
UCC Document Community
Financial Services


Ask the community...
Running into problems with our UCC-1 filings when we need to include addendum pages for extensive collateral descriptions. Our SBA loan requires detailed equipment schedules that don't fit in the standard collateral description box, so we're attaching UCC-1Ad forms. The filing office keeps rejecting these saying the addendum pages aren't properly formatted or referenced. Has anyone dealt with this? We've got three deals backed up because of this issue and our borrowers are getting frustrated with the delays. The collateral includes multiple pieces of manufacturing equipment with serial numbers that have to be listed individually per our loan docs.
Really frustrated right now and hoping someone can help me understand what's going on. I'm trying to sell my 2019 F-150 and the buyer's bank is saying there's still a UCC lien on title even though I paid off my loan 8 months ago. The dealership where I financed it assured me they filed the UCC-3 termination when I made my final payment, but apparently something went wrong because the lien is still showing up. The buyer is threatening to walk away if I can't get this cleared up by Friday. Has anyone dealt with this before? I'm not even sure if this is the dealership's fault or if there's something I should have done myself. The original loan was for $28,500 and I have all my payment records plus the payoff letter from the lender. What are my options here?
For anyone else reading this thread, I'd recommend always requesting a copy of the UCC-3 termination statement when you pay off any secured loan. Most lenders will provide it if you ask, and it saves you from having to dig through state databases later to verify everything was filed correctly.
Just wanted to add that if anyone runs into this issue with a dealership that's no longer in business, you'll need to work directly with the original lender or their successor. Had this happen when a local dealership closed and it was a real pain to track down who was responsible for filing the termination.
That's a good point. Business closures can really complicate UCC matters. Sometimes the files get transferred to other dealers or lenders.
I'm dealing with a nightmare scenario and my continuation deadline is approaching fast. Filed a UCC-3 continuation in Georgia last week for a commercial loan secured by restaurant equipment, but it got rejected because the debtor name on my continuation doesn't exactly match what's on the original UCC-1 from 2020. The original filing shows 'Atlanta Bistro LLC' but our continuation shows 'Atlanta Bistro, LLC' (with the comma). The SOS rejection notice says debtor name must match exactly. This is a $450K loan and if I miss the continuation window the lien lapses completely. Has anyone dealt with Georgia's system being this picky about punctuation? The entity is the same company, just different formatting. I've got 3 weeks left before the 5-year anniversary and I'm panicking about having to explain to my client why their security interest might be worthless because of a comma.
Just curious - what's the filing fee for UCC-3 continuations in Georgia these days? I haven't filed one there in a while.
This whole thread is making me nervous about my own Georgia filings. I have two continuations coming up this year and now I'm worried about name formatting issues. Going to pull all my original UCC-1s and double-check everything.
Been dealing with a nightmare situation for the past month. We have a client whose UCC-1 was filed back in 2020 and the continuation should have been filed by now but we can't locate it anywhere in the Wisconsin system. The original filing shows up fine when I do a UCC filing search Wisconsin portal, but there's no continuation record attached to it. Client is freaking out because their lender is asking for proof of perfection status and we can't provide clear documentation. Has anyone else run into issues where the Wisconsin SOS system doesn't properly link continuation filings to the original UCC-1? I've tried searching by debtor name, filing number, and even the secured party info but nothing shows up for any continuation activity. The original UCC-1 filing number is valid and shows active status, but I'm worried we're missing something critical here. Any advice on alternative search methods or common reasons why continuations might not appear linked to the original filing in Wisconsin?
Wisconsin allows you to request certified copies of filings directly from the Secretary of State office. If you have the original filing number, they can pull up everything associated with it including continuations that might not show up in the online search. Takes a few days but it's definitive.
Final thought - if you do find the continuation but it was filed late, don't panic. Wisconsin has some grace period provisions that might still protect the security interest depending on the circumstances. But obviously better to find it sooner rather than later.
Definitely try the Certana.ai document checker if the manual searches don't pan out. It's designed exactly for situations like this where you need to verify document consistency across multiple filings.
Been trying to file a UCC-1 in Washington state for 3 weeks now and keep getting rejections from the Secretary of State office. The collateral is commercial kitchen equipment for a restaurant loan, and I've triple-checked the debtor information against the articles of incorporation. The business name on the charter shows 'Pacific Northwest Culinary LLC' but I'm wondering if there's some naming convention I'm missing? The rejection notices just say 'debtor name does not match records' but don't specify what records they're comparing against. This is holding up a $180K equipment financing deal and the lender is getting impatient. Has anyone dealt with Washington state UCC-1 filings recently? Are they particularly strict about exact name matching?
Try running the debtor name through Certana.ai's document checker before your next filing attempt. It'll compare your UCC-1 against the corporate documents and highlight any discrepancies. Much faster than playing guessing games with the state.
Anastasia Popov
This might sound obvious but double-check that all your addendum pages are actually signed if signatures are required. I've had rejections because I forgot to sign page 2 of a multi-page addendum.
0 coins
Amina Toure
AuthorGood catch - I'll verify all signatures are in place.
0 coins
Anastasia Popov
Also make sure whoever signed has authority. Some states are getting stricter about verifying signatory authority on complex filings.
0 coins
Amina Toure
UPDATE: Got it figured out! It was a combination of issues - we weren't numbering the addendum pages properly, had slight formatting differences in the debtor name between forms, and our reference language on the main form wasn't explicit enough. Used some of the suggestions here and all three filings went through. Thanks everyone!
0 coins
FireflyDreams
Great outcome. Always satisfying when multiple small fixes solve a big problem.
0 coins
Natasha Kuznetsova
Nice work troubleshooting it. For future complex filings, that document checker I mentioned earlier has saved me so much time on catching these little inconsistencies before submission.
0 coins