IRS

Can't reach IRS? Claimyr connects you to a live IRS agent in minutes.

Claimyr is a pay-as-you-go service. We do not charge a recurring subscription.



Fox KTVUABC 7CBSSan Francisco Chronicle

Using Claimyr will:

  • Connect you to a human agent at the IRS
  • Skip the long phone menu
  • Call the correct department
  • Redial until on hold
  • Forward a call to your phone with reduced hold time
  • Give you free callbacks if the IRS drops your call

If I could give 10 stars I would

If I could give 10 stars I would If I could give 10 stars I would Such an amazing service so needed during the times when EDD almost never picks up Claimyr gets me on the phone with EDD every time without fail faster. A much needed service without Claimyr I would have never received the payment I needed to support me during my postpartum recovery. Thank you so much Claimyr!


Really made a difference

Really made a difference, save me time and energy from going to a local office for making the call.


Worth not wasting your time calling for hours.

Was a bit nervous or untrusting at first, but my calls went thru. First time the wait was a bit long but their customer chat line on their page was helpful and put me at ease that I would receive my call. Today my call dropped because of EDD and Claimyr heard my concern on the same chat and another call was made within the hour.


An incredibly helpful service

An incredibly helpful service! Got me connected to a CA EDD agent without major hassle (outside of EDD's agents dropping calls – which Claimyr has free protection for). If you need to file a new claim and can't do it online, pay the $ to Claimyr to get the process started. Absolutely worth it!


Consistent,frustration free, quality Service.

Used this service a couple times now. Before I'd call 200 times in less than a weak frustrated as can be. But using claimyr with a couple hours of waiting i was on the line with an representative or on hold. Dropped a couple times but each reconnected not long after and was mission accomplished, thanks to Claimyr.


IT WORKS!! Not a scam!

I tried for weeks to get thru to EDD PFL program with no luck. I gave this a try thinking it may be a scam. OMG! It worked and They got thru within an hour and my claim is going to finally get paid!! I upgraded to the $60 call. Best $60 spent!

Read all of our Trustpilot reviews


Ask the community...

  • DO post questions about your issues.
  • DO answer questions and support each other.
  • DO post tips & tricks to help folks.
  • DO NOT post call problems here - there is a support tab at the top for that :)

Simon White

β€’

This is exactly the kind of detailed tracking we need more of in this community! I've been using the Emerald Card for two years now and can confirm similar timing patterns. One thing I'd add for anyone new to the process - if you're checking the H&R Block app obsessively like I was my first year, the balance typically updates between 12:01 AM and 6:00 AM EST on your DDD. I learned not to panic if it's not there right at midnight. Also, for those asking about notifications - yes, the app does send push notifications when deposits post, but I recommend also setting up text alerts through their website as a backup. The text alerts have been more reliable in my experience. Thanks for sharing the transcript timeline too - that 846 code really is the golden ticket that tells you everything is on track!

0 coins

Amun-Ra Azra

β€’

This is such valuable information, thank you! As someone who just got their first Emerald Card this year, I've been checking the app constantly since getting my DDD. Your tip about the balance updating between 12:01 AM and 6:00 AM is really helpful - I was literally refreshing at midnight wondering why nothing was there yet! I'm definitely going to set up those text alerts as backup. Quick question: do the text alerts come from the same number each time, or should I make sure to save it in my contacts so I don't miss it? Also, when you mention the 846 code being the "golden ticket" - where exactly do you see that on your transcript? I downloaded mine but it's honestly pretty confusing to read through all the codes and dates.

