
IRS
CommunityGovernment Services


Ask the community...
I'm a middle school history teacher at a private school and I'm really confused about my tax situation. I work full time (7AM-3PM, 5 days a week) teaching 8 periods a day including an elective cultural studies course. My annual salary is only $21,000 for the 180-day school year (works out to about $14.50/hr) in a very high cost of living area. When tax season came around, I was shocked to receive a 1099-MISC instead of a W-2 form from the school. When I asked my principal about this, she gave me a strange explanation that it's "because the school was founded by a Catholic missionary family in the early 2000s." I have no idea what that has to do with my tax forms! I went to a professional tax preparer who was equally confused about why I would be getting a 1099 instead of a W-2 when I'm clearly an employee with set hours, a classroom, and school-directed work. I'm really worried about potential trouble with the IRS. I'm already paying around $2,700 in taxes and living with my aunt because I can't afford even the cheapest apartment in my area. I do work other jobs evenings/weekends/summers through a different organization to cover basic expenses like insurance and transportation. Any advice would be greatly appreciated! I don't want to get in trouble with the IRS, but I also don't think this is right.
Seriously frustrated right now. My husband and I are both 22, got married last summer, and we're trying to do our taxes together for the first time. I'm a full-time student at State University and paid about $7,800 in qualified education expenses last year. When I was putting everything into TurboTax, I was expecting to get the American Opportunity Tax Credit like I did when I filed as single last year, but it's saying we don't qualify because our combined income is too high?? We made around $84,000 together last year (I worked part-time, he works full-time). Nobody told me that getting married would screw us out of education credits! We were counting on getting that credit to help pay for next semester. The phaseout apparently starts at $80,000 for married filing jointly. Has anyone else dealt with this? Is there anything we can do to still qualify for some kind of education credit? Maybe the Lifetime Learning Credit instead? Or should we have filed separately? This is so frustrating.
Random question - has anyone tried filing as Married Filing Separately to get around the education credit income limits? My wife and I are in a similar situation and wondering if that would help.
I went through this exact same situation two years ago! The marriage penalty on education credits is so frustrating, especially when no one warns you about it beforehand. Since you're at $84,000 AGI, you should still qualify for a partial American Opportunity Credit - it doesn't completely phase out until $180,000 for married filing jointly. Make sure you're calculating this correctly in TurboTax because even a partial credit is better than nothing. A few things that helped me maximize what we could get back: 1. Max out any pre-tax retirement contributions (401k, traditional IRA) to lower your AGI 2. If either of you is eligible for an HSA, that also reduces AGI 3. Double-check that you're including ALL qualified expenses - required textbooks, lab fees, technology fees required by the school Also, don't overlook the Lifetime Learning Credit as a backup. While it's generally less generous than AOTC, it might work better for your specific situation depending on how your expenses break down. The income limits are really poorly designed for married couples, but there are still ways to work within the system to get some benefit!
I've been buying and selling collectibles as a side hobby through different forums for years. Recently, I've been strictly using F&F on PayPal because I heard they dropped the reporting threshold to $600 for Goods & Services payments, and I didn't want the tax headache. Problem is, more and more buyers are insisting on G&S for the buyer protection, and I'm losing potential sales by refusing. I'm 99% sure I'm actually losing money overall on these transactions since I'm buying used items at conventions and from other collectors, then selling them when I need to make space or change my collection focus. My big question: How do I properly document that these PayPal 1099k sales aren't actually taxable income since I'm selling at a loss? The tricky part is that many of my purchases are from other hobbyists through forums using PayPal or cash at meetups, so I don't have formal store receipts for most items. Does anyone have a sample of what documentation looks like when reporting that the 1099k amount is actually a loss? Is there a specific form? And what's the best way to track my purchase/sale prices going forward to avoid paying taxes on money I'm not actually making?
