Can't reach IRS? Claimyr connects you to a live IRS agent in minutes.
Claimyr is a pay-as-you-go service. We do not charge a recurring subscription.
Using Claimyr will:
- Connect you to a human agent at the IRS
- Skip the long phone menu
- Call the correct department
- Redial until on hold
- Forward a call to your phone with reduced hold time
- Give you free callbacks if the IRS drops your call
If I could give 10 stars I would
If I could give 10 stars I would If I could give 10 stars I would Such an amazing service so needed during the times when EDD almost never picks up Claimyr gets me on the phone with EDD every time without fail faster. A much needed service without Claimyr I would have never received the payment I needed to support me during my postpartum recovery. Thank you so much Claimyr!
Really made a difference
Really made a difference, save me time and energy from going to a local office for making the call.
Worth not wasting your time calling for hours.
Was a bit nervous or untrusting at first, but my calls went thru. First time the wait was a bit long but their customer chat line on their page was helpful and put me at ease that I would receive my call. Today my call dropped because of EDD and Claimyr heard my concern on the same chat and another call was made within the hour.
An incredibly helpful service
An incredibly helpful service! Got me connected to a CA EDD agent without major hassle (outside of EDD's agents dropping calls ā which Claimyr has free protection for). If you need to file a new claim and can't do it online, pay the $ to Claimyr to get the process started. Absolutely worth it!
Consistent,frustration free, quality Service.
Used this service a couple times now. Before I'd call 200 times in less than a weak frustrated as can be. But using claimyr with a couple hours of waiting i was on the line with an representative or on hold. Dropped a couple times but each reconnected not long after and was mission accomplished, thanks to Claimyr.
IT WORKS!! Not a scam!
I tried for weeks to get thru to EDD PFL program with no luck. I gave this a try thinking it may be a scam. OMG! It worked and They got thru within an hour and my claim is going to finally get paid!! I upgraded to the $60 call. Best $60 spent!
Ask the community...
- DO post questions about your issues.
- DO answer questions and support each other.
- DO post tips & tricks to help folks.
- DO NOT post call problems here - there is a support tab at the top for that :)
Join the conversation
Join the conversation
I went through this exact same situation last year with about $25 in stock profits. After reading through all the comments here, I decided to call the IRS directly (yes, it took forever to get through). The agent told me something that might help clarify things for everyone: The key isn't the profit amount - it's whether your broker reported the cost basis to the IRS on your 1099-B. Look at your 1099-B form and check if there's basis information included. If it shows "basis reported to IRS" or has the cost basis filled in, then the IRS already has all the information they need and you likely don't need Form 8453. However, if your 1099-B shows the sale proceeds but NOT the cost basis (common with older accounts or certain types of trades), then yes, you need to send Form 8453 with documentation regardless of the tiny profit amount. For my $25 situation, it turned out my broker HAD reported the basis, so I didn't need to send anything extra. Check your 1099-B first before assuming you need to mail anything!
Jean Claude
ā¢This is super helpful! I just checked my 1099-B and you're absolutely right - some of my trades show "basis reported to IRS" and others don't. I never realized that was the key distinction. It looks like I only need to send Form 8453 documentation for about 3 out of my 15 trades. This saves me from printing out a massive stack of papers for trades that are already fully reported. Thanks for taking the time to actually call and get the official answer!
This is really helpful information from everyone! I'm dealing with a similar situation but with crypto trades instead of stocks. Made about $45 in profits from some Bitcoin trades last year and my tax software is also telling me I need Form 8453. From what I'm reading here, it sounds like the key is whether the exchanges reported my cost basis to the IRS. Most crypto exchanges don't provide 1099-B forms like stock brokers do - they usually just give you a 1099-K or their own transaction summary. Does anyone know if the same "basis reported to IRS" rule applies to cryptocurrency transactions, or do crypto trades automatically require the Form 8453 documentation regardless of the amount? I'm trying to figure out if I can avoid mailing in 20+ pages of crypto transaction records for such a small gain.
Great question about crypto! Unfortunately, cryptocurrency transactions are treated quite differently from stock trades when it comes to IRS reporting. Most crypto exchanges don't report cost basis information to the IRS like traditional brokers do for stocks, so you typically need to provide your own documentation regardless of the profit amount. Since crypto exchanges generally only report gross proceeds (if anything) and not your cost basis, the IRS doesn't have the complete picture of your transactions. This means you'll likely need to include Form 8453 with your transaction records showing the purchase dates, amounts, and basis for your Bitcoin trades. The $45 profit amount doesn't change the requirement - it's about having complete documentation for transactions where the IRS doesn't already have the basis information. I'd recommend double-checking if your exchange provided any forms that specifically mention "basis reported to IRS" but in most cases with crypto, you'll need to provide the supporting documentation yourself.
