


Ask the community...
Slighy off-topic but don't forget capital gains reporting for your crypto! Even if T1135 doesn't apply, you still need to track every single transaction for calculating capital gains/losses. CRA expects you to report: - Fair market value of crypto at time of purchase - Fair market value when sold/traded - Calculate gain/loss on each transaction - Apply 50% inclusion rate for capital gains I use Koinly to track all this stuff and it saves me tons of headaches at tax time.
Does crypto-to-crypto trading count as a taxable event in Canada? Like if I trade BTC for ETH without ever converting to CAD?
Yes, crypto-to-crypto trades are definitely taxable events in Canada! When you trade BTC for ETH, the CRA treats it as if you sold your BTC for CAD and then immediately bought ETH with that CAD. You need to calculate the capital gain/loss on the BTC you "disposed of" based on its fair market value at the time of the trade. So if you bought 1 BTC for $50,000 CAD and later traded it for ETH when BTC was worth $60,000 CAD, you'd have a $10,000 capital gain to report (with 50% inclusion rate = $5,000 taxable). The ETH you received would have a new adjusted cost base of $60,000 CAD for future calculations. This is why tracking tools like Koinly are so helpful - they automatically calculate the CAD values and gains/losses for every crypto-to-crypto trade using historical exchange rates.
Great question and excellent discussion here! I just want to reinforce what others have said about the T1135 requirements for crypto. The key distinction is WHERE your crypto is held, not what type of asset it is. Since your hardware wallet is physically located in Canada (in your home safe), the Bitcoin stored on it is considered Canadian property for tax purposes, regardless of the fact that Bitcoin itself is decentralized and not tied to any specific country. The $250K+ threshold for T1135 only applies to "specified foreign property" - and crypto on a hardware wallet in Canada doesn't qualify as foreign property. You're absolutely right to be cautious about CRA compliance, but in your situation, T1135 filing isn't required. However, do keep detailed records of your transactions and holdings as others have mentioned. The crypto tax landscape is still evolving, and good documentation will protect you if rules change or if you're ever audited. Also remember that while T1135 may not apply, you'll still need to report any capital gains when you eventually sell or trade your Bitcoin. Stay compliant and keep that hardware wallet secure!
Something else to consider - if you determine you're a resident alien for 2024, you'll need to report your WORLDWIDE income on your US tax return, not just US-source income. This is a big difference from the non-resident 1040-NR where you only report US income. Did you have any income from sources outside the US during 2024? Like investments, rental property, foreign bank interest, etc.? If so, that needs to be reported on your 1040. You might also need to file FBAR forms if you had foreign bank accounts with balances over $10,000.
Oh wow, I didn't think about worldwide income. I do have a small savings account back home that earned some interest, and I received some rental income from a property my parents transferred to me in October 2024. Would I need to report both of these? And is there a way to avoid double taxation if I already paid taxes on these in my home country?
Yes, you would need to report both the interest income and the rental income on your US tax return as a resident alien. The good news is that there are protections against double taxation. You can claim a Foreign Tax Credit (Form 1116) for any taxes you paid to your home country on that income. This essentially gives you a credit against your US tax liability for taxes already paid elsewhere. Alternatively, depending on your country, you might be able to exclude certain types of income under the tax treaty. Also, don't forget about the FBAR filing requirement (FinCEN Form 114) if the total of all your foreign financial accounts exceeded $10,000 at any point during the year. This is separate from your tax return and has serious penalties if overlooked.
I went through almost the exact same situation two years ago! Your substantial presence test calculation looks spot on. Since you were exempt as an F-1 student for 2019-2023, 2024 was indeed your first year counting days, and with 335 days you definitely crossed the 183-day threshold. One thing I'd add to what others have mentioned - make sure you keep really good records of your departure date and any documentation showing you've established residence elsewhere. The IRS sometimes questions these transitions, especially for people who were students for several years. Also, since you're now filing as a resident alien, you might be eligible for some tax benefits you couldn't claim as a non-resident - like the standard deduction and certain credits. It's not all bad news! Just make sure you're thorough about reporting worldwide income as others have mentioned.
