IRS

Can't reach IRS? Claimyr connects you to a live IRS agent in minutes.

Claimyr is a pay-as-you-go service. We do not charge a recurring subscription.



Fox KTVUABC 7CBSSan Francisco Chronicle

Using Claimyr will:

  • Connect you to a human agent at the IRS
  • Skip the long phone menu
  • Call the correct department
  • Redial until on hold
  • Forward a call to your phone with reduced hold time
  • Give you free callbacks if the IRS drops your call

If I could give 10 stars I would

If I could give 10 stars I would If I could give 10 stars I would Such an amazing service so needed during the times when EDD almost never picks up Claimyr gets me on the phone with EDD every time without fail faster. A much needed service without Claimyr I would have never received the payment I needed to support me during my postpartum recovery. Thank you so much Claimyr!


Really made a difference

Really made a difference, save me time and energy from going to a local office for making the call.


Worth not wasting your time calling for hours.

Was a bit nervous or untrusting at first, but my calls went thru. First time the wait was a bit long but their customer chat line on their page was helpful and put me at ease that I would receive my call. Today my call dropped because of EDD and Claimyr heard my concern on the same chat and another call was made within the hour.


An incredibly helpful service

An incredibly helpful service! Got me connected to a CA EDD agent without major hassle (outside of EDD's agents dropping calls – which Claimyr has free protection for). If you need to file a new claim and can't do it online, pay the $ to Claimyr to get the process started. Absolutely worth it!


Consistent,frustration free, quality Service.

Used this service a couple times now. Before I'd call 200 times in less than a weak frustrated as can be. But using claimyr with a couple hours of waiting i was on the line with an representative or on hold. Dropped a couple times but each reconnected not long after and was mission accomplished, thanks to Claimyr.


IT WORKS!! Not a scam!

I tried for weeks to get thru to EDD PFL program with no luck. I gave this a try thinking it may be a scam. OMG! It worked and They got thru within an hour and my claim is going to finally get paid!! I upgraded to the $60 call. Best $60 spent!

Read all of our Trustpilot reviews


Ask the community...

  • DO post questions about your issues.
  • DO answer questions and support each other.
  • DO post tips & tricks to help folks.
  • DO NOT post call problems here - there is a support tab at the top for that :)

Rachel Clark

•

Just wanted to add another perspective on this since I work in tax prep and see these situations regularly. While the gift strategy and Roth conversion are both solid options, there's one more thing to consider: the timing of your house purchase. If you're planning to buy a house in the near future (within the next 1-2 years), you might want to think about spreading the capital gains realization across multiple tax years rather than doing it all at once. Even with your wife's 0% bracket, there are limits to how much can fit in that bracket each year. For 2025, the 0% capital gains bracket for married filing separately goes up to $47,025 in taxable income. So if your wife has earned income plus the capital gains, make sure the total doesn't push her into the 15% bracket. You could potentially do partial sales over 2025 and 2026 to maximize the 0% treatment. Also, don't forget about the net investment income tax (NIIT) - though at her income level it's probably not a concern, it's worth double-checking if you're doing large conversions or sales. The Roth conversion really is looking like your best bet given the simplicity and the fact that you're building long-term wealth. Sometimes the path of least resistance is also the smartest one!

0 coins

Ava Thompson

•

This is such a valuable point about timing and the income limits! I hadn't considered that even with the 0% bracket, there's still a cap on how much can fit there each year. The $47,025 limit for married filing separately is really important to keep in mind. Your suggestion about spreading the gains across multiple years is smart too. Since we're not in a huge rush for the house down payment, we could potentially do this strategy over both 2025 and 2026 if needed. That would also give us more flexibility if our income situation changes. The NIIT point is good to remember too, though you're right that it probably won't be an issue at her income level. I'm definitely feeling more confident about the Roth conversion approach after reading everyone's insights. It seems like the cleanest way to use her tax space without getting into complex ownership transfer issues. Thanks for sharing your professional perspective - it's really helpful to hear from someone who sees these situations regularly!

0 coins

Freya Thomsen

•

Another approach to consider is using your wife's lower tax bracket for strategic Roth IRA contributions instead of conversions. If she has earned income but has been maxing out retirement contributions elsewhere, you could potentially have her contribute to a Roth IRA directly (up to $7,000 for 2025, or $8,000 if she's 50+) using funds from your joint finances. This bypasses the complexity of transferring securities entirely while still taking advantage of her favorable tax situation. The money going into the Roth is after-tax at her lower rate, and all future growth is tax-free. If she doesn't have enough earned income to maximize IRA contributions, then the traditional IRA to Roth conversion strategy others mentioned becomes even more attractive. You could potentially do both - maximize her direct Roth contributions AND convert some traditional IRA funds, depending on how much room she has left in her lower tax brackets. This way you're building tax-free retirement wealth while avoiding any potential complications with securities transfers between spouses. Sometimes the retirement account strategies are overlooked when people focus on the capital gains planning, but they can be just as valuable for tax optimization.

