IRS

Can't reach IRS? Claimyr connects you to a live IRS agent in minutes.

Claimyr is a pay-as-you-go service. We do not charge a recurring subscription.



Fox KTVUABC 7CBSSan Francisco Chronicle

Using Claimyr will:

  • Connect you to a human agent at the IRS
  • Skip the long phone menu
  • Call the correct department
  • Redial until on hold
  • Forward a call to your phone with reduced hold time
  • Give you free callbacks if the IRS drops your call

If I could give 10 stars I would

If I could give 10 stars I would If I could give 10 stars I would Such an amazing service so needed during the times when EDD almost never picks up Claimyr gets me on the phone with EDD every time without fail faster. A much needed service without Claimyr I would have never received the payment I needed to support me during my postpartum recovery. Thank you so much Claimyr!


Really made a difference

Really made a difference, save me time and energy from going to a local office for making the call.


Worth not wasting your time calling for hours.

Was a bit nervous or untrusting at first, but my calls went thru. First time the wait was a bit long but their customer chat line on their page was helpful and put me at ease that I would receive my call. Today my call dropped because of EDD and Claimyr heard my concern on the same chat and another call was made within the hour.


An incredibly helpful service

An incredibly helpful service! Got me connected to a CA EDD agent without major hassle (outside of EDD's agents dropping calls – which Claimyr has free protection for). If you need to file a new claim and can't do it online, pay the $ to Claimyr to get the process started. Absolutely worth it!


Consistent,frustration free, quality Service.

Used this service a couple times now. Before I'd call 200 times in less than a weak frustrated as can be. But using claimyr with a couple hours of waiting i was on the line with an representative or on hold. Dropped a couple times but each reconnected not long after and was mission accomplished, thanks to Claimyr.


IT WORKS!! Not a scam!

I tried for weeks to get thru to EDD PFL program with no luck. I gave this a try thinking it may be a scam. OMG! It worked and They got thru within an hour and my claim is going to finally get paid!! I upgraded to the $60 call. Best $60 spent!

Read all of our Trustpilot reviews


Ask the community...

  • DO post questions about your issues.
  • DO answer questions and support each other.
  • DO post tips & tricks to help folks.
  • DO NOT post call problems here - there is a support tab at the top for that :)

Millie Long

•

I'm going through the exact same thing right now! Filed my injured spouse form in December and it's been crickets ever since. The anxiety is real when you're counting on that money. From what I've researched, the processing times can vary wildly depending on how backed up they are. I've been checking my transcript weekly (much more reliable than WMR like others mentioned) and at least I can see they received everything. Hang in there - we're all in this waiting game together! šŸ¤ž

0 coins

Noah Ali

•

Same here! Filed mine in January and been checking my transcript obsessively. It's so nerve-wracking when you really need that refund. At least knowing we're not alone in this makes me feel a bit better. Fingers crossed we all get our money soon! šŸ™

0 coins

Evelyn Kelly

•

I feel your pain! Been waiting on my injured spouse claim for about 10 weeks now and it's torture. One thing that's helped me stay sane is calling the IRS taxpayer advocate service - they can sometimes give you a better timeline if you're experiencing financial hardship. Also seconding what others said about checking transcripts instead of WMR. The waiting sucks but from everything I've read, most people do eventually get their refunds, it just takes forever. Stay strong! šŸ’Ŗ

0 coins

Has anyone here successfully used the QBI aggregation rules to maximize their deduction? I'm an architect with multiple business activities (design services, project management, and a small product design business) currently operating as separate Schedule Cs. Wondering if combining them under the aggregation election might help with the W-2 limitation issue since one of my businesses has employees while the others don't.

0 coins

That's super helpful, thanks! Did you need to work with a specialized CPA to get the aggregation right? I'm worried my regular tax guy might not be familiar enough with these specific QBI rules for architects.

