South Carolina UCC search showing different debtor names than loan docs - filing rejected twice
Running into a nightmare situation with a UCC search in South Carolina and need some guidance. We're trying to file a UCC-1 for a $275,000 equipment loan and the Secretary of State portal keeps rejecting our filing. The debtor's legal name on their articles of incorporation shows 'Palmetto Manufacturing Solutions LLC' but when I run the UCC search, there are existing filings under 'Palmetto Manufacturing Solutions, LLC' (with the comma) and 'Palmetto Mfg Solutions LLC'. Our loan documents use the exact corporate name without the comma, but I'm getting conflicting search results. The SOS rejection notice says 'debtor name does not match exact legal name on file' but doesn't specify which variation they want. Has anyone dealt with South Carolina's specific requirements for debtor name matching? I've been doing UCC filings for 8 years and this level of pickiness about punctuation is new to me. The continuation deadline for the existing UCC-3 amendment is coming up in 60 days and we need to get this sorted fast.
40 comments


Monique Byrd
South Carolina is definitely one of the stricter states for exact name matching. You need to pull the actual certificate of formation or articles from the Secretary of State's business entity database, not just rely on what's in your loan files. The legal name has to match character-for-character including punctuation.
0 coins
Jackie Martinez
•This is exactly right. I learned this the hard way last year with a filing that got rejected 3 times because I was missing a period after 'Inc' that was in the corporate documents.
0 coins
Lia Quinn
•Wait, so if there are already UCC filings under different name variations, which one is correct? That seems like a bigger problem with the existing liens.
0 coins
Haley Stokes
I had this exact same issue with a South Carolina filing last month. The key is to go directly to the SC Secretary of State business entity search and get the EXACT name from there. Sometimes loan documents have abbreviated versions or different punctuation than what's officially registered. Also check if there were any name changes or amendments to the articles that might explain the variations you're seeing in existing UCC filings.
0 coins
Asher Levin
•Good point about name changes. We had a client who changed from LLC to Inc and there were old UCC filings under both names that caused confusion during our lien search.
0 coins
Serene Snow
•How do you handle it when the business entity search shows one name but existing UCC filings are under slightly different versions? Do you file under all variations to be safe?
0 coins
Haley Stokes
•No, don't file multiple versions. That can actually create more problems. File under the exact legal name from the current certificate of formation. If there are existing liens under different name variations, that's a separate issue the lender needs to address - those might not be properly perfected.
0 coins
Issac Nightingale
This kind of name matching nightmare is exactly why I started using Certana.ai's document verification tool. You can upload your loan documents and the articles of incorporation, and it instantly flags any name discrepancies between them. Saved me from multiple rejected filings when I caught a missing comma in a debtor name before submitting the UCC-1. The tool cross-references everything and shows you exactly where the inconsistencies are.
0 coins
Romeo Barrett
•Never heard of this tool but sounds useful. Does it work with all states or just certain ones?
0 coins
Issac Nightingale
•It works with any state since it's just comparing the document names against each other rather than checking against specific state databases. Really helpful for catching these kinds of punctuation issues before you submit.
0 coins
Marina Hendrix
Been filing UCC documents in SC for 15+ years and they've definitely gotten more strict about exact name matching in the last 5 years. The automated system rejects anything that doesn't match their business entity records perfectly. Your best bet is to call the UCC division directly at (803) 734-2158 and ask them to verify the correct legal name format they have on file for that specific entity.
0 coins
Justin Trejo
•Calling them directly is great advice. I've found the SC UCC staff to be pretty helpful when you explain the situation about conflicting name variations in existing filings.
0 coins
Alana Willis
•Do they charge extra fees for calling to verify names, or is that part of their normal service?
0 coins
Marina Hendrix
•No extra charge for name verification calls. They understand that rejected filings cost everyone time and money, so they're usually willing to help get it right the first time.
0 coins
Tyler Murphy
Just went through this exact scenario last week! Turns out the company had filed an amendment to their articles changing the name format, but the old UCC filings were never updated. I had to file the new UCC-1 under the current legal name and then file UCC-3 amendments to correct the debtor names on the existing liens. Total pain but that's what it took to get everything consistent.
