IRS

Can't reach IRS? Claimyr connects you to a live IRS agent in minutes.

Claimyr is a pay-as-you-go service. We do not charge a recurring subscription.



Fox KTVUABC 7CBSSan Francisco Chronicle

Using Claimyr will:

  • Connect you to a human agent at the IRS
  • Skip the long phone menu
  • Call the correct department
  • Redial until on hold
  • Forward a call to your phone with reduced hold time
  • Give you free callbacks if the IRS drops your call

If I could give 10 stars I would

If I could give 10 stars I would If I could give 10 stars I would Such an amazing service so needed during the times when EDD almost never picks up Claimyr gets me on the phone with EDD every time without fail faster. A much needed service without Claimyr I would have never received the payment I needed to support me during my postpartum recovery. Thank you so much Claimyr!


Really made a difference

Really made a difference, save me time and energy from going to a local office for making the call.


Worth not wasting your time calling for hours.

Was a bit nervous or untrusting at first, but my calls went thru. First time the wait was a bit long but their customer chat line on their page was helpful and put me at ease that I would receive my call. Today my call dropped because of EDD and Claimyr heard my concern on the same chat and another call was made within the hour.


An incredibly helpful service

An incredibly helpful service! Got me connected to a CA EDD agent without major hassle (outside of EDD's agents dropping calls – which Claimyr has free protection for). If you need to file a new claim and can't do it online, pay the $ to Claimyr to get the process started. Absolutely worth it!


Consistent,frustration free, quality Service.

Used this service a couple times now. Before I'd call 200 times in less than a weak frustrated as can be. But using claimyr with a couple hours of waiting i was on the line with an representative or on hold. Dropped a couple times but each reconnected not long after and was mission accomplished, thanks to Claimyr.


IT WORKS!! Not a scam!

I tried for weeks to get thru to EDD PFL program with no luck. I gave this a try thinking it may be a scam. OMG! It worked and They got thru within an hour and my claim is going to finally get paid!! I upgraded to the $60 call. Best $60 spent!

Read all of our Trustpilot reviews


Ask the community...

  • DO post questions about your issues.
  • DO answer questions and support each other.
  • DO post tips & tricks to help folks.
  • DO NOT post call problems here - there is a support tab at the top for that :)

Yara Khoury

•

Has anyone just asked their tax preparer about this? When my wife and I file jointly, our accountant actually includes a breakdown of how much each of us contributed to the total tax liability and what portion of the refund "belongs" to each of us.

0 coins

This is what we do too! Our CPA provides a detailed split showing what our separate taxes would have been, what the joint benefit was, and how the refund should be allocated. It costs a bit more but totally worth avoiding the arguments!

0 coins

Paolo Ricci

•

This is such a relatable situation! My partner and I went through the same thing our first year filing jointly. We ended up using the withholding proportion method that Fatima mentioned - it felt the most fair since it directly reflects what each person "overpaid" during the year. One thing that helped us was also considering our different tax situations beyond just income. For example, I had more pre-tax deductions through my employer (401k, health insurance), which reduced my taxable income but also meant my withholding rate looked lower. We factored that into our discussion. For this year, I'd suggest going with the withholding-based split since it's straightforward and fair. But definitely consider setting up a system for next year - whether it's a joint tax account like Connor suggested or just agreeing on a method upfront so you're not debating it every April!

0 coins

Nia Williams

•

That's a great point about factoring in pre-tax deductions! I hadn't considered how things like 401k contributions and health insurance premiums affect the withholding calculations. In our case, my husband maxes out his 401k while I can only contribute a smaller amount, so his effective tax rate is actually different than what the raw withholding percentages show. I think you're right that the withholding-based method is the most straightforward for this year. We can always refine our approach as we get more experience with joint filing. The joint tax account idea is definitely something we'll consider implementing before next tax season - it would eliminate all this calculation drama!

0 coins

Nia Harris

•

Don't sleep on free filing options through the IRS Free File program if your income is under $73,000. I used OLT (Online Taxes) through this program last year and it was completely free for both federal and state, with a surprisingly good interface.

0 coins

Is that actually legit? I always figured the free options would be bare-bones and missing features or have hidden fees at the end.

0 coins

Khalid Howes

•

I've been using TaxSlayer for the past three years and can't recommend it enough! Started using it when I was in a similar situation with multiple income sources (W-2 from my main job, 1099s from consulting work, and some investment income). What I love about TaxSlayer is that it doesn't constantly try to upsell you like TurboTax does - you pick your plan upfront and that's it. The interface is clean and intuitive, and it walks you through everything step by step without feeling overwhelming. For your situation with 2 W-2s and a 1099, their Simply Free version might even work, but their Classic plan (around $25) handles everything smoothly. The customer support is also surprisingly good - I had a question about reporting some freelance expenses last year and got a helpful response within a few hours via chat. Much better experience than the big names for way less money.

