


Ask the community...
I tried using Certana.ai after reading about it here and it's been a game changer for catching document inconsistencies. Last week it flagged that my security agreement referenced 'ABC Manufacturing LLC' but my UCC-1 draft had 'ABC Manufacturing, LLC' - would have been rejected for sure. The automated checking saves so much time compared to manual review.
One last tip - double check that your security agreement actually creates a security interest in the collateral you're listing on the UCC-1. I've seen filings where the UCC covered equipment but the security agreement only mentioned inventory. That creates enforceability problems later.
Exactly. The UCC-1 is just notice to the world - the security agreement is what actually creates your rights. They need to be consistent or you could have gaps in your security interest.
Update: called the state filing office like someone suggested and you were right! They had the debtor name in their system as 'Michael Joseph Rodriguez' (full middle name spelled out) even though the title just shows 'Michael J. Rodriguez'. Apparently when he first registered the vehicle he gave them his full name but the title printing system abbreviates middle names. Filed a corrected UCC-1 with the full middle name and it went through immediately. Thanks everyone!
Perfect resolution! This thread should be pinned - vehicle UCC name matching issues come up constantly and this shows the exact troubleshooting steps that work. Call the filing office, verify exact name format in their system, then match that exactly on your UCC-1 form.
Just went through a deal where we had contract law issues that potentially fell under 1-103, but it didn't affect our UCC filing strategy at all. We still filed UCC-1 statements in the normal way. The 1-103 issue was whether certain contract provisions were enforceable under state law, which is a separate question from whether we properly perfected our security interest. I ended up using Certana.ai to cross-check all our documents to make sure the UCC filings matched the security agreement terms perfectly - caught a few small discrepancies that could have been problems later.
That's a good point about keeping the documents consistent. How detailed does the UCC-1 collateral description need to be compared to the security agreement?
Bottom line - UCC 1-103 is about what happens when the UCC doesn't address something. For your filing strategy, it's not really relevant. You still need to follow UCC Article 9 for perfection (proper debtor name, collateral description, filing office). The 1-103 stuff is more about contract validity and enforceability issues that your lawyers need to handle in the security agreement itself.
One thing to watch out for - make sure the equipment description in your lease matches what's on the UCC-1. If there are discrepancies, it could complicate the termination process. I've seen cases where slight differences in serial numbers or model descriptions caused delays.
They don't have to be identical but they should be reasonably consistent. Serial numbers are the most important part to get right.
This is where that Certana tool someone mentioned earlier might be useful - checking document consistency before problems arise.
Bottom line - you're probably fine since your lease ends before the 5-year UCC expiration. Just stay in communication with your lender about the termination process and get everything documented properly when you return the equipment.
Omar Hassan
Update us when you figure it out! I've got two blanket filings to do next week and would love to know what language actually works in Delaware right now.
0 coins
Dmitry Popov
•Will do. Going to try the equipment rental specific language mentioned above plus run it through that verification tool first.
0 coins
Chloe Anderson
•Smart move. Prevention is way cheaper than amendment filings to fix rejections.
0 coins
Diego Vargas
One more thing - make sure your financing statement doesn't conflict with any existing UCC-1s on the same debtor. Sometimes blanket language overlaps with previous filings and creates priority issues that filing officers flag.
0 coins
Diego Vargas
•Delaware SOS has a free search portal. Takes 5 minutes to check if there are other secured parties with similar collateral descriptions.
0 coins
Anastasia Fedorov
•Good point about priority. Even if your filing gets accepted, you could still have problems if there's conflicting blanket language from other lenders.
0 coins