IRS

Can't reach IRS? Claimyr calls for you, so you don't have to wait on hold.

Claimyr is a pay-as-you-go service. We do not charge a recurring subscription.



Fox KTVUABC 7CBSSan Francisco Chronicle

Using Claimyr will:

  • Connect you to a human agent at the IRS
  • Skip the long phone menu
  • Call the correct department
  • Redial until on hold
  • Forward a call to your phone with reduced hold time
  • Give you free callbacks if the IRS drops your call

If I could give 10 stars I would

If I could give 10 stars I would If I could give 10 stars I would Such an amazing service so needed during the times when EDD almost never picks up Claimyr gets me on the phone with EDD every time without fail faster. A much needed service without Claimyr I would have never received the payment I needed to support me during my postpartum recovery. Thank you so much Claimyr!


Really made a difference

Really made a difference, save me time and energy from going to a local office for making the call.


Worth not wasting your time calling for hours.

Was a bit nervous or untrusting at first, but my calls went thru. First time the wait was a bit long but their customer chat line on their page was helpful and put me at ease that I would receive my call. Today my call dropped because of EDD and Claimyr heard my concern on the same chat and another call was made within the hour.


An incredibly helpful service

An incredibly helpful service! Got me connected to a CA EDD agent without major hassle (outside of EDD's agents dropping calls – which Claimyr has free protection for). If you need to file a new claim and can't do it online, pay the $ to Claimyr to get the process started. Absolutely worth it!


Consistent,frustration free, quality Service.

Used this service a couple times now. Before I'd call 200 times in less than a weak frustrated as can be. But using claimyr with a couple hours of waiting i was on the line with an representative or on hold. Dropped a couple times but each reconnected not long after and was mission accomplished, thanks to Claimyr.


IT WORKS!! Not a scam!

I tried for weeks to get thru to EDD PFL program with no luck. I gave this a try thinking it may be a scam. OMG! It worked and They got thru within an hour and my claim is going to finally get paid!! I upgraded to the $60 call. Best $60 spent!

Read all of our Trustpilot reviews


Ask the community...

  • DO post questions about your issues.
  • DO answer questions and support each other.
  • DO post tips & tricks to help folks.
  • DO NOT post call problems here - there is a support tab at the top for that :)

I'm dealing with almost the exact same situation right now! Filed as independent when I should have been claimed as a dependent by my parents. Reading through all these responses has been incredibly helpful - especially hearing from people who actually went through this process successfully. A couple of quick questions for those who have been through this: How specific should the cover letter be? Should we include the exact dollar amounts of the tax difference, or just explain the filing status change? And has anyone had issues with the IRS questioning whether you actually qualify as a dependent after the fact? My parents are really stressed about the potential interest charges, but it sounds like most people here had success paying the lower corrected amount rather than the full incorrect bill. Thanks everyone for sharing your experiences - this is way more helpful than anything I could find on the IRS website!

0 coins

Paolo Ricci

β€’

I'm in a very similar boat and have been following this thread closely! From what I've gathered from everyone's experiences, it seems like the cover letter should be pretty detailed but straightforward. I'd include the exact dollar amounts showing the difference between what was originally calculated versus what should be owed after claiming you as a dependent - this helps the IRS processors understand the scope of the correction. Regarding the dependent qualification question, that's actually a really good point. Make sure you genuinely meet all the IRS tests for being claimed as a dependent (support test, residence test, etc.) before filing the amendments. The IRS might scrutinize this more closely since you're changing from independent to dependent status after the fact. One thing I learned from calling the IRS (finally got through after using one of those callback services mentioned earlier) is that they actually appreciate when taxpayers proactively correct mistakes like this, especially when both parties file amendments simultaneously. The agent told me it shows good faith effort to comply with tax law correctly. Good luck with your amendments - sounds like most people here had success within 2-3 months!

0 coins

Mia Rodriguez

β€’

I went through this exact situation two years ago and want to add a few practical tips that really helped us navigate the process smoothly. First, when you're preparing your cover letters for the amendments, include a clear timeline showing when the original returns were filed, when you realized the mistake, and when you're filing the corrections. This helps the IRS understand the sequence of events. Second, make copies of EVERYTHING before mailing - not just your amended returns, but also the cover letters, supporting documents, and payment calculations. I can't stress this enough because mail can get lost, and having exact copies saved us when we had to follow up. Third, consider sending your amendments via certified mail with return receipt. Yes, it costs a bit more, but you'll have proof of delivery and timing, which can be crucial if there are any processing delays or questions later. One thing that really helped speed our process was including our phone numbers in the cover letters and explicitly stating we were available to answer questions if needed. An IRS agent actually called us to clarify a minor detail, and having that direct communication probably saved weeks of back-and-forth through the mail. The whole process took about 10 weeks for us, and paying the corrected lower amount upfront worked out fine - the small interest charge was much better than the financial stress of overpaying. Hang in there!

