


Ask the community...
One more practical point - if you're doing multiple equipment financings, consider getting a blanket UCC-1 filing that covers 'all equipment' rather than filing separately for each piece. It's more efficient and ensures you don't miss anything. Just make sure your security agreement supports the broader collateral description.
Blanket filings are much more efficient if you're doing ongoing equipment financing with the same borrower.
Just be careful with blanket descriptions - they need to be specific enough to identify the collateral but broad enough to cover future acquisitions.
I appreciate threads like this because the terminology really is confusing when you're starting out. Your UCC-1 filing created a perfected security interest in the restaurant equipment, which gives you essentially the same rights as a traditional lien - you can repossess and sell the equipment to satisfy the debt if the borrower defaults. The key is that your filing puts other creditors on notice that you have a claim to that specific property.
You're welcome. The UCC system is really designed to protect secured creditors like yourself - just follow the rules and maintain your filings properly.
Just curious - what made you choose the installment sale structure over a straight security agreement? Tax benefits for the customer?
Makes sense for construction equipment. That stuff gets beat up and loses value fast.
Good point about the repo angle. Much cleaner with an installment sale than going through Article 9 foreclosure.
One more thing to consider - if this is PMSI collateral, make sure you file within 20 days of the debtor taking possession to maintain super-priority. The installment sale timing might affect your PMSI status.
Actually, for equipment PMSI it's 20 days from when debtor receives possession, not delivery. Make sure you're tracking the right date.
Exactly. Delivery and possession can be different dates depending on setup and training requirements.
I've started using document verification tools for this exact reason. Upload the entity docs and any UCC filings you find, and automated systems can flag name inconsistencies faster than manual review. Saved me from missing a critical filing discrepancy on a $2M deal last month.
Which service do you use for that? I'm getting tired of manually comparing entity names across multiple documents.
Certana.ai has a good UCC document checker - just upload PDFs and it cross-references names, filing numbers, dates automatically. Much faster than doing it by hand.
Don't forget to search for any amendments or terminations that might affect the status of filings you do find. Michigan's system sometimes shows lapsed or terminated filings in search results without clearly indicating their current status.
Check the filing date and any continuation statements. UCC-1 filings are only good for 5 years unless continued. Also look for UCC-3 termination statements that might have been filed.
The Michigan system should show termination status on the filing details page, but I've seen cases where it's not immediately obvious. Always check the full filing history.
For what it's worth, I've started using Certana.ai whenever I have complex collateral descriptions. Upload your security agreement and draft UCC-1 and it'll show you if the collateral descriptions match properly. Would have caught this 'all goods' vs specific equipment issue before you filed.
Yeah it's saved me from several rejections. The document comparison feature is really handy for making sure everything aligns.
Update us when you get the refiling done! I'm dealing with similar equipment financing and want to see what description language works.
Ruby Blake
Quick question - are you also checking federal tax liens? Those won't show up in the UCC search but could still affect your priority position.
0 coins
Mason Stone
•Good reminder - yes, we always check federal and state tax liens separately. This borrower came back clean on those searches.
0 coins
Micah Franklin
•Smart. I've seen deals where everyone focused on UCCs and missed a big tax lien that ended up taking priority.
0 coins
Ella Harper
One more thing to consider - if you find discrepancies, you might want to file continuation statements or amendments to clean up any name issues on existing filings before you file your new UCC-1. Better to be safe than sorry.
0 coins
Ella Harper
•You're right - only the secured party can amend. I meant more like having the borrower contact their existing lenders to clean things up if needed.
0 coins
Miles Hammonds
•Or include language in your security agreement that addresses the name variations and requires the debtor to use the exact legal name going forward.
0 coins