@CosmicCrusader is absolutely right about crypto being different from stocks. I learned this the hard way when I got audited a couple years ago. Even though my crypto gains were only around $80, the IRS still wanted to see all my transaction records because exchanges basically report nothing useful to them. The frustrating part is that even when you have detailed records, crypto accounting gets messy fast if you did any trading between different coins. Each crypto-to-crypto trade is technically a taxable event, so you need to track the fair market value of each coin at the time of every trade. For $45 in gains, you're probably looking at way more paperwork than it's worth, but unfortunately that's just how crypto taxation works right now. I'd definitely recommend keeping those transaction records organized and sending in the Form 8453 - crypto is one area where the IRS seems to be cracking down more lately.
Join the conversation
Chloe Green
I work 2 W2 jobs that combined put me over the social security cap. Just wanna confirm what I've learned after dealing with this for 3 years now: 1. Each employer pays their 6.2% SS tax on what they pay you, up to the wage base limit for each job 2. You pay 6.2% at each job, but can get refunded for amounts over the limit when you file taxes 3. Employers NEVER get refunded for their portion, even if you work multiple jobs 4. The government essentially collects more total SS tax from people with multiple jobs 5. This is totally legal and by design Honestly it feels unfair but whatever. Just remember to claim back YOUR overpaid portion on your tax return! The first year I didn't realize I could do this and lost out on like $4k.
Lucas Adams
ā¢You've got it exactly right. I'm a bookkeeper for several small businesses, and I can confirm the employer portion is never refunded, even in multiple-job situations. It's one of those quirks in the tax code that most people never encounter.
This is such a frustrating aspect of the tax system! I'm dealing with a similar situation - two W2 jobs that will put me over the Social Security wage base this year. What really gets me is that when I was negotiating salary at my second job, they kept emphasizing their "burden" of paying employer-side payroll taxes as justification for a lower offer. But now I'm learning that if I exceed the cap across both jobs, they're essentially paying Social Security tax that wouldn't be owed if I just worked one higher-paying position instead. Meanwhile, I at least get to reclaim my overpaid portion when I file. Has anyone tried arguing this point during salary negotiations? Like, "Hey, you're going to pay less in total payroll taxes on me than you think because of how the system works with multiple employers." Probably a long shot, but it seems like employers don't always understand this nuance either. Also, does anyone know if this same principle applies to unemployment insurance taxes that employers pay? Do they get capped per employer too, or is there some coordination there?
Great question about unemployment insurance! Yes, the same principle applies - each employer pays their state unemployment insurance (SUTA) and federal unemployment tax (FUTA) based on their own wage base limits, typically much lower than Social Security (often around $7,000-$15,000 depending on the state). So if you have multiple jobs, each employer pays unemployment taxes up to their respective limits without any coordination between employers. Regarding salary negotiations, I've never tried that angle but it's an interesting point. Most HR departments probably don't think about the multi-employer Social Security implications when setting compensation. However, they might counter that they still have to budget for the full employer portion since they can't predict or control your other employment situations. Plus, their payroll costs include more than just Social Security - there's also Medicare (no cap), unemployment insurance, workers' comp, and other benefits. But you're absolutely right that the system creates some perverse incentives where having multiple employers can result in higher total payroll tax collections than a single employer paying the same total amount.
You raise a really interesting negotiation angle that I hadn't considered before! I think the challenge is that most employers budget their payroll taxes as a percentage of wages paid, and they're not going to adjust their offer based on hypothetical scenarios about your other employment. From their perspective, they still have to pay the full employer portion on whatever they pay you. That said, I've found that understanding these tax nuances can be helpful in other ways during negotiations. For instance, if an employer is resistant to a higher salary because of "total compensation costs," you might have more luck negotiating things like flexible work arrangements, professional development budgets, or other benefits that don't trigger additional payroll taxes. The unemployment insurance question is spot-on too - it's another area where multiple employers each pay their full share without coordination. It really does seem like the tax system wasn't designed with the modern gig economy and multiple-job reality in mind. The whole structure assumes most people work for a single employer, which is increasingly not the case. Have you considered whether restructuring one of your positions as contract work might make more sense, given these tax inefficiencies? Obviously there are tradeoffs with benefits and job security, but it might be worth running the numbers.
Join the conversation
Quick question for anyone who knows - if I have capital loss carryover and also did a Roth conversion this year, can I use the capital losses to offset the income from the Roth conversion? Or does that count as ordinary income subject to the $3000 limit?
