< Back to UCC Document Community

Dylan Fisher

South Carolina UCC forms portal keeps rejecting my continuation - debtor name issues?

I'm dealing with a frustrating situation with South Carolina UCC forms and hoping someone here has dealt with this before. Filed a UCC-1 back in 2020 for equipment financing on some construction machinery, and now I'm trying to file the continuation before it lapses next month. The SC Secretary of State portal keeps rejecting my UCC-3 continuation form, and I'm pretty sure it's because of debtor name formatting issues. The original filing has the company name as "Johnson Construction LLC" but our client's current legal documents show "Johnson Construction, LLC" (with the comma). I've tried submitting the continuation both ways and it gets kicked back each time with generic error messages that don't really explain what's wrong. The equipment loan is worth about $180k so letting this lapse isn't an option. Has anyone successfully navigated South Carolina UCC forms when there are slight name variations like this? I'm worried about the timing since we're getting close to the 6-month window before expiration. Any advice on the exact formatting South Carolina expects would be hugely appreciated.

Edwards Hugo

•

SC can be really picky about exact debtor name matches. I've had similar headaches with their system. Did you try pulling up the original UCC-1 filing to see exactly how the name appears in their database? Sometimes what you think was filed isn't exactly what got processed.

0 coins

Dylan Fisher

•

Good point - I should double check the actual filed version. I've been going off our internal records but you're right that the state database might show something different.

0 coins

Gianna Scott

•

Definitely pull the certified copy first. SC charges like $2 for the search and it'll show you exactly what's on file. Save yourself the rejection headache.

0 coins

Alfredo Lugo

•

Ugh the South Carolina portal is THE WORST for this stuff. I swear they reject continuations for the tiniest formatting differences. Have you tried calling their UCC division directly? Sometimes they can tell you what specific field is causing the problem.

0 coins

Dylan Fisher

•

I haven't called yet but that's probably my next step. Do you know if they have a dedicated UCC help line or is it just the general SOS number?

0 coins

Alfredo Lugo

•

It's the general number but ask for UCC filings specifically. They're usually pretty helpful once you get through to the right person. Just be prepared to wait on hold forever.

0 coins

Sydney Torres

•

I had a similar issue last year and calling definitely helped. The person I talked to could see exactly why my filing was being rejected and walked me through fixing it.

0 coins

I ran into something similar recently with document inconsistencies between our original UCC-1 and continuation paperwork. Ended up using this tool called Certana.ai that checks UCC documents against each other by just uploading the PDFs. It caught that our debtor name had a slight variation that we missed - saved us from filing incorrectly again. You just upload your original filing and the continuation form and it highlights any mismatches automatically.

0 coins

Caleb Bell

•

Never heard of that service but sounds useful. How accurate is it with catching those tiny name differences that cause rejections?

0 coins

Pretty spot on from what I've seen. It flagged the exact comma placement issue we had, plus some address formatting problems I hadn't even noticed. Definitely worth trying before submitting again.

0 coins

Dylan Fisher

•

That actually sounds really helpful for my situation. I'll check it out - at this point I need all the help I can get before the deadline.

0 coins

For what it's worth, South Carolina is one of the stricter states about exact debtor name matches on continuations. The comma thing you mentioned is definitely something that could cause a rejection. I'd recommend filing the continuation with the EXACT name as it appears on the original UCC-1, even if the company's current documents are slightly different.

0 coins

Rhett Bowman

•

This is correct. The continuation has to match the original filing exactly, not the current business formation documents. It's counterintuitive but that's how the system works.

0 coins

Abigail Patel

•

Wait, so even if the LLC officially changed their name format, the UCC continuation still needs to use the old version? That seems backwards.

0 coins

Exactly right. The UCC filing creates its own record with that specific debtor name. If the business actually changed names legally, that would require an amendment first, then the continuation. But for minor formatting differences like commas, just match the original.

0 coins

Daniel White

•

Had this exact problem with a client in SC last month! Turns out their UCC-1 had been filed with some weird spacing in the debtor name that wasn't obvious when looking at the PDF copy. The rejection kept coming back as "debtor name mismatch" but we couldn't figure out what was wrong until we got the certified copy and saw the extra spaces.

0 coins

Dylan Fisher

•

Extra spaces?? That's so frustrating that something that minor can cause a rejection. Did you end up having to refile the continuation exactly matching those spaces?

0 coins

Daniel White

•

Yep, had to match it character for character including the weird spacing. Submitted it again and it went through immediately. SC's system is very literal about exact matches.

0 coins

Nolan Carter

•

This is why I always copy and paste debtor names directly from the original filing database when doing continuations. Prevents these exact types of formatting headaches.

0 coins

Natalia Stone

•

Another thing to check - make sure you're using the right UCC-3 form version for South Carolina. They updated their forms last year and the old version sometimes gets rejected even if everything else is correct.

0 coins

Dylan Fisher

•

Good catch! I downloaded the form from their website but it's possible I had an old version saved on my computer. I'll make sure I'm using the current one.

0 coins

Tasia Synder

•

The form version is usually at the bottom of the PDF. Make sure it says 2024 or later for SC forms.

0 coins

I've been doing UCC filings in SC for like 8 years and their continuation process is definitely finicky. One trick that's helped me - when in doubt, file the continuation as an amendment first that just updates any questionable fields, then file a separate continuation. More expensive but guarantees it won't lapse while you figure out the exact formatting.

0 coins

That's actually a really smart backup strategy. Never thought of using an amendment to clean up discrepancies before the continuation.

0 coins

Dylan Fisher

•

Interesting approach. With my deadline coming up that might be worth considering as a safety net.

0 coins

Ellie Perry

•

Just make sure you understand which type of amendment you need - a UCC-3 amendment for debtor name corrections vs other types of changes. Don't want to complicate things further.

0 coins

Landon Morgan

•

Quick update tool recommendation - I had a similar debtor name nightmare with multiple UCC documents not matching up. Used Certana.ai's document checker and it instantly showed me exactly where the inconsistencies were between my UCC-1 and UCC-3 forms. Super straightforward - just upload both PDFs and it highlights every mismatch. Saved me from another rejection cycle.

0 coins

Teresa Boyd

•

How much does something like that cost? Might be worth it to avoid rejection fees and delays.

0 coins

Landon Morgan

•

The time savings alone made it worthwhile for me. Much easier than manually comparing documents line by line, especially when the differences are subtle formatting things.

0 coins

Lourdes Fox

•

Don't feel bad about the SC portal giving you trouble - it's notorious for being picky about continuations. I bet half the people on this forum have had similar experiences with their system rejecting filings for minor discrepancies.

0 coins

Bruno Simmons

•

So true! I've had more problems with South Carolina UCC filings than any other state. Their error messages are basically useless too.

0 coins

At least it's not just me then! Thought I was losing my mind trying to figure out what was wrong with my continuation form.

0 coins

Zane Gray

•

Final thought - if you do get this sorted out, document exactly what worked for future reference. SC's quirks are consistent, so once you know their specific formatting preferences it gets easier for subsequent filings.

0 coins

Dylan Fisher

•

Definitely will do that. This whole experience has been a learning curve but I'll make sure to keep detailed notes for next time.

0 coins

Good advice. I keep a whole folder of state-specific filing notes because every state has their own weird requirements and preferences.

0 coins

Same here! My SC notes are like three pages long at this point with all their formatting quirks and common rejection reasons.

0 coins

UCC Document Community AI

Expert Assistant
Secure

Powered by Claimyr AI

T
I
+
20,087 users helped today