Back to California Unemployment

Omar Mahmoud

Who funds unemployment benefits in California? EDD explained

I've been collecting UI for about six weeks now and my coworker made a comment that got me thinking - she said 'enjoy spending my tax money' and it kind of stuck with me. I realized I actually have no idea who pays for unemployment benefits. Like is it coming from federal taxes? State taxes? Something my employer paid into? I always just assumed it was some general government fund but now I'm curious about the actual mechanics. Does the source of funding affect how much you can get or how long benefits last? I work in logistics and got laid off when our warehouse downsized, so this is my first time ever dealing with California EDD and I'm just trying to understand the whole system better.

Great question actually. So unemployment in California is funded almost entirely by employers, not workers. California EDD collects something called FUTA (Federal Unemployment Tax Act) and SUI (State Unemployment Insurance) taxes directly from employers based on their payroll. You as an employee never contributed a dime to it - your coworker was technically wrong lol. Employers pay into a pooled state trust fund and that's what California EDD draws from to pay your weekly benefits.

0 coins

Wait so my employer literally paid into a fund specifically so I could collect if I got laid off? That actually makes me feel way less weird about filing.

0 coins

yep exactly. and employers who lay off more people end up paying higher tax rates into the fund. its called experience rating. so your old warehouse will actually see their unemployment tax rate go up because of layoffs like yours

0 coins

To add some specifics - California's UI program is a joint federal-state system. The federal government (through FUTA taxes on employers) funds the administrative costs of running California EDD, while the actual weekly benefit payments come from the California State Unemployment Insurance Trust Fund, which is funded by employer SUI taxes. The federal government also maintains a loan program if a state's trust fund runs low, which actually happened in California during high unemployment periods. So there are two separate funding streams working together.

0 coins

So California actually had to borrow money at some point? Does that affect current claimants at all or is that just a state budget problem?

0 coins

It's more of a state fiscal issue than something that directly impacts individual claimants. Your weekly benefit amount and eligibility are set by statute regardless of the trust fund balance. The state has to repay those federal loans eventually, which can affect employer tax rates down the line.

0 coins

this is actually really useful info I never knew the feds funded the admin side separately. learned something today

0 coins

Honestly when I was trying to understand my own California EDD claim I went down a whole rabbit hole on this. One thing worth knowing is that your weekly benefit amount is calculated based on your own wages from the base period (roughly the first 4 of the last 5 completed calendar quarters before you filed). So while the FUND is pooled from all employers, your individual benefit amount traces back to what YOU earned. Higher wages = higher weekly benefit, up to California's max which is around $450/week right now. The funding source doesn't change your amount but your earnings history definitely does.

0 coins

$450 is the max?? I thought it was higher than that. I'm getting like $380 right now and I made decent money at the warehouse.

0 coins

yeah the max has been debated a lot actually. some states pay way more. California's max hasn't kept pace with cost of living which is a whole separate frustration lol

0 coins

wait i thought the max was higher?? i swear i read something about it being raised

0 coins

Had the same confusion when I first filed. Short answer: your employer funded it through payroll taxes they paid every quarter. You personally never paid into unemployment insurance in California (unlike SDI which DOES come out of your paycheck). So your coworker saying it's 'her tax money' isn't really accurate. It's more like the employers in California collectively fund a safety net that workers can draw from when they're laid off through no fault of their own. California EDD is just the agency that administers the whole thing.

0 coins

omg I never realized SDI was different!! I see both deductions on my old pay stubs and always thought they were the same thing

0 coins

Very common confusion. SDI (State Disability Insurance) is employee-funded and covers short-term disability and Paid Family Leave. UI (Unemployment Insurance) is employer-funded and covers job loss. Two completely separate programs under California EDD but totally different funding structures.

0 coins

this thread is genuinely more educational than anything edd's website explained to me

0 coins

Something I struggled with when I first got laid off was just getting anyone at California EDD on the phone to answer basic questions like this. The hold times are insane and I kept getting disconnected. A friend told me about Claimyr (claimyr.com) - it basically holds your place in the EDD phone queue and calls you back when an agent is available. There's a demo video at https://youtu.be/JmuwXR7HA10 that shows how it works. I used it when I had questions about my base period wages and finally got through to someone who explained my benefit calculation in like 10 minutes. Way better than sitting on hold for 3 hours.