0 coins

Paolo Ricci

β€’

This is incredibly helpful timing data! I'm a tax professional who's been advising clients on refund expectations, and your systematic tracking really validates what I've been telling people about the IRS maintaining their processing timelines despite volume increases. One thing I'd add for anyone reading this - while Emerald Card deposits are generally reliable, I always recommend clients have their routing/account numbers ready as backup. If there's ever an issue with the card (lost, damaged, or account frozen), you can call H&R Block and have them redirect the deposit to a traditional bank account, but this needs to be done BEFORE the IRS releases the funds. Also, for future reference, if you file early next year and get the same DDD timing pattern, the funds usually post to Emerald Cards between 3-6 AM Eastern on the DDD. Thanks for sharing real data instead of speculation - this community needs more posts like this!

0 coins

This whole thread has been incredibly enlightening! I'm a financial advisor and I see clients struggle with this MAGI/Roth IRA optimization question constantly. What I love about this discussion is how it shows the real-world complexity beyond just "contribute to your 401k to lower MAGI." A few additional points that might help others in similar situations: 1. **Timing of income recognition matters** - If you have any control over when bonuses or other variable income hits (like year-end vs early next year), that can be a powerful tool in your MAGI management strategy. 2. **Don't forget about Required Minimum Distributions (RMDs) in retirement planning** - While maximizing traditional 401k contributions helps with current Roth eligibility, remember that all those pre-tax dollars will be subject to RMDs starting at age 73, potentially pushing you into higher tax brackets later. 3. **Consider the "Roth conversion ladder" strategy** - If you end up with a large traditional 401k balance, you might want to plan for converting chunks of it to Roth during lower-income years (like early retirement or between jobs) to optimize your long-term tax situation. The key insight from this thread is that retirement planning isn't just about maximizing contributions - it's about creating a tax-efficient strategy across your entire career. Having both traditional and Roth accounts gives you flexibility to manage your tax bracket in retirement, which can be just as valuable as the current-year tax benefits. Thanks to everyone who shared their experiences and strategies!

0 coins

Rita Jacobs

β€’

@53dc090fcbaf Great perspective on the long-term planning aspect! As someone who's been wrestling with this exact optimization problem, the RMD consideration is something I definitely overlooked. Regarding @bd69a9972b96's question about balancing traditional vs Roth - I've been wondering about this too. My current thinking is to contribute just enough to traditional 401k to get under the Roth IRA limit, then split any additional retirement savings between Roth 401k contributions and the now-available Roth IRA. This way I'm getting some of both tax treatments without going overboard on the traditional side. For bonus timing, it's probably worth having a conversation with HR or finance about company policies. Some companies have flexibility around deferred compensation or might allow you to shift the timing by a few weeks if you ask early enough in the process. Won't hurt to ask! One thing I'm curious about - do you typically recommend clients prioritize maxing out the Roth IRA space first (since it's more flexible for early withdrawals) before adding more to employer 401k beyond the match? Or does the employer match make the 401k contributions more attractive regardless of the tax treatment?

0 coins

Logan Scott

β€’

@53dc090fcbaf @bd69a9972b96 @0c2b2f95f842 This conversation has been so helpful! As someone who just discovered this community while researching this exact question, I love seeing the mix of personal experiences and professional advice. I'm in a similar spot - making about $152k and trying to figure out the optimal strategy. Based on everything discussed here, it sounds like the key is finding that sweet spot where you contribute just enough to traditional 401k to qualify for Roth IRA, then potentially split additional savings between Roth 401k and the Roth IRA. One thing I'm still unclear on - if I'm doing this optimization, should I prioritize getting the full $7,000 into a Roth IRA before putting additional money into Roth 401k? I know the IRA has more flexibility for withdrawals, but the 401k has higher contribution limits. For someone in their early 30s, which would you prioritize after getting the employer match? Also, has anyone here actually used the taxr.ai tool that was mentioned earlier? I'm tempted to try it but want to hear more real experiences before uploading my financial info anywhere.

