Can't reach IRS? Claimyr connects you to a live IRS agent in minutes.
Claimyr is a pay-as-you-go service. We do not charge a recurring subscription.
Using Claimyr will:
- Connect you to a human agent at the IRS
- Skip the long phone menu
- Call the correct department
- Redial until on hold
- Forward a call to your phone with reduced hold time
- Give you free callbacks if the IRS drops your call
If I could give 10 stars I would
If I could give 10 stars I would If I could give 10 stars I would Such an amazing service so needed during the times when EDD almost never picks up Claimyr gets me on the phone with EDD every time without fail faster. A much needed service without Claimyr I would have never received the payment I needed to support me during my postpartum recovery. Thank you so much Claimyr!
Really made a difference
Really made a difference, save me time and energy from going to a local office for making the call.
Worth not wasting your time calling for hours.
Was a bit nervous or untrusting at first, but my calls went thru. First time the wait was a bit long but their customer chat line on their page was helpful and put me at ease that I would receive my call. Today my call dropped because of EDD and Claimyr heard my concern on the same chat and another call was made within the hour.
An incredibly helpful service
An incredibly helpful service! Got me connected to a CA EDD agent without major hassle (outside of EDD's agents dropping calls ā which Claimyr has free protection for). If you need to file a new claim and can't do it online, pay the $ to Claimyr to get the process started. Absolutely worth it!
Consistent,frustration free, quality Service.
Used this service a couple times now. Before I'd call 200 times in less than a weak frustrated as can be. But using claimyr with a couple hours of waiting i was on the line with an representative or on hold. Dropped a couple times but each reconnected not long after and was mission accomplished, thanks to Claimyr.
IT WORKS!! Not a scam!
I tried for weeks to get thru to EDD PFL program with no luck. I gave this a try thinking it may be a scam. OMG! It worked and They got thru within an hour and my claim is going to finally get paid!! I upgraded to the $60 call. Best $60 spent!
Ask the community...
- DO post questions about your issues.
- DO answer questions and support each other.
- DO post tips & tricks to help folks.
- DO NOT post call problems here - there is a support tab at the top for that :)
Join the conversation
Join the conversation
Lilly Curtis
I'm going through this exact situation right now and this thread has been incredibly helpful! I submitted my corrected 1095-A about 3 weeks ago via fax and have been constantly worrying about the timeline. Based on everyone's experiences here, it sounds like I need to prepare for at least 8-12 weeks total, which is much longer than I initially expected. The financial planning aspect is really what's stressing me out the most - I was hoping to use the refund adjustment for some spring expenses, but now I realize I need to completely revise my budget timeline. @AstroAce's tip about calling the Premium Tax Credit department specifically instead of general customer service is something I definitely plan to try next week. And @TamiMorgan, your advice about setting up transcript monitoring and treating faster processing as a bonus rather than an expectation is exactly the mindset shift I needed. It's frustrating that the IRS doesn't provide clearer timeline estimates for these corrections, but at least this community is sharing real experiences. I'm going to call next week just to confirm receipt, then try to be patient and plan for the 10-12 week timeline several of you mentioned. Thanks everyone for sharing your stories - it really helps to know others have successfully navigated this process!
Caleb Stone
ā¢@LillyCurtis I'm so glad this thread is helping you too! I'm actually at about the same stage as you - submitted my corrected 1095-A around 4 weeks ago and initially had no idea what timeline to expect. This community has been a lifesaver for setting realistic expectations. The financial planning stress is so real - I was also counting on that refund adjustment much sooner and had to completely rearrange my budget. What's helping me cope is creating a "Plan B" budget that assumes the full 12-week timeline, so anything faster feels like a win rather than constantly being disappointed by the wait. I'm also planning to call the Premium Tax Credit department next week based on everyone's advice here. It's reassuring to know we're not alone in this process and that others have successfully made it through the waiting period!
I'm currently at week 7 of waiting for my corrected 1095-A to process and wanted to share an update that might help others. After reading all the great advice in this thread, I called the Premium Tax Credit department at week 4 (thanks @AstroAce for that tip!) and they confirmed receipt and gave me a case number to reference in future calls. What's been most helpful is setting up the transcript monitoring that @TamiMorgan mentioned - I can see my account transcript updated with processing codes about 2 weeks ago, which at least shows movement even though there's no refund yet. The codes showed up as "971" and "570" which apparently indicate they're working on the correction. For anyone just starting this process, I'd echo what others have said about budgeting for 10-12 weeks minimum. I made the mistake of expecting it sooner and had to scramble with my finances around week 5. Now that I've adjusted my expectations and have that case number for reference, the waiting feels much more manageable. The uncertainty was definitely the worst part, but this community's shared experiences made all the difference in knowing what to expect.