0 coins

Alicia Stern

•

I'd definitely recommend finding a CPA who specializes in business taxation, especially if you're dealing with multiple entities and aggregation elections. The QBI rules are still relatively new (since 2018) and many general tax preparers haven't fully mastered the nuances, particularly for professional service businesses like architecture. The aggregation election can be really powerful but there are strict requirements - you need to demonstrate that the businesses operate as an integrated economic unit, share facilities, employees, or significant business operations. Just having the same owner isn't enough. For your situation with design services, project management, and product design, you'll want to document how these activities are interconnected and support each other. The IRS looks for things like shared marketing, overlapping customer bases, shared administrative functions, etc. One thing to watch out for - once you make the aggregation election, you're generally stuck with it unless there's a material change in facts and circumstances. So make sure it's the right move long-term, not just for one tax year.

0 coins

This is such a helpful thread! As a mechanical engineer who just crossed the income threshold this year, I'm dealing with similar QBI confusion. One thing I've learned from my research is that the "special treatment" for engineers really just means we're not completely shut out like other professional services. The wage/property limitation still applies, but at least we get something rather than zero. I'm curious though - has anyone here looked into the qualified property component of the limitation test? I know it's 25% of wages PLUS 2.5% of qualified property. For those of us without employees, investing in depreciable business equipment might be another way to increase the deduction. Things like expensive CAD workstations, surveying equipment, or specialized software licenses that qualify for depreciation could potentially help with the calculation. Would love to hear if anyone has experience with using the property component to maximize their QBI deduction as an engineer.

0 coins

Tami Morgan

•

That's a really interesting angle I hadn't considered! I'm also a mechanical engineer dealing with the phase-out, and I've been so focused on the W-2 wage limitation that I completely overlooked the qualified property component. Do you know if leased equipment counts toward the qualified property test, or does it have to be owned outright? I lease most of my CAD workstations and some testing equipment through my business, but if purchasing them could help with QBI calculations, it might make sense to restructure those arrangements. Also wondering about software - I spend probably $15-20k annually on various engineering software licenses. Some are subscription-based, but others I could potentially purchase as perpetual licenses if that would count as qualified property for depreciation purposes. Has anyone worked with a tax professional who's specifically knowledgeable about maximizing the property component for engineering firms? This thread has been way more helpful than the generic QBI advice I've been finding online.

0 coins

This is such a widespread issue and it's honestly unacceptable that the IRS system is this broken in 2025! I've been helping people with this problem all tax season and here's what consistently works: 1) Wait the full 24 hours after getting locked out, 2) Use mobile data or a different internet connection entirely (coffee shop wifi works great), 3) Clear your browser completely or try a different browser, 4) Make sure you're using the EXACT refund amount from your return - even being off by $1 will cause issues. The system treats multiple attempts from the same IP as suspicious, so if anyone else in your household has been checking refunds, that could be why you're locked out even though you never tried. It's ridiculous that taxpayers have to become tech experts just to check their own money, but hopefully these steps help you get through! šŸ’Ŗ

0 coins

Diego Fisher

•

This is exactly the kind of detailed breakdown we need! šŸ™Œ I've been pulling my hair out over this same issue and your step-by-step approach makes so much sense. The coffee shop wifi idea is brilliant - I never would have thought of that but it totally makes sense to get a completely different IP. I'm definitely going to try this whole process tomorrow morning. It's honestly insane that in 2025 we need a technical manual just to check if the government has processed our tax refund, but I really appreciate you taking the time to share what actually works! Hopefully this helps other people too who are stuck in the same frustrating loop.

