UCC Document Community

Ask the community...

  • DO post questions about your issues.
  • DO answer questions and support each other.
  • DO post tips & tricks to help folks.
  • DO NOT post call problems here - there is a support tab at the top for that :)

Sofía Rodríguez

California UCC financing lien causing issues with equipment loan refinancing

Running into problems with a california ucc financing lien that's blocking our equipment refinancing. We have a $285K loader that was financed in 2021, and the original lender filed a UCC-1 but now we're trying to refinance with a different bank and they're saying there's still an active lien showing up in the california system. The original loan was paid off 6 months ago but apparently no termination was filed. New lender won't proceed until this gets cleared up. Has anyone dealt with getting old california ucc financing lien records cleaned up? Our equipment is sitting idle while we sort this mess out and it's costing us jobs. What's the fastest way to get this resolved?

One thing to watch out for - make sure your new lender is searching correctly. We had a situation where the new bank was doing a sloppy UCC search and missing terminated liens. They kept saying there were active filings when there weren't. Sometimes the problem is on their end, not yours.

0 coins

Ask them to provide copies of their search results. If they can't show you specific UCC filing numbers and dates, they might not be doing thorough searches.

0 coins

Good point. A proper UCC search should show filing numbers, dates, and current status of each lien.

0 coins

Update us when you get this resolved! These california ucc financing lien situations are always learning experiences for the rest of us dealing with equipment financing.

0 coins

Will do! Hoping to get movement on this by next week. The suggestions about document verification and certified searches are really helpful.

0 coins

Definitely interested in hearing how it turns out. These kinds of lien clearance issues seem to be getting more common.

0 coins

Amelia Cartwright

UCC contract definition causing confusion in my collateral schedule

I'm preparing a UCC-1 filing for a client's equipment loan and getting stuck on how to properly define the contract in the collateral description. The loan agreement references multiple pieces of construction equipment but the UCC contract definition seems vague compared to what I'm seeing in other filings. Should I be more specific about the underlying financing agreement in the collateral schedule, or is a general reference to the security agreement sufficient? The debtor operates a small excavation business and we're securing earthmoving equipment purchased last month. I want to make sure the UCC filing properly reflects the contract terms without over-complicating the description. Has anyone dealt with similar contract definition issues when the underlying agreement covers multiple equipment pieces?

One more tip for the original poster - keep a copy of exactly what you file. If you ever need to do an amendment or continuation, you'll want to reference the exact language from your original UCC-1.

0 coins

Good point - I'll make sure to save the final version before submitting.

0 coins

learned this the hard way when I couldn't find my original filing language for a continuation. Had to order a certified copy from the state.

0 coins

To wrap this up - your collateral description should be clear, accurate, and sufficient to give notice. Don't overthink the 'contract definition' aspect. You're describing collateral, not drafting the contract itself. For construction equipment, use language that reasonably identifies the equipment without being overly broad or unnecessarily specific.

0 coins

Thank you everyone - this has been incredibly helpful. I feel much more confident about moving forward with the filing now.

0 coins

Great thread - I learned a lot too. The Certana.ai suggestion is definitely worth looking into for complex filings.

0 coins

QuantumQuasar

BECU secured visa security agreement UCC filing complications

I'm dealing with a nightmare situation with a BECU secured Visa card that's causing UCC filing headaches. Got this secured card about 18 months ago with a $2,500 deposit, everything seemed straightforward. Now I'm trying to close out some business financing and my lender is flagging potential issues with how BECU structured their security agreement. The language in their agreement references collateral in a way that might conflict with our UCC-1 filing for equipment financing. Has anyone else run into problems where credit union secured card agreements interfere with business UCC filings? I'm worried this could mess up our $45,000 equipment loan if there's overlap in how the collateral is described. The timing is terrible since our UCC-1 continuation is due next month and I don't want any complications with debtor name matching or conflicting security interests.

Update us on how this turns out! I'm curious whether BECU actually filed any UCC statements for your secured card or if it's just account-level security.

0 coins

Will do. I'm hoping it's just confusing language and not an actual filing conflict.