Thanks for sharing your experience! It's really reassuring to hear from someone who went through the same situation. I definitely plan to keep all my departure documentation - I have my flight records and proof of establishing residency back home. You're right about the tax benefits - I hadn't really thought about being able to claim the standard deduction now. As a non-resident on 1040-NR, I was always stuck with itemizing or taking the much smaller deductions available to non-residents. Do you remember if there were any other credits or deductions you discovered you were eligible for as a resident alien that you couldn't get before? I want to make sure I'm not leaving money on the table!
This thread has been incredibly enlightening! I've been handling my small business taxes for years and never knew about this de minimis safe harbor election. It sounds like it could save a lot of small businesses significant time and potentially money. One thing I'd add for anyone considering this - make sure you understand the trade-offs. While you get the immediate deduction when you purchase inventory, you also lose the ability to spread those costs over multiple years as your inventory sells. This could potentially push you into a higher tax bracket in years when you make large inventory purchases. Also, if your business has seasonal fluctuations or you're planning any major expansions, the timing of when you claim these deductions could impact your overall tax strategy. It might be worth running the numbers both ways (traditional COGS vs. immediate expensing) for your specific situation before making the election. Has anyone here actually compared the total tax impact over multiple years between the two methods? I'm curious if the immediate deduction always comes out ahead or if there are scenarios where the traditional COGS method might be better.
You raise an excellent point about running the numbers both ways! I actually did this analysis for my business last year before making the election. In my case, the immediate expensing came out ahead even when factoring in the higher tax bracket issue you mentioned. The key factor for me was cash flow - getting the deduction upfront meant I had more working capital to reinvest in inventory, which generated additional sales that more than offset the higher tax rate. But you're absolutely right that it's not a one-size-fits-all solution. For businesses with very predictable, steady inventory turnover, the traditional COGS method might actually provide better tax smoothing across years. It really depends on your growth trajectory, cash flow needs, and how much your inventory levels fluctuate year to year. I'd definitely recommend modeling both scenarios over a 3-5 year period before making the election.
This discussion has been incredibly helpful! I'm a CPA who works with a lot of small retail businesses, and I see so many clients struggling with inventory tracking when they could be using this simplified method. A few additional points for anyone considering this election: 1. Documentation is key - even though you're not tracking COGS, you still need to maintain records of your inventory purchases for the deduction. Keep all receipts and invoices organized. 2. The election applies to your entire business, not just certain types of inventory. So if your boutique sells both clothing and accessories, both categories would be treated the same way under this method. 3. Consider your state tax implications too. Most states conform to federal tax treatment, but some have different rules. Make sure to check how your state handles this election. 4. If you're planning to sell your business in the future, discuss with your accountant how this method might affect the valuation or sale terms, since your inventory won't be reflected as an asset on your books. The $27 million gross receipts test is quite generous for most small businesses, so this really is a game-changer for reducing administrative burden while potentially improving cash flow through earlier deductions.
Thanks for the additional insights! As someone new to small business taxes, the state conformity point is really important - I hadn't even thought about that. Do you happen to know if there's an easy way to check state-specific rules, or is this something where I'd need to consult with a local tax professional? Also, regarding the documentation requirement you mentioned - when you say "maintain records of inventory purchases," does this mean we still need to track quantities and individual item costs, or is it sufficient to just keep the purchase receipts showing total amounts spent on inventory? I'm trying to understand how much of the administrative burden this actually eliminates versus traditional COGS tracking. The point about business valuation is interesting too. If inventory isn't shown as an asset, would this potentially make the business appear less valuable on paper, even though the tax benefits might improve actual cash flow and profitability?
Just FYI, if you're adjusting your W4 for a non-resident spouse with an ITIN, don't forget about state tax withholding too! You mentioned owing state taxes last year while getting a federal refund. Each state has different forms and requirements for withholding adjustments. Some states use the federal W4 info, but many have their own forms. Make sure you're adjusting both federal AND state withholding.
