IRS

Can't reach IRS? Claimyr connects you to a live IRS agent in minutes.

Claimyr is a pay-as-you-go service. We do not charge a recurring subscription.



Fox KTVUABC 7CBSSan Francisco Chronicle

Using Claimyr will:

  • Connect you to a human agent at the IRS
  • Skip the long phone menu
  • Call the correct department
  • Redial until on hold
  • Forward a call to your phone with reduced hold time
  • Give you free callbacks if the IRS drops your call

If I could give 10 stars I would

If I could give 10 stars I would If I could give 10 stars I would Such an amazing service so needed during the times when EDD almost never picks up Claimyr gets me on the phone with EDD every time without fail faster. A much needed service without Claimyr I would have never received the payment I needed to support me during my postpartum recovery. Thank you so much Claimyr!


Really made a difference

Really made a difference, save me time and energy from going to a local office for making the call.


Worth not wasting your time calling for hours.

Was a bit nervous or untrusting at first, but my calls went thru. First time the wait was a bit long but their customer chat line on their page was helpful and put me at ease that I would receive my call. Today my call dropped because of EDD and Claimyr heard my concern on the same chat and another call was made within the hour.


An incredibly helpful service

An incredibly helpful service! Got me connected to a CA EDD agent without major hassle (outside of EDD's agents dropping calls – which Claimyr has free protection for). If you need to file a new claim and can't do it online, pay the $ to Claimyr to get the process started. Absolutely worth it!


Consistent,frustration free, quality Service.

Used this service a couple times now. Before I'd call 200 times in less than a weak frustrated as can be. But using claimyr with a couple hours of waiting i was on the line with an representative or on hold. Dropped a couple times but each reconnected not long after and was mission accomplished, thanks to Claimyr.


IT WORKS!! Not a scam!

I tried for weeks to get thru to EDD PFL program with no luck. I gave this a try thinking it may be a scam. OMG! It worked and They got thru within an hour and my claim is going to finally get paid!! I upgraded to the $60 call. Best $60 spent!

Read all of our Trustpilot reviews


Ask the community...

  • DO post questions about your issues.
  • DO answer questions and support each other.
  • DO post tips & tricks to help folks.
  • DO NOT post call problems here - there is a support tab at the top for that :)

Layla Mendes

β€’

The 24% total tax rate you're seeing is absolutely normal for your income level! A lot of people get confused because they focus only on the federal income tax brackets (10%, 12%, 22%), but those percentages don't include all the other taxes that come out of your paycheck. Here's what's likely making up your 24%: - Federal income tax: probably around 10-12% effective rate for your income - Social Security tax: 6.2% (this is a flat rate on wages up to ~$168K) - Medicare tax: 1.45% (flat rate on all wages) - State income tax: varies by state, could be anywhere from 0-6%+ - Possibly local/city taxes depending on where you work So when you add federal income tax + Social Security (6.2%) + Medicare (1.45%) + state taxes, you easily get to that 24% range. To see exactly where your money is going, look at your ADP paystub - it should have separate line items for each type of tax. You can also log into your ADP employee portal online to see year-to-date totals for each tax category, which gives you an even clearer picture of your overall tax burden. The good news is your 6% 401k contribution is actually helping reduce your taxable income, so you're saving on taxes there!

0 coins

This is such a clear explanation! I'm in a similar situation as Aaron and was also confused about why my total tax rate seemed so much higher than the federal brackets I kept reading about. I never realized that Social Security and Medicare alone add up to 7.65% - that's a huge chunk right there! It's also good to know that the 401k contribution helps with taxes. I've been hesitant to increase mine because I thought it would just mean less take-home pay, but if it's reducing my taxable income too, that makes it even more worthwhile. Thanks for breaking this down so clearly!

0 coins

Dmitry Volkov

β€’

Your 24% tax withholding is totally normal! I had the same confusion when I first started working and couldn't understand why my take-home was so much less than I expected. The key thing to remember is that the tax brackets you see (10%, 12%, 22%) are ONLY for federal income tax. But your total tax burden includes a bunch of other stuff: - Federal income tax (those bracket rates) - Social Security: 6.2% - Medicare: 1.45% - State income tax (varies by state, usually 3-6%) - Sometimes local/city taxes too So even if your federal income tax is around 12%, you're automatically adding 7.65% just for Social Security and Medicare, plus whatever your state charges. That gets you to your 24% pretty quickly! The best part is that your 6% 401k contribution is actually reducing your taxable income, so you're saving money there. If you weren't contributing to retirement, your tax percentage would be even higher. Check your ADP paystub - it should break down each tax type separately so you can see exactly where every dollar is going. Understanding this stuff really helps with budgeting!