0 coins

Ethan Scott

•

This is such a common and frustrating issue! I went through the exact same thing last month - kept getting the "max attempts" error even though I'd literally never successfully checked once. Here's what finally worked for me: 1) Wait exactly 24 hours from when you first got locked out, 2) Use a completely different internet connection (I used my phone's hotspot), 3) Clear all browser data or use incognito mode, 4) Double-check you're entering the EXACT refund amount from line 35a of your return (don't round at all!), and 5) Try checking early morning around 6-7am when their servers are less busy. The IP lockout is real and affects everyone on your network, so if family members have been checking refunds it can lock you out too. It's absolutely ridiculous that we need all these workarounds just to check our own refund status in 2025, but hopefully this helps! šŸ¤ž

0 coins

Carmen Vega

•

I've been following this thread as someone who went through a very similar situation last year - high W2 income from tech stock options and rental property losses that I couldn't deduct due to the passive loss limitations. A few additional thoughts that might help: **Material participation documentation:** Since you work in property management professionally, make sure you're documenting every hour you spend on YOUR rental property. Even though it won't help you qualify as a Real Estate Professional at your current income/time allocation, having detailed time logs could be valuable if your situation changes in future years. **Repair vs. improvement analysis:** I hired a tax professional to review all my expenses and found about $4K in items I had incorrectly categorized as capital improvements that were actually deductible repairs. Things like fixing HVAC issues, repairing existing flooring, and some electrical work qualified as current-year repairs rather than depreciable improvements. **Long-term planning:** With suspended losses building up, consider whether this property will be a long-term hold or eventual sale. If you're planning to sell in 5-7 years, those suspended losses will provide a substantial tax benefit at disposition. At your tax bracket, that $30K could save you $10K+ in taxes on the sale. The frustrating reality is that the tax code penalizes high earners who invest in rental real estate, but the losses aren't truly "lost" - they're just deferred until you can use them more effectively. Keep detailed records and think of this as part of your long-term tax strategy.

0 coins

Yara Haddad

•

This is really helpful, especially the advice about documenting hours even if it won't immediately qualify me for Real Estate Professional status. I'm definitely going to start tracking my time more systematically - using a simple app or spreadsheet to log every minute spent on property-related activities. The repair vs. improvement point is particularly valuable. I think I've been overly conservative in categorizing things as improvements when some might legitimately qualify as repairs. Do you have any specific resources or guidelines you used to make those distinctions? I want to be aggressive but legitimate in the reclassification. Your long-term perspective is reassuring too. While it's frustrating not to get the immediate tax benefit, thinking of those suspended losses as a future $10K+ tax savings does help me view this as a strategic investment decision rather than just a tax disappointment. Given your experience, do you think it's worth paying for a cost segregation study now even though we can't use the additional depreciation currently? Or is that something to consider later when we might have rental income to offset?

0 coins

Jamal Wilson

•

For repair vs. improvement distinctions, I used IRS Publication 527 and also found the "Uniform Capitalization Rules" helpful. The key test is whether you're restoring the property to its previous condition (repair) or adding value/extending useful life significantly (improvement). I also used the "BAR test" - Betterment, Adaptation, or Restoration - anything that only restores gets repair treatment. Regarding cost segregation studies - I'd probably hold off for now given your situation. You're already generating substantial suspended losses that you can't use, so accelerating even more depreciation would just increase your suspended loss balance without providing current benefit. The cost (typically $3K-8K for residential properties) might be better spent when you either have rental income to offset or are closer to a sale where you can use all suspended losses. That said, if you're planning to acquire multiple rental properties over the next few years, it might make sense to do cost segregation studies on future properties when your income situation potentially changes. The studies are most valuable in the first year of ownership when you can reclassify and accelerate the most depreciation. Keep tracking those hours though - if you ever transition to more real estate focus or your W2 income drops, having historical documentation of material participation will be invaluable for Real Estate Professional qualification.