This is such an important point! I messed this up last year. Got our federal withholding perfect with a non-resident spouse but completely forgot that my state (CA) has a separate DE-4 form. Ended up with a nice federal refund but owed almost $2,000 to California. Don't make my mistake!
Great question about W4 withholding with a non-resident spouse! I went through this exact situation last year when my husband had an ITIN while waiting for his green card. Your calculation of $126 per paycheck sounds reasonable, and yes, that amount would go on line 4(c) of your W4. The key thing to remember is that you're essentially covering the tax liability for both your income and your wife's cash income through your withholding. A few additional tips from my experience: 1. Keep meticulous records of your wife's cash income (sounds like you're already doing this with your spreadsheet) - you'll need quarterly totals for accurate tax planning. 2. Consider making estimated quarterly payments instead of (or in addition to) increased withholding. Sometimes this gives you more control, especially if your wife's income varies significantly. 3. Once you know your wife's total annual income, you can use the IRS withholding calculator mid-year to see if you need to adjust your W4 again. 4. When her green card comes through, her tax status won't change dramatically for withholding purposes, but definitely recalculate everything since you'll have more certainty about the full year's income by then. The fact that you got a federal refund but owed state taxes suggests your federal withholding might have been close to right, so your new calculation should help balance things out better for 2025!
This is incredibly helpful, thank you! I hadn't even thought about estimated quarterly payments as an option. Would that actually be better than increasing withholding through my W4? My wife's income does vary quite a bit week to week since she does freelance work. Also, when you mention keeping quarterly totals - did you find the IRS wanted any specific format for documentation of cash payments, or was a well-organized spreadsheet sufficient? Your point about recalculating mid-year once we know her full income is really smart. I was planning to just set it and forget it, but it makes sense to adjust as we get better data.
Haley Stokes
You might consider implementing a quarterly dividend strategy alongside a reasonable base salary. This is what I do - I pay myself a consistent reasonable base that covers my actual work (based on market rates for my position), then distribute profits as needed through distributions. Remember that while S-Corp distributions aren't subject to self-employment tax, they ARE subject to income tax. And the IRS is very clear that you can't take distributions without a reasonable salary first.
0 coins
Ellie Perry
โขThat seems like a smart approach. So in practice, how do you handle this? Do you start with a somewhat conservative base salary and then do quarterly reviews to determine distributions? And do you ever adjust the base salary mid-year if business is significantly better or worse than expected?
0 coins
Haley Stokes
โขI start with a base salary that would be reasonable to hire someone to replace me in my role - I actually got quotes from headhunters for similar positions to document this amount. I review quarterly but rarely change the base unless my duties significantly change. For distributions, I first ensure all business cash flow needs are covered (including reserves for taxes and future expenses), then distribute a portion of excess profits quarterly. In exceptionally good quarters, I sometimes pay myself a W-2 bonus rather than taking it all as distributions - this looks better for maintaining that reasonable salary requirement while still giving me flexibility. The key is having a documented methodology that shows you're not artificially suppressing salary to avoid payroll taxes.
0 coins
Drew Hathaway
The uncertainty you're facing is totally understandable - that's a massive potential revenue jump! Here's what I'd recommend based on going through something similar: Start with a conservative approach for Q1. Set your salary based on a blend of last year's performance plus modest growth expectations - maybe bump from $65k to around $75-80k to start. This keeps your fixed commitment manageable while acknowledging some growth. Then implement quarterly reviews. As you hit Q2 and Q3, if the revenue is materializing as projected, you can either: 1. Increase your base salary mid-year (requires payroll adjustments) 2. Pay yourself W-2 bonuses quarterly to catch up 3. Take the excess as distributions (though remember you need that reasonable salary first) The IRS doesn't expect you to predict the future perfectly, but they do expect you to make reasonable adjustments as circumstances change. Document everything - why you set the initial salary, what factors you considered for increases, and how you determined what's "reasonable" for your role and industry. Most importantly, focus on what you'd need to pay someone else to do your job, not on percentages of profit. Your duties might not change much even if revenue quadruples, so your salary shouldn't necessarily scale directly with profits.
0 coins