Ask the community...
- DO post questions about your issues.
- DO answer questions and support each other.
- DO post tips & tricks to help folks.
- DO NOT post call problems here - there is a support tab at the top for that :)
Join the conversation
Join the conversation
This thread is super helpful! I'm dealing with something similar but with a corporation that merged with another entity. The surviving corporation kept its original name but I need to make sure I'm not missing any predecessor entities in my collateral research. Anyone dealt with merger situations in UCC filings?
I had a merger situation last year. Ended up needing to file additional UCC-1s to cover assets that transferred from the non-surviving entity.
Thanks, I'll definitely need to dig deeper into the merger docs then.
After reading all this, I'm definitely going to be more careful with name verification. We had one rejected filing last month that cost us extra fees to refile, and now I realize it was probably a name mismatch issue. The additional verification steps everyone mentioned seem worth the extra time to avoid rejections and potential perfection problems down the road.
The rejection fees really add up if you're doing volume filings. Prevention is definitely cheaper than correction.
Plus the time factor - rejections can delay closing if you're working on a tight timeline.
Join the conversation
Just want to second the Certana.ai recommendation. I was initially skeptical too but it really does streamline the verification process. The Charter→UCC-1 check workflow caught several name mismatches between our corporate filings and UCC documents that could have caused problems later. For a portfolio audit like this, the time savings alone would be worth it.
I still think manual verification is safer for critical filings, but I admit the volume you're dealing with might make that impractical.
The tool doesn't replace good judgment, but it does flag potential issues you might miss in manual review. Especially helpful for catching subtle debtor name variations.
One more thought - document everything you're doing for this audit. Your examiners will want to see your process and how you prioritized the review. Having a clear methodology will help if you can't get through all 800 before your deadline.
Yeah, examiners love to see risk-based prioritization and systematic approaches, even if you can't complete everything.
Also keep screenshots of any portal errors or system issues. Sometimes that helps explain delays in compliance reviews.
Join the conversation
For SC specifically, make sure you understand their continuation requirements too. I know you're doing a search not a filing, but it's worth knowing that SC requires continuations to be filed within 6 months before the 5-year anniversary. Some of the UCC-1s you find might be close to lapsing.
Depends on your transaction structure. If you're taking a senior position you might not care if junior liens lapse, but if there's any question about priority you'll want to factor that into your risk analysis.
Also worth noting that a lien that lapses and then gets revived through a late continuation can affect priority in some situations. Something to discuss with your client if you find any close calls.
Quick question - are you also checking federal tax liens and state tax liens? Those don't always show up in UCC searches but can definitely affect your deal. SC has separate databases for those.
Good catch, I was planning to do that separately but you're right that it's important for the overall lien picture. Do you know if SC's tax lien searches are online too?
Federal tax liens you have to check with the IRS, but SC state tax liens should be searchable through their Department of Revenue. I think there might be a fee but it's not too expensive.
Join the conversation
Make sure you're also checking for any UCC-5 correction statements that might affect the search results. Sometimes the original filing had errors that were corrected later, which can create confusion in the search results.
Good catch - correction statements can definitely muddy the waters when you're trying to interpret search results.
I hadn't considered correction statements. I'll need to look for any UCC-5 filings related to these file numbers.
Bottom line is that UCC search results are just the starting point. You need to dig into the actual documents to understand the real lien status. It's tedious but necessary for accurate due diligence.
Thanks everyone for all the advice. Sounds like I have a lot of document review ahead of me, but at least I know what to look for now.
Good luck with the review! It's time-consuming but you'll have a much clearer picture of the lien situation once you're done.
Felicity Bud
For anyone else reading this thread, I'd recommend always requesting a copy of the UCC-3 termination statement when you pay off any secured loan. Most lenders will provide it if you ask, and it saves you from having to dig through state databases later to verify everything was filed correctly.
0 coins
Max Reyes
•This is solid advice. I've started doing this for all my equipment loans and it's already caught one filing error before it became a problem.
0 coins
Mikayla Davison
•Agreed. It's such a simple thing to request but can save huge headaches down the road.
0 coins
Adrian Connor
Just wanted to add that if anyone runs into this issue with a dealership that's no longer in business, you'll need to work directly with the original lender or their successor. Had this happen when a local dealership closed and it was a real pain to track down who was responsible for filing the termination.
0 coins
Aisha Jackson
•That's a good point. Business closures can really complicate UCC matters. Sometimes the files get transferred to other dealers or lenders.
0 coins
Ryder Everingham
•Yep, and if the original secured party is out of business with no successor, you might need to petition the court for a termination order. It's rare but it happens.
0 coins