Ask the community...
- DO post questions about your issues.
- DO answer questions and support each other.
- DO post tips & tricks to help folks.
- DO NOT post call problems here - there is a support tab at the top for that :)
Join the conversation
Join the conversation
Quick reality check - if you've been filing UCC-1s on your equipment loans, you're doing it right. The lien vs UCC confusion is just terminology. Your security agreement creates the lien, your UCC-1 filing perfects it. Both together give you a perfected security interest in the equipment. Don't overthink it - sounds like you've been protecting your lender's interests properly.
Thanks, that's what I needed to hear. All this legal terminology was making me think I'd been doing something completely wrong.
Chris King
•The terminology is definitely confusing at first. I still catch myself mixing up "lien" and "security interest" even though they mean basically the same thing in this context.
Rachel Clark
Here's a simple way to remember it: Lien = your claim on the equipment (created by security agreement). UCC filing = public notice of that claim (perfects the lien). You need both. The UCC-1 doesn't create the lien - it just makes it enforceable against third parties and establishes your priority. As long as you're filing UCC-1s with accurate debtor names and collateral descriptions, you're perfecting your liens properly.
Oh great, another thing to track. Do you set reminders or use a system for that?
Rachel Clark
•Most lenders use a tickler system or software that tracks UCC expiration dates. You want to file continuations at least 6 months before the 5-year mark to be safe.
Join the conversation
Justin Evans
Update: I ended up using the original UCC-1 name format (without the comma) and the continuation was accepted! Thanks everyone for the advice. Still annoying that such a small punctuation difference can cause so much hassle, but at least the lien is continued for another 5 years.
Zoe Gonzalez
•Glad it worked out! This thread will definitely help others dealing with the same issue.
Perfect example of why consistency with original filings is so important. Thanks for updating us on the resolution.
Emily Parker
This whole thread is giving me anxiety about my own filings lol. I've got two continuations coming up next year and now I'm paranoid about name matching issues. Definitely going to pull my original UCC-1s and double-check everything before filing.
Aaron Lee
•Smart approach. Better to check now than deal with rejection stress later. Document verification tools really take the guesswork out of it.
Good plan. Start early and you'll have plenty of time to fix any issues that come up.
Join the conversation
Emma Bianchi
Update: I ended up using that Certana tool and it immediately flagged that the charter had 'Mountain Ridge Equipment, L.L.C.' with periods after each L. Filed with that exact format and it went through perfectly. Can't believe I missed something so small but it would have cost me another week of delays. Thanks for the suggestion!
Periods after L.L.C.? That's so random. Good thing you caught it.
This is exactly why I always double-check documents now. One small mistake can derail everything.
Charlie Yang
For future Nevada filings, I always request the certified copy of articles instead of relying on online displays. Costs a few extra bucks but saves the headache of multiple rejections.
Cass Green
•That's probably smart. The $15 for a certified copy would have saved me days of stress.
Grace Patel
•Especially when you're dealing with multi-million dollar collateral. The extra cost is nothing compared to the delays.
Join the conversation
Sofia Gomez
If you determine you're actually in second position, you'll need to decide whether to proceed with the deal or renegotiate terms. What type of collateral are we talking about?
Sofia Gomez
•You might be okay then if the collateral descriptions don't overlap significantly. Worth having legal review the specific language.
StormChaser
•Definitely get legal involved at this point. Priority disputes can get messy quickly.
This is why I always run a final lien search the day before funding, even if we did one recently. Systems can change and new filings appear constantly.
Ava Williams
•Smart practice. The small cost of an extra search is nothing compared to discovering priority issues after closing.
Nia Johnson
•Lesson learned for sure. We'll definitely implement day-before searches going forward.
Mateo Rodriguez
Been thinking about this thread and realized most of my UCC cost problems come from errors and refiling. Fixed my document review process and filing costs dropped significantly even with fee increases.
0 coins
Mateo Rodriguez
•Started cross-checking all entity documents against UCC forms before filing. Caught name mismatches and formatting issues that were causing rejections.
0 coins
CosmicCaptain
•That's exactly what Certana.ai automates - the cross-checking between charter documents and UCC forms. Saves time and prevents expensive refiling.
0 coins
Ethan Wilson
Filing fees are going up everywhere unfortunately. Better to focus on process efficiency and error prevention than trying to negotiate lower fees with state agencies.
0 coins
Amina Toure
•This thread has been really helpful. Sounds like investing in better document verification upfront is the way to control overall UCC costs.
0 coins
Yuki Tanaka
•Exactly. The filing fees are what they are, but you can control the accuracy and efficiency of your process.
0 coins