IRS

Can't reach IRS? Claimyr connects you to a live IRS agent in minutes.

Claimyr is a pay-as-you-go service. We do not charge a recurring subscription.



Fox KTVUABC 7CBSSan Francisco Chronicle

Using Claimyr will:

  • Connect you to a human agent at the IRS
  • Skip the long phone menu
  • Call the correct department
  • Redial until on hold
  • Forward a call to your phone with reduced hold time
  • Give you free callbacks if the IRS drops your call

If I could give 10 stars I would

If I could give 10 stars I would If I could give 10 stars I would Such an amazing service so needed during the times when EDD almost never picks up Claimyr gets me on the phone with EDD every time without fail faster. A much needed service without Claimyr I would have never received the payment I needed to support me during my postpartum recovery. Thank you so much Claimyr!


Really made a difference

Really made a difference, save me time and energy from going to a local office for making the call.


Worth not wasting your time calling for hours.

Was a bit nervous or untrusting at first, but my calls went thru. First time the wait was a bit long but their customer chat line on their page was helpful and put me at ease that I would receive my call. Today my call dropped because of EDD and Claimyr heard my concern on the same chat and another call was made within the hour.


An incredibly helpful service

An incredibly helpful service! Got me connected to a CA EDD agent without major hassle (outside of EDD's agents dropping calls – which Claimyr has free protection for). If you need to file a new claim and can't do it online, pay the $ to Claimyr to get the process started. Absolutely worth it!


Consistent,frustration free, quality Service.

Used this service a couple times now. Before I'd call 200 times in less than a weak frustrated as can be. But using claimyr with a couple hours of waiting i was on the line with an representative or on hold. Dropped a couple times but each reconnected not long after and was mission accomplished, thanks to Claimyr.


IT WORKS!! Not a scam!

I tried for weeks to get thru to EDD PFL program with no luck. I gave this a try thinking it may be a scam. OMG! It worked and They got thru within an hour and my claim is going to finally get paid!! I upgraded to the $60 call. Best $60 spent!

Read all of our Trustpilot reviews


Ask the community...

  • DO post questions about your issues.
  • DO answer questions and support each other.
  • DO post tips & tricks to help folks.
  • DO NOT post call problems here - there is a support tab at the top for that :)

Does anyone know if the standard mileage rate or actual expenses method is better for a high-mileage vehicle? I drive about 35,000 business miles a year in a 5-year-old Toyota.

0 coins

With that many miles on an economical car like a Toyota, the standard mileage rate is almost certainly better. I drive about 30k miles/year for my business and did the math both ways. Unless you're driving a luxury vehicle with expensive maintenance costs or a gas guzzler, the standard rate (65.5 cents per mile for 2025) usually wins by a significant margin.

0 coins

I've been tracking my mileage for three years as a freelance graphic designer, and here's what I learned the hard way: the key is understanding your "tax home" vs your "principal place of business." If you work from a qualifying home office (where you regularly and exclusively conduct business), then trips from home to clients are deductible. But here's the catch - you need to meet the IRS requirements for a home office deduction, which means having a dedicated space used ONLY for business. For those without a qualifying home office, the first and last trips of the day are typically commuting (non-deductible), but everything in between clients is deductible business mileage. One tip that saved me during an audit: keep a simple log noting the business purpose of each trip. "Meeting with Client A" or "Picking up supplies for Project B" goes a long way with the IRS. They don't just want to see miles - they want to see legitimate business purposes. Also, be careful about the 100% business vehicle claim mentioned earlier. Unless you literally never use the car for personal trips (grocery store, doctor visits, etc.), the IRS will flag this. I learned to track personal vs business use religiously after getting questioned on this exact issue.

0 coins

Lauren Wood

β€’

This is incredibly helpful, especially the point about keeping detailed logs of business purposes! I'm just starting out as a freelance consultant and have been tracking miles but not really documenting WHY each trip was business-related. Quick question - when you say "dedicated space used ONLY for business" for the home office, does that mean I can't use my home office desk for personal stuff like paying bills or checking personal email? I work from a spare bedroom but sometimes use the desk for non-business tasks.

0 coins

GalacticGuru

β€’

This thread has been incredibly helpful! I'm relatively new to self-employment and had no idea about the after-tax contribution option for Solo 401ks. Quick question about plan providers - for those who switched from providers that don't allow after-tax contributions (like Vanguard) to ones that do (like Fidelity), how complicated was the rollover process? I'm currently with a provider that doesn't offer this feature, but after reading about the potential for mega backdoor Roth conversions, I'm seriously considering making a switch. Also, @Santiago your point about the QBI deduction not reducing compensation for retirement purposes is huge - I've been calculating this wrong and probably missed out on contributions. Is there a good resource or publication that clearly outlines all these nuances for Solo 401k calculations? The IRS publications I've found are pretty dense and sometimes seem contradictory. One more thing - for anyone who's used both the tax analysis tools and direct IRS consultation, which approach gave you more confidence in your contribution strategy? I'm trying to decide if it's worth investing in both or if one approach covers all the bases.

