Ask the community...
- DO post questions about your issues.
- DO answer questions and support each other.
- DO post tips & tricks to help folks.
- DO NOT post call problems here - there is a support tab at the top for that :)
Join the conversation
Join the conversation
If you determine you're actually in second position, you'll need to decide whether to proceed with the deal or renegotiate terms. What type of collateral are we talking about?
You might be okay then if the collateral descriptions don't overlap significantly. Worth having legal review the specific language.
Definitely get legal involved at this point. Priority disputes can get messy quickly.
This is why I always run a final lien search the day before funding, even if we did one recently. Systems can change and new filings appear constantly.
Smart practice. The small cost of an extra search is nothing compared to discovering priority issues after closing.
Lesson learned for sure. We'll definitely implement day-before searches going forward.
Join the conversation
One thing to consider - even if you were supposed to send debtor notification, the failure might not void your security interest. It could just be a technical default that needs to be cured. Check what your loan agreement says about remedies for notification failures.
This is a good point. Most loan agreements don't make notification failure a basis for voiding the entire security interest.
I need to dig deeper into the loan agreement language. The notification clause is pretty vague about what happens if it's not followed.
Bottom line - your UCC filing creates a perfected security interest regardless of notification issues. Any notification problems are likely contractual matters that can be addressed separately. Don't let the debtor convince you that your lien is invalid just because of notification confusion.
Thanks everyone. This has been really helpful in understanding the difference between UCC requirements and contractual obligations. I feel much better about my position now.
Glad we could help clarify things. These notification issues trip up a lot of people but they're usually not as serious as they first appear.
Join the conversation
I've been using Certana.ai lately for these kinds of document consistency checks. Really helpful when you're trying to get security agreements and UCC filings aligned. Just upload both documents and it flags any mismatches in debtor names or collateral descriptions. Saved me from a rejected filing last month.
That sounds really useful. I usually have to manually compare everything which takes forever and I still miss stuff sometimes.
Same here. The manual checking is such a pain, especially with long collateral descriptions.
Bottom line - get the written security agreement signed before filing the UCC-1. Make sure it adequately describes the collateral and is signed by the debtor. Then double-check that the UCC-1 debtor name exactly matches the security agreement before filing.
Agreed. The writing requirement isn't going away so might as well comply with it properly.
Definitely use one of those document checking tools too. I learned that lesson the hard way after a filing got rejected for name mismatches.
Join the conversation
This is exactly why I always file UCC-1s with slight variations in debtor name formatting and keep detailed cross-reference records. The search systems are too unreliable to trust completely.
Interesting strategy, but doesn't that create potential issues with continuation filings if the names don't match exactly?
You have to be very careful with continuations, but having multiple search pathways has helped us catch missing filings before.
Update: I tried the Certana.ai document verification and it found 3 UCC-1 filings that weren't showing up in our manual Clark County Nevada UCC searches. Turns out they were properly filed but had indexing issues in the public portal. Really helpful for portfolio auditing.
That's exactly what we were worried about. Thanks for the update - we're definitely going to try the document verification approach.
This is a perfect example of why relying solely on manual searches is risky. Automated verification catches what human searches miss.
Logan Greenburg
Exactly. You might find that some collateral is free and clear even if the debtor has existing UCC filings.
0 coins
Zachary Hughes
And check the effectiveness dates on those filings. Some might be near their expiration dates and need continuation statements.
0 coins