IRS

Can't reach IRS? Claimyr connects you to a live IRS agent in minutes.

Claimyr is a pay-as-you-go service. We do not charge a recurring subscription.



Fox KTVUABC 7CBSSan Francisco Chronicle

Using Claimyr will:

  • Connect you to a human agent at the IRS
  • Skip the long phone menu
  • Call the correct department
  • Redial until on hold
  • Forward a call to your phone with reduced hold time
  • Give you free callbacks if the IRS drops your call

If I could give 10 stars I would

If I could give 10 stars I would If I could give 10 stars I would Such an amazing service so needed during the times when EDD almost never picks up Claimyr gets me on the phone with EDD every time without fail faster. A much needed service without Claimyr I would have never received the payment I needed to support me during my postpartum recovery. Thank you so much Claimyr!


Really made a difference

Really made a difference, save me time and energy from going to a local office for making the call.


Worth not wasting your time calling for hours.

Was a bit nervous or untrusting at first, but my calls went thru. First time the wait was a bit long but their customer chat line on their page was helpful and put me at ease that I would receive my call. Today my call dropped because of EDD and Claimyr heard my concern on the same chat and another call was made within the hour.


An incredibly helpful service

An incredibly helpful service! Got me connected to a CA EDD agent without major hassle (outside of EDD's agents dropping calls – which Claimyr has free protection for). If you need to file a new claim and can't do it online, pay the $ to Claimyr to get the process started. Absolutely worth it!


Consistent,frustration free, quality Service.

Used this service a couple times now. Before I'd call 200 times in less than a weak frustrated as can be. But using claimyr with a couple hours of waiting i was on the line with an representative or on hold. Dropped a couple times but each reconnected not long after and was mission accomplished, thanks to Claimyr.


IT WORKS!! Not a scam!

I tried for weeks to get thru to EDD PFL program with no luck. I gave this a try thinking it may be a scam. OMG! It worked and They got thru within an hour and my claim is going to finally get paid!! I upgraded to the $60 call. Best $60 spent!

Read all of our Trustpilot reviews


Ask the community...

  • DO post questions about your issues.
  • DO answer questions and support each other.
  • DO post tips & tricks to help folks.
  • DO NOT post call problems here - there is a support tab at the top for that :)

Axel Far

•

Has anyone had experience with the IRS actually catching and auditing someone over 1098-T scholarship overages? I'm in the same boat with my son having about $14k in excess scholarship and I haven't been reporting it for two years now...starting to get nervous after reading this thread!

0 coins

My neighbor's daughter got an audit letter specifically about unreported scholarship income last year. They had to pay back taxes plus interest. Apparently the college had reported the 1098-T to the IRS, and they got flagged when they didn't report the excess on their taxes. Not sure how common it is though.

0 coins

Sean Kelly

•

Your tax preparer's casual approach is really concerning. The IRS has specific rules about scholarship income, and Publication 970 clearly states that scholarship amounts exceeding qualified education expenses are taxable to the student. Even though your daughter is your dependent, she still needs to file her own return if she has taxable income above the filing threshold. The $16,000 difference you mentioned would likely put her over the standard deduction limit, meaning she'd need to file and pay taxes on that excess amount. The college reports this information to the IRS via Form 1098-T, so they have the data to potentially flag discrepancies. I'd strongly recommend getting a second opinion from a CPA who specializes in education tax issues. While many people might not get caught, intentionally ignoring reportable income isn't worth the risk of penalties, interest, and potential audit issues down the road. Better to handle it correctly from the start.

0 coins

Malia Ponder

•

This is exactly the kind of thorough advice I was hoping to see! As someone new to navigating college financial aid and taxes, I really appreciate you mentioning Publication 970 - that gives me something concrete to reference. Quick question though - you mentioned the standard deduction limit. For 2024, wouldn't a dependent student's filing threshold be lower than the standard deduction amount? I thought I read somewhere that dependents have different thresholds, but I could be totally wrong about that. Also, do you happen to know if there are any legitimate ways to reduce the taxable portion? Like if some of the scholarship money went toward required books or supplies that weren't captured in the 1098-T's box 1?