0 coins

Diego Ramirez

β€’

This is such great practical advice! I'm definitely going to use the certified mail approach - I never thought about how important it would be to have proof of delivery timing. The tip about including phone numbers in the cover letter is brilliant too. One question about the timeline you mentioned including in the cover letter - did you also explain WHY you initially filed incorrectly? I'm wondering if I should mention that I genuinely thought I qualified as independent because I was confused about the residence test, or if it's better to just focus on correcting the mistake without going into the reasons behind it. Also, when you say you included supporting documents, what specific ones did you find most helpful? I'm thinking about including my college enrollment records and maybe some mail I received at my parents' address to show residence, but I don't want to overwhelm them with paperwork if it's not necessary.

0 coins

Demi Hall

β€’

As someone who works in tax compliance, I want to emphasize something that's been touched on but bears repeating: the wash sale "functionality" isn't missing from FreeTaxUSA - it's working exactly as the IRS intends it to work. The wash sale rule requires brokers to adjust your cost basis and report it on your 1099-B. When you see Box 1g checked, that's your broker telling you (and the IRS) that they've already done all the wash sale calculations and factored them into the adjusted basis in Box 1e. This is actually much better than having tax software try to recalculate wash sales, because your broker has access to all your trading data throughout the year and can track the 30-day windows perfectly. If tax software tried to duplicate this calculation, there's a higher chance of errors or discrepancies with what your broker reported to the IRS. For anyone still worried: the IRS computer systems automatically match your 1099-B entries with what brokers reported. As long as you enter the exact numbers from your 1099-B into FreeTaxUSA, you're in complete compliance. No additional forms, no manual calculations needed. You're making the right choice sticking with FreeTaxUSA and saving the money!

0 coins

@Demi Hall This is exactly what I needed to hear from someone in the industry! I ve'been reading through this whole thread as someone completely new to dealing with wash sales first (year with any significant trading activity and) was getting overwhelmed by all the conflicting information I found online about needing special software or manual calculations. Your explanation about brokers doing the heavy lifting and the IRS systems automatically matching makes so much sense. I was overthinking this whole process and ready to spend money I didn t'need to spend. Just checked my Robinhood 1099-B forms and Box 1g is checked, so it sounds like I m'all set to just enter those numbers directly into FreeTaxUSA. Really appreciate the professional perspective - it s'reassuring to know that the system is actually designed to be simpler than the tax software marketing makes it seem!

0 coins

I went through this exact same situation last year with about $18k in wash sales from some aggressive trading on tech stocks. I was convinced FreeTaxUSA was inadequate and was ready to pay for TurboTax Premium. After doing a deep dive into how wash sales actually work, I realized I was completely misunderstanding the process. Your broker (whether it's Fidelity, Schwab, E*TRADE, etc.) is required by law to calculate wash sale adjustments and include them in the adjusted cost basis they report on your 1099-B. Here's the simple test: Look at Box 1g on your 1099-B forms. If it's checked, your broker has already done ALL the wash sale calculations for you. The adjusted basis in Box 1e already includes the wash sale adjustments. You literally just enter those numbers exactly as they appear into FreeTaxUSA - no special functionality needed. I saved the $79 TurboTax fee and my return was processed without any issues. The IRS gets the same 1099-B forms you do, so as long as your entries match exactly what your broker reported, you're golden. The only time you'd need special wash sale functionality is if your broker somehow failed to calculate wash sales properly (which would be extremely unusual for major brokerages) or if you're doing complex manual calculations for some reason. Check Box 1g first before spending extra money - you'll probably find FreeTaxUSA works perfectly fine!

0 coins

@Oliver Fischer This is such a perfect summary of the whole wash sale situation! I wish I had found this thread months ago when I first started panicking about my wash sales. I spent way too much time researching different tax software options and almost bought TurboTax Premium just for the wash sale features "that" I didn t'even need. Your point about Box 1g being the key indicator is spot on. I just went through all my Vanguard 1099-B forms and every single one has Box 1g checked, which means all my wash sale adjustments are already baked into the adjusted basis amounts. It s'actually kind of brilliant how the system is designed - the brokers do all the complex tracking and calculations throughout the year, and we just report their final numbers. I m'definitely sticking with FreeTaxUSA now. Thanks to everyone in this thread for sharing their real experiences and saving newcomers like me from unnecessary expenses and stress!