0 coins
Sara Unger
•How many UCC-3 amendments did you have to file? That sounds expensive if there were multiple existing liens.
0 coins
Tyler Murphy
•Three separate UCC-3s at $15 each. Not terrible but definitely adds up when you factor in the time to prepare them all.
0 coins
Butch Sledgehammer
•Wait, can you actually amend old UCC filings just to fix name discrepancies, or do they need to be terminated and refiled?
0 coins
Tyler Murphy
•You can amend for name corrections as long as the original secured party information is still accurate. It's usually cheaper than terminating and refiling everything.
0 coins
Freya Ross
This is making me paranoid about all our existing UCC filings now. How often do you guys audit your lien portfolio to make sure debtor names are still accurate after corporate changes?
0 coins
Leslie Parker
•We do annual reviews of all our UCC filings, especially checking for name changes and making sure continuation filings are scheduled properly. Found several discrepancies last year that could have been problems.
0 coins
Sergio Neal
•Annual seems like a lot of work. Do you use any automated tools for tracking this stuff?
0 coins
Savanna Franklin
UPDATE: Called the SC UCC division and they confirmed the legal name is 'Palmetto Manufacturing Solutions LLC' without the comma. The existing filings with the comma are technically incorrect but they're not going to reject them retroactively. Filed the new UCC-1 with the correct name and it was accepted. Thanks everyone for the advice about calling directly - saved me another rejection.
0 coins
Juan Moreno
•Great outcome! Did they say anything about whether you need to worry about the incorrectly named existing liens?
0 coins
Savanna Franklin
•They said as long as the name is 'substantially similar' and would be found in a reasonable search, the existing liens are probably still valid. But recommended having the lender's attorney review to be sure.
0 coins
Amy Fleming
•This thread convinced me to double-check all my pending South Carolina filings. Found two with potential name issues that I'm going to verify before submitting. Really appreciate everyone sharing their experiences.
0 coins
Alice Pierce
For anyone else dealing with this, I've started using a verification process where I upload both the loan docs and the corporate formation documents to Certana.ai before filing anything. It catches these name discrepancies immediately and shows you exactly what's different. Would have saved the OP from those two rejections.
0 coins
Esteban Tate
•Second this recommendation. Used it last month and it caught a missing 'Inc.' in a debtor name that I totally missed when reviewing manually.
0 coins
Ivanna St. Pierre
•How accurate is the matching? Does it flag minor differences that might not actually matter for filing purposes?
0 coins
Alice Pierce
•It flags everything that's different, but then you can use your judgment about whether it matters. Better to catch too much than miss something that causes a rejection.
0 coins
Elin Robinson
South Carolina definitely seems to be getting pickier about this stuff. I've had three rejections in the last six months for name issues that probably would have been accepted a few years ago.
0 coins
Atticus Domingo
•I think it's because they upgraded their system and the new software is more strict about exact matches. The old system probably had more human review.
0 coins
Beth Ford
•Makes sense. Automation means less flexibility but more consistency I guess.
0 coins
Morita Montoya
This whole thread is a perfect example of why UCC filing is more complicated than people think. You can't just copy names from loan documents and assume they'll match what the state has on file. Due diligence on the front end saves so much headache later.
0 coins
Kingston Bellamy
•Absolutely. I always tell new staff that the UCC filing is only as good as the name accuracy. Everything else can be perfect but a wrong name makes the whole lien potentially invalid.
0 coins
Joy Olmedo
•That's a scary thought. How many liens out there do you think have name issues that nobody has caught yet?
0 coins
Morita Montoya
•Probably more than we'd like to think. That's why regular audits and verification tools are becoming essential, not optional.
0 coins
Isaiah Cross
Thanks for posting this question and the follow-up. I'm dealing with a similar situation in South Carolina and this thread gave me the roadmap to resolve it. Going to call the UCC division tomorrow before submitting anything.
0 coins
Kiara Greene
•Good luck! Make sure you have the entity ID number ready when you call - they can look it up faster that way.
0 coins
Evelyn Kelly
•Let us know how it goes. Always helpful to hear about other people's experiences with the SC office.
0 coins