IRS

Can't reach IRS? Claimyr connects you to a live IRS agent in minutes.

Claimyr is a pay-as-you-go service. We do not charge a recurring subscription.



Fox KTVUABC 7CBSSan Francisco Chronicle

Using Claimyr will:

  • Connect you to a human agent at the IRS
  • Skip the long phone menu
  • Call the correct department
  • Redial until on hold
  • Forward a call to your phone with reduced hold time
  • Give you free callbacks if the IRS drops your call

If I could give 10 stars I would

If I could give 10 stars I would If I could give 10 stars I would Such an amazing service so needed during the times when EDD almost never picks up Claimyr gets me on the phone with EDD every time without fail faster. A much needed service without Claimyr I would have never received the payment I needed to support me during my postpartum recovery. Thank you so much Claimyr!


Really made a difference

Really made a difference, save me time and energy from going to a local office for making the call.


Worth not wasting your time calling for hours.

Was a bit nervous or untrusting at first, but my calls went thru. First time the wait was a bit long but their customer chat line on their page was helpful and put me at ease that I would receive my call. Today my call dropped because of EDD and Claimyr heard my concern on the same chat and another call was made within the hour.


An incredibly helpful service

An incredibly helpful service! Got me connected to a CA EDD agent without major hassle (outside of EDD's agents dropping calls – which Claimyr has free protection for). If you need to file a new claim and can't do it online, pay the $ to Claimyr to get the process started. Absolutely worth it!


Consistent,frustration free, quality Service.

Used this service a couple times now. Before I'd call 200 times in less than a weak frustrated as can be. But using claimyr with a couple hours of waiting i was on the line with an representative or on hold. Dropped a couple times but each reconnected not long after and was mission accomplished, thanks to Claimyr.


IT WORKS!! Not a scam!

I tried for weeks to get thru to EDD PFL program with no luck. I gave this a try thinking it may be a scam. OMG! It worked and They got thru within an hour and my claim is going to finally get paid!! I upgraded to the $60 call. Best $60 spent!

Read all of our Trustpilot reviews


Ask the community...

  • DO post questions about your issues.
  • DO answer questions and support each other.
  • DO post tips & tricks to help folks.
  • DO NOT post call problems here - there is a support tab at the top for that :)

Miguel Silva

•

Just FYI - make sure you're sending these by certified mail with return receipt! I sent FIRPTA forms to the correct address last year but the IRS claimed they never received them. Had no proof and ended up having to resubmit everything and pay penalties. Now I document EVERYTHING with tracking and keep digital copies of all receipts.

0 coins

This x1000! Same thing happened to me. Also take photos of the envelope before sending so you can prove you used the correct address. IRS lost our FIRPTA forms twice last year and the second time we had photos of everything including what was inside the envelope. Saved us from having to pay the 25% FIRPTA withholding again.

0 coins

Adding to the excellent advice already shared here - I just want to emphasize double-checking the specific requirements in Treas. Reg. 1.897-2(h) before mailing. The regulation requires that the certification include not just the transferor's information, but also a detailed statement about why the transferor believes they qualify for the exception from FIRPTA withholding. I've seen cases where people send the forms to the correct Ogden address but forget to include the required affidavit or supporting documentation, which can delay processing for months. The IRS won't process incomplete submissions and often doesn't send timely rejection notices. Also worth noting - if this is for a certification under section 1.897-2(h)(1) (non-recognition provision), make sure you're including documentation of the qualifying exchange. The requirements are slightly different depending on which subsection applies to your situation.

0 coins

Rita Jacobs

•

This is really helpful advice! I'm new to FIRPTA filings and wondering - is there a standard format for the affidavit you mentioned, or does it just need to be a sworn statement explaining the basis for the exception? Also, when you say "supporting documentation," what specific types of documents are typically required? I want to make sure I don't miss anything critical on my first submission.

0 coins

Zainab Ahmed

•

This post saved me! I was about to mail my FIRPTA cert to the old Philly address today. Quick question - does anyone know if there's a way to submit these electronically yet? Seems ridiculous that we still have to mail physical forms in 2025.

0 coins

Unfortunately, FIRPTA certs are still paper-only. Most international tax forms can't be e-filed yet. The IRS keeps saying they're expanding e-file options but the international stuff is always last on their list.

