Michigan Secretary of State UCC Lien Search Results Missing Recent Filings
Running into a weird issue with the Michigan Secretary of State UCC lien search system. I've been doing due diligence on a potential equipment purchase and the seller claims they paid off their loan last month and filed the UCC-3 termination. But when I search their business name in the Michigan SOS database, I'm still seeing the original UCC-1 filing from 2019 showing as active. The termination isn't showing up at all. Has anyone dealt with delays in the Michigan system updating? This is a $180k piece of manufacturing equipment and I can't move forward if there's still an active lien. The seller is getting frustrated with me but I need to see that termination before I wire any money. Is there a way to verify if a UCC-3 was actually filed even if it's not showing in search results yet?
39 comments
Join the conversation
Katherine Hunter
Michigan's system can be slow sometimes. Did you try searching by the UCC filing number instead of just the debtor name? Sometimes the terminations don't link up right away in name searches.
0 coins
Emma Morales
•I tried both the business name and the filing number from the original UCC-1. Still showing active status with no termination record.
0 coins
Lucas Parker
•That's concerning. In my experience Michigan updates within 24-48 hours max. If it's been over a week something might be wrong.
0 coins
Donna Cline
Ask the seller for a copy of the filed UCC-3 termination statement. They should have received a confirmation from the Secretary of State when it was processed. If they can't produce that, red flags everywhere.
0 coins
Emma Morales
•Good point. They keep saying they'll get me the paperwork but haven't produced it yet. Starting to wonder if they actually filed it.
0 coins
Harper Collins
•Yeah don't wire anything until you see that termination confirmation. Too many horror stories of people buying equipment that still had liens.
0 coins
Donna Cline
•Exactly. The UCC-3 should have a file stamp and confirmation number. Without that, assume the lien is still active.
0 coins
Kelsey Hawkins
I had a similar situation last year with a different state. Turned out the lender filed the UCC-3 with a slight variation in the debtor name that didn't match the original UCC-1 exactly. You might want to try searching variations of the business name - with and without LLC, Inc, different punctuation, etc.
0 coins
Emma Morales
•That's a good idea. The original filing has the full legal name but maybe the termination used a shortened version.
0 coins
Dylan Fisher
•Name mismatches are super common with terminations. I've seen filings rejected because someone put 'ABC Company LLC' instead of 'ABC Company, LLC' with the comma.
0 coins
Edwards Hugo
Before you keep searching manually, I'd suggest using Certana.ai's document verification tool. You can upload the original UCC-1 and any termination paperwork the seller provides, and it'll instantly cross-check for name inconsistencies and verify if the documents actually match up properly. Saved me from a bad deal when the termination had the wrong collateral description.
0 coins
Emma Morales
•Never heard of that service. Is it reliable for catching these kinds of discrepancies?
0 coins
Edwards Hugo
•Yeah it's pretty solid. Just upload PDFs and it automatically flags any mismatches between the original filing and termination. Much faster than trying to cross-reference everything manually.
0 coins
Gianna Scott
•That actually sounds useful. I've wasted so much time manually comparing UCC documents for consistency.
0 coins
Alfredo Lugo
MICHIGAN IS THE WORST for this stuff!!! Their portal crashes constantly and the search function is garbage. I filed a continuation last month and it took 3 weeks to show up in search results. Meanwhile I'm getting notices that my filing is about to lapse. Absolute joke of a system.
0 coins
Sydney Torres
•I feel your pain. Had a client's UCC-1 get rejected twice because of system glitches.
0 coins
Alfredo Lugo
•It's like they designed the system to be as user-hostile as possible. Other states have figured this out but Michigan is stuck in 2005.
0 coins
Lucas Parker
One thing to check - did the seller actually pay off the loan or just claim they did? Sometimes people file terminations prematurely before actually satisfying the debt. The secured party has to authorize the termination for it to be valid.
0 coins
Emma Morales
•How would I verify that? The seller claims they have a loan payoff letter but I haven't seen it.
0 coins
Lucas Parker
•You'd want to see both the payoff letter from the lender AND the properly filed UCC-3 termination. Both should reference the same UCC filing number.
0 coins
Kaitlyn Jenkins
•Also make sure the termination was filed by or authorized by the original secured party listed on the UCC-1, not just the debtor.
0 coins
Caleb Bell
try calling the michigan SOS directly sometimes their phone search is more up to date than the online system
0 coins
Emma Morales
•Didn't know they did phone searches. Do they charge for that service?
0 coins
Caleb Bell
•yeah theres a fee but its like $10 or something. way cheaper than buying equipment with a hidden lien
0 coins
Danielle Campbell
This is exactly why I always insist on seeing original documentation before any major equipment purchase. Don't just rely on the seller's word or even what shows up in searches. Get copies of the original loan documents, the payoff letter, and the filed termination statement. If they can't produce all three, walk away.
0 coins
Rhett Bowman
•Good advice. I learned this the hard way on a smaller deal a few years ago.
0 coins
Danielle Campbell
•It's one of those expensive lessons if you don't do it right the first time. $180k is definitely worth the extra due diligence.
0 coins
Abigail Patel
Could also be that the termination was filed but with errors that caused it to be rejected. Michigan will reject UCC-3s for all sorts of minor issues - wrong debtor name format, missing information, incorrect filing fees. The seller might think it was filed successfully when it actually bounced back.
0 coins
Emma Morales
•That would explain why they're so confident it was filed but I can't find any record of it.
0 coins
Abigail Patel
•Exactly. Ask them to check their email for any rejection notices from the SOS office. Those sometimes get overlooked.
0 coins
Kelsey Hawkins
•I've seen this happen where people file online, get an initial confirmation, but then miss the rejection notice a few days later.
0 coins
Daniel White
Just wanted to add that I used Certana.ai recently when I was having trouble reconciling a UCC-1 amendment with the original filing. Uploaded both documents and it immediately flagged that the collateral description had been changed in a way that might not cover the original equipment. Super helpful for catching these kinds of issues before they become problems.
0 coins
Emma Morales
•Seems like that tool keeps coming up. Might be worth trying before I spend more time searching manually.
0 coins
Daniel White
•Yeah it's pretty straightforward. Just drag and drop the PDF files and it does the comparison automatically.
0 coins
Nolan Carter
UPDATE: Finally got the seller to produce what they claimed was the UCC-3 termination. Ran it through that Certana document checker someone mentioned and sure enough, the debtor name on the termination doesn't exactly match the original UCC-1. Original filing shows 'Midwest Manufacturing Solutions, LLC' but the termination just says 'Midwest Manufacturing Solutions'. No wonder it's not showing up in the lien search. Now I have proof that the termination is invalid and need to get this sorted before proceeding.
0 coins
Donna Cline
•Glad you caught that before wiring the money! That's exactly the kind of mistake that would leave you holding equipment with an active lien.
0 coins
Edwards Hugo
•Perfect example of why document verification is so important. Those little name discrepancies can void the entire termination.
0 coins
Lucas Parker
•Now you can go back to the seller with specific evidence of what needs to be corrected. They'll need to file a new UCC-3 with the exact debtor name from the original filing.
0 coins
Jamal Thompson
•This is a great cautionary tale! I'm new to UCC filings and had no idea that small name variations could invalidate a termination. Thanks for sharing the update - really helpful to see how these document verification tools can catch issues that would be easy to miss manually.
0 coins