IRS

Can't reach IRS? Claimyr connects you to a live IRS agent in minutes.

Claimyr is a pay-as-you-go service. We do not charge a recurring subscription.



Fox KTVUABC 7CBSSan Francisco Chronicle

Using Claimyr will:

  • Connect you to a human agent at the IRS
  • Skip the long phone menu
  • Call the correct department
  • Redial until on hold
  • Forward a call to your phone with reduced hold time
  • Give you free callbacks if the IRS drops your call

If I could give 10 stars I would

If I could give 10 stars I would If I could give 10 stars I would Such an amazing service so needed during the times when EDD almost never picks up Claimyr gets me on the phone with EDD every time without fail faster. A much needed service without Claimyr I would have never received the payment I needed to support me during my postpartum recovery. Thank you so much Claimyr!


Really made a difference

Really made a difference, save me time and energy from going to a local office for making the call.


Worth not wasting your time calling for hours.

Was a bit nervous or untrusting at first, but my calls went thru. First time the wait was a bit long but their customer chat line on their page was helpful and put me at ease that I would receive my call. Today my call dropped because of EDD and Claimyr heard my concern on the same chat and another call was made within the hour.


An incredibly helpful service

An incredibly helpful service! Got me connected to a CA EDD agent without major hassle (outside of EDD's agents dropping calls – which Claimyr has free protection for). If you need to file a new claim and can't do it online, pay the $ to Claimyr to get the process started. Absolutely worth it!


Consistent,frustration free, quality Service.

Used this service a couple times now. Before I'd call 200 times in less than a weak frustrated as can be. But using claimyr with a couple hours of waiting i was on the line with an representative or on hold. Dropped a couple times but each reconnected not long after and was mission accomplished, thanks to Claimyr.


IT WORKS!! Not a scam!

I tried for weeks to get thru to EDD PFL program with no luck. I gave this a try thinking it may be a scam. OMG! It worked and They got thru within an hour and my claim is going to finally get paid!! I upgraded to the $60 call. Best $60 spent!

Read all of our Trustpilot reviews


Ask the community...

  • DO post questions about your issues.
  • DO answer questions and support each other.
  • DO post tips & tricks to help folks.
  • DO NOT post call problems here - there is a support tab at the top for that :)

Julia Hall

•

Just a warning from someone who went through a mileage audit - if you're claiming more than about 15,000 business miles without VERY solid documentation, you're significantly increasing audit risk. Mine was triggered by claiming around 20k miles with only partial records. They didn't just question the mileage either - once they started digging into that, they reviewed EVERYTHING. Ended up costing me way more in accounting fees than what I saved on the deduction.

0 coins

Arjun Patel

•

Oof, that sounds rough. Did you have to pay back taxes and penalties too, or just the accounting fees to deal with it?

0 coins

Maggie Martinez

•

Based on your mileage amounts (around 4,200 total miles), you're well below typical audit trigger thresholds. The key is having reasonable documentation for what you claim. For your Midwest project, yes - both the initial drive there and return home are deductible as business travel since it was a temporary work assignment. Just make sure to separate any personal side trips or detours. Your notebook system can work fine, but I'd suggest adding a few details: starting point, destination, business purpose, and actual miles driven. For trips you forgot to log, you can reconstruct them using Google Maps, but note them as "estimated" and keep supporting evidence like client emails, calendar entries, or receipts from those locations. The IRS doesn't publish specific dollar thresholds, but your total deduction (~$2,967 at current rates) is pretty modest. Focus on having consistent records rather than worrying about audit risk at this level. Most mileage audits are triggered by claiming extremely high percentages of business use or amounts that seem unrealistic for the taxpayer's income/profession.

0 coins

Grace Johnson

•

Hey there! I was in almost the exact same situation when I first started filing taxes. The mix of W-2 income and cash payments can definitely feel confusing at first, but you've got this! A few quick tips from my experience: - For record-keeping with cash jobs like babysitting, even a simple note in your phone with dates and amounts helps. Going forward, try to track it as you go - The $400 threshold for self-employment income that others mentioned is key - since you made $2,800 babysitting, you'll definitely need to report it - Don't stress too much about not having perfect records this time. The IRS understands that cash payments don't always come with formal documentation. Just make your best honest estimate One thing that really helped me was understanding that filing taxes gets SO much easier after your first time. All the forms and terminology that seem scary now will make perfect sense next year. You're learning a valuable life skill! Also, definitely have that conversation with your parents about the dependent status before you file. It affects both your taxes and theirs, so you want to make sure you're on the same page about who's claiming what.