0 coins

Marcus Marsh

β€’

This is exactly what I needed to understand! I'm completely new to full-time work and had no idea about all these different taxes beyond just the federal income tax. The way you broke down Social Security (6.2%) and Medicare (1.45%) really helps - I can see now why that alone adds almost 8% on top of everything else. I feel so much better knowing that 24% is actually normal and I'm not doing anything wrong. I was starting to panic thinking my employer was making mistakes or that I messed up my W-4 somehow. Going to look at my ADP paystub more carefully now to see the breakdown. Thanks for the reassurance!

0 coins

This is exactly why I always recommend getting an independent appraisal for high-value business vehicle trades, especially when dealing with significant depreciation recapture. The IRS has access to valuation databases and will scrutinize trade-in values that seem inflated. In your case, getting exactly what you paid ($65,000) after 2-3 years of use on a construction truck does seem unusually high - most commercial vehicles depreciate faster than that due to wear and tear. You might want to document why the trade-in value equals your original purchase price (low mileage, excellent condition, market appreciation, etc.) in case the IRS questions it. Also consider that if the IRS later determines the actual FMV was lower than $65,000, it would actually reduce your depreciation recapture amount. For example, if they determine FMV was $55,000, your recapture would be $55,000 instead of $57,000, since recapture is limited to the lesser of depreciation taken or gain realized.

0 coins

Jayden Hill

β€’

That's a really good point about documenting the trade-in value! I hadn't thought about the IRS questioning why I got full purchase price back after 3 years of heavy construction use. The truck did have relatively low mileage (about 45k) and was in excellent condition, plus the used truck market has been crazy the past couple years. I kept detailed maintenance records and can show it was garage-kept when not in use. Should I get a formal appraisal now even though the trade is already done, or just gather documentation to support the dealer's valuation? Also interesting point about how a lower FMV would actually reduce my recapture - I hadn't considered that angle.

0 coins

Since the trade is already completed, I'd focus on gathering strong documentation rather than getting a formal appraisal at this point. Collect your maintenance records, photos showing the truck's condition, mileage documentation, and maybe some comparable sales data from that time period to justify the $65,000 value. The used truck market really was exceptional in 2024-2025, especially for commercial vehicles, so your trade-in value isn't as unusual as it might seem. Construction trucks that are well-maintained and garage-kept often hold value better than people expect. You're right that a lower FMV determination would reduce your recapture, but it would also reduce your basis in the new truck for depreciation purposes. The IRS typically accepts dealer trade-in values when they're reasonable and supported by market conditions, so as long as you have good documentation, you should be fine. One more tip - make sure your depreciation calculations account for any personal use percentage if applicable, even though you mentioned 100% business use. The IRS scrutinizes high depreciation claims on vehicles more closely than other business assets.

0 coins

Max Knight

β€’

This is really helpful advice about the documentation approach. I'm wondering though - if I do end up getting audited on this, would the IRS want to see the actual condition of the truck at the time of trade-in, or would photos and maintenance records be sufficient? I took some photos when I traded it in just for my own records, but I'm not sure if they're detailed enough to prove the condition justified the $65k value. Also, you mentioned comparable sales data - where's the best place to find that for commercial trucks? KBB and Edmunds seem to be more focused on consumer vehicles.

0 coins

Has anyone used the home office deduction in conjunction with mortgage interest when you have unequal ownership? I'm in a similar situation (30/70 split with my partner) but I also use about 15% of the house exclusively for my business. Not sure if I calculate the business portion before or after applying the ownership percentage.

0 coins

Oliver Cheng

β€’

You would first determine your portion of the mortgage interest based on ownership (30%), then calculate the business use percentage (15%) of your portion. So if the total deductible mortgage interest was $20,000, your personal portion would be $6,000 (30% of $20,000), and your business deduction would be $900 (15% of $6,000). The remaining $5,100 of your portion would go on Schedule A if you itemize. Don't double-dip by counting the same interest for both personal and business deductions!

0 coins

Just wanted to add a practical tip from my experience last year - make sure you keep documentation of how you calculated everything! I had a similar situation (40/60 split on a $1.6M mortgage) and got a letter from the IRS asking for clarification on my mortgage interest deduction. Having a clear worksheet showing: 1. Total mortgage amount ($2M) 2. Mortgage interest limit calculation ($750K Γ· $2M = 37.5%) 3. Total deductible interest ($53K Γ— 37.5% = $19,875) 4. Your ownership percentage and resulting deduction ($19,875 Γ— 25% = $4,969) Made the response super straightforward. The IRS accepted my documentation without any issues. Also, make sure both you and your wife are consistent in how you report this - any discrepancy between your returns could trigger additional questions. One more thing - if you're using tax software, double-check the calculations manually. Some programs don't handle the unequal ownership split correctly and you might end up claiming more or less than you're entitled to.

