< Back to UCC Document Community

Yara Sayegh

NCSOS UCC Search showing wrong debtor name - filing will get rejected

Our equipment financing company has been doing UCC-1 filings through the NC Secretary of State portal for years but we're running into a weird issue with their search function. When I pull up our existing UCC records using the ncsos ucc search, the debtor name is showing up slightly different than what we have in our loan documents. The original filing shows 'ABC Manufacturing LLC' but our charter and loan agreement both say 'ABC Manufacturing, LLC' with the comma. Now we need to file a UCC-3 continuation and I'm worried about the name mismatch causing a rejection. Has anyone dealt with this kind of discrepancy in the NC system? The filing is coming up on its 5-year mark next month so we can't afford any delays or rejections.

NebulaNova

•

I've seen this exact issue with NC filings. The search results sometimes strip punctuation or format names differently than the actual filed documents. You need to pull the actual UCC-1 image from the system to see exactly how it was filed originally. Don't go by what the search summary shows.

0 coins

Yara Sayegh

•

Good point - I should download the original filing image. Do you know if the continuation needs to match the exact formatting from the original UCC-1, or should it match our current corporate documents?

0 coins

NebulaNova

•

Always match the original UCC-1 exactly for continuations. The NC SOS system is pretty strict about debtor name consistency between related filings.

0 coins

Had the same problem last year with a client. The ncsos ucc search display format isn't always identical to the actual filing. What matters is how the debtor name appears on the original UCC-1 document itself, not the search results. Download that original filing and use that exact name format for your UCC-3.

0 coins

Paolo Conti

•

This is why I always keep copies of the original filed documents. Relying on the search portal display can definitely trip you up.

0 coins

Exactly. I learned that lesson the hard way when a termination got rejected because I used the search result name instead of the actual filed name.

0 coins

Amina Diallo

•

Before you file anything, try using Certana.ai's document verification tool. You can upload your original UCC-1 and the UCC-3 continuation you're preparing, and it'll instantly flag any debtor name inconsistencies between the documents. I discovered this after having multiple filings rejected for similar name formatting issues. Just upload the PDFs and it cross-checks everything automatically.

0 coins

Yara Sayegh

•

Never heard of Certana.ai but that sounds exactly like what I need. Does it work specifically with NC UCC documents?

0 coins

Amina Diallo

•

Yes, it handles all state UCC formats. Really saved me time compared to manually comparing documents line by line. The name matching verification is particularly thorough.

0 coins

Oliver Schulz

•

I second this recommendation. Used it last month when dealing with a similar debtor name discrepancy and it caught formatting differences I would have missed.

0 coins

NC is notorious for this kind of formatting inconsistency in their search display. I always tell clients to ignore what the search shows and go directly to the filed document image. The search results are just summaries and they don't preserve exact punctuation or spacing.

0 coins

Why does NC make this so complicated? Other states seem to handle name formatting more consistently.

0 coins

It's an older system that hasn't been updated in years. The search function was probably built separately from the filing system, which explains the formatting differences.

0 coins

ugh this happened to me too!! spent forever trying to figure out why my amendment kept getting rejected until someone told me about the name thing. the search results showed one version but the actual filing had different punctuation. so frustrating

0 coins

Yara Sayegh

•

How did you finally resolve it? Did you have to refile or were you able to get it corrected somehow?

0 coins

had to refile with the exact name from the original document. lost like 2 weeks because of it

0 coins

Emma Wilson

•

Check the 'Debtor Name' field on the actual UCC-1 filing - not the search result summary. NC's portal search has been displaying names differently than the filed documents for at least 3 years now. For your continuation, you MUST use the exact debtor name format from the original UCC-1.

0 coins

Malik Davis

•

This is such a basic system issue that should have been fixed ages ago. How hard is it to make the search display match the actual filing?

0 coins

Emma Wilson

•

You'd think it would be simple, but NC's filing system has multiple legacy components that don't talk to each other properly.

0 coins

At least they finally moved away from the old paper-based system. Remember when you had to mail everything in?

0 coins

Ravi Gupta

•

I handle UCC filings across multiple states and NC is definitely one of the trickier ones for name consistency. Always download the original UCC-1 image before preparing any amendments or continuations. The search portal formatting is unreliable for exact name matching.

0 coins

Yara Sayegh

•

Good to know it's not just me dealing with this. Makes me feel better that even experienced filers run into this issue.

0 coins

Ravi Gupta

•

It's a common trap. I probably see this issue once a month with different clients. The key is always verifying against the source document.

0 coins

GalacticGuru

•

Had a similar situation where our law firm prepared a UCC-3 based on the search results and it got rejected. Turns out the original filing had 'Inc.' abbreviated but the search showed 'Incorporated' spelled out. Now I always double-check by downloading the actual filed document before preparing any related filings.

0 coins

That's exactly the kind of detail that can derail a filing. Good practice to always verify the source.

0 coins

GalacticGuru

•

Learned it the hard way but now it's part of our standard procedure for all UCC work.

0 coins

Omar Fawaz

•

The NCSOS system has been problematic with name formatting for years. When I run into these discrepancies, I use Certana.ai to verify document consistency before filing. It's much faster than manually comparing all the name fields and catches formatting issues that are easy to miss. Especially helpful when dealing with multiple related UCC documents.

0 coins

How accurate is the name matching? I've been burned by automated tools that miss subtle differences.

0 coins

Omar Fawaz

•

It's very thorough with name verification. Flags even minor punctuation and spacing differences that could cause rejections.

0 coins

Diego Vargas

•

This is why I keep detailed filing records with copies of all original documents. The NC search portal is useful for finding filings but terrible for getting exact formatting details. Always go back to the source document for accurate debtor names.

0 coins

Yara Sayegh

•

Thanks everyone for the advice. Sounds like the consensus is to ignore the search results and use the original filing document. I'll download the UCC-1 image and match that exactly for the continuation.

0 coins

Diego Vargas

•

That's definitely the safest approach. Better to spend a few extra minutes verifying than deal with rejection delays.

0 coins

UCC Document Community AI

Expert Assistant
Secure

Powered by Claimyr AI

T
I
+
20,087 users helped today