0 coins

TommyKapitz

β€’

Welcome to the community! The rollover process between Solo 401k providers is actually pretty straightforward - most of the major providers (Fidelity, Schwab, E*Trade) handle the paperwork for you. It's typically a direct trustee-to-trustee transfer, so no tax implications. The whole process took about 2-3 weeks when I switched from Vanguard to Fidelity last year. For resources on Solo 401k nuances, I'd recommend IRS Publication 560 as the primary source, but you're right that it's dense. The Department of Labor's FAQ on Solo 401ks is more readable. That said, given how many people in this thread have mentioned calculation errors (myself included with the QBI thing), having a professional review or using one of those analysis tools seems worth it. From what I've seen here, the tax analysis tools seem better for comprehensive plan document review and complex calculations, while the IRS consultation is great for getting official confirmation on specific technical questions. If budget allows, using both approaches for your initial setup might give you the most confidence, then just the analysis tool for annual reviews. @Santiago's QBI insight really shows how easy it is to miss these details - definitely worth double-checking your past contributions if you've been making that same mistake!

0 coins

NebulaNinja

β€’

This has been such an educational thread! As someone who just started my consulting business last year, I'm realizing I have a lot to learn about Solo 401k optimization. @Nora Brooks - your situation is very similar to mine, and it's reassuring to see the community consensus that your $2,770 calculation for after-tax contributions looks correct. I'm definitely going to check if my provider (currently with Charles Schwab) allows after-tax contributions. The QBI deduction clarification from @Santiago is absolutely crucial - I've been making the same mistake and reducing my compensation base incorrectly. That could easily be costing me thousands in potential contributions each year! One question I haven't seen addressed yet - for those making both regular Solo 401k contributions and after-tax contributions, do you need to track them separately for tax reporting purposes? I'm assuming the after-tax contributions don't reduce your current year taxable income like the regular contributions do, but want to make sure I understand the tax implications correctly. Also really interested in the mega backdoor Roth strategy that several people mentioned. If I'm understanding correctly, you make after-tax contributions and then immediately convert them to Roth to avoid taxation on any growth? That seems like an incredible way to get more money into Roth accounts beyond the normal IRA limits. Thanks to everyone for sharing their experiences - this is exactly the kind of real-world insight that's hard to find elsewhere!

0 coins

Welcome to the Solo 401k world! You're absolutely right about the tax treatment - after-tax contributions don't reduce your current year taxable income, unlike regular pre-tax contributions. You'll definitely want to track them separately since they have different tax implications. For tax reporting, after-tax contributions to your Solo 401k get reported on Form 5500-EZ (if required based on plan assets), but they don't appear on your personal tax return the same way pre-tax contributions do. Your plan administrator should provide statements showing the breakdown of pre-tax vs. after-tax balances. Regarding the mega backdoor Roth - yes, you've got it exactly right! The strategy is to make after-tax contributions and then convert them to Roth as quickly as possible (some people do it monthly or even immediately after each contribution). This avoids taxation on growth since there's minimal time for the after-tax funds to appreciate before conversion. Charles Schwab does offer after-tax contributions on their Solo 401k plans, so you should be good to go there. Just call them to confirm your specific plan document allows it and ask about their in-plan Roth conversion process. The combination of maximizing regular contributions plus after-tax contributions with immediate Roth conversion can really supercharge your retirement savings beyond what most people think is possible with Solo 401ks!

0 coins

Something no one has mentioned yet - have you considered using a Self-Directed IRA LLC (sometimes called a checkbook IRA) instead of ROBS? It might be better suited for real estate investments and doesn't require setting up a C-corp or dealing with the active business requirement. The downside is you can't personally benefit from the properties or be involved in day-to-day management, but for pure investment purposes it might be a cleaner structure. Just make sure you understand prohibited transaction rules because they're strictly enforced.

0 coins

I went down this road and the self-directed IRA route has its own complications though. The UBIT (Unrelated Business Income Tax) can kick in if there's debt-financed income from the properties, which often makes leveraged real estate less attractive inside an IRA. Plus, you lose out on depreciation deductions that would otherwise flow through on your personal return.

0 coins

Ravi Sharma

β€’

I've been following this discussion closely as I'm considering a similar structure. One thing I haven't seen mentioned is the potential impact of the Corporate Transparency Act (CTA) on ROBS structures. Since your C-corp would likely be considered a "reporting company" under the new beneficial ownership reporting requirements, you'll need to file FinCEN reports disclosing ownership information. This adds another layer of compliance but shouldn't affect the tax treatment of your ROBS. Also, regarding the LLC structure you mentioned - make sure you understand how the K-1 income will be treated at the C-corp level. Since C-corps don't get pass-through treatment, the rental income will be subject to corporate tax rates, and if you later want to access those funds personally, you'll face potential double taxation through dividends. Have you considered whether the rental income strategy makes sense given that corporate tax treatment, or would you be better off with a structure that allows pass-through taxation?

