UCC Document Community

Ask the community...

  • DO post questions about your issues.
  • DO answer questions and support each other.
  • DO post tips & tricks to help folks.
  • DO NOT post call problems here - there is a support tab at the top for that :)

Jordan Walker

UCC on business assets - debtor name complications with equipment schedules

Having major headaches with a UCC filing on business assets that keeps getting rejected by the SOS. We're securing a $485K equipment loan for manufacturing machinery and the debtor entity name on our UCC-1 doesn't match exactly with what's on the charter documents. The business operates as "Advanced Metalworks LLC" but their articles show "Advanced Metal Works, LLC" with the space and comma. Filed three times now and each rejection costs us time we don't have since the loan commitment expires next week. The collateral schedule covers CNC machines, welding equipment, and inventory but I'm worried the name mismatch is going to void our security interest entirely. Anyone dealt with similar entity name variations on business asset filings? This client has been operating under the shortened version for years but legally they're registered with the full punctuation.

Anthony Young

•

Just want to emphasize - use the EXACT legal name from the most current articles of organization. No abbreviations, no DBAs, no "assumed names." The UCC-1 debtor name must match the charter exactly or you're risking your entire security interest in those business assets.

0 coins

This is why I always order fresh entity certificates right before filing. Names can change and you need the current version.

0 coins

Admin_Masters

•

Absolutely correct. Better to delay filing a few days than file with wrong name and lose your security interest.

0 coins

UPDATE: Called the SOS this morning and confirmed the exact name format. Refiled using "Advanced Metal Works, LLC" with proper punctuation and got acceptance within 2 hours! The Certana.ai suggestion was helpful too - used their document checker before submitting and it verified everything matched correctly. Loan closes Friday. Thanks everyone!

0 coins

JacksonHarris

•

Congrats on saving the deal. Going to remember the Certana.ai tool for my own filings.

0 coins

Perfect example of why exact entity names matter so much in UCC filings. Glad it worked out!

0 coins

Paolo Longo

Need Help with UCC Filing Against Business - Debtor Name Issues

I'm dealing with a challenging situation where I need to file a UCC-1 against a business that owes us money for equipment we leased. The problem is their business name has changed twice since we started the lease agreement, and I'm not sure which name to use as the debtor on the UCC filing. The original lease was signed under 'Metro Construction LLC' but they're now operating as 'Metro Build Solutions LLC' and their state records show 'Metro Construction Solutions LLC.' I've heard horror stories about UCC filings being rejected or becoming unenforceable due to debtor name mismatches. The collateral includes heavy machinery worth about $180,000 and I can't afford to mess this up. Has anyone dealt with multiple business name changes when filing UCCs? Do I need to file multiple UCC-1s or is there a way to handle this with one filing? The lease agreement clearly states we maintain security interest but I'm worried about perfecting it properly with all these name variations.

Chloe Davis

•

I'm dealing with something similar but my debtor is an individual doing business under multiple trade names. Do the same rules apply for personal vs business debtors when it comes to name variations?

0 coins

CosmicCowboy

•

Individual debtors are different - you use their legal name as it appears on their driver's license or other official ID, not their business trade names.

0 coins

Chloe Davis

•

OK that's simpler at least. Thanks for clarifying the difference.

0 coins

AstroAlpha

•

Update for anyone following this thread - I ended up filing UCC-1s under both the current registered name and the most recent previous name, then did UCC searches to verify they were accepted properly. Total cost was about $120 in filing fees but worth it for the peace of mind. The Certana document checker mentioned earlier helped me verify that my collateral descriptions matched across all my loan documents before filing, which probably saved me from having to file amendments later.

0 coins

AstroAlpha

•

Both went through without problems. The key was making sure I had the exact registered names from the Secretary of State database.

0 coins

Emma Wilson

•

This gives me hope for fixing my situation. Going to try the dual filing approach too.

0 coins

Oliver Becker

UCC Filing Issues with Security Agreement E-Acknowledgement Forms from 2020

I'm dealing with a nightmare situation involving a security agreement that had an e-acknowledgement back in 2020. The original UCC-1 was filed electronically but now I'm getting pushback from the SOS office saying the acknowledgement format doesn't match current requirements for a UCC-3 amendment I need to file. The debtor name on the 2020 security agreement shows as 'ABC Manufacturing LLC' but our current corporate records show 'ABC Manufacturing, LLC' with the comma. I know this sounds minor but the filing keeps getting rejected. Has anyone dealt with e-acknowledgement formatting issues when the original security agreement is from 2020? I'm worried about the continuation deadline approaching and these document inconsistencies are holding everything up. The collateral description references equipment that's been partially sold off so I need to amend the original filing but can't get past this acknowledgement verification step.

