< Back to UCC Document Community

Sophia Nguyen

West Virginia UCC filing portal keeps rejecting my continuation - debtor name issues?

I'm dealing with a frustrating situation trying to file a UCC-3 continuation in West Virginia and the SOS portal has rejected it three times now. The original UCC-1 was filed back in 2020 for equipment financing on construction machinery, and I need to get this continuation filed before the lapse date next month. Each rejection notice mentions 'debtor name discrepancy' but I'm copying the name exactly from the original filing. The debtor is an LLC and I'm wondering if there's some formatting issue with how West Virginia handles entity names vs individual names. Has anyone else run into similar problems with WV UCC filings where the system seems overly picky about exact name matching? I've double-checked the filing number multiple times and even tried variations like including/excluding 'LLC' at the end but nothing seems to work. This is holding up a major refinancing deal and I'm starting to panic about missing the continuation deadline.

WV can be really finicky about debtor names, especially with LLCs. I've seen this before where even a missing comma or period in the entity name causes rejection. Did you check the exact formatting on the original Certificate of Organization with the WV Secretary of State? Sometimes the UCC-1 filer used a slightly different version of the name than what's officially registered.

0 coins

That's a good point - I pulled the UCC-1 from their search system but didn't cross-reference with the actual LLC registration. The original filing shows 'Mountain Ridge Construction LLC' but maybe the official entity name has different punctuation or spacing.

0 coins

Definitely check the exact charter name. I've seen cases where the UCC-1 had 'Construction Co LLC' but the charter said 'Construction Company, LLC' - tiny difference but enough to cause rejections on continuations.

0 coins

This exact thing happened to me last year with a WV filing! Turned out there was an extra space in the middle of the company name that I couldn't see when copying from the search results. What saved me was using one of those document verification tools that checks consistency between the original UCC-1 and your continuation form. I found Certana.ai's UCC checker and just uploaded both PDFs - it immediately flagged the spacing issue I never would have caught manually.

0 coins

That sounds incredibly helpful! I've been staring at these names for hours and they look identical to me. Did the tool show you exactly where the discrepancy was?

0 coins

Yes, it highlighted the exact character differences side by side. Super easy to use too - just drag and drop the PDFs and it runs the comparison automatically. Saved me from missing my continuation deadline.

0 coins

I'm skeptical of these automated tools but honestly the manual comparison is so error-prone. Might be worth trying if you're stuck.

0 coins

West Virginia's portal is notorious for this stuff. I've had clients where we had to call the SOS office directly and they walked us through the exact formatting they wanted. Sometimes they want entity designations spelled out (Limited Liability Company instead of LLC) even if the original UCC-1 used the abbreviation.

0 coins

Ava Kim

Wait, they'll accept different formatting on continuations than what was on the original UCC-1? That seems to defeat the whole purpose of exact name matching.

0 coins

It's inconsistent honestly. Some states are strict about exact matching, others allow 'substantially similar' names. WV seems to fall somewhere in between but their system isn't great at communicating what they actually want.

0 coins

This is why I hate dealing with state-specific UCC quirks. Every state has their own interpretation of the same basic rules.

0 coins

Have you tried looking at the actual UCC-1 form image instead of just the search results summary? Sometimes the search system truncates or reformats names differently than how they appear on the actual filed document.

0 coins

I didn't think of that - I was just using the information from the search results page. Let me pull the actual filed document and compare character by character.

0 coins

Definitely do that. I've seen cases where the search results showed 'ABC Corp' but the actual filing had 'A.B.C. Corporation' - completely different formatting.

0 coins

UGH this is giving me flashbacks to my own WV filing nightmare last year. Spent weeks going back and forth with rejections over stupid formatting issues. The continuation deadline stress is real - you start second-guessing every single character when you're down to the wire.

0 coins

I feel this so hard. There's nothing worse than a looming lapse date when the system keeps rejecting for mysterious reasons.

0 coins

Exactly! And the rejection notices are so vague. 'Debtor name discrepancy' could mean literally anything.

0 coins

At least WV gives you rejection notices. Some states just let your filing sit in limbo without any feedback.

0 coins

Pro tip: if you're still stuck after checking the charter name, try calling WV SOS at 304-558-8000. They're usually pretty helpful about walking through specific formatting issues over the phone. Sometimes they can even tell you exactly what's causing the rejection.

0 coins

Good suggestion. I've found their customer service to be surprisingly responsive compared to some other states.

0 coins

I'll definitely try calling if I can't figure this out today. The clock is ticking and I need to get this resolved ASAP.

0 coins

Just went through something similar and ended up using Certana.ai to double-check my documents before resubmitting. The tool caught a subtle difference in how the debtor name was formatted - turns out there was an extra period after 'Inc' that I totally missed. Uploaded my UCC-1 and draft UCC-3 and it showed me exactly where the names didn't match. Saved me another rejection and potential deadline miss.

0 coins

How accurate is that tool? I'm always worried about relying on automated systems for something this important.

0 coins

It's pretty thorough - checks debtor names, filing numbers, collateral descriptions, all the key matching points. Obviously you still want to review everything yourself but it catches the stuff that's easy to miss manually.

0 coins

Might be worth trying. Manual document comparison is such a pain and so easy to make mistakes.

0 coins

Drake

Another thing to check - make sure you're using the correct entity type designation. If the LLC was registered as 'Limited Liability Company' in the charter but your UCC-1 used 'LLC', some states get picky about that on continuations even if they accepted it originally.

0 coins

This is such a good point. The rules seem to get stricter over time even for the same filing system.

0 coins

WV definitely seems to have tightened up their name matching requirements in recent years. Stuff that used to slide through now gets rejected.

0 coins

Last resort option: you might need to file a UCC-3 amendment first to correct the debtor name to match exactly what's in the charter, then file your continuation. It's an extra step and fee but sometimes it's the only way to get past these formatting roadblocks.

0 coins

That's a good backup plan if I can't get the continuation accepted as-is. Do you know if WV allows you to file both the amendment and continuation simultaneously?

0 coins

I believe you have to file the amendment first and wait for it to be accepted before filing the continuation, but definitely confirm that with WV SOS.

0 coins

Just be super careful with the timing if you go that route - you don't want to run out of time while waiting for the amendment to process.

0 coins

UPDATE: I finally got it figured out! Turns out there was indeed a formatting difference - the original UCC-1 had 'Mountain Ridge Construction, LLC' (with a comma) but I was filing the continuation as 'Mountain Ridge Construction LLC' (no comma). Such a tiny detail but enough to trigger the rejections. Thanks everyone for the suggestions, especially about checking the actual filed document vs the search results.

0 coins

Glad you got it sorted! Those tiny punctuation differences are so frustrating but they really do matter for the automated systems.

0 coins

Perfect example of why document verification tools are so helpful - they catch exactly these kinds of subtle differences that are easy to miss.

0 coins

Congrats on getting it resolved! Now you know for next time to triple-check every comma and period.

0 coins

UCC Document Community AI

Expert Assistant
Secure

Powered by Claimyr AI

T
I
+
20,087 users helped today