im in kinda same boat with my sneaker reselling but sometimes i make profit sometimes loss. my accountant told me since its not just a hobby but im trying to make profit overall, i need to file schedule C even for the years i lose money. if u report losses too many years in a row irs might say its just a hobby not a business and disallow the losses. thats what happened to my cousin with his baseball card collection
Great thread! I'm dealing with a similar situation with my Pokemon card collection. One thing I learned from my CPA is that you can use the "fair market value" method for establishing your cost basis on items you bought years ago without receipts. For example, if you sold a card in 2024 that you bought at a convention in 2019, you can research what that card was selling for in 2019 using sites like eBay sold listings, price guides, or auction records from that time period. The IRS accepts this as reasonable documentation as long as you're consistent and not inflating values. I've been going back through old forum posts and Facebook groups where people discussed prices they paid for items - sometimes that's the best evidence you can find. It's tedious work but worth it when you're looking at a big 1099-K amount that doesn't reflect your actual profit. Also remember that if you're consistently losing money over multiple years, you might want to treat it as a hobby rather than a business to avoid the Schedule C complications that Noah mentioned. Just depends on your specific situation and intent.
Great question! By "consistent" I mean using the same methodology across similar items - you don't have to use eBay for everything, but if you use eBay sold listings for one Pokemon card from 2019, you should generally use that same approach for other Pokemon cards from that era rather than switching to price guides that might show different values. You absolutely can go back 5+ years - in fact, that's often when you'll see the biggest difference between purchase price and current values, which helps demonstrate legitimate losses. For older items, try to find data points as close to your actual purchase date as possible. Archive.org sometimes has snapshots of old price guide websites, and some auction houses keep historical records. The key is showing you made a reasonable, good-faith effort to determine what you actually paid. Document your research process - save screenshots of the eBay sold listings you used, note the dates and sources. If an auditor questions it, you can show exactly how you arrived at your numbers.
Good question! By "consistent" I mean using a reasonable and systematic approach rather than cherry-picking. You don't have to use the exact same source for every item, but your methodology should be defensible. For example, using eBay sold listings for most items but switching to a price guide for rare items where sales data is sparse is fine. For the timeframe, 5+ years is definitely doable. I've successfully documented items going back 6-7 years using archived price data. The key is showing you made a good-faith effort to find contemporaneous market values. Archive.org can be helpful for accessing old price guide websites, and some auction houses maintain searchable databases of past sales. One tip: document your research process! Keep notes on which sources you used and why. If questioned, being able to show you used multiple data points and took a conservative approach goes a long way with the IRS.
I have a retired client who received a Statement of Annuity Paid from the Office of Personnel Management (similar to a 1099-R), and I'm struggling to figure out how much is taxable. I haven't worked with this specific form before and could use some advice. Here's the breakdown of what's on the form: - Box 1: Gross distribution $25,000 - Box 2a: Taxable amount listed as "Unknown" - Box 9b: Total employee contributions $74,356 - There's also a footnote stating: "Gross annuity reduced by $14,530.80 paid to former spouse as part of divorce agreement" I'm thinking none of this is taxable since the employee contributions in Box 9b exceed the distribution amount in Box 1. But I've never seen Box 9b be larger than Box 1 on a 1099-R before, so I'm confused. Is the amount in Box 9b the basis in the plan, and will it be reduced by this year's distribution next year? What's throwing me off even more is that I looked at last year's tax return (prepared by another CPA), and they showed $19,000 of a $22,000 distribution as taxable. I'm trying to get last year's statement to compare, but this seems odd given the large employee contribution amount. Also, does the payment to the ex-spouse mentioned in the footnote affect the taxability at all? Really appreciate any help with this!
Im confused about how to handle the divorce payment. If the client doesn't receive that money, why does it affect their taxes? Doesn't the ex get their own tax form?
The OPM is weird about this. Ex-spouse gets a 1099-R but the original retiree's form still shows the full amount before the divorce payment. It's like they're paying tax on money they never received! But its actually more complicated - the Simplified Method calculation is still based on the full original benefit. The ex-spouse has to report their portion and pay taxes on it separately.