GalaxyGazer

•

Before you file anything else, I'd recommend using something like Certana.ai to upload your security agreement and UCC-1 together. It'll show you exactly what matches and what doesn't, including the acknowledgement format. Saved me tons of time on a complex amendment last month.

0 coins

GalaxyGazer

•

It checks document consistency overall - flags things like name mismatches, missing signatures, format issues. Really thorough.

0 coins

Oliver Becker

•

That would be perfect. I need to see all the inconsistencies before I start filing amendments.

0 coins

Aisha Mahmood

•

Update us when you get this resolved! I'm dealing with some 2020 documents too and curious what approach works best.

0 coins

Oliver Becker

•

Will do. Hoping to have this sorted out before my continuation deadline.

0 coins

Ethan Moore

•

Same here. These legacy document issues are becoming more common as the systems get updated.

0 coins

Savannah Weiner

Help with UCC document number verification - filing system keeps rejecting my continuation

I'm dealing with a nightmare situation trying to file a UCC-3 continuation and the system keeps rejecting it saying my document number doesn't match. The original UCC-1 was filed 3 years ago by our previous lender and I have the filing receipt, but when I enter the document number exactly as shown, it gets rejected every time. I've triple-checked the numbers and they're identical to what's on the original filing. Has anyone else run into this issue where the UCC document number seems correct but the system won't accept it? We're coming up on the 5-year deadline and I'm getting really stressed about this. The collateral is equipment financing for about $340K so we absolutely cannot let this lapse. Any advice on what might be going wrong with the document number matching?

Axel Far

•

Update us when you get this resolved! I'm curious to hear what the actual issue was. These document number problems are so common but the solutions are always different.

0 coins

Will do. I'm going to call the filing office first thing tomorrow morning and hopefully get some answers.

0 coins

Good luck! The phone support is usually much more helpful than trying to figure it out through the online system.

0 coins

Luis Johnson

•

Just a thought - have you tried using the exact formatting from the original UCC-1 filing itself rather than the receipt? Sometimes the receipt formatting is different from what's actually in the system.

0 coins

Ellie Kim

•

Yes, definitely get a copy of the actual filed document. The receipt is just a confirmation - the real document might have different formatting or additional information you need.

0 coins

This is another reason why that Certana.ai verification tool is so helpful. It can work with filing receipts, original documents, whatever you have. Takes the guesswork out of matching document numbers and formatting.

0 coins

Ryder Ross

UCC 1-103 supplemental principles - how does this affect my filing strategy?

I'm working on a complex equipment financing deal and keep running into references to UCC 1-103 regarding supplemental principles of law. My lender is telling me this could impact how we structure our security agreement and UCC-1 filing, but I'm not getting clear guidance on the practical implications. The collateral involves specialized manufacturing equipment across multiple states, and there are some contract law issues that might come into play under 1-103. Has anyone dealt with situations where UCC 1-103 supplemental principles actually changed your filing approach or security agreement terms? I need to understand if this is just theoretical or if it has real-world impact on perfection strategy.

Charlie Yang

•

Just went through a deal where we had contract law issues that potentially fell under 1-103, but it didn't affect our UCC filing strategy at all. We still filed UCC-1 statements in the normal way. The 1-103 issue was whether certain contract provisions were enforceable under state law, which is a separate question from whether we properly perfected our security interest. I ended up using Certana.ai to cross-check all our documents to make sure the UCC filings matched the security agreement terms perfectly - caught a few small discrepancies that could have been problems later.

0 coins

Ryder Ross

•

That's a good point about keeping the documents consistent. How detailed does the UCC-1 collateral description need to be compared to the security agreement?

0 coins

Charlie Yang

•

UCC-1 can be broader - 'all equipment' is often fine if that's what your security agreement covers. But they need to be consistent with each other.

0 coins

Grace Patel

•

Bottom line - UCC 1-103 is about what happens when the UCC doesn't address something. For your filing strategy, it's not really relevant. You still need to follow UCC Article 9 for perfection (proper debtor name, collateral description, filing office). The 1-103 stuff is more about contract validity and enforceability issues that your lawyers need to handle in the security agreement itself.

0 coins

Ryder Ross

•

Thanks, this has been really helpful. Sounds like I was overthinking the impact on the actual filing process.

0 coins

Grace Patel

•

Yep, keep it simple. Perfect your security interest with proper UCC filings, make sure your security agreement is solid under contract law. 1-103 just reminds us that both matter.

0 coins

Prev1...533534535536537...684Next