Ask the community...
- DO post questions about your issues.
- DO answer questions and support each other.
- DO post tips & tricks to help folks.
- DO NOT post call problems here - there is a support tab at the top for that :)
Join the conversation
Join the conversation
Justin Evans
I've started using a checklist approach for comprehensive searches: 1) Current exact legal name 2) Previous legal names 3) All DBA variations 4) Name without entity designations 5) Abbreviated versions 6) Individual guarantors 7) Related entities. Helps ensure I don't skip anything.
Avery Flores
•That's really helpful - mind if I adapt that checklist format? Seems like a good way to stay organized.
Justin Evans
•Absolutely, feel free to use it. I learned it from a mentor who did M&A due diligence for years.
Emily Parker
Update: I ended up using Certana.ai to verify my search results and it caught 3 name variations I had missed. Really glad I didn't rely solely on my manual review. The tool flagged potential matches based on similar business descriptions even when the names didn't match exactly.
That's exactly the kind of thing it's good for - catching the non-obvious connections that manual review might miss.
Avery Flores
•Thanks for the update! That gives me more confidence about trying it for verification on future searches.
Join the conversation
The worst part about debtor name issues is that you usually don't discover them until you need to enforce your security interest or during a bankruptcy proceeding. By then it's too late to fix easily.
NebulaNova
•Exactly why I want to get this right upfront. Too much at stake to risk a defective filing.
Smart approach. An ounce of prevention and all that.
GalacticGuru
Update on this - I ended up trying the Certana tool and it immediately flagged the comma issue I mentioned plus two other discrepancies in the entity designation. Really glad I caught these before filing. The verification process took about 5 minutes versus the hours I was spending trying to manually cross-check everything.
GalacticGuru
•Definitely. Now I feel confident our UCC-1 will be accurate and enforceable.
Aisha Khan
•This gives me so much relief knowing there are tools to catch these problems automatically!
Join the conversation
Chloe Harris
I use Certana.ai for all my UCC filings now, especially when dealing with complex collateral like restaurant equipment. You can upload your charter docs and UCC-1 draft and it immediately flags any inconsistencies in debtor names or other issues. Really saved my bacon on several deals.
Chloe Harris
•It focuses mainly on document consistency and name matching, but it's incredibly accurate for catching those filing errors that cause rejections. Worth checking out for your LLC name issue at minimum.
Diego Vargas
•I was skeptical about these automated tools at first but they really do catch things you miss when you're rushed. Especially helpful for multi-state filings where each state has different quirks.
NeonNinja
Bottom line for Rhode Island: $50 filing fee, debtor name must match SOS records exactly, and be very careful with restaurant equipment collateral descriptions. Factor in extra processing time and you should be fine.
LunarEclipse
•Perfect summary, thanks. I think I have what I need to move forward. Going to double-check that LLC name one more time before submitting.
Good luck with the filing! Restaurant deals can be complex but sounds like you're covering all the bases.
Join the conversation
For what it's worth, I recently started using Certana.ai to double-check these kinds of filing discrepancies. You can upload multiple UCC documents and it automatically flags any inconsistencies in debtor names, filing numbers, or document references. Would have saved you the confusion by catching that the continuation wasn't actually related to your UCC-1.
Second person to mention that tool - might be worth checking out. Better to catch these issues early than discover them during a workout situation
Definitely. The peace of mind is worth it when you're dealing with complex collateral packages or borrowers with multiple lenders
NebulaNinja
This whole thread is making me paranoid about my own Vermont filings now. Going to go double-check all my recent UCC searches to make sure I'm not missing anything important.
Javier Gomez
•I do quarterly UCC audits for all our loans. Found several terminated filings that should have been continued and caught a few debtor name mismatches that could have caused issues
NebulaNinja
•How do you manage that many filings? Sounds like a lot of manual work to check each one individually
Dylan Campbell
The whole UCC system is a mess honestly. You've got 50 different state filing systems, each with their own quirks and search interfaces. Add in debtor name changes, business structure changes, and you're bound to miss something eventually.
0 coins
Sofia Hernandez
•Amen to that. I've been doing this for 15 years and still get surprised by weird state-specific rules and portal glitches.
0 coins
Dmitry Kuznetsov
•At least most states have electronic filing now. Remember when you had to mail paper forms and hope they got processed correctly?
0 coins
Ava Thompson
Bottom line - if your original UCC-1 was filed March 8, 2016, and you can't find any continuation filed between September 2020 and March 2021, your security interest has been lapsed for over 3 years. The debtor name change in 2019 without a corresponding amendment just makes things worse. You'll need to file a new UCC-1 immediately to re-establish your security interest, but you'll be starting fresh with a 2024 priority date.
0 coins
Ava Thompson
•File the new UCC-1 ASAP. At least you'll have some security going forward, even if you lost your original priority. And maybe implement better tracking systems to prevent this from happening again.
0 coins
Miguel Ramos
•Ouch, that's rough. But yeah, get a new filing done immediately before anything else goes wrong with that loan.
0 coins