0 coins

Mei Zhang

•

This is a really thoughtful approach that I hadn't fully considered! You're absolutely right that direct Roth IRA contributions could be part of the strategy too. Since my wife has been maxing out her 401k, she definitely has earned income to support IRA contributions. The combination approach you mentioned - doing both direct Roth contributions AND traditional IRA conversions - could really maximize the use of her available tax space. We could contribute $7,000 directly to a Roth IRA for 2025, and then convert additional amounts from her old traditional IRA to fill up the rest of her lower tax bracket. I like how this keeps everything in the retirement account world and avoids any potential issues with securities transfers between spouses. Plus, as you said, we're building tax-free growth for the long term rather than just optimizing for the house down payment. Thanks for pointing out that retirement strategies can be just as valuable as capital gains planning - sometimes it's easy to get tunnel vision on one approach when there are multiple ways to achieve the same tax optimization goals!

0 coins

Has anyone else noticed that TurboTax sometimes asks for forms you don't actually need? Last year it had me fill out some crypto tax form even though I had zero crypto transactions. After talking with a tax professional, I learned you can sometimes override these prompts.

0 coins

Yara Khoury

•

Yes! TurboTax is super annoying with that. I found that sometimes if you go back and review your answers to previous questions, you might find something you answered wrong that's triggering unnecessary forms. Double-check your answers about dependency status and support.

0 coins

That's a good tip! I'll look back through my answers again. I'm wondering if I misunderstood something about the scholarship questions, since that seems to be what might be triggering this Form 8615 requirement.

0 coins

Sophia Long

•

This is such a common issue with first-time filers! The key thing to understand is that Form 8615 (kiddie tax) is triggered by three main factors: age, student status, and the type/amount of income you have. Since you're 20 and a student (even part-time), TurboTax is being cautious and asking about the form. But you likely don't need it if: 1. Your scholarship money was used only for qualified expenses (tuition/books) - which sounds like your case 2. You provide more than half your own support through your job income The "support test" is crucial here. Add up ALL your expenses for the year (rent, food, tuition not covered by scholarships, books, clothes, etc.) and see if your café job income covers more than 50% of that total. If yes, you're exempt from kiddie tax rules. When TurboTax asks the support questions, be very careful with your answers. It sounds like you're working while in school and likely supporting yourself, so make sure you're answering those questions accurately. The software should then skip the Form 8615 requirement. Don't let this stress you out too much - it's just TurboTax being overly cautious based on your age and student status!

0 coins

Rajiv Kumar

•

Has anyone used H&R Block instead of TurboTax for this? I'm wondering if one handles these 409A adjustments better than the other.

0 coins

I've used both. H&R Block's interface for entering stock adjustments is actually clearer in my opinion. They have a specific section for employer equity compensation that walks you through the adjustment process step by step. TurboTax feels more like you're just entering numbers into boxes without much guidance.

0 coins

I just went through this exact same situation with my RSU sales from last year! The confusion around adjustment codes is so real. What helped me was understanding that the key is avoiding double taxation - since the income from your stock compensation was already reported on your W-2, you need to adjust your basis on the 1099-B to reflect that. For most RSU situations like yours, you'll likely use adjustment code "B" as others mentioned. But here's a tip that saved me a lot of time: before you finalize anything in TurboTax, print out or save a PDF of your tax return and review the Schedule D to make sure your gains/losses look reasonable. If you see huge gains that don't match what you expected, you probably need to double-check your adjustment amounts. Also, if you have any ESPP transactions mixed in with your RSUs, those might need different codes depending on whether they were qualifying or disqualifying dispositions. The supplemental documents that ApolloJackson mentioned are golden for this - definitely hunt those down if you haven't already!

0 coins

This is incredibly helpful advice! I'm new to dealing with stock compensation taxes and the Schedule D review tip is brilliant. I never would have thought to check that before submitting. Quick question though - when you mention ESPP transactions needing different codes, how do you tell if it's a qualifying vs disqualifying disposition? Is that something that would be clearly marked on the forms or do you have to calculate the timing yourself?