0 coins

I'm in a very similar boat with high W2 income and rental property losses that I can't currently deduct. What really helped me was getting organized for the long term since these losses will eventually be valuable when I sell the property or generate rental income. A few practical steps that made a difference: **Immediate actions:** I set up a dedicated business checking account for the rental property and started using QuickBooks to track everything professionally. This made it much easier to categorize expenses properly and will be invaluable if the IRS ever asks questions. **Documentation system:** I created a simple time-tracking system using a phone app to log every hour spent on rental property activities - maintenance calls, tenant communications, property visits, etc. Even though I can't use it now for Real Estate Professional status, having this historical record could be valuable if my situation changes. **Expense review:** I had a tax professional review my first year's expenses and found several items I had conservatively categorized as capital improvements that actually qualified as deductible repairs. This saved me about $1,500 in current taxes. **Mental reframe:** Instead of seeing the $30K loss as "wasted," I started thinking of it as a $10K+ tax credit I'll get to use when I sell the property. At our tax bracket, those suspended losses are actually quite valuable. The passive loss rules are frustrating when you're actively involved in the property, but the losses aren't truly lost - just deferred until you can maximize their benefit. Keep detailed records and think long-term!

0 coins

Luca Bianchi

•

This is such a well-organized approach! I'm definitely going to implement several of these suggestions, especially setting up the dedicated business checking account and using proper accounting software. I've been using spreadsheets which work but aren't nearly as professional or audit-ready. The mental reframe you mentioned really resonates with me. It's easy to get frustrated seeing that $30K loss just sitting there, but you're absolutely right that at our tax bracket, those suspended losses represent significant future value. When I eventually sell this property, that could easily translate to $10K+ in tax savings. I'm curious about your experience with the tax professional expense review - was this something you did with your regular CPA or did you seek out someone who specializes specifically in real estate taxation? I'm wondering if it's worth paying for a specialist review even though my regular accountant is competent with basic rental property returns. Also, regarding the time tracking app - do you have a specific recommendation? I want something simple but professional that would hold up to IRS scrutiny if needed. Even though I can't qualify as a Real Estate Professional now, having that documentation ready could be valuable if my employment situation ever changes. Thanks for sharing such practical, actionable advice!

0 coins

GalaxyGazer

•

Has anyone actually calculated how much the penalties would be for this? I'm in a similar situation with about $4500 in excess contributions from 2021, and I'm wondering if it might just be cheaper to leave it in there and pay the penalty rather than go through all this hassle. Would it be 6% of $4500, so like $270 per year?

0 coins

Dmitry Popov

•

That's a dangerous approach to take. Yes, the excess contribution penalty is 6% per year, but it continues EVERY year until you fix the problem. So it's not just a one-time $270 penalty - you'd pay that $270 every single year indefinitely until you correct the excess contribution. Plus, having known excess contributions in your account could potentially cause issues if you ever get audited. The IRS might view it as an intentional violation once you're aware of the problem. Better to fix it now and just pay the penalty for the years it was already in there.

0 coins

GalaxyGazer

•

That makes sense, I didn't realize the penalty continues every year! Definitely not worth saving a little hassle now to keep paying penalties forever. Thanks for explaining that - I'll call Vanguard tomorrow to start the process of removing my excess contribution too.

0 coins

One thing I haven't seen mentioned yet is that you should also check if this affects your ability to make future Roth IRA contributions. Since you exceeded the income limits in 2021, make sure you're aware of what the current income limits are for 2024 and 2025 so you don't accidentally repeat this mistake. The income limits change every year, and if your income has grown since 2021, you might still be over the limit. For 2024, the phase-out range for Roth IRA contributions is $138,000-$153,000 for single filers and $218,000-$228,000 for married filing jointly. Also, once you get this sorted out with Vanguard, consider setting up a backdoor Roth strategy for future years if you're consistently over the income limits. You can contribute to a non-deductible Traditional IRA and then convert it to Roth - it's perfectly legal and achieves the same result as direct Roth contributions.

0 coins

Olivia Clark

•

This is really helpful advice about checking future eligibility! I'm actually wondering - if someone discovers they were over the income limit in 2021, should they also go back and check 2022 and 2023 contributions? It seems like if you didn't know about the income limits before, you might have made the same mistake in multiple years. That could make the penalty situation even worse if you've been accidentally contributing excess amounts for several years in a row.

0 coins

Prev1...13231324132513261327...5645Next