Pay nothing until a live IRS agent is on the phone with you.
Can't reach IRS? Claimyr calls for you, so you don't have to wait on hold.
$0 upfront. We only hold your card.
No live agent, no charge.
$9.99 is charged only once a live IRS agent is on the phone with you.
Using Claimyr will:
- Connect you to a human agent at the IRS
- Skip the long phone menu
- Call the correct department
- Redial until on hold
- Forward a call to your phone with reduced hold time
- Give you free callbacks if the IRS drops your call
Ask the community...
- DO post questions about your issues.
- DO answer questions and support each other.
- DO post tips & tricks to help folks.
- DO NOT post call problems here - there is a support tab at the top for that :)
Join the conversation
Join the conversation
Has anyone used H&R Block instead of a private CPA? Their offices are convenient but I'm not sure if they're experienced enough for higher income situations with commissions.
Honestly, for your income level ($580k), I'd avoid H&R Block. Nothing against them, but they're generally better for straightforward tax situations. Most of their preparers don't have the specialized knowledge to optimize taxes for high-income professionals with variable compensation. You'd be better off with a CPA who specializes in working with sales professionals or high-income individuals.
At your income level with variable commission and a new baby, I'd definitely recommend at least consulting with a CPA. The combination of high income ($580k), fluctuating pay, and new dependent creates several optimization opportunities that TurboTax might miss. A few specific things to consider: With commission income, you might benefit from income smoothing strategies or adjusting withholdings throughout the year. Your new child opens up opportunities for dependent care FSAs, 529 college savings plans, and potentially life insurance strategies. At your income bracket, you're also getting into territory where AMT (Alternative Minimum Tax) might apply, and itemizing vs. standard deduction becomes more complex. The key is finding a CPA who works with sales professionals regularly - they'll understand the nuances of commission-based compensation. Even if you only use them for the first year to establish a baseline strategy, you might discover planning opportunities that save you more than the professional fees. You can always go back to self-preparation once you understand your optimal tax strategy.
Join the conversation
Be sure to get a tax professional to help with the amended returns! I tried fixing a similar mistake myself and ended up making things worse. The rules for married filing separately are weird and different from single filing. For example, if one spouse itemizes, the other MUST itemize too, even if the standard deduction would be better.
Strongly agree! And for responding to an audit notice, it might be worth getting representation rather than trying to handle it yourself. When I got audited, I used a CPA who knew exactly what language to use in the response letter and it went super smoothly.
I wish I'd gotten representation for my audit! The IRS agent kept asking me questions I wasn't prepared for, and I ended up having to pay more than I probably should have. A professional would have known how to properly frame my situation and what supporting documentation would be most convincing.
I'm dealing with a very similar situation right now! My wife and I both accidentally filed as single instead of married filing separately, and we just got our first audit notice last week. Reading through all these responses has been incredibly helpful - especially the advice about responding promptly and honestly with our marriage certificate. One thing I wanted to add is that we contacted our tax preparer (H&R Block) about this mistake, and they told us they see this error fairly often, especially with couples who are used to filing separately. They said the key is to act quickly once you realize the mistake rather than waiting for the IRS to catch it. For anyone else in this situation, don't beat yourself up too much about it. The IRS representatives I've spoken with have been pretty understanding when I explained it was an honest error. They seem much more concerned with people who are intentionally trying to avoid taxes than those who made a simple checkbox mistake. Also, if you're worried about the penalties, ask about first-time penalty abatement when you call. I didn't know this was an option until someone at the IRS mentioned it during my call. Since we've never had any issues before, they said there's a good chance any penalties could be waived if we correct everything promptly.
I had to call multiple times actually - the first few attempts I gave up after waiting over an hour. But when I finally got through (it took about 90 minutes on hold), the agent was really helpful and patient. She walked me through exactly what I needed to send for the audit response and even explained the penalty abatement process. One tip that helped me - I called early in the morning around 7am EST when they first opened. The wait times seemed much shorter than when I tried calling in the afternoon. Also, if you get disconnected (which happened to me twice), don't give up! The third time was the charm. The agent also told me that since both spouses made the same mistake, it actually helps our case because it clearly shows it was an innocent error rather than intentional tax avoidance. She said if we were trying to cheat the system, we probably would have been more strategic about it rather than both making the identical mistake. Hang in there - it's stressful but definitely manageable once you get the right guidance!
I actually got through to the IRS much faster than I expected - it took about 45 minutes on hold, which wasn't nearly as bad as I thought it would be. I called early in the morning around 8:30 AM, which might have helped. The agent was really patient and walked me through exactly what documentation I needed to send. One tip that worked for me: when you call, have your Social Security number, the tax year in question, and the audit notice letter ready. They ask for all of this right away to pull up your case. The agent also suggested that both spouses call separately to discuss their individual returns, even though the mistake is the same, because they handle each return as a separate case. The whole conversation only took about 20 minutes once I got connected, and I felt so much better afterward. Sometimes talking to a real person makes all the difference when you're stressed about these things!