I've handled several OPM annuity situations like this, and the key is understanding that the Simplified Method calculation was locked in when your client first retired. The $74,356 in Box 9b represents their lifetime contributions, but you can't just compare it to this year's distribution to determine taxability. When they first started receiving payments, a monthly exclusion amount was calculated based on their age and life expectancy at retirement. This same dollar amount is excluded from taxes each month until they've recovered their full $74,356 in contributions. After that, everything becomes taxable. Regarding the divorce payment - this is tricky. Your client's form shows the gross amount before the $14,530.80 payment to the ex-spouse, but for the Simplified Method calculation, you still use the full gross amount. The ex-spouse should receive their own 1099-R for the portion they received and will report that income separately. To get the correct calculation, you really need to find either the original Simplified Method worksheet from when payments began, or get the client's retirement date and age to recalculate it. The fact that the previous CPA showed most of the distribution as taxable suggests they were correctly applying an established exclusion amount that's much smaller than what you might expect.
Yes, OPM keeps detailed records of all retirement benefits and can provide you with the original start date and calculation details. You'll need Form SF-3112 (Authorization and Release of Information) signed by your client to request this information directly from OPM. Alternatively, you can often find the retirement date on the client's final pay stub from their federal employment, or look at their first Social Security statement after retirement - federal retirees typically have a gap in their SS earnings record that corresponds to their retirement date. If you absolutely can't get the exact date, you can use the IRS life expectancy tables in Publication 590-B to make a reasonable estimate, but having the precise information from OMP will give you the most accurate calculation and avoid any potential issues down the road.
Yes, OPM should have all the retirement details on file! You can request this information by having your client call OPM's Retirement Information Office at 1-888-767-6738, or they can submit a written request. They'll need to provide authorization for you to discuss their account if you want to call directly. OPM can provide the exact date payments began, the client's age at retirement, and even the original calculation method that was used. This is much more reliable than trying to reconstruct it from memory or incomplete records. Alternatively, if your client has been filing returns consistently, you could also request transcripts from the IRS for the first few years they received the annuity. The transcript should show if a Simplified Method worksheet was filed, and sometimes includes the key calculation details. The important thing is getting the accurate monthly exclusion amount that was established at the beginning - using the wrong number could significantly affect the tax liability and potentially trigger issues down the road.
Just checked my transcripts and I see code 150 and 570 both dated 3/4, then theres a code 971 dated 3/11. Can anyone tell me what this means for my refund timeline? Really need this money soon.
Those codes are pretty standard when the IRS needs to review something! Code 150 means they received and processed your return, 570 is just a temporary hold (usually for verification), and 971 means they're mailing you a notice explaining what they need. I had the exact same sequence last year and it took about 4 weeks total to clear up. The notice I got was just asking me to verify my identity online through ID.me, which was actually pretty quick once I got around to doing it. Try not to stress too much - these holds are super common this year and most resolve without any major issues. Just keep an eye on your transcript updates (they refresh on Fridays) and watch for that notice in the mail! ๐ฌ
I went through this exact situation last year! Those codes are actually pretty routine - 150 means your return was processed, 570 is a temporary refund hold, and 971 indicates they're sending you a notice explaining why. In my case, I got a CP05 notice about 10 days after the 971 date asking for identity verification. Once I completed the ID.me process (took about 20 minutes), my refund was released within 2 weeks. The whole thing from start to finish was about 5 weeks. I know the waiting is stressful when you really need the money, but try to stay patient. Check your transcript every Friday for updates and keep an eye out for that notice in the mail. Most of these holds resolve pretty smoothly once you provide whatever verification they need. Hang in there! ๐ช
This is super helpful, thank you! 5 weeks total doesn't sound too bad honestly. I'm at about 2 weeks since my 971 code appeared so hopefully I'll get that notice soon. Did you have any issues with the ID.me verification or was it pretty straightforward? I've been putting off setting up an account but sounds like I should probably get that ready to go.
