Ask the community...
- DO post questions about your issues.
- DO answer questions and support each other.
- DO post tips & tricks to help folks.
- DO NOT post call problems here - there is a support tab at the top for that :)
Join the conversation
Join the conversation
Also check for any parent/subsidiary relationships. Sometimes UCCs get filed against parent companies or holding companies instead of the operating entity. Florida corporate database can help you map out the corporate structure.
Good catch - this company does have a parent holding company. I should search under that name too.
Yeah and don't forget guarantor situations. Sometimes the UCC is against individual guarantors instead of the company.
Follow up question - when you find all these UCCs with name variations, how do you confirm they're actually for the same company? Sometimes similar names could be completely different entities.
This is another area where document verification tools help. They can flag when addresses or other details don't match between filings with similar names.
Makes sense. I've been looking at addresses but some of these companies have moved several times so that's not always reliable.
Join the conversation
This is exactly why I always file UCC-1s with slight variations in debtor name formatting and keep detailed cross-reference records. The search systems are too unreliable to trust completely.
Interesting strategy, but doesn't that create potential issues with continuation filings if the names don't match exactly?
You have to be very careful with continuations, but having multiple search pathways has helped us catch missing filings before.
Update: I tried the Certana.ai document verification and it found 3 UCC-1 filings that weren't showing up in our manual Clark County Nevada UCC searches. Turns out they were properly filed but had indexing issues in the public portal. Really helpful for portfolio auditing.
That's exactly what we were worried about. Thanks for the update - we're definitely going to try the document verification approach.
This is a perfect example of why relying solely on manual searches is risky. Automated verification catches what human searches miss.
Join the conversation
Quick question - are you dealing with fixture filings on any of these agricultural equipment loans? UCC 9-318 assignment rules get even more complicated when real estate is involved because you might need to update county records in addition to the SOS filings.
Good catch - yes, several of these are fixture filings for irrigation systems and grain storage. We'll need to check county records too. This just keeps getting more complicated.
Fixture filing assignments are the worst. Every county has different requirements and some don't even have computerized records going back to 2019.
UPDATE: Following everyone's advice here, we pulled comprehensive UCC search reports and found that most of our assignments were actually filed correctly - we just didn't have the internal documentation. The search reports showed proper UCC-3 assignment filings from the merger date. Still using Certana.ai to double-check everything and make sure we didn't miss any gaps, but feeling much better about our secured position. Thanks for all the guidance!
Great outcome. This is why UCC search reports should be the first step in any portfolio acquisition analysis. Glad it worked out!
Perfect example of UCC 9-318 working as intended - the assignments were valid even without perfect internal records. The public filing system protected everyone's interests.
Join the conversation
Pro tip: always search both the debtor's current legal name AND any former names. Corporate name changes create gaps in search results that can hide active liens. I keep a spreadsheet of all name variations for each client.
Absolutely. M&A activity is one of the biggest sources of UCC search complications. Names change, entities merge, and the filing records don't always connect properly.
This is why UCC searches for M&A deals take forever. So many potential name variations to check.
Been doing UCC searches for 15 years and the inconsistency between systems is still my biggest frustration. Best practice is to use at least 2-3 different search platforms and then manually reconcile the results. Time consuming but necessary for thoroughness.
Exactly. One missed lien can torpedo an entire deal and cost way more than the extra search time.
This is where tools like Certana.ai really help - automates that reconciliation process instead of doing it manually.
Fatima Al-Suwaidi
Make sure you're filing in the right county if your state requires county filing. Also check if the property crosses county lines - that can complicate things.
0 coins
Fatima Al-Suwaidi
•Look up your state's fixture filing requirements. Most states require county filing but a few handle fixtures through the state UCC office.
0 coins
Dylan Mitchell
•This is why the UCC system is so confusing. Every state does things differently.
0 coins
Sofia Morales
Been doing fixture filings for 15 years. Common mistakes: wrong filing office, insufficient real estate description, debtor name doesn't match real estate records, and unclear fixture descriptions. Double-check all four.
0 coins
Dmitry Popov
•Wish someone had told me this before I wasted three weeks on rejected filings last year.
0 coins
Ava Garcia
•The real estate description is the trickiest part. Sometimes you need to get the exact language from the county assessor's office.
0 coins