0 coins

Ravi Gupta

•

has anyone actually received a 1095-a BEFORE filing their taxes? i swear they always come late and then the irs gets mad when you file without it. such a broken system lol.

0 coins

Right?? Mine showed up March 15th last year when I'd already filed in February. Got my return rejected and had to amend. Healthcare.gov claims they send them by January 31st but I've NEVER gotten one that early.

0 coins

I've been through this exact scenario! The key thing to understand is that the IRS computer systems often have "sticky" flags from previous years. Since you had marketplace coverage in 2023, their system is still expecting 1095-A documentation even though you correctly switched to employer coverage. Here's what worked for me: First, call the IRS practitioner priority line if you can get through (or use one of those callback services others mentioned). Explain that you switched from marketplace to employer coverage and only have a 1095-C for 2024. They can often remove the flag immediately. Also, when you file your amended return, include a statement explaining the insurance change. Write something like "Taxpayer had employer-provided health insurance for all of 2024 as evidenced by Form 1095-C. No marketplace coverage in 2024." Attach it to your 1040-X. The $2,800 refund will come through once this gets sorted - just takes patience with their system!

0 coins

Amina Diallo

•

This is really helpful advice! I'm actually dealing with a similar situation right now. Quick question - when you say "practitioner priority line," is that different from the regular taxpayer assistance line? I've been trying the main IRS number but keep getting the "high call volume" message. Also, how long did it take for your refund to process once they removed the flag? I'm worried this is going to delay everything by months.

0 coins

I'm surprised nobody has mentioned Form 8308 yet. When there's a sale or exchange of a partnership interest, the partnership has a filing requirement to report the transaction to the IRS using Form 8308 (Report of a Sale or Exchange of Certain Partnership Interests). This is required if there are Section 751 assets involved. Make sure the partnership's tax preparer is aware of this transaction so they can handle this reporting requirement correctly. I've seen partnerships miss this form, which can create problems later.

0 coins

Lucas Bey

•

Good call on Form 8308! I completely forgot about that one. Does that get filed with the partnership return or separately?

0 coins

Sean Murphy

•

Form 8308 gets filed with the partnership's annual return (Form 1065). The partnership has to file it by the due date of their return for the tax year in which the transfer occurred. It's not a separate filing - it's an attachment to the 1065. The form requires information about the transferor, transferee, and details about any Section 751 property involved in the transaction. Since your client is selling 40% to an existing partner, the partnership will definitely need to handle this if there are any unrealized receivables or substantially appreciated inventory. @Charlotte Jones - thanks for bringing this up, it s'such an easy one to overlook but can cause headaches if missed!

0 coins

Sunny Wang

•

This is a really comprehensive discussion! I'm dealing with a similar situation right now and wanted to add one more consideration that might be relevant. If your client has been receiving guaranteed payments from the LLC (like for management services), make sure to clarify whether any portion of the sale proceeds might be attributable to those future guaranteed payments. Sometimes in these partner buyouts, part of the purchase price is actually compensation for giving up future guaranteed payments rather than just the equity interest itself. Any portion that's really compensation for guaranteed payments would be ordinary income, not capital gain. It's another layer to analyze beyond just the Section 751 hot assets. The partnership agreement and sale documentation should help clarify this, but it's worth discussing with your client to make sure the economic substance matches how the transaction is structured on paper. Also, if the selling partner has any outstanding loans to/from the partnership, those need to be factored into the overall transaction analysis too.

0 coins

Harold Oh

•

This is such a helpful point about guaranteed payments that I hadn't fully considered! As someone new to partnership taxation, I'm wondering - how do you typically identify when part of a buyout might actually be disguised compensation? Are there specific red flags in the partnership agreement or sale documents that would indicate this, or is it more about looking at the economic reality of what the departing partner was contributing to the business? I imagine this could significantly impact the tax treatment if a substantial portion of what looks like a capital transaction is actually ordinary income for services. @Sunny Wang - do you have any practical tips for spotting this issue early in the analysis?

