Ask the community...
- DO post questions about your issues.
- DO answer questions and support each other.
- DO post tips & tricks to help folks.
- DO NOT post call problems here - there is a support tab at the top for that :)
Join the conversation
Join the conversation
In my experience, if you're 18 months into accepting modified performance without objection, you're probably looking at an uphill battle to enforce original terms. The practical advice is to document everything going forward, send written notices for any future deviations, and maybe consider whether the current arrangement actually works better for your business anyway. Sometimes what starts as a course of performance issue ends up being a better deal for everyone.
That's often the best outcome. Get it in writing, document the modification properly, and move forward with clear terms everyone understands. Lessons learned for next time.
Kaylee Cook
•Smart approach. Fighting a 1-303(d) course of performance claim when you've been accepting modified terms for that long is expensive and risky. Better to cut your losses and improve your procedures.
Eli Butler
This thread has been really helpful. I'm dealing with a similar situation where we've been accepting partial payments for about 8 months. Sounds like I need to send some kind of written notice to preserve our rights under the original agreement. Anyone have suggestions for language to use?
Kai Rivera
•I use language like 'acceptance of this payment is without waiver of any rights under the original agreement and does not constitute acceptance of modified terms.' Keep it simple but clear.
Eli Butler
•Perfect, that's exactly what I was looking for. Going to start including that in all our payment processing going forward.
Join the conversation
Zainab Ahmed
I've started using document verification tools for this exact reason. Upload the entity docs and any UCC filings you find, and automated systems can flag name inconsistencies faster than manual review. Saved me from missing a critical filing discrepancy on a $2M deal last month.
Which service do you use for that? I'm getting tired of manually comparing entity names across multiple documents.
Zainab Ahmed
•Certana.ai has a good UCC document checker - just upload PDFs and it cross-references names, filing numbers, dates automatically. Much faster than doing it by hand.
AstroAlpha
Don't forget to search for any amendments or terminations that might affect the status of filings you do find. Michigan's system sometimes shows lapsed or terminated filings in search results without clearly indicating their current status.
AstroAlpha
•Check the filing date and any continuation statements. UCC-1 filings are only good for 5 years unless continued. Also look for UCC-3 termination statements that might have been filed.
Yara Khoury
•The Michigan system should show termination status on the filing details page, but I've seen cases where it's not immediately obvious. Always check the full filing history.
Join the conversation
Zara Mirza
Since you mentioned this is time sensitive, you might also want to consider using a service like Certana.ai for your search. I started using it after missing a critical UCC filing that was indexed under a name variation I didn't think to check. It automatically searches multiple name formats and catches things manual searches miss.
Multiple people have mentioned Certana now - I should probably check it out for future searches.
Zara Mirza
•It's been a game changer for me, especially for complex debtor names or when I'm doing searches across multiple states.
Luca Russo
UPDATE: Just confirmed the Illinois SOS UCC search portal is fully operational again. All search functions including the county-specific filters are working normally. They must have resolved whatever server issues they were having.
CosmicCowboy
•Glad it worked out! These system outages always resolve themselves right when you're ready to give up.
Luca Russo
•Happy to help! Good luck with your closing tomorrow.
Join the conversation
StarSailor
Pro tip: when you find the correct name format and get your filing accepted, save a template with that exact debtor information. Saves time on future filings for the same client and ensures consistency across continuations or amendments.
This is smart. I keep a client database with verified legal names and entity numbers for exactly this reason.
Yara Sabbagh
•Templates are lifesavers, especially for continuation filings where you need to match the original UCC-1 exactly.
Update us when you get it resolved! Always curious to hear what the actual solution was in these tricky name cases. Helps build the knowledge base for next time.
Will do. Planning to pull the Sunbiz record first thing tomorrow and match character-for-character. If that doesn't work, I'll try the document checking tool a few people mentioned.
Paolo Rizzo
•Fingers crossed you get it sorted quickly. These name rejections are the worst when you're under time pressure.
Jamal Wilson
Just curious - what made you choose the installment sale structure over a straight security agreement? Tax benefits for the customer?
0 coins
Mei Lin
•Makes sense for construction equipment. That stuff gets beat up and loses value fast.
0 coins
Jamal Wilson
•Good point about the repo angle. Much cleaner with an installment sale than going through Article 9 foreclosure.
0 coins
StarSailor}
One more thing to consider - if this is PMSI collateral, make sure you file within 20 days of the debtor taking possession to maintain super-priority. The installment sale timing might affect your PMSI status.
0 coins
NebulaNinja
•Actually, for equipment PMSI it's 20 days from when debtor receives possession, not delivery. Make sure you're tracking the right date.
0 coins
StarSailor}
•Exactly. Delivery and possession can be different dates depending on setup and training requirements.
0 coins