibly reassuring - before finding this thread I was convinced something had gone wrong! **Question for those who've completed the process:** Did any of you find it helpful to send a brief check-in email around week 4, or is it better to just wait for them to contact you? I don't want to be annoying, but I also want to stay engaged in the process. Thanks to everyone who's shared their detailed timelines - this thread is incredibly valuable for setting realistic expectations! It's so much better than the generic official estimates that don't account for the complexity of international tax issues.
@Lindsey Fry I m'literally in the exact same situation right now! Got my advocate assigned about 2.5 weeks ago for French tax credit issues and I m'also in that dreaded silence period everyone keeps mentioning. Reading through all these detailed timelines has been such a lifesaver for my anxiety levels - before finding this thread I was convinced my case had somehow fallen through the cracks. Your question about the week 4 check-in is exactly what I ve'been wondering too! From what I ve'gathered reading everyone s'experiences, it seems like most people who did brief check-ins around that time got polite responses saying still "under review but" no real updates. Maybe it s'worth a short email just to confirm they have everything they need from you, rather than asking for a status update? The consistency in everyone s'6-8 week timelines for international cases is so reassuring. I was initially hoping for the 30-day best case scenario, but now I m'planning for the realistic timeline and honestly feel much better having proper expectations. Thanks for sharing where you re'at in the process - it helps knowing I m'not the only one sitting in the week 3 silence wondering if everything s'okay!
Olivia Garcia
This has been such a helpful discussion! I'm new to this community and facing the exact same situation with some designer pieces I want to donate. What I'm taking away from all these responses is that the key is thorough documentation and being realistic about condition. It sounds like using eBay completed sales, Poshmark, and similar platforms to establish fair market value is absolutely legitimate - you just need to save screenshots of actual sold listings (not just asking prices) and be honest about any wear or condition issues. The $30 thrift store valuation for a $2000 designer suit that's selling for $350 on the secondary market does seem ridiculously low. Fair market value should reflect what the item would actually sell for, not what a thrift store prices it at for quick turnover. I'm planning to follow the systematic approach several people mentioned: photograph items showing condition, research 3-5 comparable sales, create a simple spreadsheet with documentation, and be conservative when there's any question about condition. For anyone else new to this like me - it sounds like the documentation is key, especially if you're claiming higher values than standard donation guides suggest. Better to spend time upfront creating good records than worry about it later during tax season! Thanks everyone for sharing your experiences - this community is incredibly helpful for navigating these tax questions!
0 coins
Leo Simmons
β’Welcome to the community! You've really captured the essence of what everyone's been sharing here. As another newcomer who just went through this process, I can confirm that the systematic approach works well. One thing I'd add for anyone starting out - don't feel like you have to tackle everything at once. I started with just my 3-4 most valuable pieces to get comfortable with the research process, then worked through the rest. It made it much less overwhelming. Also, I found it helpful to set up a simple folder system on my computer from the start - one folder for photos, one for screenshots of comparable sales, and one for donation receipts. Staying organized as you go saves so much time later. The community advice about being conservative with condition assessment has been spot on in my experience. When in doubt, I've been using the lower end of the comparable price range, which still gives me much better deductions than standard thrift store values while keeping everything defensible. Thanks for summarizing everything so clearly - it's a great roadmap for anyone facing this same situation!
0 coins
Nia Johnson
As someone who's been navigating this exact issue for the past few tax seasons, I can definitely confirm that you're on the right track with using eBay completed sales for valuation. The IRS Publication 561 specifically states that fair market value is "the price that property would sell for on the open market between a willing buyer and willing seller." The key distinction here is that thrift stores aren't really operating in the same market as your designer items. They price for quick turnover to generate donations revenue, not to reflect actual market value of quality pieces. For your designer suits, if you can find similar items selling for $350 on eBay, that's absolutely legitimate comparable sales data. Just make sure you're looking at "sold" listings rather than active listings, and try to match condition as closely as possible. A few practical tips from my experience: - Take detailed photos before donating showing brand labels, overall condition, and any wear - Save PDF screenshots of 3-4 completed sales with dates visible - Create a simple spreadsheet linking each item to its comparable sales - Be honest about condition - if there's visible wear, use the conservative end of your price range I've used this approach for several years now and my tax preparer has always been comfortable with the documentation. The difference between realistic market values and generic thrift store pricing can be substantial, especially for quality designer pieces. You shouldn't have to artificially undervalue legitimate charitable contributions just because some online tools use overly conservative estimates.
0 coins
AaliyahAli
β’This is exactly the kind of detailed, experience-based advice I was hoping to find! Your reference to IRS Publication 561 is really helpful - I hadn't thought to look up the actual IRS definition of fair market value, but that "willing buyer and willing seller" language makes it clear that thrift store pricing isn't the right benchmark for designer items. Your point about thrift stores pricing for quick turnover rather than actual market value is spot on. It explains why there's such a huge disconnect between what these items actually sell for and what donation value guides suggest. I really appreciate the practical tips, especially about saving PDF screenshots with dates visible. That level of documentation seems like it would give anyone confidence if questions ever came up. The spreadsheet linking items to comparable sales is a great organizational approach too. One follow-up question - when you're matching condition, how specific do you get? For example, if I have a designer blazer with very minor pilling that's barely noticeable, do I need to find sold items with similar pilling, or is it sufficient to look for items described as "good used condition" more generally? Thanks for sharing your multi-year experience with this approach - it's really reassuring to hear from someone who's successfully used this method consistently!
0 coins
Emily Jackson
β’For condition matching, I generally don't need to get overly specific about minor flaws like slight pilling. I look for items in the same general condition category - "good used condition," "excellent condition," etc. For your blazer with minor pilling, I'd search for items described as "good used condition" or "pre-owned with normal wear" and then be conservative in my valuation by using the lower end of that price range. The key is being honest in your own condition assessment and then matching that to similar condition levels in your comparable sales. I've found that trying to find items with identical specific flaws is often impossible and unnecessary. The IRS is looking for reasonable comparable sales, not perfect matches. As long as you're in the same general condition ballpark and being conservative where there's any question, you should be fine. What's more important is making sure the items are truly comparable in terms of brand, style, and general condition level. A Armani suit in "good condition" is much more relevant than trying to find the exact same minor flaw pattern.
0 coins