0 coins

Thank you everyone for all this helpful information! I'm the original poster and I just wanted to update that I successfully completed my Schedule 1 using the advice here. You were all absolutely right - Line 16 is just the simple sum of lines 1-15 in the far right column. I ended up with $13,360 total ($8,700 business income + $410 capital gain + $4,250 unemployment) and made sure to transfer that exact amount to Line 8 on my Form 1040. I double-checked my math three times after reading about the software errors some of you experienced! One thing I learned from this thread is that I should probably consider getting help with next year's taxes since my side business is growing. The tips about taxr.ai and Claimyr are bookmarked for future reference. Really appreciate this community - you saved me from potentially making costly mistakes!

0 coins

Beth Ford

•

Glad to hear you got it sorted out! As someone new to this community, I just wanted to say how helpful this whole thread has been. I'm dealing with my first Schedule 1 this year too (started freelance writing) and was totally overwhelmed by all the different line items. Seeing how you worked through the math step-by-step really clarified things for me. I appreciate everyone taking the time to explain not just the "what" but also the "why" behind Line 16 - makes it so much less intimidating!

0 coins

As someone who's been dealing with tax preparation for years, I want to emphasize something crucial that came up in this thread - the importance of keeping detailed records throughout the year. I see you mentioned business income of $8,700 from your side gig, and that's exactly the kind of income that can get complicated quickly. For next year, consider setting up a simple spreadsheet or using accounting software to track your business income and expenses monthly. This will make Schedule 1 much easier and could potentially save you money through deductions you might be missing. Business expenses like equipment, software, home office deductions, and even mileage can significantly reduce that $8,700 taxable income. Also, since you mentioned not trusting tax software after it messed up your state taxes, you might want to look into having a tax professional review your return before filing - especially with business income involved. The peace of mind is often worth the cost, and they can catch things that might save you more than their fee.

0 coins

This is such valuable advice! I'm new to both this community and to having business income, and your point about record-keeping really hits home. I've been scrambling to gather all my receipts and income records for this tax season, and it's been a nightmare. Starting a monthly tracking system sounds like it would save so much stress next year. Do you have any specific software recommendations for someone just starting out with freelance income? I'm looking for something simple but thorough enough to handle basic business expenses and income tracking.

0 coins

Michigan Tax Return Stuck in Manual Review for 4+ Weeks - No Updates Since Feb 3, 2025 on Treasury eServices Portal

I filed my Michigan state taxes on January 28, 2025, and my return status has been stuck in manual review since February 3rd, 2025. When I check the Michigan Department of Treasury eServices portal under Individual Income Tax, it just shows the same information it has for weeks. The portal initially showed: Date: Jan 28, 2025 Description: "We have received your Tax Return." But since February 3rd, it's been displaying: Date: Feb 3, 2025 Description: "If your return status is listed as pending review that means your return was selected for a manual review, requiring additional processing time. If further information is necessary to complete your return, you will be contacted by mail. The Department is unable to provide a specific date when your return will be completed, any dates provided are an estimated completion date. Michigan Department of Treasury appreciates your continued patience." They say they'll contact me by mail if they need any additional information to complete the return, but I haven't received anything yet. I log into the eServices portal almost daily to check if there's any update, but it's always the same message. The Department of Treasury website specifically states they "are unable to provide a specific date when your return will be completed" and that any dates shown are just estimates. It's been over 4 weeks now since I got the initial confirmation that "We have received your Tax Return" on January 28th, and I'm starting to get worried. I was counting on getting this refund soon. The Michigan Department of Treasury says they "appreciate my continued patience" but this waiting is stressing me out. Has anyone else dealt with this manual review process? How long did it take to resolve? I'm wondering if I should call them or just keep waiting.