0 coins

I had this exact same situation last year and was pulling my hair out trying to understand those 1099-DIV instructions! The confusion comes from how the IRS worded that exception - it's really poorly written. Here's what I figured out after doing way too much research: When they say "may be able to report" on Form 1040, that option completely disappears the moment you have ANY other capital gains or losses. Even a single stock sale from another brokerage means you must use Schedule D for everything. Think of it this way - the IRS created a simple shortcut for people who ONLY receive capital gain distributions from mutual funds/REITs and have no other investment activity. But once you start buying and selling individual stocks, you're in the "complex" category and have to use the full Schedule D process. Your Box 2a amount will go on Line 13 of Schedule D as a long-term capital gain distribution, and all your stock sales will be reported on the appropriate lines based on their holding periods. There's no tax difference between the methods - it's just about following the correct reporting requirements for your situation.

0 coins

Summer Green

•

This is such a great explanation! I was getting caught up in the "may be able to report" language too and didn't realize it was an either/or situation. So basically, if I understand correctly, the IRS is saying "you can use the simple method OR the Schedule D method, but not both" - and having any stock sales automatically puts you in the Schedule D category. That makes so much more sense than trying to parse whether there's some advantage to one method over the other when you have mixed capital gains!

0 coins

Giovanni Greco

•

I went through this exact same headache with my 1099-DIV last year! That "may be able to report" language is so confusing because it makes it sound like you have a choice when you really don't. Here's the bottom line: since you have capital gains from stock sales through other brokerages, you MUST use Schedule D for everything. The shortcut to report Box 2a directly on Form 1040 is only available if those capital gain distributions are literally your ONLY capital gains for the entire year. The IRS created that simplified reporting option for people who just hold mutual funds or REITs and never buy/sell individual stocks. But the moment you have any other capital gains activity, you lose that option entirely. Your Box 2a amount goes on Line 13 of Schedule D, and there's no tax advantage either way - it's just about following the correct reporting format. The total tax you'll pay will be exactly the same regardless of which method you use. Don't overthink it - just put everything on Schedule D and you'll be good to go!

0 coins

Jamal Brown

•

I'm so sorry for your loss, Andrew. Going through estate administration while grieving is incredibly difficult, and you're smart to ask these questions upfront. Everyone here has given you excellent advice about the CTR process being routine and the importance of avoiding structuring. I just wanted to add that as an executor, you should also check if your state requires any additional reporting for cash assets found in the estate. Some states have their own inheritance or estate tax forms where you'll need to list all assets, including cash found in the home. Also, don't forget to get a receipt from the bank for the deposit and keep it with your estate records. The probate court will likely want to see documentation of all estate assets and how they were handled. Having that paper trail will make the final accounting much smoother when you close the estate. You're handling this exactly right by being transparent and asking the right questions. The hardest part of being an executor is often just knowing what questions to ask, and you're clearly on the right track.

0 coins

Luca Esposito

•

Thank you so much for the kind words and condolences, Jamal. This whole process has been overwhelming, but this thread has been incredibly helpful. I hadn't even thought about state-specific reporting requirements - I'll definitely look into that for my state. Your point about getting a receipt and keeping detailed records for the probate court is really practical advice. I've been trying to document everything but wasn't sure exactly what the court would need to see later. Having a clear paper trail from the bank deposit through to the final accounting makes total sense. It's amazing how much I've learned from everyone here about what seemed like a simple question about depositing cash. Really grateful for this community and all the thoughtful responses from people who've been through this before.

0 coins

Madison Tipne

•

Andrew, I'm sorry for your loss. As a tax professional, I want to reinforce what others have said - definitely deposit the full $12,500 at once and don't try to break it up. The CTR filing is truly routine administrative work for banks. One additional consideration for executors: make sure you're keeping detailed inventory records of all estate assets for the final tax returns. Cash found in the home needs to be reported on Form 706 (if the estate is large enough) or your state's estate tax return. The IRS values cash at face value as of the date of death, so that $12,500 will be listed at exactly that amount. Also, if your grandmother had been avoiding banks and keeping large amounts of cash, there might be unreported income issues to consider. You may want to review her final tax returns to ensure everything was properly reported. As executor, you could be responsible for filing amended returns if needed. The transparency you're showing by asking these questions and planning to deposit everything properly is exactly the right approach. Keep documenting everything and you'll be fine.

0 coins

StarSailor

•

Madison, this is really helpful advice about the tax implications. I hadn't considered that there might be unreported income issues if my grandmother was keeping large amounts of cash at home. She was pretty old-school about banks and definitely preferred cash for most things. Should I be looking at her past few years of tax returns to see if her reported income matches up with the cash she had? And if I find discrepancies, is that something I need to address proactively or only if the IRS asks about it? I want to make sure I'm handling everything properly as executor, but I'm also not sure how deep I need to dig into potential past issues. The Form 706 information is good to know too - I'll need to check if her estate is large enough to require filing that. Thanks for the guidance on documenting everything properly.

0 coins

Prev1...19061907190819091910...5643Next