0 coins

Jade Santiago

β€’

One important thing to consider is organizing your records NOW before tax season gets busy. Since you mentioned shutting down the business a few months ago, this is actually perfect timing to get everything sorted while it's still fresh in your memory. Create a simple spreadsheet with columns for: Date, Item Description, Purchase Cost, Sale Price, Platform Fees, Shipping Costs, and Net Profit/Loss per transaction. Even if you don't have perfect records, try to reconstruct what you can from your bank statements, PayPal records, and any Whatnot transaction history you can download. Also consider whether you want to treat this as a sole proprietorship (Schedule C) or if there are any advantages to filing as a partnership since you mentioned this was run with your partner. The tax implications can be different, and you might want to consult a tax professional for that specific question since it involves two people and substantial income. The key thing is that high gross sales with low/no profit is actually pretty common in reselling, especially when markets get saturated like you described with Lego. The IRS understands this, but you need solid documentation to support your expense claims.

0 coins

Dmitry Ivanov

β€’

This is really helpful advice about organizing records now! I'm actually in a similar situation with my own reselling business. Quick question - when you mention downloading Whatnot transaction history, do you know if they provide a comprehensive report that includes all the fees and shipping costs? I've been trying to piece together my records from different sources and it's been a nightmare. Also, regarding the partnership vs sole proprietorship question - if they weren't legally married but split the work and expenses, would they each need to file separate Schedule Cs for their portion, or is there a way to handle it as an informal partnership?

0 coins

Carmen Diaz

β€’

@61d990d64ed3 Great questions! For Whatnot transaction history, they do provide seller reports that include gross sales, fees, and some shipping details, but the format isn't always perfect for tax purposes. You'll want to log into your seller dashboard and look for "Reports" or "Analytics" - they usually have monthly/yearly summaries you can download. However, you might still need to cross-reference with your bank statements since some fees get bundled together. For the partnership vs sole proprietorship question - this is tricky when you're unmarried partners. If they truly operated as equal partners sharing expenses and profits, they could file Form 1065 (partnership return) and each receive a K-1 showing their share of income/loss. However, this requires more paperwork and record-keeping. The simpler approach might be for whoever received the 1099-K to file the Schedule C, then handle the profit/loss split between them privately (essentially one person "pays" the other their share). But definitely consult a tax pro for this since it involves two people and substantial amounts - the wrong choice could cost them significantly in taxes or create complications down the road.

0 coins

Something to keep in mind - since you mentioned your partner ran the business but you're both concerned about taxes, make sure you're clear on whose SSN/EIN the Whatnot account was registered under. Whoever's tax ID is associated with the account will receive the 1099-K and be responsible for reporting all the income, even if you both contributed to the business. If the account was under your partner's SSN but you both invested money and time, you'll need to figure out how to handle the income split. The person who gets the 1099-K will need to report the full gross income on their Schedule C, but they can potentially "expense out" payments made to you as a business partner - though this gets complicated without formal partnership agreements. Also, don't stress too much about the high gross sales number. The IRS sees this all the time with resellers, especially on platforms like Whatnot, eBay, etc. What matters is your net profit after legitimate business expenses. Just make sure you have documentation for your major expense categories: inventory costs, shipping supplies, platform fees, storage costs if you rented space, mileage for sourcing inventory, and even a portion of utilities if you used part of your home for the business. The key is being organized and honest about your record-keeping. If you lost money or barely broke even, that's a legitimate business outcome that the IRS recognizes, especially in competitive reselling markets.

0 coins

This is such an important point about the SSN/tax ID issue! I'm dealing with something similar where my boyfriend and I started a reselling business together but everything was set up under his name. We're not sure how to handle the fact that I contributed about 40% of the initial inventory investment and did a lot of the sourcing work, but he'll be getting the 1099-K. From what I understand, he could potentially pay me as a contractor for my work and deduct that as a business expense, but we'd need to be careful about documentation and making sure it looks legitimate to the IRS. Has anyone dealt with this kind of informal partnership situation before? I'm worried we might be overcomplicating things, but also don't want to mess up our taxes over a technicality.

