Ask the community...
- DO post questions about your issues.
- DO answer questions and support each other.
- DO post tips & tricks to help folks.
- DO NOT post call problems here - there is a support tab at the top for that :)
Join the conversation
Join the conversation
Just curious - what made you choose the installment sale structure over a straight security agreement? Tax benefits for the customer?
Makes sense for construction equipment. That stuff gets beat up and loses value fast.
Good point about the repo angle. Much cleaner with an installment sale than going through Article 9 foreclosure.
One more thing to consider - if this is PMSI collateral, make sure you file within 20 days of the debtor taking possession to maintain super-priority. The installment sale timing might affect your PMSI status.
Actually, for equipment PMSI it's 20 days from when debtor receives possession, not delivery. Make sure you're tracking the right date.
Exactly. Delivery and possession can be different dates depending on setup and training requirements.
Join the conversation
Don't forget to check if there were any amendments filed on the original UCC-1. Sometimes collateral gets added or debtor names change, and you need to reference the most current information, not just what was on the original filing.
How do you track all the amendments? Is there an easy way to see the full filing history?
Most SOS search systems will show you the complete chain of filings when you look up the original number.
Just get it done ASAP. The borrower paid off their debt and deserves to have their credit cleared. File the UCC-3 termination today if possible - it's really not that complicated once you have all the right information from the original filing.
Agreed - better to file it quickly and correctly than let it drag out and create relationship problems.
Thanks everyone - I found the original filing details and I'm going to use one of those verification tools before submitting. Really appreciate all the guidance!
Join the conversation
Just want to second the Certana.ai recommendation. I was initially skeptical too but it really does streamline the verification process. The Charter→UCC-1 check workflow caught several name mismatches between our corporate filings and UCC documents that could have caused problems later. For a portfolio audit like this, the time savings alone would be worth it.
I still think manual verification is safer for critical filings, but I admit the volume you're dealing with might make that impractical.
The tool doesn't replace good judgment, but it does flag potential issues you might miss in manual review. Especially helpful for catching subtle debtor name variations.
One more thought - document everything you're doing for this audit. Your examiners will want to see your process and how you prioritized the review. Having a clear methodology will help if you can't get through all 800 before your deadline.
Yeah, examiners love to see risk-based prioritization and systematic approaches, even if you can't complete everything.
Also keep screenshots of any portal errors or system issues. Sometimes that helps explain delays in compliance reviews.
Join the conversation
Just went through something similar with Michigan's UCC system last week. These database sync issues seem to be happening across multiple states. I ended up having to download every single document manually and cross-reference them outside the portal. Pain in the neck but it's the only way to be sure.
Michigan's system is terrible too. Seems like a widespread problem with state databases.
At least Michigan lets you download documents easily. Some states make even that difficult.
UPDATE: Finally got this resolved. Called the SD Secretary of State office and they confirmed there's a known issue with their database indexing that they're working to fix. They manually ran the search for me and provided certified copies of the correct filings. Turns out there were only two active UCC-1s, not three like the portal was showing. Also used that Certana tool someone mentioned earlier to double-check all the document consistency - really helpful for catching details I might have missed.
Nice work getting the official confirmation. How did the Certana verification work out for you?
The Certana check was really useful - it immediately flagged that one of the documents had an inconsistent debtor name format that could have caused problems later. Easy upload process and instant results.
Freya Thomsen
Just a heads up - some states have moved to electronic filing only and the systems can be really particular about formatting. Make sure you're using their current forms and requirements, not something you downloaded months ago.
0 coins
Freya Thomsen
•Yeah, I learned that lesson the hard way when my filing got rejected for using an outdated form version.
0 coins
Paolo Ricci
•This is another thing Certana's tool helped with - it flagged that I was using an old form template and directed me to the current one.
0 coins
Omar Zaki
Thanks everyone for all the advice! This has been super helpful. I'm going to pull the official corporate records first, then double-check everything before submitting. Better to spend extra time upfront than deal with rejections and potential lien priority issues later.
0 coins
Natasha Volkova
•Feel free to post back if you run into any other issues. This community is pretty good about helping with UCC questions.
0 coins
Connor O'Neill
•Definitely will - thanks again everyone. This is exactly the kind of guidance I needed.
0 coins