0 coins

Lara Woods

•

I can confirm the Ogden, UT 84201-0023 address is correct for FIRPTA certificates. I had to deal with this exact situation about 6 months ago when the Philadelphia address stopped working. What really helped me was calling the IRS Practitioner Priority Service line (if you have a PTIN) - they were able to confirm the address change and explain that many international tax form addresses were updated in late 2023/early 2024. One tip: when you send to the Ogden address, make sure your cover letter specifically mentions "Treasury Regulation 1.897-2(h) submission" in the subject line. The IRS processing center told me this helps ensure it gets routed to the right department faster. Also keep detailed records of your mailing - I used certified mail with signature confirmation and kept copies of everything including the tracking receipts. Don't stress too much about the timing issue. As long as you can document your good faith efforts to comply (like the returned mail from Philadelphia), the IRS is generally reasonable about address change situations.

0 coins

This is incredibly helpful, thank you! I'm new to dealing with FIRPTA requirements and the specific mention of including "Treasury Regulation 1.897-2(h) submission" in the subject line is exactly the kind of detail I needed. Quick question - do you know if the Practitioner Priority Service line is available to regular taxpayers or only tax professionals with PTINs? I'm handling this transaction myself and want to make sure I have all the confirmation I can get before mailing everything to Utah.

0 coins

Thanks everyone for the helpful discussion! As someone new to running a small business, this has been really educational. I had no idea that service discounts weren't considered gifts from a tax perspective - I was worried I'd been doing something wrong by offering those client discounts. One follow-up question: if I decide to switch from discounts to actual gifts (like those $25 gift cards mentioned), do I need to report the value of those gifts to the recipients on any tax forms? Or is that only required for larger gifts? I want to make sure I'm handling everything properly on both the giving and receiving ends. Also appreciate the tip about business meals being a better tax strategy than gifts in some cases. Definitely something to consider for my client appreciation efforts going forward!

0 coins

Jamal Wilson

•

Great question about reporting requirements! For business gifts under $25, you generally don't need to issue any tax forms to the recipients. The IRS doesn't consider these small gifts as taxable income to the person receiving them, so no 1099 or other reporting is required on your end. However, if you were to give gifts worth more than $25 (even though you couldn't deduct the full amount), then it could potentially become taxable income to the recipient and you might need to report it. But sticking to that $25 limit keeps things simple for everyone involved. The business meal approach really is worth considering - not only is the tax treatment more favorable, but it also gives you quality face time with your clients which can be valuable for relationship building beyond just showing appreciation.

0 coins

Ana Rusula

•

As a tax professional who's dealt with this exact confusion many times, I wanted to add a few practical tips for small business owners navigating this area: 1. **Keep a simple spreadsheet** tracking any gifts you give throughout the year - recipient name, date, amount, and business purpose. This makes it easy to stay under the $25 limit per person and provides documentation if needed. 2. **Consider the "employee vs. client" distinction** - the $25 limit applies to business gifts to clients/customers, but gifts to employees have different rules (they're generally taxable compensation to the employee with some small exceptions). 3. **Don't overthink promotional items** - things like branded pens, calendars, or other promotional materials that cost less than $4 and have your company name on them aren't subject to the $25 limit at all. The meal strategy mentioned earlier really is smart from both a tax and business development perspective. A $50 dinner with a client gives you a $25 deduction (50% rule) versus a $25 gift card that only gives you a $25 deduction, plus you get valuable relationship-building time. Hope this helps clarify things for fellow small business owners dealing with these same questions!

0 coins

QuantumLeap

•

This is incredibly helpful, thank you! The spreadsheet idea is brilliant - I've been trying to keep track of everything in my head which obviously isn't working well. Quick question about the promotional items exception: does the $4 limit apply to the cost to me or the retail value? For example, if I buy branded mugs in bulk for $3 each but they'd normally retail for $8, which number matters for the promotional item rule? Also, I'm curious about the employee gift distinction you mentioned. I occasionally give small thank-you gifts to my freelance contractors - would they be treated as clients or employees for this purpose? I issue them 1099s at year end if that makes a difference.