0 coins

This is such valuable advice about keeping detailed documentation! I'm new to homeownership and had no idea the IRS might ask for clarification on these calculations. Quick question - when you say "make sure both you and your wife are consistent," do you mean we should both use the exact same numbers on our separate returns? We file separately, so I want to make sure we don't accidentally claim overlapping amounts or have our calculations not add up to the total. Also, did the IRS letter come quickly after filing, or was it months later? I'm wondering if I should prepare all this documentation upfront or just keep good records in case they ask.

0 coins

I want to echo what others have said - you absolutely have a strong case for deducting this as a medical expense. Having documentation from four different doctors is exceptional and really strengthens your position with the IRS. One additional point that might help: make sure to ask your doctors to be as specific as possible in their letters about how the mold is directly impacting each child's condition. Phrases like "medically necessary to prevent further deterioration" or "required to manage chronic asthma condition" carry more weight than general recommendations. Also, if you haven't already, consider getting a professional mold assessment report that documents the specific types and levels of mold in your home. This creates an official record of the problem that correlates with your children's symptoms. The fact that your 4-year-old has dropped to the 2nd percentile is extremely concerning from a medical standpoint, which actually works in your favor for the deduction. The IRS recognizes that some medical expenses are urgent and necessary regardless of cost. Keep every single piece of documentation - medical records, test results, photos of the mold, air quality reports, remediation quotes and final invoices. The more comprehensive your documentation, the less likely you'll face any challenges if questioned. Your children's health comes first, and it sounds like you have everything you need to properly claim this deduction. I hope the remediation helps them recover quickly.

0 coins

This is excellent advice about getting specific language in the doctor letters! I just wanted to add that when we went through our remediation process, our pediatrician actually helped us by writing a follow-up letter after the work was completed that documented the improvement in our son's condition. Having that "before and after" medical documentation really sealed the deal for our deduction. Also, @Astrid BergstrΓΆm, if you're working with a pediatric pulmonologist for your 8-year-old's asthma, they're usually very familiar with environmental triggers and can provide really detailed documentation about how mold specifically impacts respiratory conditions. They often have standard language they use for these situations since environmental remediation is pretty common for asthma patients. The weight loss in your 4-year-old dropping to 2nd percentile is definitely something that will strengthen your case - failure to thrive due to environmental factors is a serious medical condition that the IRS would clearly recognize as requiring immediate intervention.

0 coins

NebulaNova

β€’

I'm so sorry your family is dealing with this situation - having children with serious health issues is stressful enough without the financial burden of necessary medical treatments. Based on everything shared here, you have an exceptionally strong case for deducting the full remediation cost as a medical expense. Having four different doctors document that mold remediation is medically necessary is really compelling evidence. The IRS specifically allows deductions for home modifications that are primarily for medical care, and your situation clearly fits this criteria. A few practical suggestions from someone who works in tax preparation: 1. When you get the final remediation contract, ask the company to itemize the work with medical language where appropriate (e.g., "installation of medical-grade air filtration," "removal of health-hazardous materials," etc.) 2. Keep a detailed health log for both children starting now - document symptoms, medications, doctor visits, emergency room visits, etc. This creates a clear timeline showing the medical necessity and urgency 3. After remediation, continue the health log to document improvements. This demonstrates that the expense was truly effective medical treatment 4. Consider getting a written statement from your children's doctors specifically addressing the tax deduction - many physicians are willing to write letters that explicitly state the remediation is "medically necessary treatment" for tax purposes Your children's health is the priority here, and you shouldn't have to choose between their wellbeing and your financial stability. With your documentation, you should be able to deduct this expense and get some relief to make this possible for your family.

0 coins

Noland Curtis

β€’

This is really comprehensive advice! I especially appreciate the suggestion about asking the remediation company to use medical language in their contract. That's such a smart way to make sure the documentation clearly supports the medical necessity aspect. The health log idea is brilliant too - I'm going to start that immediately. My 8-year-old has been having asthma attacks almost daily, and my 4-year-old barely eats anymore, so documenting this pattern will definitely show the urgency of the situation. One question - when you mention getting doctors to write letters specifically for tax purposes, is there usually a fee for that? We're already stretched financially with all the medical costs, but if it helps secure the deduction it would obviously be worth it. Thank you for taking the time to provide such detailed guidance. It's reassuring to know that people think we have a strong case. The stress of watching your children suffer while worrying about the financial impact is overwhelming, so this community support means everything.

