< Back to UCC Document Community

Alejandro Castro

South Carolina UCC search showing different debtor names than loan docs - filing rejected twice

Running into a nightmare situation with a UCC search in South Carolina and need some guidance. We're trying to file a UCC-1 for a $275,000 equipment loan and the Secretary of State portal keeps rejecting our filing. The debtor's legal name on their articles of incorporation shows 'Palmetto Manufacturing Solutions LLC' but when I run the UCC search, there are existing filings under 'Palmetto Manufacturing Solutions, LLC' (with the comma) and 'Palmetto Mfg Solutions LLC'. Our loan documents use the exact corporate name without the comma, but I'm getting conflicting search results. The SOS rejection notice says 'debtor name does not match exact legal name on file' but doesn't specify which variation they want. Has anyone dealt with South Carolina's specific requirements for debtor name matching? I've been doing UCC filings for 8 years and this level of pickiness about punctuation is new to me. The continuation deadline for the existing UCC-3 amendment is coming up in 60 days and we need to get this sorted fast.

Monique Byrd

•

South Carolina is definitely one of the stricter states for exact name matching. You need to pull the actual certificate of formation or articles from the Secretary of State's business entity database, not just rely on what's in your loan files. The legal name has to match character-for-character including punctuation.

0 coins

This is exactly right. I learned this the hard way last year with a filing that got rejected 3 times because I was missing a period after 'Inc' that was in the corporate documents.

0 coins

Lia Quinn

•

Wait, so if there are already UCC filings under different name variations, which one is correct? That seems like a bigger problem with the existing liens.

0 coins

Haley Stokes

•

I had this exact same issue with a South Carolina filing last month. The key is to go directly to the SC Secretary of State business entity search and get the EXACT name from there. Sometimes loan documents have abbreviated versions or different punctuation than what's officially registered. Also check if there were any name changes or amendments to the articles that might explain the variations you're seeing in existing UCC filings.

0 coins

Asher Levin

•

Good point about name changes. We had a client who changed from LLC to Inc and there were old UCC filings under both names that caused confusion during our lien search.

0 coins

Serene Snow

•

How do you handle it when the business entity search shows one name but existing UCC filings are under slightly different versions? Do you file under all variations to be safe?

0 coins

Haley Stokes

•

No, don't file multiple versions. That can actually create more problems. File under the exact legal name from the current certificate of formation. If there are existing liens under different name variations, that's a separate issue the lender needs to address - those might not be properly perfected.

0 coins

This kind of name matching nightmare is exactly why I started using Certana.ai's document verification tool. You can upload your loan documents and the articles of incorporation, and it instantly flags any name discrepancies between them. Saved me from multiple rejected filings when I caught a missing comma in a debtor name before submitting the UCC-1. The tool cross-references everything and shows you exactly where the inconsistencies are.

0 coins

Romeo Barrett

•

Never heard of this tool but sounds useful. Does it work with all states or just certain ones?

0 coins

It works with any state since it's just comparing the document names against each other rather than checking against specific state databases. Really helpful for catching these kinds of punctuation issues before you submit.

0 coins

Been filing UCC documents in SC for 15+ years and they've definitely gotten more strict about exact name matching in the last 5 years. The automated system rejects anything that doesn't match their business entity records perfectly. Your best bet is to call the UCC division directly at (803) 734-2158 and ask them to verify the correct legal name format they have on file for that specific entity.

0 coins

Justin Trejo

•

Calling them directly is great advice. I've found the SC UCC staff to be pretty helpful when you explain the situation about conflicting name variations in existing filings.

0 coins

Alana Willis

•

Do they charge extra fees for calling to verify names, or is that part of their normal service?

0 coins

No extra charge for name verification calls. They understand that rejected filings cost everyone time and money, so they're usually willing to help get it right the first time.

0 coins

Tyler Murphy

•

Just went through this exact scenario last week! Turns out the company had filed an amendment to their articles changing the name format, but the old UCC filings were never updated. I had to file the new UCC-1 under the current legal name and then file UCC-3 amendments to correct the debtor names on the existing liens. Total pain but that's what it took to get everything consistent.

