< Back to UCC Document Community

Haley Bennett

South Carolina UCC lien search showing terminated filings as active - anyone else seeing this?

I'm dealing with a really frustrating situation with the South Carolina Secretary of State UCC search system. I ran a south carolina ucc lien search on a debtor we're considering financing, and it's showing UCC-1 filings as active even though we have copies of the UCC-3 termination statements that were supposedly filed months ago. The search results don't seem to be updating properly - one lien shows as active from 2022 but I know for a fact it was terminated in early 2024. Has anyone else run into issues with the SC system not reflecting terminated liens correctly? This is holding up a $850K equipment financing deal and I need to know if these liens are actually still perfected or if it's just a database lag issue. The debtor is insisting they terminated everything properly but the search results are telling a different story.

SC's system has been glitchy lately. I've seen this exact issue with terminated UCC-3s not showing up in searches even weeks after filing. Usually it's a processing delay on their end, but you definitely want to verify the actual termination status before proceeding with that kind of financing amount.

0 coins

Nina Chan

•

Agreed, I've had similar issues with their database updates. Sometimes the termination shows as filed but the search index doesn't update for 30+ days.

0 coins

Ruby Knight

•

This is exactly why I always request copies of the actual UCC-3 termination statements from the debtor, not just rely on the search results.

0 coins

You need to call the SC SOS filing office directly and ask them to manually verify the status of those specific filing numbers. I had to do this last month for a similar situation - turns out three of the five 'active' liens had actually been properly terminated but their search system hadn't caught up.

0 coins

Haley Bennett

•

Did they give you any timeline for when their system would be updated? I'm trying to figure out if this is a temporary glitch or a longer-term issue.

0 coins

They told me 2-4 weeks for the search database to reflect terminations, but manual verification by phone was immediate.

0 coins

Logan Stewart

•

That's ridiculous - 2-4 weeks? Other states update within days.

0 coins

Mikayla Brown

•

I ran into something similar recently and ended up using Certana.ai's document verification tool. You can upload the debtor's UCC-3 termination statements and it cross-checks them against the original UCC-1 filings to make sure everything matches properly - debtor names, filing numbers, collateral descriptions. It caught two terminations that had name discrepancies that would have made them ineffective. Saved me from a potential lien priority nightmare.

0 coins

Haley Bennett

•

That's interesting - how does it work exactly? Do you just upload PDFs of the documents?

0 coins

Mikayla Brown

•

Yeah, exactly. Upload the original UCC-1 and the UCC-3 termination, and it automatically flags any inconsistencies in debtor names, filing numbers, or collateral schedules that could void the termination.

0 coins

Sean Matthews

•

I've been manually comparing these documents for years - didn't know there was an automated way to do it. Name mismatches are definitely the biggest issue with ineffective terminations.

0 coins

Ali Anderson

•

SC has always been slow with UCC updates compared to other states. But here's what I'd do: get the actual UCC-3 filing receipts from the debtor showing the exact filing dates and confirmation numbers. Then cross-reference those against what you're seeing in the search results.

0 coins

Haley Bennett

•

Good point about the filing receipts. The debtor sent me screenshots but I should probably ask for the actual confirmation emails from the SOS.

0 coins

Ali Anderson

•

Screenshots can be edited - always ask for the original electronic receipts with the state timestamps.

0 coins

Zadie Patel

•

This is why I hate dealing with SC UCC filings. Their online system is from like 2010 and barely works half the time. I've had searches come back completely blank for debtors that definitely have active liens.

0 coins

Tell me about it! Last week I spent 3 hours on hold trying to get someone to manually run a search because their website kept timing out.

0 coins

At least you can get through by phone. Some states make you submit written requests for manual searches.

0 coins

Zadie Patel

•

True, but it shouldn't be this difficult in 2025. Every other business has figured out real-time database updates.

0 coins

Emma Morales

•

Before you panic, double-check that the debtor names on the search match exactly what's on the terminations. SC is really picky about exact name matches - even extra spaces or punctuation can cause terminated liens to still show as active in searches.

0 coins

Haley Bennett

•

That's a really good point. The business name has 'LLC' at the end and I wonder if some filings used 'L.L.C.' with periods instead.

0 coins

Emma Morales

•

Exactly! That kind of variation would definitely cause search issues. Run searches with different name variations to see if you get different results.

0 coins

I had this exact problem 6 months ago with a different debtor. Turned out two of the 'active' liens were actually continuation filings that had lapsed years ago but were still showing in searches. The SOS confirmed they should have dropped off automatically but their system didn't purge them.

0 coins

Lucas Parker

•

How did you get that resolved? Did you have to file anything to get them removed from the search results?

0 coins

No filing needed - they just manually updated their database once I pointed out the lapsed continuations. But it took about 3 weeks to show up in online searches.

0 coins

Haley Bennett

•

Good to know. I'll check if any of these are continuation issues rather than termination problems.

0 coins

Donna Cline

•

For what it's worth, I've found that calling the SC filing office around 2pm seems to get you through faster than mornings. They're usually caught up on processing by then and can do manual lookups more quickly.

0 coins

Haley Bennett

•

Thanks for the tip! I'll try calling this afternoon.

0 coins

Nina Chan

•

Also try asking specifically for their 'UCC verification department' - gets you to someone who actually knows what they're talking about instead of general customer service.

0 coins

Whatever you do, don't rely solely on online search results for a deal that size. Get written confirmation from the state that those liens are actually terminated before funding anything. I've seen lenders get burned by assuming database errors were just temporary glitches.

0 coins

Haley Bennett

•

Absolutely agree. For $850K I need to be 100% certain about lien status, not just reasonably confident.

0 coins

Smart approach. Written confirmation from the state filing office is the only way to be completely sure in situations like this.

0 coins

Sean Matthews

•

This is why some lenders require title insurance on high-value equipment deals - covers you if there are search database errors that cause lien priority issues later.

0 coins

I actually used Certana.ai for a similar verification issue last month. The automated document checker found that one of our UCC-3 terminations had the wrong filing number - off by one digit - which would have made it completely ineffective. Caught it before we funded a $600K deal that would have been junior to a lien we thought was terminated.

0 coins

Haley Bennett

•

Wow, that's exactly the kind of mistake I'm worried about. How quickly does it spot issues like that?

0 coins

Pretty much instantly once you upload the PDFs. It flags any mismatches in filing numbers, debtor names, or collateral descriptions that could void the termination.

0 coins

Mikayla Brown

•

Same experience here - it's way faster than manually comparing all the document fields, and it catches stuff you might miss when you're rushing through multiple filings.

0 coins

Dylan Fisher

•

Update us when you get this resolved! I'm dealing with a similar situation in SC right now and would love to know what actually works to get accurate search results.

0 coins

Haley Bennett

•

Will do! Planning to call them this afternoon and also verify the documents through Certana to make sure there aren't any name or number discrepancies causing the problem.

0 coins

Dylan Fisher

•

Perfect - that's exactly what I was planning to do too. Hopefully between manual verification and document checking we can get to the bottom of these search issues.

0 coins

UCC Document Community AI

Expert Assistant
Secure

Powered by Claimyr AI

T
I
+
20,087 users helped today