Sean Flanagan
The IRS has a "Safe Harbor" provision (Section 530) that some small religious schools try to use as a loophole, but it doesn't apply in situations like yours. They have to meet very specific requirements including consistent treatment of all similar workers and a "reasonable basis" for classification. With you working set hours, teaching assigned curriculum, and using their facilities, there's no reasonable basis for contractor status. The school is definitely in the wrong here. If they don't fix this after you bring it up, file Form 8919 "Uncollected Social Security and Medicare Tax on Wages" with your tax return to pay only your half of these taxes instead of the full self-employment tax. Check code G in box 9: "I received a Form 1099 but I am a statutory employee.
0 coins
GalaxyGlider
AuthorThank you for mentioning Form 8919! That's really helpful and something my tax preparer didn't bring up. One question though - will filing this form trigger an automatic audit or investigation of the school?
0 coins
Sean Flanagan
Filing Form 8919 doesn't automatically trigger an audit, but it does flag a discrepancy in how the school is classifying you versus how you're classifying yourself. The IRS may contact the school for clarification, which often motivates employers to fix the issue. If you want to avoid this potential conflict, you could file Form SS-8 first, which specifically requests the IRS to make a determination about your status. The downside is that SS-8 determinations can take 6+ months, but you can still file your return with Form 8919 while waiting for the determination.
0 coins
Yara Khoury
I'm dealing with something very similar at my tutoring center! They've been giving me 1099s even though I work set hours, use their curriculum, and teach in their facility. After reading through all these responses, I'm definitely going to try the taxr.ai suggestion first to get documentation, then have a conversation with my employer. The Form 8919 option is really helpful to know about - I had no idea you could pay just the employee portion of Social Security and Medicare taxes when you're misclassified. At $21k salary, that self-employment tax difference is probably costing you around $1,600 extra per year, which is huge when you're already struggling financially. One thing I'd add - document everything about your work relationship (your schedule, any employee handbook, emails about duties, etc.) before you approach the school. Having that paper trail will be crucial whether you end up filing IRS forms or just need to convince your administration to fix the classification. Good luck with this! It's frustrating that schools think they can get away with this just because teachers are often desperate for work and don't know their rights.
0 coins
Giovanni Rossi
Yes, you can potentially recover overpayments from previous years! If the IRS determines you were misclassified, you can file Form 843 "Claim for Refund and Request for Abatement" to get back the excess self-employment taxes you paid. There's generally a 3-year statute of limitations for refund claims, so you should be able to recover at least some of those overpayments. For documentation at my tutoring center, I didn't have a formal employee handbook, but I kept screenshots of my scheduled shifts from their online system, emails about curriculum changes I was required to implement, and photos of the name tag and company materials they provided me. Even small things like being required to wear their branded shirt or having a company email address can help establish the employment relationship. The key is showing that they controlled HOW, WHEN, and WHERE you did your work. Save any communications about dress codes, meeting attendance requirements, or specific teaching methods you're required to use. These all demonstrate the level of control that distinguishes employees from independent contractors. @bc2679de8fd7 How did your conversation with the tutoring center go? I'm planning to approach my nonprofit next week and would love to hear how they responded to the documentation you presented.
0 coins
Malik Johnson
Yes, you can absolutely recover overpayments from previous years! If the IRS determines you were misclassified, you can file Form 843 "Claim for Refund and Request for Abatement" to get back the excess self-employment taxes you paid. You generally have 3 years from the date you filed your return or 2 years from when you paid the tax (whichever is later) to claim a refund. For documentation, any written materials showing they control how/when you work are golden - employee handbooks, schedules, training materials, emails about specific work duties, dress codes, etc. Even things like being required to attend staff meetings or having a company email address help establish employee status. At my tutoring center, I had an "independent contractor agreement" that actually described an employee relationship - set hours, mandatory training, their curriculum, their location. The contract language contradicted the classification, which made it an easy case. The key is showing the employer controls the "how, when, and where" of your work, not just the end result. Keep copies of everything before you approach them - some employers try to "clean up" documentation once they realize they might have a problem.
0 coins