UCC Document Community

Ask the community...

  • DO post questions about your issues.
  • DO answer questions and support each other.
  • DO post tips & tricks to help folks.
  • DO NOT post call problems here - there is a support tab at the top for that :)

Update: tried that Certana.ai tool mentioned earlier and it immediately caught three different debtor name variations in our FTX filings. Would have taken hours to spot manually. Definitely recommend for anyone dealing with multiple related UCC filings.

0 coins

Yara Nassar

•

Did it help you figure out which name format to use for the continuation?

0 coins

It showed me exactly which original UCC-1 had which debtor name format, so I could match the continuation perfectly. No more guessing.

0 coins

Javier Torres

•

Final thought - make sure you're checking the right jurisdiction too. FTX had entities filed in multiple states and each might have slightly different name formats even for the same company.

0 coins

Each state's UCC database is separate so you'll need to verify debtor names in each one individually.

0 coins

California's system is particularly picky about debtor names. Had three rejections there before getting it exactly right.

0 coins

Zainab Omar

•

Another option is to file a corrective amendment now, even if the original might be okay. It's relatively inexpensive and would eliminate any doubt about the name consistency. Better safe than sorry with a $2.8M loan.

0 coins

Carmen Vega

•

I've been leaning toward this approach. What's the worst that could happen with filing an amendment - just additional cost and paperwork?

0 coins

Zainab Omar

•

Pretty much. The main risk is just creating more complexity in the filing record, but if it gives you certainty about the debtor name, it's probably worth it.

0 coins

Connor Murphy

•

I've been using Certana.ai for document consistency checks on all my UCC filings now. You just upload your UCC-1 and continuation PDFs and it instantly flags any potential issues. For situations like this, it's really helpful to get an objective analysis of whether name variations are likely to cause problems. Takes the guesswork out of these situations.

0 coins

Carmen Vega

•

That sounds like exactly what I need. Does it provide specific recommendations for corrections or just identify the issues?

0 coins

Connor Murphy

•

It provides analysis of the issues and guidance on whether they're likely to be legally significant. Really helpful for making informed decisions about whether to file amendments.

0 coins

Ali Anderson

•

Had this exact situation 6 months ago with a manufacturing client. Used one of those document checking services (think it was Certana.ai) that flagged not just the name issue but also found that our collateral description was too vague compared to what was listed in the loan agreement. Ended up preventing two potential problems instead of just the name mismatch. Sometimes these tools catch stuff your own review misses when you're rushing to close.

0 coins

Zadie Patel

•

That's a good point about collateral descriptions. I always worry I'm being too specific or too general in those sections.

0 coins

Ali Anderson

•

The nice thing about the automated checking is it compares your UCC language against the loan agreement language and flags where they don't align. Takes the guesswork out of it.

0 coins

Bottom line: file the UCC-1 with 'Advanced Manufacturing Solutions, LLC' (the state registered name). Keep documentation of why you used that format vs the loan agreement version. Most importantly, don't let this delay your closing - a properly perfected lien with a minor documentation discrepancy is way better than missing your perfection window entirely.

0 coins

Arjun Patel

•

Thanks everyone for the advice. Going with the state registered name and adding a note to the loan file about the variation. Really appreciate the quick responses - this forum always comes through!

0 coins

Glad it worked out! These name issues are so common but they still stress everyone out every time.

0 coins

Just went through something similar but I caught it before filing by using one of those document verification tools. Uploaded my corporate docs and UCC form and it immediately showed me three small differences in how the business name was formatted. Saved me from getting a rejection and having to deal with the delay.

0 coins

I used Certana.ai - you just upload your PDFs and it checks everything for consistency. Really straightforward and caught issues I never would have noticed manually.

0 coins

Omar Fawaz

•

That's the same one I mentioned earlier. It's been a lifesaver for avoiding these exact types of filing problems.

0 coins

Update us when you figure out what the actual issue was! I'm curious whether it was punctuation, spacing, or something else entirely. These rejection stories are helpful for the rest of us to avoid the same mistakes.

0 coins

Will do! I'm about to check the business entity search and compare it with what I filed. Hopefully it's something simple I can fix quickly.

0 coins

Yes please update! I have a NH filing coming up next week and want to make sure I don't run into the same problem.

0 coins

Dylan Baskin

•

Bottom line, don't panic but definitely take this seriously. UCC search discrepancies can kill deals if not properly resolved. I'd recommend getting copies of all the actual filings (not just the search results) and reviewing them carefully. If you're still confused after that, consider bringing in outside counsel who specializes in secured transactions. The cost of expert help is usually worth it compared to the risk of missing something important.

0 coins

Lauren Wood

•

Agreed on getting the actual filed documents rather than relying on search summaries. Sometimes the search results don't capture all the nuances in the actual filings.

0 coins

Ellie Lopez

•

We always order certified copies of all UCC filings for deals over a certain dollar threshold. It's amazing how often the actual documents reveal details that don't show up in the search results.

0 coins

Update us on what you find out! These kinds of situations are great learning experiences for everyone. I'm curious whether the partial release issue turns out to be an amendment you missed or something else entirely.

0 coins

Paige Cantoni

•

Looking forward to hearing how this resolves. Always interesting to see how these complex filing situations work out.

0 coins

Kylo Ren

•

Same here. These real-world examples are so much more helpful than textbook scenarios.

0 coins

Prev1...529530531532533...684Next