0 coins

Haley Stokes

β€’

That's a really important point about the Corporate Transparency Act that I hadn't considered. As someone new to this whole ROBS concept, I'm starting to realize there are layers of compliance I never even knew existed. The double taxation issue you mentioned is particularly concerning. If I'm understanding correctly, the rental income from the LLC would be taxed at the corporate level first, and then again if I try to distribute any of those profits to myself personally later? That seems like it could significantly eat into the benefits of using the ROBS structure in the first place. Would it make more sense to structure the C-corp's business activities in a way that generates income that can be reinvested back into the business rather than distributed? Or are there other strategies to minimize this double taxation problem?

0 coins

ApolloJackson

β€’

Has anyone used TurboTax for figuring this out? I'm wondering if it automatically calculates the limits or if I need to manually keep track of my SIMPLE IRA contributions when entering my traditional IRA info.

0 coins

TurboTax actually handles this pretty well. When you enter your W-2 info, it asks about retirement plans and automatically factors your SIMPLE IRA participation into the calculations. Then when you get to the IRA contribution section, it tells you whether your traditional IRA contributions are fully deductible, partially deductible, or non-deductible based on your income and participation in the SIMPLE IRA.

0 coins

Great question! Yes, you're absolutely correct that SIMPLE IRA and traditional IRA contribution limits are completely separate. You can contribute the full $19,000 to your SIMPLE IRA and still contribute up to $7,500 to a traditional or Roth IRA for 2025 (assuming you're under 50). However, there's an important caveat: since you participate in a SIMPLE IRA (which is considered a workplace retirement plan), your ability to deduct traditional IRA contributions may be limited based on your income. For 2025, if you're single, the deduction phases out between $77,000-$87,000 of modified adjusted gross income. For married filing jointly, it's $123,000-$143,000. If your income is above these thresholds, you might want to consider a Roth IRA instead, which has higher income limits and provides tax-free growth. Just make sure to check the Roth income limits too - they phase out starting at $146,000 for single filers in 2025.

0 coins

The Boss

β€’

This is really helpful! I'm new to retirement planning and was totally confused about how all these different account types interact. So just to make sure I understand correctly - if I'm making $85,000 and have a SIMPLE IRA at work, I could still put money into a traditional IRA but wouldn't get any tax deduction for it since I'm above the $87,000 limit? In that case, would it make more sense to just go with a Roth IRA since I'm well under the $146,000 phase-out threshold?

0 coins

Sofia Perez

β€’

Guys, I've been carrying over capital losses for 4 years now after a really bad crypto investment in 2021. Quick tip - TurboTax doesn't always get the carryover right if you have complicated situations! Last year it somehow "lost" about $4200 of my long-term carryover and I had to manually correct it. Make sure you ALWAYS print out or save PDFs of: 1. Your complete tax return 2. Schedule D 3. The Capital Loss Carryover Worksheet 4. Form 8949 with all your transactions Then double-check the starting carryover amounts each new tax year. I learned this the hard way.

0 coins

Does anyone know if H&R Block's software handles carryovers better than TurboTax? I'm thinking of switching but don't want to lose my carryover tracking.

0 coins

Isaiah Cross

β€’

Great question about tracking capital loss carryovers! I've been dealing with this for a few years now after some unfortunate investment losses. One thing I'd add to the excellent advice already shared - make sure you understand the "netting" rules. If you have both short-term and long-term carryover losses, they get applied in a specific order against future gains. Short-term carryover losses first offset short-term gains, then long-term gains. Long-term carryover losses first offset long-term gains, then short-term gains. This matters because long-term gains are taxed at preferential rates, so using short-term losses against them first can actually be more tax-efficient. Also, regarding TurboTax - I've found it helpful to manually verify the carryover amounts by looking at the prior year's Schedule D before starting each new tax year. The software usually gets it right, but as others mentioned, it's not foolproof, especially if you're importing from different tax software or have complex transactions. One more tip: Keep detailed records of the original transaction dates for your losses. Even though the carryover loses connection to specific investments, you might need this info if the IRS ever questions the short-term vs long-term classification of your carryovers.

0 coins

Yara Haddad

β€’

This is really helpful information about the netting rules! I had no idea that the order mattered so much for tax efficiency. Just to make sure I understand correctly - if I have $2,000 in short-term carryover losses and $3,000 in long-term carryover losses, and next year I have $1,500 in long-term gains and $800 in short-term gains, the short-term carryover losses would first offset the $800 short-term gains, then $1,200 of the long-term gains? And then my long-term carryover losses would offset the remaining $300 of long-term gains? Also, regarding keeping records of original transaction dates - how far back should we realistically keep these records? I'm assuming at least until all carryover losses are fully utilized, but is there a specific timeframe the IRS recommends?

0 coins

Prev1...10881089109010911092...5643Next