The form 1065 instructions literally say "A partnership must file a return for every tax year" with no mentioned exception for zero income. I learned this the hard way. If there's any silver lining, the penalties are based on a per-partner-per-month calculation, so with just 2 members it won't be astronomical if you file soon.

I went through this exact situation two years ago with my multi-member LLC. The bottom line is that partnerships (including multi-member LLCs taxed as partnerships) are required to file Form 1065 annually regardless of income level - even $0 income. Here's what I wish I had known: even though you haven't generated revenue, those startup expenses you mentioned are actually reportable business activities. The IRS considers incurring business expenses as the beginning of operations, which triggers the filing requirement. Don't panic though - you have options. File your 1065 as soon as possible to minimize penalties. The penalty is $210 per partner per month (so $420/month for you two), but it caps at 12 months. More importantly, you can request penalty abatement for "reasonable cause" since this is likely your first partnership return and the rules aren't always crystal clear for new business owners. When you file, make sure to properly categorize those startup costs. Up to $5,000 in startup expenses can be deducted immediately, with the remainder amortized over 15 years. Getting this documentation right from the start will save you headaches when you do start generating revenue. The key is to file now rather than waiting - the IRS is generally more lenient when you self-correct versus when they discover the issue later.

I've been through this exact situation myself about 2 years ago - was stuck on emergency tax for nearly 6 months due to a PAYE coding issue. The good news is that yes, you should absolutely see the refund automatically in your next paycheck once your correct tax code is applied. What happens is your employer's payroll system will do a "year to date" reconciliation, comparing what you've actually paid in tax since April 6th against what you should have paid with your correct code. The overpayment gets refunded to you automatically - no forms to fill out or additional steps needed. In my case, I got back just over £2,100 which made that paycheck look absolutely massive! Just be prepared for it to potentially affect your student loan repayments if you have them, since the system will see that one large paycheck amount. One tip: keep all your payslips from the emergency tax period just in case there are any discrepancies. In 99% of cases it works perfectly, but it's always good to have the documentation if you need to query anything with payroll or HMRC later. You should definitely see that refund by end of October - the relief will be incredible after months of those reduced paychecks!

I can confirm that yes, you should see the refund automatically in your next paycheck! I went through this exact situation about 18 months ago when I switched jobs and got stuck on emergency tax for nearly 4 months. It was painful watching so much of my salary disappear each month. Once HMRC sorted my tax code (took forever to get through to them!), my employer's payroll automatically calculated the year-to-date difference and I got back £1,340 in my next pay. The system compares what you've paid since April 6th against what you should have paid with your correct code, then refunds the difference. Just a heads up - that refund paycheck will look enormous compared to what you've been getting, which is both exciting and a bit jarring! Also double-check your payslip when it comes through to make sure the math looks right. In rare cases there can be calculation errors, but usually it's spot on. You've done the hard part getting through to HMRC and getting it sorted. Now you just need to wait for that sweet, sweet refund to hit your account. Should definitely be there by end of October!

Great question, Caden! For proactive learning about retirement account rules, I'd recommend starting with IRS Publication 590-A (Contributions to Individual Retirement Arrangements) and Publication 590-B (Distributions from Individual Retirement Arrangements). These are the official sources and get updated annually. The IRS website also has a pretty good "Retirement Plans" section that breaks down the rules in more digestible chunks. For ongoing updates, I follow a few tax professionals on social media who regularly post about rule changes - they often catch nuances that the general financial press misses. One thing I've learned is that retirement account rules are complex enough that it's worth building a relationship with a fee-only financial advisor or tax professional before you need them. Having someone you can call with questions before making major moves (like Dylan's situation) can save thousands in the long run. Also, whenever you're dealing with multiple accounts or unusual circumstances, always get a second opinion. Even financial professionals sometimes miss these edge cases - the one-rollover rule is a perfect example of something that trips up both advisors and account holders regularly. Dylan's experience is actually a valuable reminder that even well-intentioned moves can have unintended consequences when retirement account rules are involved!