0 coins

Most doctors will write letters for tax purposes without charging a fee, especially when it's for a situation like yours where the medical necessity is so clear-cut. Since you already have four doctors who have documented this in writing, they'll likely be very willing to provide more specific language for tax purposes - they understand that families dealing with serious health issues need all the financial relief they can get. If any of them do charge, it's usually a minimal administrative fee (maybe $25-50), and that fee itself would also be tax deductible as a medical expense! Also, since you mentioned your 8-year-old is having daily asthma attacks, definitely document every single episode in your health log - date, time, severity, what medications were needed, whether you had to miss work/school, etc. The more detailed the better. This level of daily health impacts really emphasizes the urgent medical necessity of the remediation. Your situation is exactly what the medical expense deduction was designed for - necessary medical treatment that creates a significant financial burden. With your level of documentation, you should feel confident claiming this deduction.

0 coins

Chloe Taylor

β€’

I went through this exact situation last year and ended up speaking with a tax professional at H&R Block about it. Here's what they told me: You absolutely need to address the 1099-K on your return, but you don't need to itemize every single item if you have reasonable documentation showing most were personal items sold at a loss. What worked for me was creating a simple summary with broad categories: - Electronics: ~15 items, original cost ~$800, sold for ~$300 - Clothing/accessories: ~20 items, original cost ~$600, sold for ~$200 - Collectibles: ~10 items, original cost ~$400, sold for ~$150 Then I noted the few items where I actually made a profit and reported those gains separately. The key is showing the IRS that you're not trying to hide income - you're demonstrating that most of your sales were personal property sold at a loss (which isn't taxable income). H&R Block's software has a specific workflow for this under the "Other Income" section where you can reconcile your 1099-K. Don't stress too much about perfect documentation for every $15 t-shirt - reasonable estimates based on what you remember paying are usually sufficient for personal items.

0 coins

Alexis Renard

β€’

This is really helpful! I'm in almost the exact same situation and was panicking about having to track down receipts from years ago for random stuff I sold. Your category approach makes so much sense - I can definitely estimate what I originally paid for broad groups of items rather than trying to remember every single purchase. Quick question though - when you say you reported the gains separately for items you profited on, did you have to treat those as regular income or capital gains? And do you remember roughly how long the H&R Block process took once you had your summary ready?

0 coins

GalaxyGazer

β€’

@Alexis Renard For personal items that you profited on, those are typically treated as ordinary income, not capital gains since (they weren t'held as investments .)The H&R Block software walked me through this - it was actually pretty straightforward once I had my summary prepared. The whole process took me maybe 30-45 minutes once I had my categories and estimates ready. The longest part was honestly just creating that initial summary spreadsheet, but even that only took about an hour since I didn t'need to be super precise with every item. One tip: if you sold any items for significantly more than you paid like (a collectible that appreciated ,)you might want to double-check whether those should be treated differently. But for most regular personal items sold at small profits, it s'just regular income on your 1040. The peace of mind was totally worth the effort - much better than ignoring the 1099-K and potentially getting a letter from the IRS later!

0 coins

Zoe Dimitriou

β€’

Just went through this exact situation with my 2023 return! I had over 60 items sold on eBay and was completely overwhelmed at first. Here's what I learned: You definitely need to report the 1099-K amount on your return, but the good news is you don't need to itemize every single $20 item. I created a simple spreadsheet grouping similar items together - like "vintage electronics (8 items): original cost ~$400, sold for ~$180" and "clothing/accessories (25 items): original cost ~$650, sold for ~$320." The key insight my tax preparer shared was that the IRS mainly wants to see you're not hiding income. Since most of your items were sold at a loss (like mine), you're actually showing there's NO taxable income from those sales - just documenting it properly. For the few items where you made a profit, you'll report those gains as ordinary income. Keep it simple but reasonable - the IRS isn't expecting you to have receipts for every garage sale find from 5 years ago. I used TaxAct and they had a specific 1099-K reconciliation section that made this pretty painless once I had my summary ready. H&R Block should have something similar. The whole process took maybe an hour once I stopped overthinking it!

0 coins

This is exactly the kind of practical advice I was hoping to find! I've been stressing about this for weeks thinking I'd need to recreate every single transaction. Your grouping approach makes so much sense - I can definitely estimate what I originally paid for categories like "old video games," "unused kitchen gadgets," etc. Quick follow-up question: when you say you used the 1099-K reconciliation section in TaxAct, did it automatically calculate that there was no taxable income once you showed the items were sold at a loss? I'm wondering if H&R Block's system works similarly where it basically zeroes out the 1099-K amount when you demonstrate higher original costs. Also really appreciate you mentioning it only took about an hour once you stopped overthinking - I've been procrastinating on this for way too long because it seemed impossible!

0 coins

Prev1...19041905190619071908...5643Next