0 coins

This is a complex situation that highlights why proper documentation is crucial for professional gambling operations. From a tax compliance perspective, the W2Gs legally belong to whoever's SSN is on the forms - your cousin in this case. However, there are legitimate ways to handle this through proper income attribution. Your cousin will need to report the $83,000 in gambling winnings on his return since the IRS expects to see this income under his SSN. He can then document the transfer of these winnings to you through a formal agreement showing he was acting as your agent. A few critical points to consider: 1. Any federal withholding (typically 24% on jackpots over $5,000) was credited to your cousin's account, which needs to be factored into both returns 2. You'll want to create a written agreement backdated to before the gambling occurred that establishes your cousin was acting as your agent 3. As a professional gambler filing Schedule C, you can deduct your gambling losses and related business expenses against this income I'd strongly recommend consulting with a tax professional who has experience with gambling income attribution. The documentation needs to be bulletproof if either of you gets audited, and the specific reporting mechanics can be tricky to get right on both returns.

0 coins

Sofia Perez

•

This is really helpful advice, especially the point about the withholding being credited to my cousin's account. I hadn't fully thought through how that would complicate things on both our returns. The backdated agent agreement makes sense too - it establishes the arrangement existed before the winnings occurred rather than looking like we're just trying to shuffle income after the fact. Do you happen to know if there's a specific IRS form or publication that addresses agent relationships for gambling winnings, or is this more of a general tax principle that applies here?

0 coins

AstroAlpha

•

The IRS doesn't have a specific form for gambling agent relationships, but this falls under general tax principles around nominees and agents found in various revenue rulings and court cases. The key is establishing that a genuine agency relationship existed before the gambling occurred, not just a post-hoc arrangement to avoid taxes. For documentation, you'll want to reference the common law agency principles where an agent acts on behalf of a principal. The written agreement should clearly state that your cousin was authorized to gamble with your funds on your behalf, that he had no beneficial interest in the winnings, and that he was obligated to turn over any proceeds to you. Some tax professionals also reference Rev. Rul. 69-144 which deals with nominee situations, though that's more about investment income. The broader principle is that income should be taxed to the person who is the true economic owner, not necessarily the person whose name appears on the tax document. The challenge is that casinos are required to issue W2Gs to the person who physically triggered the jackpot, regardless of whose money was being played. This creates the attribution issue you're dealing with. Proper documentation of the agency relationship is your best defense if questioned.

0 coins

Raj Gupta

•

Be very careful with this situation - I've seen similar cases get messy during IRS audits. The key issue is that W2Gs create a paper trail directly linking income to your cousin's SSN, so any "transfer" arrangement needs to be rock-solid defensible. A few red flags to avoid: - Don't try to create documentation after the fact that looks suspicious - Make sure any agent agreement reflects the actual relationship that existed when the gambling occurred - Consider that if your cousin owes other taxes or has liens, those W2G withholdings might get applied elsewhere One thing many people miss: your cousin may need to file quarterly estimates going forward since the IRS now expects gambling income under his SSN. Even if he transfers the money to you, the withholding timing can create cash flow issues. Also worth noting - if you're truly operating as a professional gambler, you should already have systems in place to avoid these complications. Most pros I know never let others physically trigger jackpots with their money specifically because of these tax attribution nightmares.

0 coins

This is really solid advice about the potential audit risks and quarterly estimate issues. I hadn't considered that the IRS might now expect ongoing gambling income under my cousin's SSN, which could create problems down the road even after we resolve this year's situation. Your point about professional gamblers having systems to avoid these complications is spot on. I'm definitely learning this lesson the hard way. Going forward, I think I need to either handle all the machines myself or set up a more formal business structure like some others mentioned with the LLC approach. Do you know if there's any way to notify the IRS that my cousin doesn't expect ongoing gambling income in future years, or will he potentially deal with estimated payment issues until his filing history shows otherwise?