0 coins

Aidan Hudson

β€’

Great question about prioritizing Roth IRA vs Roth 401k contributions! As someone who went through this exact optimization a couple years ago, here's what I learned: I'd definitely prioritize maxing out the Roth IRA first ($7,000 for 2025) before putting additional money into Roth 401k, for a few key reasons: 1. **Investment flexibility** - IRAs typically offer way more investment options than employer 401k plans. You can choose any broker and invest in individual stocks, bonds, REITs, etc., while 401k plans usually limit you to a handful of mutual funds. 2. **Withdrawal flexibility** - With a Roth IRA, you can withdraw your contributions (not earnings) at any time without penalty. This makes it a great emergency fund backup in your 30s when you might have other major expenses (house down payment, wedding, etc.). 3. **Lower fees** - Most 401k plans have higher administrative fees than what you can get with a low-cost broker for your IRA. 4. **Estate planning benefits** - Roth IRAs have better inheritance rules and no RMDs during your lifetime. So my strategy was: get employer match β†’ contribute enough to traditional 401k to qualify for Roth IRA β†’ max out Roth IRA β†’ then consider additional Roth 401k contributions if I had money left over. Regarding taxr.ai - I actually did try it after seeing it mentioned here and found it genuinely helpful for modeling different contribution scenarios. The basic features let you see the impact without needing to pay anything upfront.

0 coins

Dananyl Lear

β€’

This is such a helpful breakdown! I'm just starting my career and making around $85k, so I'm not hitting the Roth IRA income limits yet, but I want to understand this strategy for when my income grows. The point about investment flexibility really resonates with me - my current 401k plan has pretty limited fund options and high expense ratios. Being able to choose low-cost index funds through someone like Vanguard or Fidelity for the IRA portion seems like it could make a meaningful difference over decades of compound growth. One follow-up question: when you say "get employer match β†’ contribute enough to traditional 401k to qualify for Roth IRA β†’ max out Roth IRA," are you suggesting that ALL the additional 401k contributions should be traditional/pre-tax? Or could some of that MAGI-reducing contribution be split between traditional and Roth 401k as long as the total amount gets you under the income limit? I'm thinking ahead to when I might be in this situation and wondering if there's value in having some Roth 401k contributions in the mix, or if the traditional contributions are always better for this specific strategy since you need to reduce your MAGI anyway.

0 coins

Quinn Herbert

β€’

I completely understand your concern about the timeline, especially with medical expenses waiting! From my experience and what I've observed in this community, the SBTPG to bank transfer process typically follows this pattern: **Normal Timeline:** - 24-48 hours for most major banks (Chase, Wells Fargo, BofA) - 48-72 hours for credit unions and smaller regional banks - Digital banks like Chime sometimes post earlier, traditional banks sometimes later **Key factors affecting timing:** - SBTPG processes ACH transfers daily with a 3pm ET cutoff - If your "funded" status appeared after 3pm, processing starts the next business day - Weekends and holidays don't count - Friday funding often means Tuesday deposit - First-time refunds to an account may have additional verification holds **When to be concerned:** - More than 3 business days without deposit - No pending transactions showing in your bank account - Any recent changes to your banking information Since you mentioned monitoring this for medical expenses, I'd recommend calling your bank after 72 hours to check for pending deposits or holds. They can often provide more specific timing once the transfer is in their system. The medical urgency is completely understandable - these delays are frustrating when you have real expenses waiting! Hope your funds arrive soon! Keep us updated on how it resolves.

0 coins

Andre Laurent

β€’

@Quinn Herbert Thank you for such a comprehensive breakdown! As someone new to this process, I really appreciate you laying out all the different factors that can affect timing. The 3pm ET cutoff detail is particularly helpful - I had no idea there was a daily processing deadline like that. I m'currently at about 36 hours since my SBTPG status changed to funded, so it sounds like I m'still well within the normal window. My bank is a mid-sized regional institution, so based on your timeline it could easily take the full 48-72 hours. The point about first-time refunds potentially having verification holds is interesting - this is actually my first year using this particular bank account for tax refunds, so that could be a factor. I ll'definitely keep the 72-hour rule in mind before getting too concerned. Really grateful for communities like this where experienced members share their knowledge! It makes navigating these financial processes so much less stressful when you understand what s'happening behind the scenes.