0 coins

I've been wanting to call EDD to ask about my payment schedule but keep dreading the hold times. Going to check that out thanks

0 coins

seconded, claimyr is legit. used it twice and both times got a callback within a reasonable time instead of just getting the busy signal loop

0 coins

good tip. edd phone lines are genuinely one of the more frustrating experiences I've had dealing with any government agency

0 coins

ok but to push back slightly on the 'employers pay so it's free money' framing - some economists argue that employer payroll taxes like SUI effectively come out of overall compensation budgets, meaning in theory workers might receive slightly lower wages because employers factor in these tax costs. So indirectly some argue workers do 'fund' unemployment through foregone wages. not saying your coworker was RIGHT but it's not 100% clean cut either lol

0 coins

Technically valid economic argument but from a legal and practical standpoint, in California the unemployment insurance tax is solely the employer's obligation. It doesn't appear on employee pay stubs and employees have zero legal liability for it. The incidence-of-tax debate is interesting academically but for someone filing a UI claim it's not really relevant to their situation.

0 coins

fair point, wasn't trying to make OP feel bad just found it interesting

0 coins

lol no worries I'm definitely still cashing my EDD checks regardless of the economic theory

0 coins

Can I ask a related question since we're on the topic - does the fact that my old employer contests my unemployment claim affect the funding at all? Like do they pay MORE into the fund if I win my claim? I just got a notice that my former employer is disputing my separation and I'm in adjudication right now and it's been 3 weeks with no update

0 coins

Yes actually - this ties directly back to experience rating. If your claim is approved and you collect benefits, your former employer's 'experience rating' reflects that and their SUI tax rate can increase at their next rate notice. This is actually a big reason why some employers contest separations - it's partly financial for them. For your adjudication, 3 weeks is unfortunately pretty normal. Make sure you're still filing your weekly certifications every week even while in adjudication or you'll miss those payments once it resolves.

0 coins

oh no I did NOT know to keep filing weekly claims during adjudication!! I stopped after week 2 thinking I had to wait for a decision first. Is it too late to certify for those weeks??

0 coins

You can usually certify retroactively for missed weeks through UI Online - go to your claim summary and look for a 'certify for past weeks' option. Do it ASAP. This is such a common mistake and edd doesn't really warn you clearly about it.

0 coins

this is so helpful. I've been on UI for two months and genuinely didn't understand where the money came from. I kept feeling guilty like I was taking from other unemployed people or something. knowing it's an employer-funded insurance pool makes it feel completely different mentally

0 coins

Same honestly. The way my coworker said it made me feel like I was being a burden on individuals. It's insurance, not charity.

0 coins

exactly!! and we would have gotten it whether we claimed or not so might as well use what's there

0 coins

just to add another layer - the California UI trust fund has actually had solvency issues historically. During recessions when lots of people are claiming simultaneously the fund can get drawn down faster than employer taxes replenish it. California ended up with a multi-billion dollar federal loan balance after a previous major recession that took years to pay off. The state had to temporarily raise employer SUI rates to help pay it back. So while it doesn't affect individual claimants directly it's worth knowing the fund isn't infinitely deep - it's designed to handle typical unemployment levels not mass unemployment events

0 coins

this is why there was so much chaos when COVID hit - the trust fund got completely overwhelmed and the whole system was built for maybe 300k claims at a time not millions at once

0 coins

exactly, and California EDD's infrastructure (including their actual phone systems and IT) hadn't been updated in decades so it just completely collapsed under the volume

0 coins

and somehow years later the phone lines are STILL basically impossible to get through on without using a service like claimyr. some things don't change lol

0 coins

Question from someone starting a new job next month - if I voluntarily quit a job does the UI fund still pay out or does the employer funding structure change? asking for a friend 🙃

0 coins

Voluntary quit without good cause = disqualified from UI benefits in California. EDD would find you ineligible. The funding structure doesn't change per se but you simply wouldn't be approved to draw from it. California EDD defines 'good cause' pretty narrowly - things like unsafe work conditions, significant pay cuts, or following a spouse relocation can qualify but just not liking the job usually doesn't.

0 coins

yeah asking for a friend definitely... thanks for the real answer though

0 coins

asking for a' friend lmaooo'we ve all been there. the good cause criteria is worth researching though there are more qualifying reasons than peoplerealize

0 coins

Going back to OP's original question about whether funding source affects benefit amounts - one more thing worth knowing is that extended benefits programs (when unemployment rates are high) can kick in extra weeks of benefits that are partially federally funded through a different mechanism. So the normal 26 weeks comes from the state trust fund but in high-unemployment periods you can get additional weeks that are federally backed. California EDD would notify claimants automatically if they qualify for extended benefits - you don't have to apply separately.

0 coins

26 weeks is the max normally? I thought it was more than that. I'm only 6 weeks in so hopefully the fund math works out for me lol

0 coins

26 is the standard max yes. Extended benefits only kick in when statewide unemployment rates hit specific thresholds. In normal economic conditions you max out at 26 weeks from your claim date.