Mei-Ling Chen

•

I'm in the exact same boat as everyone here! Filed my Michigan return on February 3rd and it's been stuck in manual review since February 10th. This thread has been such a relief to find - I was starting to think I was the only one dealing with this frustrating waiting game. Like so many others have mentioned, I've been obsessively checking the eServices portal multiple times a day hoping for any kind of update. It's become this anxious habit where I refresh the page expecting something different, but it's always that same message about manual review and "appreciating patience." Reading through everyone's experiences and timelines has really helped me understand that this is just Michigan's standard fraud prevention process during peak filing season, not some red flag on my specific return. The explanation about batch processing and automated verification checks makes so much more sense than what I was imagining. I'm definitely going to follow everyone's advice and switch to weekly portal checks instead of this daily obsession. It's clear that checking more often just adds stress without actually helping anything move faster. Based on all the shared timelines here, it sounds like those of us who filed in early February should hopefully start seeing some movement in the next few weeks. Thanks Oliver for starting this incredibly helpful discussion - this community support has been amazing for managing the anxiety! šŸ™

0 coins

James Maki

•

@Mei-Ling Chen Welcome to our unofficial Michigan manual review support group! 😊 Your timeline of filing February 3rd and entering review February 10th fits perfectly with everyone else s'pattern. It s'honestly amazing how many of us are all going through this exact same process right now. I just discovered this thread today and it s'been such a huge relief! I filed my Michigan return on February 1st and it s'been in manual review since February 8th. Like you, I ve'been doing the obsessive daily portal checking - sometimes even multiple times a day when my anxiety gets really high. Reading through all these experiences has completely changed my perspective on what s'happening. Before finding this community, I was convinced there was something seriously wrong with my return or that I had somehow triggered an audit. Now I understand this is just Michigan s'standard batch processing system for fraud prevention during peak season. The weekly check strategy everyone s'talking about makes so much sense - daily checking clearly just feeds our anxiety without helping anything! Based on all the timelines shared here, it looks like us early February filers should hopefully see some movement in the next 3-4 weeks. Thanks for sharing your experience and adding to this incredibly supportive thread! šŸ¤ž

0 coins

I'm dealing with this exact same situation! Filed my Michigan return on January 26th and it's been in manual review since February 2nd. Finding this thread has been such a huge relief - I was starting to panic thinking I had done something wrong on my return. Like everyone else here, I've been caught in that obsessive daily portal checking cycle. I probably refresh that eServices page 4-5 times a day hoping for any kind of change, but it's always the same "manual review" message. It's become this compulsive habit that's definitely not helping my stress levels! Reading through all these shared experiences has really opened my eyes to how common this process is during Michigan's peak filing season. The explanations about fraud prevention, batch processing, and automated verification make so much more sense than what I was imagining in my head. What gives me the most hope is hearing that most people eventually get their returns processed without needing to provide additional documentation. The "no mail is good news" rule seems to hold true for almost everyone here. I'm definitely joining the weekly check club instead of my current daily obsession! Based on all the timelines shared in this thread, it sounds like those of us who filed in late January should hopefully start seeing some movement very soon. Thanks Oliver for creating this incredibly supportive discussion - knowing we're all in this waiting game together makes it so much more bearable! šŸ™

0 coins

@Miranda Singer Your timeline is almost identical to mine! I filed on January 28th and entered manual review on February 3rd, so we re'basically on the exact same track. This thread has been such a lifesaver for my anxiety too - before finding this community I was convinced I had somehow messed up my taxes or was being audited. The obsessive portal checking is so relatable! I ve'been refreshing that page multiple times a day like it s'social media šŸ˜… It s'really comforting to know that based on everyone s'experiences here, late January filers like us should hopefully see some movement any day now. We re'definitely at that 6+ week mark that seems to be when things start happening. Thanks for sharing your experience - it helps knowing we re'all riding this roller coaster together! šŸŽ¢