0 coins

Fingers crossed for you. These things usually work out fine once you get the proper documentation.

0 coins

One more thing - make sure your UCC-1 continuation gets filed on time regardless of this BECU issue. You don't want to let that lapse while sorting out the secured card question.

0 coins

Smart approach. Handle the immediate filing deadline first, then clean up any collateral conflicts.

0 coins

Agreed. Never let UCC continuations slide, even when dealing with other issues.

0 coins

Nia Davis

UCC 3 amendment filing rejected - need help with debtor name formatting

I'm dealing with a UCC 3 amendment that keeps getting rejected and I'm not sure what I'm doing wrong. We have an existing UCC-1 from 2022 for equipment financing on manufacturing equipment, and now we need to file a UCC-3 to add additional collateral (new CNC machines the debtor just purchased). The original filing shows the debtor as 'PRECISION MANUFACTURING SOLUTIONS LLC' but our new purchase agreement has them listed as 'Precision Manufacturing Solutions, LLC' with the comma. I've tried submitting the UCC-3 three times now and it keeps coming back rejected for 'debtor name mismatch.' The SOS website isn't very clear about exact formatting requirements. Do I need to match the original UCC-1 exactly even if the current legal documents show the comma? This is holding up a $180k equipment purchase and the lender is getting impatient. Has anyone dealt with similar debtor name formatting issues on UCC-3 amendments?

Another option is using a document verification service before filing. I started using Certana.ai after getting burned on a continuation filing that got rejected for a debtor name error I didn't catch. Now I upload both documents first to verify everything matches before submitting to the state. Catches those tiny formatting differences that cause rejections.

0 coins

How accurate is the automated checking? Does it catch subtle formatting issues?

0 coins

Very thorough. It flagged a period vs comma difference I never would have spotted manually. Saved me from another rejection cycle.

0 coins

Update: I pulled the original UCC-1 filing and copied the debtor name exactly as it appears there - 'PRECISION MANUFACTURING SOLUTIONS LLC' without the comma and all caps. Resubmitted the UCC-3 amendment this morning and it was accepted within two hours. Thanks everyone for the advice about exact name matching!

0 coins

Glad you got it sorted out. Now you know for any future UCC-3 filings on this debtor to use that exact name format.

0 coins

Perfect example of why keeping track of exactly how names appear on original UCC filings is so important for future amendments and continuations.

0 coins

Paolo Romano

Tennessee UCC filing rejected for debtor name mismatch - need urgent help

I'm dealing with a nightmare situation here. Filed a UCC-1 in Tennessee three weeks ago for a $450,000 equipment loan and it got rejected yesterday. The rejection notice says "debtor name does not match entity records" but I triple-checked everything against the borrower's LLC formation documents. Has anyone else run into Tennessee's system being super picky about exact name formatting? The loan closes Friday and I'm starting to panic. The debtor is registered as "Mountain View Logistics LLC" but I'm wondering if there's some spacing or punctuation issue I'm missing. The Tennessee SOS portal doesn't give you much detail on what exactly they want. Really need some guidance from anyone who's dealt with Tennessee UCC filings recently.

Tennessee has gotten so much pickier about UCC filings lately. Used to be more forgiving with name variations but now they're rejecting everything that doesn't match exactly.

0 coins

It's probably because of increased automation in their processing system. Less human review means stricter matching requirements.

0 coins

Makes sense but it's really frustrating for practitioners trying to get deals closed on time.

0 coins

UPDATE: Finally got through to the Tennessee UCC office. Turns out the LLC had filed an amendment to add a business purpose that slightly changed how the name appears in their system. Had to match the name exactly as it shows on the most recent amendment filing, not the original Articles of Organization. Refiled this morning and it was accepted within 2 hours. Thanks everyone for the suggestions!

0 coins

Glad you got it sorted out. This is exactly the kind of issue that document verification tools are designed to catch before filing.

0 coins

Thanks for the update! This will help others dealing with similar Tennessee filing issues.

0 coins

Prev1...237238239240241...684Next