0 coins

This has been such a helpful discussion! I'm new to this community and facing the exact same situation with some designer pieces I want to donate. What I'm taking away from all these responses is that the key is thorough documentation and being realistic about condition. It sounds like using eBay completed sales, Poshmark, and similar platforms to establish fair market value is absolutely legitimate - you just need to save screenshots of actual sold listings (not just asking prices) and be honest about any wear or condition issues. The $30 thrift store valuation for a $2000 designer suit that's selling for $350 on the secondary market does seem ridiculously low. Fair market value should reflect what the item would actually sell for, not what a thrift store prices it at for quick turnover. I'm planning to follow the systematic approach several people mentioned: photograph items showing condition, research 3-5 comparable sales, create a simple spreadsheet with documentation, and be conservative when there's any question about condition. For anyone else new to this like me - it sounds like the documentation is key, especially if you're claiming higher values than standard donation guides suggest. Better to spend time upfront creating good records than worry about it later during tax season! Thanks everyone for sharing your experiences - this community is incredibly helpful for navigating these tax questions!

0 coins

Leo Simmons

•

Welcome to the community! You've really captured the essence of what everyone's been sharing here. As another newcomer who just went through this process, I can confirm that the systematic approach works well. One thing I'd add for anyone starting out - don't feel like you have to tackle everything at once. I started with just my 3-4 most valuable pieces to get comfortable with the research process, then worked through the rest. It made it much less overwhelming. Also, I found it helpful to set up a simple folder system on my computer from the start - one folder for photos, one for screenshots of comparable sales, and one for donation receipts. Staying organized as you go saves so much time later. The community advice about being conservative with condition assessment has been spot on in my experience. When in doubt, I've been using the lower end of the comparable price range, which still gives me much better deductions than standard thrift store values while keeping everything defensible. Thanks for summarizing everything so clearly - it's a great roadmap for anyone facing this same situation!

0 coins

Nia Johnson

•

As someone who's been navigating this exact issue for the past few tax seasons, I can definitely confirm that you're on the right track with using eBay completed sales for valuation. The IRS Publication 561 specifically states that fair market value is "the price that property would sell for on the open market between a willing buyer and willing seller." The key distinction here is that thrift stores aren't really operating in the same market as your designer items. They price for quick turnover to generate donations revenue, not to reflect actual market value of quality pieces. For your designer suits, if you can find similar items selling for $350 on eBay, that's absolutely legitimate comparable sales data. Just make sure you're looking at "sold" listings rather than active listings, and try to match condition as closely as possible. A few practical tips from my experience: - Take detailed photos before donating showing brand labels, overall condition, and any wear - Save PDF screenshots of 3-4 completed sales with dates visible - Create a simple spreadsheet linking each item to its comparable sales - Be honest about condition - if there's visible wear, use the conservative end of your price range I've used this approach for several years now and my tax preparer has always been comfortable with the documentation. The difference between realistic market values and generic thrift store pricing can be substantial, especially for quality designer pieces. You shouldn't have to artificially undervalue legitimate charitable contributions just because some online tools use overly conservative estimates.

0 coins

AaliyahAli

•

This is exactly the kind of detailed, experience-based advice I was hoping to find! Your reference to IRS Publication 561 is really helpful - I hadn't thought to look up the actual IRS definition of fair market value, but that "willing buyer and willing seller" language makes it clear that thrift store pricing isn't the right benchmark for designer items. Your point about thrift stores pricing for quick turnover rather than actual market value is spot on. It explains why there's such a huge disconnect between what these items actually sell for and what donation value guides suggest. I really appreciate the practical tips, especially about saving PDF screenshots with dates visible. That level of documentation seems like it would give anyone confidence if questions ever came up. The spreadsheet linking items to comparable sales is a great organizational approach too. One follow-up question - when you're matching condition, how specific do you get? For example, if I have a designer blazer with very minor pilling that's barely noticeable, do I need to find sold items with similar pilling, or is it sufficient to look for items described as "good used condition" more generally? Thanks for sharing your multi-year experience with this approach - it's really reassuring to hear from someone who's successfully used this method consistently!

0 coins

For condition matching, I generally don't need to get overly specific about minor flaws like slight pilling. I look for items in the same general condition category - "good used condition," "excellent condition," etc. For your blazer with minor pilling, I'd search for items described as "good used condition" or "pre-owned with normal wear" and then be conservative in my valuation by using the lower end of that price range. The key is being honest in your own condition assessment and then matching that to similar condition levels in your comparable sales. I've found that trying to find items with identical specific flaws is often impossible and unnecessary. The IRS is looking for reasonable comparable sales, not perfect matches. As long as you're in the same general condition ballpark and being conservative where there's any question, you should be fine. What's more important is making sure the items are truly comparable in terms of brand, style, and general condition level. A Armani suit in "good condition" is much more relevant than trying to find the exact same minor flaw pattern.

0 coins

Prev1...19171918191919201921...5644Next