0 coins

Ryan Vasquez

•

This thread has been incredibly enlightening! As someone who's been wrestling with a similar decision for my small marketing agency, I really appreciate all the real-world experiences shared here. One thing I wanted to add that might be helpful - I recently attended a small business tax seminar where the speaker emphasized that the IRS has been increasingly scrutinizing Section 179 deductions on luxury vehicles, especially in industries where the business necessity isn't immediately obvious. They mentioned that auditors are specifically trained to look for patterns where business owners are trying to "lifestyle upgrade" through tax deductions. What really struck me from this discussion is how many hidden complexities there are beyond just the basic math. The insurance costs, cash flow timing, recapture risks, documentation requirements - it's way more involved than I initially thought. Based on everything I've read here, I think I'm going to follow @77200260064f's advice about starting smaller. Maybe I'll look at a used F-150 or similar vehicle in the $25-35k range to get comfortable with the documentation process and understand my real usage patterns before even considering something as significant as a Cybertruck purchase. The 6-month usage logging trial that several people mentioned also seems like an absolute must-do. I suspect I'd find that my actual business use is lower than I think it would be, especially once I factor in that novelty effect where everyone wants to check out the cool new truck! Thanks to everyone who shared their experiences - this is exactly the kind of practical advice you can't get from just reading IRS publications.

0 coins

This thread has been absolutely invaluable for anyone considering a major vehicle purchase with Section 179! As someone who's just getting started in business ownership, I'm grateful for all the experienced perspectives shared here. Your point about the IRS specifically training auditors to look for "lifestyle upgrade" patterns really drives home the importance of having legitimate business justification rather than just tax optimization motives. That's probably the most important takeaway from this entire discussion - the purchase needs to make business sense first, with tax benefits being secondary. I love the idea of starting with a more modest vehicle to learn the ropes. It seems like the documentation requirements and business use tracking are skills that need to be developed over time, and making mistakes on a $30k purchase is much more manageable than on an $80k one. The 6-month logging trial really does seem to be the consensus recommendation across multiple comments here. I'm definitely going to implement that before making any major vehicle decisions - I suspect like you that my actual business use might be lower than my optimistic projections! This community discussion has saved me from potentially making a very expensive mistake. Sometimes the best business decision is recognizing when you're not quite ready for something yet and taking the time to build up the necessary experience and systems first.

0 coins

Cynthia Love

•

This has been an absolutely fantastic thread to read through! As a new business owner who was considering a similar vehicle purchase, I've learned so much from everyone's real-world experiences and professional insights. What really stands out to me is how this discussion evolved from a simple question about Section 179 math into a comprehensive analysis of business necessity, cash flow management, audit risks, and practical implementation challenges. The recurring theme seems to be that the tax benefits should be secondary to legitimate business need. A few key takeaways that really resonated with me: 1. The 6-month usage logging trial is brilliant and seems essential before any major vehicle purchase 2. Starting with a less expensive qualifying vehicle to learn the documentation requirements is smart risk management 3. The "audit-ready" approach from day one is crucial - not just meeting minimums but building bulletproof documentation 4. Total cost of ownership analysis (including insurance, maintenance, financing) is just as important as the Section 179 benefits I'm particularly grateful for the honest perspectives from people who've actually been through IRS audits on vehicle deductions. That real-world insight about documentation requirements and scrutiny levels is invaluable. For anyone else reading this thread in the future - this is a masterclass in thorough business decision-making. The consensus advice to focus on business necessity first, get professional tax guidance, and build experience with smaller purchases before going for something like a Cybertruck seems spot-on. Thanks to everyone who took the time to share their experiences and expertise!

0 coins

This really has been an incredible discussion! As someone completely new to business ownership and Section 179 deductions, I'm honestly overwhelmed by how much complexity is involved in what seemed like a straightforward tax question. The evolution from "can I write off a Cybertruck?" to a comprehensive business strategy discussion really shows the value of this community. I came here thinking about tax benefits, but now I realize I should be thinking about legitimate business operations first. The repeated emphasis on the 6-month usage logging trial makes so much sense - it's essentially a low-cost way to gather real data before making a major financial commitment. I suspect many of us overestimate how much we'd actually use a vehicle for business versus personal purposes. @77200260064f's suggestion about starting with a less expensive qualifying vehicle is probably the most practical advice in this whole thread. Learning the documentation requirements and audit-readiness on a $30k vehicle seems much smarter than trying to figure it out with an $80k Cybertruck. What strikes me most is how the IRS scrutiny for "lifestyle upgrades disguised as business expenses" seems very real. That alone makes me want to be extra conservative and focus on vehicles that have obvious business utility rather than ones that might be seen as luxury purchases. Thank you all for essentially providing a free masterclass in business vehicle purchasing strategy!

0 coins

Prev1...146147148149150...5643Next