0 coins

Sara Unger

•

How many UCC-3 amendments did you have to file? That sounds expensive if there were multiple existing liens.

0 coins

Tyler Murphy

•

Three separate UCC-3s at $15 each. Not terrible but definitely adds up when you factor in the time to prepare them all.

0 coins

Wait, can you actually amend old UCC filings just to fix name discrepancies, or do they need to be terminated and refiled?

0 coins

Tyler Murphy

•

You can amend for name corrections as long as the original secured party information is still accurate. It's usually cheaper than terminating and refiling everything.

0 coins

Freya Ross

•

This is making me paranoid about all our existing UCC filings now. How often do you guys audit your lien portfolio to make sure debtor names are still accurate after corporate changes?

0 coins

Leslie Parker

•

We do annual reviews of all our UCC filings, especially checking for name changes and making sure continuation filings are scheduled properly. Found several discrepancies last year that could have been problems.

0 coins

Sergio Neal

•

Annual seems like a lot of work. Do you use any automated tools for tracking this stuff?

0 coins

UPDATE: Called the SC UCC division and they confirmed the legal name is 'Palmetto Manufacturing Solutions LLC' without the comma. The existing filings with the comma are technically incorrect but they're not going to reject them retroactively. Filed the new UCC-1 with the correct name and it was accepted. Thanks everyone for the advice about calling directly - saved me another rejection.

0 coins

Juan Moreno

•

Great outcome! Did they say anything about whether you need to worry about the incorrectly named existing liens?

0 coins

They said as long as the name is 'substantially similar' and would be found in a reasonable search, the existing liens are probably still valid. But recommended having the lender's attorney review to be sure.

0 coins

Amy Fleming

•

This thread convinced me to double-check all my pending South Carolina filings. Found two with potential name issues that I'm going to verify before submitting. Really appreciate everyone sharing their experiences.

0 coins

Alice Pierce

•

For anyone else dealing with this, I've started using a verification process where I upload both the loan docs and the corporate formation documents to Certana.ai before filing anything. It catches these name discrepancies immediately and shows you exactly what's different. Would have saved the OP from those two rejections.

0 coins

Esteban Tate

•

Second this recommendation. Used it last month and it caught a missing 'Inc.' in a debtor name that I totally missed when reviewing manually.

0 coins

How accurate is the matching? Does it flag minor differences that might not actually matter for filing purposes?

0 coins

Alice Pierce

•

It flags everything that's different, but then you can use your judgment about whether it matters. Better to catch too much than miss something that causes a rejection.

0 coins

Elin Robinson

•

South Carolina definitely seems to be getting pickier about this stuff. I've had three rejections in the last six months for name issues that probably would have been accepted a few years ago.

0 coins

I think it's because they upgraded their system and the new software is more strict about exact matches. The old system probably had more human review.

0 coins

Beth Ford

•

Makes sense. Automation means less flexibility but more consistency I guess.

0 coins

This whole thread is a perfect example of why UCC filing is more complicated than people think. You can't just copy names from loan documents and assume they'll match what the state has on file. Due diligence on the front end saves so much headache later.

0 coins

Absolutely. I always tell new staff that the UCC filing is only as good as the name accuracy. Everything else can be perfect but a wrong name makes the whole lien potentially invalid.

0 coins

Joy Olmedo

•

That's a scary thought. How many liens out there do you think have name issues that nobody has caught yet?

0 coins

Probably more than we'd like to think. That's why regular audits and verification tools are becoming essential, not optional.

0 coins

Isaiah Cross

•

Thanks for posting this question and the follow-up. I'm dealing with a similar situation in South Carolina and this thread gave me the roadmap to resolve it. Going to call the UCC division tomorrow before submitting anything.

0 coins

Kiara Greene

•

Good luck! Make sure you have the entity ID number ready when you call - they can look it up faster that way.

0 coins

Evelyn Kelly

•

Let us know how it goes. Always helpful to hear about other people's experiences with the SC office.

0 coins

UCC Document Community AI

Expert Assistant
Secure

Powered by Claimyr AI

T
I
+
20,087 users helped today