0 coins

This is such great advice! I'm also dealing with my first tax season and the whole "make your best honest estimate" part really takes some pressure off. I was worried I'd get in trouble for not having perfect records of my tutoring income, but it sounds like being honest and doing your best is what matters most. The point about having the dependent conversation with parents is so important too. I almost filed without talking to mine first and could have messed up both our returns! Thanks for the reassurance that it gets easier - right now it feels like learning a foreign language but I guess everyone goes through this learning curve.

0 coins

Sean O'Connor

•

Just wanted to jump in as someone who works in tax preparation - you're asking all the right questions! A few additional points that might help: Since you mentioned your parents have always claimed you as a dependent, definitely confirm this with them before filing. The IRS has specific tests for dependency - age, residence, support, etc. Being 18 and working doesn't automatically disqualify you from being their dependent if you're still a student and they provide more than half your support. For your babysitting income, keep in mind that as self-employment income, you can also deduct legitimate business expenses. Things like transportation costs to/from babysitting jobs, any supplies you bought for the kids, etc. These deductions can help reduce your self-employment tax burden. One more tip - if this is your first time filing and you're feeling overwhelmed, don't hesitate to visit a VITA (Volunteer Income Tax Assistance) site. They offer free tax help for people making under $60,000, and they're specifically trained to help with situations like yours. You can find locations on the IRS website. The fact that you're being proactive about understanding your tax obligations shows great financial responsibility. Many people your age just wing it or ignore the cash income entirely, which can cause problems later. You're on the right track!

0 coins

Gianna Scott

•

Thank you so much for mentioning VITA sites! I had no idea that existed and it sounds perfect for my situation. I'm definitely under the $60k limit lol. Do you know if they can help with both the regular W-2 stuff AND the self-employment income from babysitting? I'm worried about messing up the Schedule C and SE forms you mentioned earlier. Also, the business expense deduction thing is interesting - I did spend some money on gas driving to babysitting jobs and bought snacks for the kids a few times. I didn't keep receipts though since I didn't know it mattered. Is it too late to try to reconstruct those expenses or should I just skip trying to deduct anything this year?

0 coins

Emma Johnson

•

As a tax professional, I want to emphasize that you're absolutely right to be asking these questions! The 1099-R can be confusing for first-time retirement distributors. Since Box 2b "Taxable amount not determined" is NOT checked on your form, the $2,320 in Box 2a is indeed the taxable amount you'll report on your return. However, I'd recommend keeping all your retirement account statements and contribution records just in case. While the plan administrator's calculation is usually correct, there are rare instances where they might not have complete information about your contribution history (especially if you changed jobs or rolled funds between accounts over the years). Also, don't forget to check Box 7 for your distribution code - this will tell you if you owe any early withdrawal penalties on top of the regular income tax. And as others mentioned, any federal taxes withheld in Box 4 will be credited toward your tax bill, just like withholding from a regular paycheck. Since this is new territory for you, you might want to consider having a tax professional review your return this year, especially if you're planning additional distributions. Better to get it right the first time than deal with IRS correspondence later!

0 coins

This is really helpful advice, thank you! As someone who's never dealt with retirement distributions before, I'm definitely feeling overwhelmed by all the different boxes and codes on this form. It's reassuring to hear from a tax professional that the plan administrator's calculation is usually correct. I checked Box 7 on my form and it shows code "1" - from what I've read in this thread, that might mean I'm subject to the early withdrawal penalty since I'm only 35. Is that right? That would be on top of the regular income tax on the $2,320, correct? I'm starting to think having a professional review my return this year might be worth the cost, especially since I might need to take another distribution later in the year. Better to get expert help now than make a costly mistake! Also, should I be worried if my plan administrator made an error? What's the process for getting a corrected 1099-R if needed?