0 coins

Khalid Howes

β€’

I'm confused about something - doesn't the 2-year ownership and use test apply regardless of this non-qualified use issue? Like if you move back and live there for 2 years before selling, wouldn't you qualify for the exclusion anyway? I've been trying to understand this for my own situation.

0 coins

Gael Robinson

β€’

The 2-year ownership and use test is just one part of qualifying for the Section 121 exclusion. The non-qualified use rules (added in 2008) create an additional limitation. While you do need to meet the 2-year test, the exclusion can be limited based on the ratio of non-qualified use periods to total ownership. However, the exception the original poster is asking about is important - periods after you've used the home as a principal residence are NOT considered periods of non-qualified use. That's why their situation is actually more favorable than their CPA might have indicated. Since they lived there for 5 years initially, then let a relative stay without charging rent, they should be able to qualify for the full exclusion after moving back for 2 years.

0 coins

Miguel Castro

β€’

This is a really complex situation, and I appreciate everyone sharing their experiences and insights. As someone who's dealt with similar Section 121 exclusion questions, I want to emphasize how important it is to get this right given the significant tax implications. From what I understand about your situation, the key issue is whether the 17 years your brother-in-law lived there would count as "non-qualified use." Based on the responses here, it sounds like since you weren't charging rent and this was a family arrangement, those years likely wouldn't count against you under the non-qualified use rules. However, given that you're looking at a $675k gain with only $500k in potential exclusion, I'd strongly recommend getting a second opinion from a tax professional who specializes in real estate transactions. The difference between 25% exclusion and full exclusion that's been discussed here could save you tens of thousands of dollars. Also, make sure to document everything about the arrangement with your brother-in-law - even informal family arrangements should be properly documented in case the IRS has questions later. The fact that he paid property taxes directly actually seems to support that this was a family care arrangement rather than a rental situation.

0 coins

QuantumQuasar

β€’

This is excellent advice, Miguel. I'm new to this community but have been following this discussion closely as I'm potentially facing a similar situation with a property I inherited from my grandmother. The documentation point you made really resonates with me. Even though these family arrangements feel informal, having proper records could make all the difference if the IRS ever questions the nature of the arrangement. I'm now thinking I should retroactively document the informal agreement I had with my cousin who's been living in my grandmother's house. One question for the group - when you say "document everything," are we talking about formal written agreements, or would things like family emails and text messages discussing the arrangement be sufficient? I'm trying to understand what level of documentation would actually be helpful in a situation like this. Thanks to everyone who's shared their experiences here. This discussion has been incredibly valuable for understanding these complex tax rules!

0 coins

This appears to be a CP2000 Proposed Adjustment Notice or similar correspondence. These notices typically involve a discrepancy between income reported on your return versus information the IRS received from third parties. The processing timeframe after acceptance varies based on current IRS backlog status and submission method. Electronic submission via the IRS portal generally results in faster processing (6-12 weeks) compared to mail submission (12-16 weeks).

0 coins

Javier Torres

β€’

I submitted my signed form on March 23rd and still haven't received my refund. Is there a specific date when I should start to worry? I'm planning my summer expenses around this refund.

0 coins

Emma Davis

β€’

I analyzed the IRS processing patterns for these adjustment responses using data from various forums. The mean processing time for electronic submissions is 8.3 weeks with a standard deviation of 2.4 weeks. Mail submissions show significantly higher variance with processing times ranging from 10-20 weeks. Authentication protocols for these submissions require multi-stage verification, which contributes to the extended timeline.

0 coins

Zainab Khalil

β€’

I went through this exact process about 18 months ago with a CP2000 notice. Here's what I learned: definitely use the upload option through the IRS website - it's much faster than mail. I submitted mine electronically and got my adjusted refund in about 7 weeks. Make sure to take screenshots of your submission confirmation and save any reference numbers they give you. Also, set up online account access at irs.gov if you haven't already so you can monitor your account transcript for updates. The transcript will show processing codes that indicate where your case stands in the system. One tip: if you're uploading, make sure your signature is clear and the document quality is good - poor scans can cause delays.

0 coins

This is really helpful advice! I'm dealing with a similar situation right now and was debating between mailing and uploading. Your point about document quality is something I hadn't considered - I'll make sure to scan at high resolution. Did you notice any specific processing codes on your transcript that indicated progress, or was it mostly waiting until the final refund code appeared?

0 coins

Prev1...137138139140141...5645Next