Laila Fury
ā¢@ZoePapadakis This update is incredibly helpful, especially the specific transcript codes! I'm at week 6 myself and haven't seen any codes show up yet, so knowing that "971" and "570" indicate progress gives me something concrete to watch for. The case number aspect is brilliant too - I called last week but didn't think to ask for one, so I'll definitely request that on my next call. Your point about the uncertainty being worse than the actual waiting really resonates with me. Once I started planning for the full 12-week timeline instead of hoping for something faster, my stress level dropped significantly. Thanks for taking the time to share this real-time update - it's exactly what those of us still in the process need to hear!
Join the conversation
I can definitely relate to this confusion! As someone who went through a similar verification disappearing act last year, I wanted to share what worked for me. The message vanished from my account after about a week, but I still had the physical letter. I called the verification hotline at 800-830-5084 and spoke with an agent who confirmed that the verification requirement was absolutely still active in their system - the online message disappearing was just a display glitch on their end. She walked me through the verification process over the phone using my control number, and the whole thing took about 10 minutes. My transcript updated with the completion codes within a few days, and I received my refund about 2 weeks later. The key thing I learned is that the physical letter is what matters, not what you see (or don't see) in your online account. Don't let this system quirk delay your refund - the verification requirement is definitely still there waiting to be completed!
Thank you so much for sharing your experience with the phone verification option! I hadn't even considered calling the hotline directly, but that sounds like it might be even more straightforward than trying to navigate the online portal. It's really helpful to know that the agent was able to confirm the verification requirement was still active on their end - that removes any doubt about whether I actually need to complete this step. The 10-minute phone process sounds much less intimidating than trying to figure out the website, especially since I'm still getting familiar with all these IRS systems. I think I'll try calling 800-830-5084 first before attempting the online route. Thanks for the practical advice and realistic timeline expectations!
Ally Tailer
I completely understand your confusion - this verification message disappearing issue has been plaguing taxpayers all season! Based on all the experiences shared here, I want to emphasize that you should definitely proceed with verification using your control number. The physical letter is your golden ticket, regardless of what's showing (or not showing) in your online account. As someone who's helped friends navigate similar issues, I've seen this exact scenario play out multiple times. The verification requirement remains active in the IRS backend systems even when the frontend message disappears - it's essentially a display glitch that doesn't affect the actual processing requirements. You have two solid options: either use the direct verification portal at idverify.irs.gov with your control number, or call the verification hotline at 800-830-5084 to complete it over the phone. Both methods bypass the problematic account dashboard entirely. Don't wait for the message to reappear because it likely won't, and every day you delay is another day your refund sits in limbo. Since you mentioned being new to the US tax system, just know that this kind of technical hiccup is unfortunately common with IRS systems, but the community here has shown that it's totally resolvable. Trust the physical letter over the online interface, complete your verification, and you should see your refund processing within 2-3 weeks!
Join the conversation
Has anyone here successfully used the QBI aggregation rules to maximize their deduction? I'm an architect with multiple business activities (design services, project management, and a small product design business) currently operating as separate Schedule Cs. Wondering if combining them under the aggregation election might help with the W-2 limitation issue since one of my businesses has employees while the others don't.
That's super helpful, thanks! Did you need to work with a specialized CPA to get the aggregation right? I'm worried my regular tax guy might not be familiar enough with these specific QBI rules for architects.
Alicia Stern
ā¢I'd definitely recommend finding a CPA who specializes in business taxation, especially if you're dealing with multiple entities and aggregation elections. The QBI rules are still relatively new (since 2018) and many general tax preparers haven't fully mastered the nuances, particularly for professional service businesses like architecture. The aggregation election can be really powerful but there are strict requirements - you need to demonstrate that the businesses operate as an integrated economic unit, share facilities, employees, or significant business operations. Just having the same owner isn't enough. For your situation with design services, project management, and product design, you'll want to document how these activities are interconnected and support each other. The IRS looks for things like shared marketing, overlapping customer bases, shared administrative functions, etc. One thing to watch out for - once you make the aggregation election, you're generally stuck with it unless there's a material change in facts and circumstances. So make sure it's the right move long-term, not just for one tax year.
This is such a helpful thread! As a mechanical engineer who just crossed the income threshold this year, I'm dealing with similar QBI confusion. One thing I've learned from my research is that the "special treatment" for engineers really just means we're not completely shut out like other professional services. The wage/property limitation still applies, but at least we get something rather than zero. I'm curious though - has anyone here looked into the qualified property component of the limitation test? I know it's 25% of wages PLUS 2.5% of qualified property. For those of us without employees, investing in depreciable business equipment might be another way to increase the deduction. Things like expensive CAD workstations, surveying equipment, or specialized software licenses that qualify for depreciation could potentially help with the calculation. Would love to hear if anyone has experience with using the property component to maximize their QBI deduction as an engineer.
Tami Morgan
ā¢That's a really interesting angle I hadn't considered! I'm also a mechanical engineer dealing with the phase-out, and I've been so focused on the W-2 wage limitation that I completely overlooked the qualified property component. Do you know if leased equipment counts toward the qualified property test, or does it have to be owned outright? I lease most of my CAD workstations and some testing equipment through my business, but if purchasing them could help with QBI calculations, it might make sense to restructure those arrangements. Also wondering about software - I spend probably $15-20k annually on various engineering software licenses. Some are subscription-based, but others I could potentially purchase as perpetual licenses if that would count as qualified property for depreciation purposes. Has anyone worked with a tax professional who's specifically knowledgeable about maximizing the property component for engineering firms? This thread has been way more helpful than the generic QBI advice I've been finding online.
