Ask the community...
- DO post questions about your issues.
- DO answer questions and support each other.
- DO post tips & tricks to help folks.
- DO NOT post call problems here - there is a support tab at the top for that :)
Join the conversation
Join the conversation
Make sure you're also checking for any UCC-5 correction statements that might affect the search results. Sometimes the original filing had errors that were corrected later, which can create confusion in the search results.
Good catch - correction statements can definitely muddy the waters when you're trying to interpret search results.
I hadn't considered correction statements. I'll need to look for any UCC-5 filings related to these file numbers.
Bottom line is that UCC search results are just the starting point. You need to dig into the actual documents to understand the real lien status. It's tedious but necessary for accurate due diligence.
Thanks everyone for all the advice. Sounds like I have a lot of document review ahead of me, but at least I know what to look for now.
Good luck with the review! It's time-consuming but you'll have a much clearer picture of the lien situation once you're done.
Join the conversation
Just want to second the Certana.ai recommendation. I was initially skeptical too but it really does streamline the verification process. The Charter→UCC-1 check workflow caught several name mismatches between our corporate filings and UCC documents that could have caused problems later. For a portfolio audit like this, the time savings alone would be worth it.
I still think manual verification is safer for critical filings, but I admit the volume you're dealing with might make that impractical.
The tool doesn't replace good judgment, but it does flag potential issues you might miss in manual review. Especially helpful for catching subtle debtor name variations.
One more thought - document everything you're doing for this audit. Your examiners will want to see your process and how you prioritized the review. Having a clear methodology will help if you can't get through all 800 before your deadline.
Yeah, examiners love to see risk-based prioritization and systematic approaches, even if you can't complete everything.
Also keep screenshots of any portal errors or system issues. Sometimes that helps explain delays in compliance reviews.
Join the conversation
Just a heads up - some states have moved to electronic filing only and the systems can be really particular about formatting. Make sure you're using their current forms and requirements, not something you downloaded months ago.
Yeah, I learned that lesson the hard way when my filing got rejected for using an outdated form version.
This is another thing Certana's tool helped with - it flagged that I was using an old form template and directed me to the current one.
Thanks everyone for all the advice! This has been super helpful. I'm going to pull the official corporate records first, then double-check everything before submitting. Better to spend extra time upfront than deal with rejections and potential lien priority issues later.
Feel free to post back if you run into any other issues. This community is pretty good about helping with UCC questions.
Definitely will - thanks again everyone. This is exactly the kind of guidance I needed.
Join the conversation
Don't forget to check if there were any amendments filed on the original UCC-1. Sometimes collateral gets added or debtor names change, and you need to reference the most current information, not just what was on the original filing.
How do you track all the amendments? Is there an easy way to see the full filing history?
Most SOS search systems will show you the complete chain of filings when you look up the original number.
Just get it done ASAP. The borrower paid off their debt and deserves to have their credit cleared. File the UCC-3 termination today if possible - it's really not that complicated once you have all the right information from the original filing.
Agreed - better to file it quickly and correctly than let it drag out and create relationship problems.
Thanks everyone - I found the original filing details and I'm going to use one of those verification tools before submitting. Really appreciate all the guidance!
Ella Cofer
For SC specifically, make sure you understand their continuation requirements too. I know you're doing a search not a filing, but it's worth knowing that SC requires continuations to be filed within 6 months before the 5-year anniversary. Some of the UCC-1s you find might be close to lapsing.
0 coins
Ella Cofer
•Depends on your transaction structure. If you're taking a senior position you might not care if junior liens lapse, but if there's any question about priority you'll want to factor that into your risk analysis.
0 coins
Finnegan Gunn
•Also worth noting that a lien that lapses and then gets revived through a late continuation can affect priority in some situations. Something to discuss with your client if you find any close calls.
0 coins
Kevin Bell
Quick question - are you also checking federal tax liens and state tax liens? Those don't always show up in UCC searches but can definitely affect your deal. SC has separate databases for those.
0 coins
Jasmine Hernandez
•Good catch, I was planning to do that separately but you're right that it's important for the overall lien picture. Do you know if SC's tax lien searches are online too?
0 coins
Kevin Bell
•Federal tax liens you have to check with the IRS, but SC state tax liens should be searchable through their Department of Revenue. I think there might be a fee but it's not too expensive.
0 coins