Join the conversation
Looks like FreeTaxUSA is back up now! Just managed to login and continue my return. Maybe try again?
OMG THANK YOU! Just tried and got in! Guess I'll be staying up late tonight finishing this return before it goes down again 😅
Glad to hear FreeTaxUSA is back online! For anyone still experiencing issues or looking for backup options, I'd recommend having a Plan B ready for next year. Server outages like this are pretty rare but they always seem to happen at the worst possible time (right before deadlines). One thing that's helped me is starting my tax prep earlier in the season - like February instead of April. Less server load, more time to troubleshoot issues, and you're not stressed about deadlines. Plus if you're getting a refund, you get your money faster! For those mentioning alternatives like TaxSlayer and TaxAct, they're solid choices. I've used both in the past and they handle most tax situations well. The main advantage of FreeTaxUSA is really that pricing for state returns - $15 vs $40+ elsewhere adds up if you file in multiple states.
Join the conversation
Don't forget that your K-1 losses might push you into claiming a Net Operating Loss (NOL) if they're large enough to offset all your other income. The rules for NOLs changed after the TCJA - now you can only carry them forward, not back, and they're limited to 80% of taxable income in future years.
Are you sure about that? I thought the CARES Act temporarily changed the NOL rules back to allow carrybacks for tax years 2018-2020?
You're partially right. The CARES Act did temporarily modify the NOL rules to allow carrybacks for tax years 2018, 2019, and 2020. However, for current tax years (2021 and beyond), we're back to the TCJA rules: NOLs can only be carried forward, not back, and they're limited to 80% of taxable income in any given year. So for the original poster dealing with 2022 K-1 losses, the TCJA rules would apply. If their partnership losses create an NOL, they can only carry it forward to future tax years, and it will be subject to the 80% limitation when used. It's always good to be precise about these timeframes since tax laws change so frequently.
This is exactly the kind of confusion I had when I first started receiving K-1s! The key thing to understand is that partnership taxation operates on a "conduit" theory - the partnership itself doesn't pay taxes, so all income and losses flow through to the partners whether you receive cash distributions or not. Your K-1 losses are legitimate tax deductions, not some kind of accounting trick. The partnership actually incurred these losses through its business operations, and as a partner, you're allocated your proportionate share. This is fundamentally different from stock investments where you only recognize losses when you sell. To address your concern about "paying it back" - if the company becomes profitable in future years, you'll receive K-1s showing income rather than losses, which will increase your taxable income. But you won't have to "repay" the prior year loss deductions. Think of it like any other business - losses in one year offset income in profitable years. Just make sure you're tracking your basis properly, as others have mentioned, since you can only deduct losses up to your investment plus any retained earnings allocated to you over the years.
Oscar Murphy
Something isn't adding up in your math. If you were paying $244.97 before and want to pay $683, that's an increase of $438.03 per check. But you set the extra withholding to $685, which would be $244.97 + $685 = $929.97. That's much closer to the $1,013.92 you ended up with. The "Multiple Jobs" checkbox is just adding a bit more on top. I'd suggest unchecking that box and just setting your additional withholding to $438 if that's the total you're trying to hit.
0 coins
Hannah Flores
•You're right! I think I wasn't clear on how the extra withholding would stack with my existing withholding. I was thinking the $685 would REPLACE my current withholding, not add to it. That totally explains why it jumped so much higher than I expected. Do you think I should just uncheck the "Multiple Jobs" box completely and use the extra withholding field to manually control the amount?
0 coins
Oscar Murphy
•Yes, that's exactly what I'd recommend. Uncheck the "Multiple Jobs" box completely and set your additional withholding to whatever amount gives you the total withholding you want. If your base withholding without any additional amount is around $245, and you want your total withholding to be $683, then you'd enter $438 in the additional withholding field ($683 - $245 = $438). This gives you much more precise control than using the checkbox options which apply IRS formulas that you can't easily predict.
0 coins
Nora Bennett
I had this EXACT same problem with ADP last year! Here's what worked for me: 1) Go to the W4 section in ADP 2) Select "Married Filing Jointly" (do NOT check the Multiple Jobs box) 3) In Step 4(c) "Extra withholding", put the exact additional amount you want The Multiple Jobs checkbox uses an IRS formula that's usually way too aggressive in my experience. Much better to manually control it with the extra withholding field.
0 coins
Ryan Andre
•Would this approach still work if both spouses have jobs with similar incomes? I thought the Multiple Jobs checkbox was specifically designed for that situation.
0 coins
Javier Mendoza
•The Multiple Jobs checkbox is designed for that situation, but it often overcorrects. When both spouses have similar incomes, you're right that you need extra withholding, but the IRS formula can be too aggressive. What I'd suggest is start with "Married Filing Jointly" without the Multiple Jobs checkbox, then use the extra withholding field to add a specific amount. You can use the IRS withholding calculator online to get a ballpark figure, then fine-tune it based on your actual paychecks. This gives you much more control than letting the system guess with the checkbox.
0 coins