0 coins

You're absolutely correct to be concerned about code "1" in Box 7 - that does indicate an early distribution that's subject to the 10% penalty since you're under 59½. So yes, you'd owe both regular income tax on the $2,320 PLUS an additional $232 penalty (10% of the distribution amount). However, before you panic, double-check if any exceptions might apply to your situation. Common exceptions include: hardship distributions for medical expenses, first-time home purchase (up to $10,000), higher education expenses, or certain unemployment situations. If any of these apply, you should contact your plan administrator to request a corrected 1099-R with the appropriate code. If you need a corrected form, contact your plan administrator immediately and explain the situation. They'll issue a corrected 1099-R (usually marked as "CORRECTED" at the top) with the proper distribution code. The IRS gets copies of all 1099-Rs, so having the correct one is important. Given the potential penalty and your plans for future distributions, I'd definitely recommend getting professional help this year. A tax pro can also help you strategize the timing of future distributions to minimize your overall tax impact.

0 coins

I went through this exact same situation last year and made the mistake of not understanding all the codes and boxes on my 1099-R. One thing I learned the hard way is that even if Box 2a shows the full amount as taxable, you should still verify this against your own records if you have any reason to think there might be after-tax contributions involved. Also, I see some discussion about Box 7 codes - if you're seeing code "1" and you're under 59½, definitely look into whether any penalty exceptions might apply before you file. I initially thought I'd owe the 10% penalty, but it turned out my distribution qualified for the medical expense exception. Had to get a corrected 1099-R, but it saved me several hundred dollars. One more tip: if you do end up owing both income tax and the early withdrawal penalty on this distribution, consider adjusting your withholding or making estimated payments if you're planning another distribution this year. I got hit with underpayment penalties because I didn't plan ahead for the additional tax burden. The IRS doesn't care that the extra tax came from an unexpected retirement distribution - they still expect you to pay throughout the year.

0 coins

This is incredibly helpful, thank you for sharing your experience! As someone new to all this, it's really valuable to hear from people who've been through similar situations. The point about medical expense exceptions is particularly relevant to me since part of the reason I took this distribution was to cover some unexpected medical bills. How exactly did you go about getting the corrected 1099-R? Did you have to provide documentation to your plan administrator about the medical expenses, or was it more straightforward? And do you remember roughly how long it took to get the corrected form? Your warning about underpayment penalties is also something I hadn't considered. Since I might need another distribution later this year for more medical expenses, I should probably start planning for the tax implications now rather than getting surprised at filing time. Did you end up making estimated payments, or did you adjust your regular paycheck withholding? Thanks again for the practical advice - it's so much more helpful than just reading the IRS instructions!

0 coins

Lucy Lam

•

Thanks for sharing your audit experience! This is really helpful for those of us in similar situations. Just to clarify - when you say you kept records showing both spouses used it as primary residence, what specific documentation did the IRS want to see during the audit? I'm asking because my husband owned our home for 8 years before we married, and we've been living there together for 3 years since. I want to make sure I'm keeping the right paperwork in case we get audited when we eventually sell. Did they ask for things like utility bills in both names, voter registration, or something more specific?

0 coins

QuantumQueen

•

Great question about documentation! During my audit, the IRS requested several types of records to verify both spouses used the home as primary residence. They wanted to see utility bills, property tax statements, voter registration records, driver's license addresses, bank statements showing the home address, and insurance policies - basically anything showing we both consistently used that address as our main residence during the required 2-year period. The key was showing a pattern of both spouses using the address for official purposes over the full time period. One-off documents weren't enough - they wanted to see consistent evidence from multiple sources. I'd recommend keeping utility bills in both names if possible, updating voter registration and driver's licenses promptly after marriage, and maintaining bank/credit card statements that show the home address for both spouses.

0 coins

NeonNova

•

This is such a common situation and it sounds like you're on the right track! I went through something very similar when my wife and I sold our home last year. She had owned it for 6 years before we got married, and we lived there together for 4 years after marriage before selling. The key thing to remember is that for married couples filing jointly, the IRS allows you to combine your ownership and use periods. Since your husband owned and used the home for 10+ years before marriage, and you've both lived there for 2+ years since marriage, you easily meet both the ownership test (at least one spouse owned for 2+ years) and the use test (both spouses used as primary residence for 2+ years). Being added to the deed through your trust doesn't reset anything - the IRS counts ownership from your husband's original purchase date. We qualified for the full $500,000 exclusion without any issues. Just make sure you have good documentation of both of you living there as your primary residence during those 2 years post-marriage, in case you ever need to prove it later.

