Just FYI, when making payments through Pay1040, there's a processing fee that varies depending on how you pay. It's around 1.87% if you use a credit card (minimum $2.50) or $2.55 flat fee for direct debit from your bank account. I've been making partial payments for the past 3 months. I always choose the direct debit option since it's cheaper for payments over about $140. One thing to remember is to print or save the confirmation for each payment - I've had one payment that didn't get properly credited to my account at first, and having that confirmation made it much easier to get it sorted out.

I just wanted to share that I did exactly what you're describing last year - owed about $1,800 and made payments over 5 months without setting up a formal plan. I used Pay1040 and selected "Form 1040 Series" like others have mentioned. One thing no one has pointed out yet: make sure you factor in the failure-to-pay penalty, which is 0.5% per month (or partial month) on the unpaid balance, capped at 25% of the unpaid amount. This is on top of the interest. The IRS will recalculate your balance every time they process a payment, but they don't always send updated notices. I ended up paying about $45 in combined penalties and interest by the time I was done, which wasn't too bad considering the flexibility it gave me.

Is no one gonna talk about offshore accounts? Like aren't all these billionaires just hiding money in the Cayman Islands or something to avoid the 23.8% capital gains entirely? I thought that was the main thing they did.

Something that hasn't been fully explored here is how stock options and restricted stock units (RSUs) complicate the tax picture for tech billionaires. When executives receive stock compensation, they often pay ordinary income tax rates (up to 37%) when the options vest or RSUs are delivered, not the lower capital gains rates. However, any appreciation after that point is subject to capital gains treatment. So if a CEO exercises options at $50/share, pays ordinary income tax on that amount, and later sells at $200/share, only the $150/share gain gets the preferential capital gains treatment. This means that for many tech billionaires, a significant portion of their wealth was already taxed at the higher ordinary income rates. The 23.8% capital gains rate only applies to the appreciation that occurs after they actually own the stock outright. This context is important when evaluating their overall tax burden on stock sales - they're not getting the lower rate on the entire transaction value.

One more thing to consider - if your income is under $30k, check if you qualify for any tax credits related to charitable giving. Some states have credits (not deductions) for donations that apply regardless of whether you take standard deduction. The 1098-C might be needed to document eligibility for those. I took standard deduction last year but still got a small credit on my state return for my car donation.

I'd strongly recommend getting the 1098-C form, even though you're taking the standard deduction. Here's why: The IRS has specific rules for vehicle donations over $500 - they require the 1098-C for proper documentation, regardless of whether you itemize or not. Since your CR-V is worth $6,500, this puts you well into the range where the IRS expects official documentation. Also, consider that your financial situation could change. Maybe you'll have unexpected medical expenses later in the year, or other deductible expenses that could make itemizing worthwhile. Having the 1098-C gives you that option. From an audit protection standpoint, vehicle donations are one of the areas the IRS scrutinizes more closely. Having the official form filed with the IRS creates a paper trail that protects you, even if you don't claim the deduction this year. The only "cost" is sharing your SSN with a legitimate charity, which they're required to keep secure anyway. There's really no downside to getting proper documentation for such a significant donation.

One thing I wish someone had told me when I filled out my Form 9465 is to double-check your Social Security Number and the tax year you're requesting the installment agreement for. I made a simple typo in my SSN and it delayed my application by weeks while they tried to match it to my account. Also, if you're married filing jointly, make sure you're clear about whether both spouses are requesting the installment agreement or just one of you. This was confusing for me since my spouse and I file jointly but only I was responsible for the additional tax owed. The IRS website has a payment estimator tool that can help you figure out what monthly payment amount to propose, but honestly the explanations here about the 72-month rule and adding buffer for interest are really helpful. Good luck with your application!

I went through this exact same situation last year and want to share a few key points that really helped me get my Form 9465 approved on the first try. First, be very careful with the payment amount calculation. I used the formula someone mentioned above (total debt ÷ 72 months + buffer for interest) but also called the IRS beforehand to confirm my total balance including all penalties and interest accrued to date. This gave me a more accurate starting point. Second, if you're proposing direct debit (which I highly recommend since it often gets faster approval), make sure your bank account information is exactly correct - account number, routing number, and that the account name matches exactly what's on your tax return. Third, don't forget to sign and date the form! I know it sounds obvious, but I almost submitted mine without a signature which would have caused an automatic rejection. Finally, keep copies of everything you submit and send it certified mail so you have proof it was received. The IRS processing times can be unpredictable, and having that paper trail helped when I needed to follow up on my application status. The whole process was much less scary than I thought it would be once I actually started filling it out. You've got this!

I went through almost the exact same situation last year! My employer did the same thing - stopped withholding taxes for part-timers and then sent 1099s instead of W-2s. Like you, nothing about my actual job changed at all. I ended up filing Form SS-8 and Form 8919 after documenting my work situation (set schedule, company equipment, direct supervision, etc.). The IRS ruled in my favor within about 4 months and determined I was misclassified as an independent contractor. My employer had to issue corrected W-2s and handle the back taxes they owed. The key thing is to document everything about your work arrangement - your set Monday-Thursday schedule, the fact that you use their equipment, how your boss directs your work, etc. This all supports your case that you're an employee, not a contractor. Don't let them shift their tax burden onto you! The "less than 40 hours" rule they made up has zero basis in tax law. Employee vs contractor classification is based on the nature of the work relationship, not arbitrary hour thresholds. You shouldn't have to pay an extra 15.3% in self-employment taxes because your employer wants to save money on payroll taxes.

This is definitely a case of employee misclassification. Your employer can't just decide to stop withholding taxes and reclassify workers as independent contractors based on hours worked - that's not how the IRS determines worker classification at all. The fact that you have set hours (Monday-Thursday), use company equipment, work on-site, and have your boss direct all your work clearly indicates you're an employee, not an independent contractor. The IRS uses a multi-factor test that looks at behavioral control, financial control, and the relationship type - and based on what you've described, you meet the employee criteria. Your employer is essentially trying to shift their tax burden onto you while saving money on payroll taxes, benefits, and other employer obligations. This could cost you thousands in extra self-employment taxes (15.3% instead of the normal employee share of 7.65%). I'd recommend filing Form SS-8 to get an official IRS determination on your worker status, and Form 8919 to pay only the employee portion of Social Security and Medicare taxes rather than the full self-employment amount. You might also want to document your work arrangement (schedule, equipment use, supervision, etc.) in case you need evidence. Don't just accept this 1099 and pay the extra taxes - you have legitimate grounds to challenge this misclassification.