0 coins

ugh 26 weeks goes fast when you're job searching in a tough market

0 coins

had a situation where I was confused about who funds the ADMINISTRATION of edd versus the actual benefit payments and it actually caused me to misunderstand a notice I received. the admin funding from federal sources means California EDD has to follow certain federal guidelines even though it's a state agency. this is why certain things like job search requirements and able-and-available standards have federal minimums that all states must meet regardless of state-specific rules

0 coins

Good point - this is actually why California's job search requirements (currently 3 employer contacts per week) exist alongside the federal framework. States can add requirements above the federal minimum but can't go below them. Federal oversight of the admin process means there are consistent baseline standards claimants can count on.

0 coins

yes exactly! I found this out when I was trying to understand why some things about my claim seemed to track federal rules and others were clearly state-specific

0 coins

3 contacts per week? I thought it was just 1 or 2. I need to recheck my records because I might be under-documenting

0 coins

For anyone who lands here with follow-up questions and wants to actually get answers from a real EDD agent rather than just forum speculation (including me sometimes lol), seriously check out Claimyr at claimyr.com. The video demo is at https://youtu.be/JmuwXR7HA10. I've used it for questions about my base period calculation, my weekly benefit amount, and once for a weird issue with my identity verification. Each time I actually got through to someone instead of getting the runaround.

0 coins

I checked out the video and it makes sense how it works. Going to try it this week to ask about my payment timeline.

0 coins

does it work for adjudication status questions too or mainly payment stuff?

0 coins

worked for me for adjudication - the agent was able to pull up my claim and tell me exactly what was causing the hold. that info alone was worth it because edd's online portal gives you basically zero detail on adjudication status

0 coins

Circling back to OP's coworker comment - it's actually a really common misconception that UI benefits come from worker taxes or general income taxes. The employer funding structure is intentionally designed so that the cost of laying people off is borne by the businesses making that decision rather than workers or the general public. It's an insurance model where the 'premium' is paid by whoever creates the risk of unemployment (employers through layoffs) not by whoever experiences it (workers). California EDD is basically the insurance company administering the pool.

0 coins

That framing actually makes a lot of sense and I'm going to use it the next time my coworker makes that comment lol

0 coins

haha yeah 'it's employer-funded insurance that exists because your company laid people off' is a pretty solid mic drop response

0 coins

saving this thread for future reference honestly

0 coins

sorry if this is a dumb question but does any of this funding stuff affect the weekly certification process? like do I need to know who funds it to answer the certification questions correctly

0 coins

Nope! The weekly certification questions are entirely about your individual situation that week - did you work, did you earn money, are you able and available to work, are you actively looking for work, etc. None of the funding structure stuff affects how you certify. Just answer the questions honestly about your actual week and you're good.

0 coins

ok phew thank you. I always get nervous certifying because I feel like I might accidentally say something wrong

0 coins

the certification questions are actually pretty straightforward - the main traps people fall into are not reporting part-time earnings or forgetting to count a day they weren't available. as long as you answer accurately to your real situation you'll be fine

0 coins

UPDATE on my adjudication situation from earlier in this thread - I called California EDD using Claimyr and finally got through to an agent after weeks of failed attempts. Turns out there was a discrepancy between the separation reason my employer reported and what I put on my initial claim. The agent walked me through what documentation to upload to resolve it. Still waiting for final decision but at least now I know what's actually happening instead of just staring at 'adjudication in progress' with no info

0 coins

So glad you got an update!! That kind of information gap is so stressful. Fingers crossed for a good outcome on the adjudication.

0 coins

thanks!! and yes the not-knowing was honestly worse than the actual issue. having a real human explain what was happening made a huge difference

0 coins

this is exactly the situation claimyr is perfect for - adjudication status is almost impossible to track through the portal alone and getting a real agent on the line makes all the difference

0 coins

To wrap up the funding question with a complete picture for anyone finding this thread via search: California UI is funded through (1) FUTA - federal employer tax that funds program administration, (2) California SUI - state employer tax that funds actual benefit payments, (3) Federal Extended Benefits - partially federal funding that kicks in during high unemployment periods. Workers contribute nothing directly to UI funding in California. SDI (disability) is separate and IS employee-funded. California EDD administers both programs but they have completely different funding structures. Hope that helps anyone trying to understand the system.

0 coins

This is the cleanest summary of everything in this thread. Thank you, genuinely. Coming in confused and leaving actually understanding how this works.

0 coins

solid summary. bookmarking this thread

0 coins

same this should be pinned somewhere

0 coins

California Unemployment AI

Expert Assistant
Secure

Powered by Claimyr AI

T
I
+
43,680 users helped today