0 coins

Norman Fraser

•

This is really reassuring to hear from someone who actually went through the process! I'm curious though - did you run into any complications with the trust aspect when you filed? I'm wondering if having the property in a revocable trust changes anything about how you report the sale or claim the exclusion, or if the IRS just looks through the trust to the underlying ownership like it never existed for tax purposes.

0 coins

Dmitry Smirnov

•

Great question about the trust complications! In our case, the revocable trust didn't create any issues at all. For tax purposes, the IRS treats revocable trusts as "disregarded entities" - meaning they essentially look through the trust as if it doesn't exist. We reported the sale on our joint return exactly as if we owned the property directly, and claimed the full Section 121 exclusion without any special forms or complications. The key is that it's a revocable trust where you're both trustees and beneficiaries. The IRS considers this the same as direct ownership for income tax purposes. If it were an irrevocable trust or had different beneficiaries, that could complicate things, but standard revocable living trusts are designed to be tax-transparent. Just make sure your tax preparer understands the trust structure, but it shouldn't change your Section 121 eligibility or reporting requirements at all.

0 coins

Javier Torres

•

I'm currently facing a very similar situation and this entire thread has been incredibly educational! I took Section 179 depreciation on some business equipment in 2022 and now I'm dealing with the recapture implications after selling it this year. One thing I learned from my tax professional that might be helpful - the recapture calculation can sometimes be more complex if you used bonus depreciation in combination with Section 179. In my case, I had equipment that qualified for both, and the recapture treatment varies slightly depending on which method was actually applied to each dollar of depreciation. For anyone dealing with the mortgage situation, I found that having a year-over-year cash flow analysis really helped lenders understand that the depreciation was a tax strategy, not a reflection of actual business performance. My business bank statements showed consistent revenue and expenses throughout the depreciation and recapture periods, which demonstrated operational stability separate from the tax timing effects. The stress of this situation is real, but reading everyone's experiences here has been so reassuring. It's clear that with proper documentation and the right lender, this is definitely a manageable situation that many business owners navigate successfully.

0 coins

This is such a great point about the complexity when combining Section 179 and bonus depreciation! I'm just learning about all these different depreciation methods and had no idea they could interact in ways that affect the recapture calculation. Your cash flow analysis approach is brilliant - showing that the business operations remained stable while the tax numbers were fluctuating due to strategic timing decisions really helps separate the operational story from the tax story. I think that's exactly what lenders need to see to understand that we're not dealing with a business performance issue. I'm definitely going to implement your suggestion about preparing bank statements that show consistent business activity throughout the depreciation and recapture periods. That operational stability narrative seems like it would be much more meaningful to underwriters than just trying to explain the tax complexities. Like you, I've found this whole thread incredibly reassuring. It's amazing how much less overwhelming this situation feels when you realize how many other business owners have successfully navigated these same depreciation timing challenges. The key seems to be preparation, documentation, and finding the right professionals who understand these strategies. Thanks for sharing your experience - especially the detail about the interaction between different depreciation methods. That's definitely something I need to discuss with my tax advisor to make sure I'm calculating everything correctly!

0 coins

CosmicCaptain

•

I'm dealing with a very similar situation right now and wanted to share what I've learned from working through the depreciation recapture process with my tax advisor. The $132k you received from the sale will indeed be subject to depreciation recapture since your adjusted basis is $0 after the full depreciation. However, since this is a vehicle (Section 1245 property), it's taxed at your ordinary income rate, not the 25% rate that applies to real estate depreciation recapture. One thing that helped me feel better about the situation was calculating the net tax effect over both years. If you were in a higher tax bracket in 2022 when you took the $144k deduction, the overall strategy might still save you money even after paying the recapture tax in 2023. For the mortgage situation, I'd recommend creating what my loan officer called a "business income story" - a simple document showing your normal income before 2022, the strategic depreciation decision, the recapture year, and projected normalized income going forward. This helps lenders see it as sophisticated tax planning rather than business volatility. Also, consider getting quotes from multiple lenders, especially credit unions and community banks. They often have more flexibility in underwriting self-employed borrowers and understanding business tax strategies than the big banks with automated systems. The timing is definitely stressful, but it's a very common situation that many business owners navigate successfully with proper documentation!

0 coins

Prev1...140141142143144...5643Next