0 coins

Lola Perez

β€’

Your circulatory system analogy is spot-on! As someone who's been through this process multiple times, I can share that the SBTPG timeline varies significantly based on several factors. From my tracking over the past few years: - **Major banks** (Chase, Wells Fargo, BofA): Usually 24-48 hours - **Credit unions**: Often 48-72 hours due to batch processing - **Online banks** (Ally, Capital One 360): Sometimes faster, sometimes slower - **Regional banks**: Generally 48-72 hours The key thing to remember is that "funded" means SBTPG has initiated the ACH transfer, but your bank still needs to process and post it. Think of it like mail being sent vs. delivered. Given that you need these funds for medical expenses, here's what I'd do: 1. **Wait 72 business hours** before worrying 2. **Check for pending deposits** in your online banking 3. **Call your bank** after 72 hours to ask about ACH holds 4. **Verify account info** matches exactly what SBTPG has on file Most people see their deposits within 2 business days. Since you mentioned monitoring closely, consider setting up mobile deposit alerts so you're notified immediately when it hits. The waiting is always nerve-wracking when you have expenses pending, but the funds should appear soon!

0 coins

Ethan Clark

β€’

This is exactly the kind of high-level S-corp planning that requires professional guidance. At $2.7M, you're in territory where small mistakes can be very expensive. One key point that hasn't been fully emphasized: the tax treatment is the same whether you take distributions or leave money in the S-corp - you'll pay personal income tax on all $2.7M regardless. The only real tax savings comes from the salary vs. distribution split, where distributions avoid payroll taxes. For your situation, I'd suggest getting a formal reasonable compensation study done before making any decisions. The IRS scrutinizes high-income S-corp owners much more closely, and having proper documentation of your salary determination could save you significant audit costs down the road. Also consider timing - if this is a one-time windfall vs. ongoing income, that affects what salary level would be considered reasonable. A business owner making $2.7M consistently would likely need a higher salary than someone who had an exceptional year due to a large contract or sale. The 37% federal rate is just income tax - you'll need to add payroll taxes on the salary portion, but those are capped for Social Security. Most of your income would only face Medicare taxes (2.9% combined) plus the 0.9% additional Medicare tax on high earners.

0 coins

Zainab Omar

β€’

This is really helpful perspective, especially the point about one-time windfall vs ongoing income. I hadn't considered how that might affect what's considered "reasonable" for salary determination. The tax treatment being identical for distributions vs retained earnings is something I think a lot of S-corp owners misunderstand. It seems like the only real decision points are: 1) What's the optimal salary/distribution split to minimize payroll taxes while staying defensible, and 2) Whether to actually distribute the money or keep it in the business for operational reasons. Given the high stakes at this income level, the formal compensation study seems like a no-brainer. Do you know roughly what these studies typically cost? I'm trying to weigh that against the potential audit exposure and back-tax risks that others have mentioned. Also curious - when you mention timing considerations, are there any strategies around spreading income across tax years to potentially lower the overall tax burden, or does the pass-through nature of S-corps make that impossible?

0 coins

Great question about compensation studies and timing strategies! Formal reasonable compensation studies typically run anywhere from $2,500 to $8,000 depending on complexity and the firm doing the analysis. At your income level, this is definitely worthwhile insurance - I've seen audit settlements that cost 10-20x that amount. Regarding timing strategies, the pass-through nature does limit some options, but there are still planning opportunities. You can't defer the tax on S-corp income to future years since it all passes through in the year earned. However, you can time when you actually distribute the cash (separate from the tax obligation), and you might have some control over when certain income is recognized depending on your accounting method. For salary timing, you do have some flexibility - you could potentially adjust your salary up or down during the year based on how profits are tracking, as long as you end up with a reasonable annual amount. Some businesses pay higher salaries early in profitable years, then reduce them if profits don't materialize as expected. The key is having documentation for whatever approach you take. At $2.7M, you're absolutely in the zone where the IRS pays attention, so every decision should be defensible with clear business reasoning and market data.