Dylan, what a costly lesson! I went through something similar a few years back, though thankfully on a smaller scale. The one-rollover rule is genuinely one of the most misunderstood aspects of IRA management. One thing I learned from my tax professional that might help you moving forward - make sure you're crystal clear about which specific distribution you're treating as the qualifying 60-day rollover when you file. The IRS wants to see documentation that clearly identifies which transaction gets the rollover treatment versus which ones are being reported as taxable distributions. Also, don't beat yourself up too much about this. I've seen posts on various financial forums where even CPAs have made similar mistakes with client accounts. The interaction between multiple IRA accounts and the rollover rules is genuinely confusing, and the consequences are harsh relative to how easy the mistake is to make. Going forward, you might want to consider consolidating your IRAs at one custodian to simplify future management and reduce the chance of similar issues. Just make sure any future consolidation moves are done as direct trustee-to-trustee transfers rather than distributions to avoid rollover limitations entirely. Hope you can minimize the damage and that sharing your experience helps others avoid the same trap!

I've been through this exact situation with US Bank before! Filed early, got approved quickly, then had to wait anxiously for the actual deposit date to show up on WMR. Based on my experience over the past 3 years with them, here's what you can expect: US Bank is very consistent - they deposit exactly on the IRS date, never early. However, this reliability actually helps with planning once you get that date from WMR. Since you filed March 3rd and got accepted same day, you're in the typical 21-day processing window. Most people filing around that time are seeing deposit dates between March 21-25 right now. WMR usually updates on Wednesday mornings, so tomorrow might be when you finally see your specific date. For planning purposes, I'd recommend having a backup plan for those bills just in case your deposit date ends up being later than you need. US Bank has been super reliable for me, but the IRS timing can sometimes stretch a few days beyond the 21-day window during busy periods. The good news is once you see that deposit date on WMR, you can count on US Bank to have it available first thing that morning - usually by 6 AM in my experience. Hope this helps with your financial planning!

I can share some additional perspective as a long-time US Bank customer who's dealt with this exact timing issue multiple times. US Bank absolutely follows the IRS deposit date to the letter - no early releases, but also very reliable once you have that date. Since you filed March 3rd and got accepted same day, you're actually in a really good position. The current processing times have most early March filers seeing deposit dates around March 21-24, so you should get your WMR update with a specific date very soon. One thing that's helped me with financial planning in similar situations: US Bank's customer service can sometimes see pending Treasury deposits 24-48 hours before they actually post. If you call and ask specifically about pending ACH transfers from the U.S. Treasury, they might be able to give you a heads up that it's coming even before it shows as pending in your account. Also, their deposits typically hit around 2-3 AM on the scheduled date, so you'll have access to the funds first thing in the morning rather than waiting until later in the day. This has been consistent for me across multiple tax seasons. For your immediate planning, I'd suggest having a small buffer - maybe shift a couple bills by a day or two if possible, just to avoid any stress if there are minor delays on the IRS side.

Just a thought - did the 1099-MISC list the payment in Box 3 (Other Income) or somewhere else? That could give you a clue about how the city views these payments.

I've been through a similar situation with city rebates and the 1099-MISC issue. The fact that your city issued a 1099-MISC is a strong indicator that they're treating these as taxable income rather than true purchase price reductions. For your home improvement rebate, since the city is essentially paying you a percentage of costs rather than the vendor reducing their price, it's likely considered a government subsidy or grant payment. The tree planting rebate is similar - it's an environmental incentive payment from the city. One thing to consider is whether any portion might qualify for basis adjustment instead of income. For permanent improvements to your property, sometimes you can reduce your cost basis by the rebate amount rather than claiming it as income, but this gets complicated and you'd want to verify this applies to your specific situation. Given the complexity and the 1099-MISC, I'd recommend getting professional guidance on this one. The distinction between rebates, subsidies, and grants can significantly impact your tax liability.