0 coins

Yuki Ito

•

This is a frustrating situation that many field workers face. While the tax deduction landscape changed significantly in 2018, there are still some important distinctions to understand about your specific situation. Since you mentioned you don't have a regular office and travel to different client sites daily, this could potentially change how your mileage should be classified. The IRS distinguishes between: 1. **Commuting** - travel from home to your regular workplace (not deductible) 2. **Business travel** - travel between work locations or to temporary work sites (should be reimbursable) If you're truly going to different temporary work locations each day rather than one fixed workplace, your employer's policy of treating the first 90 miles as "commuting" may not align with IRS guidelines. Here's what I'd recommend: - Document that you have no fixed office location - Keep records showing you visit different client sites - Research IRS Publication 463 which covers travel expenses - Present this information to your employer's HR/finance department While you can't currently deduct unreimbursed employee expenses on your personal taxes, you may have grounds to argue for better reimbursement from your employer based on the temporary work location rules. The key is demonstrating that your daily travel pattern doesn't fit the traditional "home to office" commute model.

0 coins

This is really helpful! I think you've hit on exactly what I need to focus on. I definitely don't have a regular office - I get my assignments each morning and drive to completely different locations every day. Some are 30 miles away, others are 80+ miles. I never go to the same place twice in a week usually. Based on what you're saying about temporary work locations, it sounds like my employer might be incorrectly classifying ALL my driving as commuting when it should actually be business travel. Do you know if there's a specific distance threshold or time period that defines "temporary" versus "regular" work locations? I want to make sure I have the right terminology when I talk to HR. Also, would it help to get something in writing from my supervisor confirming that I have no assigned office location and that all my work sites are temporary assignments?

0 coins

Great questions! The IRS generally considers a work location "temporary" if you realistically expect to work there for one year or less. If you're going to different sites daily/weekly and none are expected to be long-term assignments, that strongly supports the temporary work location classification. Getting written confirmation from your supervisor about having no fixed office location would be extremely valuable documentation. I'd also recommend requesting a letter stating that your work assignments are to various temporary client locations rather than a regular workplace. When you approach HR, emphasize these key points: - No fixed office or regular workplace - Daily assignments to different temporary locations - Current policy may misclassify business travel as commuting - Request policy review based on IRS Publication 463 guidelines You might also want to calculate the annual financial impact - if you're losing $300+ per week in unreimbursed expenses, that's over $15,000 annually. Having concrete numbers often gets management's attention faster than abstract policy discussions. The fact that you use your own vehicle and tools for temporary work assignments actually strengthens your case that this is business travel, not a regular commute to a fixed workplace.

0 coins

I've been following this thread and want to add something important that might help your case. The IRS actually has a specific ruling about workers who have no fixed office location - it's called the "home office deduction" principle, but it also applies to travel reimbursement policies. If your home is your principal place of business (which sounds like it might be, since you get assignments there and have no fixed office), then travel from your home to temporary work locations should be considered business travel, not commuting. This is covered under IRS Revenue Ruling 99-7. The key factors the IRS considers are: - Do you perform administrative tasks at home? - Do you receive work assignments at home? - Is your home where you store work materials/tools? - Do you have no other fixed business location? If you can answer "yes" to these questions, you have a strong argument that your employer's 90-mile "commute" exclusion is incorrect. Your home should be treated as your business headquarters, making all travel to client sites reimbursable business travel. I'd suggest documenting these factors and presenting them to your employer along with Revenue Ruling 99-7. Even though you can't deduct unreimbursed expenses personally, this ruling could help you get proper reimbursement from your company.