0 coins

Jacinda Yu

β€’

This thread has been incredibly helpful - thank you all for sharing your experiences! As someone just starting to navigate S-corp planning with a growing business, the range of perspectives here really highlights how nuanced this issue is. What strikes me most is the consensus that at high income levels like $2.7M, the documentation and defensibility aspect becomes crucial. The stories about audit consequences are sobering, and it seems like the relatively small cost of a formal compensation study is really just smart risk management. I'm curious though - for those who have gone through this process, how often do you update your reasonable compensation analysis? Is this something you revisit annually, or only when there are significant changes in business income or structure? Also, @Miguel HernΓ‘ndez, your point about timing salary adjustments during the year is interesting. Do you know if there are any IRS guidelines about how frequently you can adjust S-corp owner salary, or is it pretty flexible as long as the annual total is reasonable?

0 coins

GalaxyGazer

β€’

I've been dealing with a similar situation with our farm S-Corp and wanted to share what I learned from my research and conversations with tax professionals. The consensus here is absolutely correct - Form 943 is the right choice for your farm S-Corp when you and your brother are performing agricultural work as shareholders. The IRS looks at the nature of the work being performed rather than the corporate structure. One additional consideration I haven't seen mentioned yet: if you're making the S-Corp election for the first time this year, make sure you've properly handled the reasonable compensation requirement for S-Corp shareholders. You'll need to pay yourselves reasonable wages for the agricultural work you perform, and those wages are what get reported on Form 943. Also, since you mentioned handling "everything from tractor maintenance to bookkeeping," be aware that if a significant portion of your time is spent on administrative/bookkeeping work rather than direct agricultural activities, you might need to consider whether all your wages qualify as agricultural wages. Most farm operations have some administrative component, but as long as the primary work is agricultural (which it sounds like it is for you), Form 943 should still be appropriate. The annual reporting is definitely more convenient than quarterly 941s, just make sure you stay current with your deposit obligations throughout the year!

0 coins

Jason Brewer

β€’

This is a really important point about reasonable compensation for S-Corp shareholders! I hadn't thought about how that requirement intersects with the agricultural employee classification. It's good to know that as long as we're paying ourselves reasonable wages for the actual farm work we do, those wages would still qualify for Form 943 treatment. Your point about the administrative vs. agricultural work balance is also really helpful. Since we do spend some time on bookkeeping and administrative tasks, it's reassuring to know that as long as the primary work is agricultural (which it definitely is - probably 80-90% of our time is direct farm work), we should still qualify for Form 943. I appreciate you mentioning the S-Corp election timing too. We did make the election this year, so making sure we handle the reasonable compensation requirement correctly from the start is crucial. Thanks for adding these important details that complement all the other great advice in this thread!

0 coins

CosmicCruiser

β€’

I'm in a very similar situation with our family farm S-Corp and this thread has been incredibly helpful! We converted to S-Corp status last year but I've been stressing about the employment tax forms ever since. Based on all the detailed responses here, it sounds like Form 943 is definitely the way to go since we're doing agricultural work as shareholders. The fact that it's annual instead of quarterly is a huge relief - I was dreading having to deal with Form 941 every three months on top of everything else we have to manage on the farm. One question I have after reading through all these responses: when you switch to Form 943, do you need to notify the IRS in advance that you'll be filing as an agricultural employer, or do you just start using the correct form? I want to make sure I don't miss any required notifications or setup steps. Also, has anyone had experience with state employment taxes for farm S-Corps? I'm assuming the state requirements might be different from the federal forms, but I haven't researched that aspect yet. Thanks to everyone who shared their experiences - this is exactly the kind of real-world guidance that's so hard to find elsewhere!

0 coins

Prev1...19051906190719081909...5643Next