Join the conversation
Millie Long
I'm going through the exact same thing right now! Filed my injured spouse form in December and it's been crickets ever since. The anxiety is real when you're counting on that money. From what I've researched, the processing times can vary wildly depending on how backed up they are. I've been checking my transcript weekly (much more reliable than WMR like others mentioned) and at least I can see they received everything. Hang in there - we're all in this waiting game together! š¤
Noah Ali
ā¢Same here! Filed mine in January and been checking my transcript obsessively. It's so nerve-wracking when you really need that refund. At least knowing we're not alone in this makes me feel a bit better. Fingers crossed we all get our money soon! š
Evelyn Kelly
I feel your pain! Been waiting on my injured spouse claim for about 10 weeks now and it's torture. One thing that's helped me stay sane is calling the IRS taxpayer advocate service - they can sometimes give you a better timeline if you're experiencing financial hardship. Also seconding what others said about checking transcripts instead of WMR. The waiting sucks but from everything I've read, most people do eventually get their refunds, it just takes forever. Stay strong! šŖ
Amara Eze
I'm dealing with this exact same situation right now! My broker (Schwab) also shows wash sales on my 1099-B even though I have a valid 475(f) election. One thing I discovered is that you should definitely keep detailed records of when you made your 475(f) election, including copies of any Form 3115 if you filed one for a change in accounting method. The IRS will want to see proof that your election was properly made before the beginning of the tax year. For the Form 4797 reporting, I've been advised to create a separate schedule that shows the broker-reported amounts, the wash sale adjustments being reversed, and the final amounts reported on Form 4797. Make sure to title it something clear like "475(f) MTM Trader - Form 4797 Reconciliation to 1099-B." Has anyone had experience with multiple brokers reporting different wash sale calculations for the same underlying trades? I'm trying to figure out how to handle overlapping positions across platforms.
0 coins
Lydia Santiago
ā¢I had the same issue with multiple brokers (Fidelity and E*TRADE) showing different wash sale calculations for overlapping positions. The key is to reconstruct your actual trades chronologically across all platforms to determine the true cost basis without wash sales. What I did was export all trade confirmations from both brokers and create a master spreadsheet sorted by execution date and time. This helped me identify when I had the same security positions open across platforms and calculate the correct aggregate cost basis for each closing trade. For the reconciliation statement, I created separate sections for each broker showing their individual 1099-B amounts, then a combined section showing how the total reconciles to my Form 4797. The IRS agent I spoke with through one of the services mentioned here said this approach makes it much easier for them to verify the calculations during review. Make sure to save all your raw trade data and broker statements - if you get questioned later, you'll need to be able to reconstruct every calculation step by step.
0 coins
Giovanni Martello
I went through this exact situation last year and can confirm that the IRS does cross-reference Form 4797 against 1099-B data, but they're generally aware of the 475(f) trader issue. Here's what worked for me: I reported the exact proceeds amount from my 1099-B on Form 4797 ($437,500 in your case), then adjusted only the cost basis to reflect the true MTM treatment without wash sales. So instead of using TD Ameritrade's $522,000 adjusted cost basis, I used my actual $421,000 cost basis. The key is creating a comprehensive reconciliation statement that clearly shows: 1. Your valid 475(f) election date and documentation 2. Broker-reported amounts from 1099-B 3. Wash sale adjustments being reversed ($106,000 in your case) 4. Final amounts reported on Form 4797 I titled my statement "Section 475(f) Mark-to-Market Trader - Form 4797 Reconciliation" and attached it to my return. No CP2000 notice received, and my return processed normally. The statement should emphasize that wash sale rules don't apply to MTM traders per IRC Section 475(f). One additional tip: if you have year-end open positions that need to be marked to market, make sure to include those adjustments in your reconciliation as well, since that's another area where your numbers will differ from standard 1099-B reporting.
0 coins
Ravi Choudhury
ā¢This is exactly what I needed to see! Thank you for the detailed breakdown. I'm in a very similar situation with TD Ameritrade showing wash sales that don't apply to my 475(f) status. Your approach of keeping the proceeds amount identical to the 1099-B while adjusting only the cost basis makes perfect sense - it maintains the paper trail while accurately reflecting the MTM treatment. I was overthinking this and considering adjusting both numbers, which probably would have caused more confusion. Quick question: when you say "year-end open positions that need to be marked to market," are you referring to unrealized gains/losses on positions held at December 31st? I have about $8,500 in unrealized gains on positions I'm still holding, and I wasn't sure if those should be included in the Form 4797 calculations or handled separately. Also, did you file your reconciliation statement as a separate PDF attachment, or did you include it in the text fields of your tax software?
0 coins