0 coins

This is exactly the kind of information I needed! I definitely check all those boxes - I receive my daily assignments via email at home, store all my work tools in my garage, do my paperwork and invoicing from my home office, and have zero fixed business locations. Revenue Ruling 99-7 sounds like it could be a game-changer for my situation. Do you happen to know if there are any specific forms or documentation templates that HR departments typically expect when employees request policy reviews based on IRS rulings? I want to present this as professionally as possible. Also, I'm curious - have you seen other people successfully use this approach with their employers? I'm hoping this isn't one of those "technically correct but companies ignore it anyway" situations. Thanks for pointing me toward this specific ruling - it feels like the first real solution I've found in this whole mess!

0 coins

Aria Khan

•

I've had success with this approach in several cases! The key is presenting it as a policy compliance issue rather than a personal complaint. Here's what has worked best: Create a formal memo that includes: 1. Reference to Revenue Ruling 99-7 (include a copy) 2. Documentation that your home qualifies as your principal place of business 3. Evidence that all work sites are temporary locations 4. Calculation of annual financial impact using current vs. compliant reimbursement Most HR departments take IRS compliance seriously, especially when presented with specific rulings and clear documentation. I've seen companies adjust policies within 30-60 days when the evidence is solid. The strongest cases include a letter from your supervisor confirming no fixed workplace, photos of your home office setup, and a log showing the variety of temporary work locations. Frame it as helping the company align with federal guidelines rather than requesting special treatment. One tip: if HR initially pushes back, ask them to get a written opinion from their tax advisor about Revenue Ruling 99-7's applicability to your situation. That often moves things forward quickly since most advisors will confirm the ruling supports your position.

0 coins

Kayla Morgan

•

Just a quick tip from a former bank employee: make sure the SSNs on the 1099-INT forms match your children's Social Security cards exactly. Sometimes banks make errors, especially with children's accounts that might have been set up as custodial accounts. I've seen cases where the parent's SSN accidentally got associated with the child's account, which creates a real headache when tax forms are generated. Might be worth double-checking before you file!

0 coins

James Maki

•

This happened to us! The bank accidentally put my SSN on my son's 1099-INT form instead of his. How do we fix this if we spot an error? Do we need to contact the bank first or can we just correct it on the tax form?

0 coins

Mateo Warren

•

You absolutely need to contact the bank first to get a corrected 1099-INT form issued. The IRS matches the SSN on tax forms with what's reported by the issuing institution, so if there's a mismatch, it can trigger correspondence or delays in processing your return. Call your bank's customer service and explain the error - they should be able to issue a corrected 1099-INT (sometimes called a 1099-INT-C) with the right SSN. Don't just manually correct it on your tax return because that creates a discrepancy in the IRS system. Most banks can turn around corrected forms pretty quickly, especially for simple SSN errors like this.

0 coins

Great question! I went through this same situation last year with my daughter's savings account. Here's what I learned that might help: In FreeTaxUSA, you'll want to navigate to the "Income" section, then look for "Interest and Dividends." From there, you should see an option for "Child's Interest and Dividends (Form 8814)." This is where you can elect to report your children's interest income on your own return instead of filing separate returns for them. Since each child only earned about $45 in interest, using Form 8814 is definitely the way to go. You'll need to enter each child's information separately - their full name exactly as it appears on their Social Security card, their SSN, and the interest amount from each 1099-INT. One helpful tip: make sure you have both kids' Social Security cards handy when you're entering this information, as the software is pretty strict about matching the names exactly. Also, keep those 1099-INT forms with your tax records even though you're reporting the income on your return. The whole process should only take a few minutes once you find the right section in the software. Don't worry about the small amounts affecting your tax situation significantly - with interest that low, it's mainly just a reporting requirement.

0 coins

LongPeri

•

This is really helpful, thank you! I was getting confused by all the different menu options in FreeTaxUSA. Just to clarify - when I'm in that "Child's Interest and Dividends" section, do I need to enter both kids' information in the same form, or does the software create separate entries for each child? Also, will the software automatically generate the actual Form 8814 that gets attached to my return, or is that something I need to print out separately?

0 coins

Prev1...136137138139140...5643Next