Income from a Roth conversion is considered ordinary income, not capital gains. So you would be limited to offsetting only $3,000 of that conversion income with your capital losses. Capital losses first offset capital gains (without limit), then up to $3,000 can offset ordinary income (like your Roth conversion), and anything beyond that carries forward to future years.
Thanks for clearing that up! That makes sense - too bad though, was hoping to use more of my losses against the conversion. Guess I'll be carrying these losses forward for a few more years.
This is such a great question and the answers here are spot on! I went through something very similar last year. Had about $8,000 in carryover losses from some bad stock picks in 2021, then finally had a good year with $5,000 in capital gains. Just to add to what others have said - make sure you keep good records of your carryover losses year to year. I almost lost track of mine and had to dig through old tax returns to reconstruct the carryover worksheet. The IRS doesn't send you a reminder of what you're carrying forward, so it's on you to track it. Also, if you're using tax software, it should automatically calculate this for you once you enter your prior year carryover and current year gains/losses. But it's still good to understand how it works like you're doing. You'll use $7,000 of your carryover against your gains, then $3,000 against ordinary income, leaving you with $0 carryover going into next year. Pretty efficient way to finally clear out those old losses!
This is really helpful advice about keeping good records! I'm new to dealing with capital loss carryovers and didn't realize the IRS doesn't track this for you. Quick question - when you say "reconstruct the carryover worksheet," where exactly do you find that information on old tax returns? Is it a specific line on Schedule D I should be looking for? I want to make sure I'm carrying forward the right amount this year.
Join the conversation
Has anyone tried the IRS's Free File program? I heard they have direct options now for filing without using third-party software if your income is under a certain amount. Wondering if it's user-friendly or if it's better to just pay for one of the options mentioned.
I used the IRS Free File option last year with an AGI under $73k. It basically directs you to free versions of the major tax software options that participate in the program. I was directed to TaxSlayer and it was completely free for federal and state. Interface was decent, not as nice as TurboTax but definitely usable. Worth checking if you qualify!
I made the switch from TurboTax to FreeTaxUSA two years ago and it's been great! The savings are definitely real - I went from paying around $100 with TurboTax to about $25 total with FreeTaxUSA (federal + state). For your situation with W2, mortgage interest, and stock sales, FreeTaxUSA handles everything smoothly. The stock transaction entry is actually pretty intuitive - you can import from most major brokers or enter manually. The mortgage interest deduction process is straightforward too. One tip: if you're worried about making the transition, FreeTaxUSA offers a side-by-side comparison tool where you can prepare your return in both systems to make sure you get the same result. I did that my first year for peace of mind. The interface isn't as flashy as TurboTax but honestly, once you get used to it, it's just as functional for a fraction of the cost.
Thanks for mentioning the side-by-side comparison tool! I had no idea FreeTaxUSA offered that. That would definitely give me peace of mind for my first year switching over. Did you find any differences between the two when you ran the comparison, or did they come out with the same refund amount? I'm always paranoid about missing something when switching tax software.
Kara Yoshida
Quick tip for everyone confused about Form 4562 - there's a worksheet in the instructions called the "Maximum Deduction Worksheet" that walks you through this calculation step by step. Saved me a ton of headaches. Also, remember that for 2024/2025, there's a $1,220,000 limit on section 179 property, and the deduction starts phasing out when you place more than $3,050,000 of section 179 property in service. Just FYI in case anyone has much larger purchases.
0 coins
Philip Cowan
ā¢Thank you for mentioning the worksheet! I swear I read through the instructions three times and completely missed that. Just found it and it clarifies everything.
0 coins
TommyKapitz
The order of operations is crucial here, and I think there's been some great clarification in this thread. Just to summarize for Rita's specific situation: Your business income for section 179 purposes is calculated as: $27,000 (gross income) - $10,500 (other business expenses, with meals at 50%) = approximately $16,500-17,000 depending on how much of that $10,500 was meals. Since your desired section 179 deduction of $18,500 exceeds this business income threshold, you can only deduct up to your business income amount this year. The excess carries forward to next year as a section 179 carryover (not a credit). One thing to double-check: make sure all your "other expenses" are legitimate business deductions. Sometimes reclassifying certain items or splitting purchases between section 179 and regular deductions can optimize your total tax benefit. The IRS is pretty strict about the business income limitation - it's designed to prevent section 179 from creating losses that offset other income.
0 coins
Ellie Kim
ā¢This is really helpful! I'm new to business taxes and have been lurking here trying to understand section 179. One quick question - when you mention that the excess "carries forward to next year as a section 179 carryover," does that mean it automatically gets applied next year, or do I need to remember to claim it? And is there a time limit on how long I can carry it forward?
0 coins