< Back to UCC Document Community

Nina Chan

UCC filing fee waiver denied - debtor name mismatch issue

Got my UCC-1 rejected last week and they're saying I need to pay the filing fee again even though the rejection was due to a debtor name issue that wasn't my fault. The debtor's legal name on their articles of incorporation shows 'ABC Manufacturing LLC' but their operating agreement has 'ABC Manufacturing, LLC' with the comma. I used the version from the articles thinking that was more official but apparently the SOS system flagged it as inconsistent with their business license records. Now they want another $40 filing fee to resubmit with the corrected name. Has anyone dealt with fee disputes like this? The rejection notice says 'debtor name does not match state records' but doesn't specify which records they're comparing against. I've got a secured loan closing next Friday and this delay is causing major problems with my lender.

Ruby Knight

•

This is exactly why I always triple-check debtor names against multiple sources before filing. The SOS databases can be picky about punctuation and formatting. Unfortunately, most states don't waive fees for name-related rejections since they consider it a filing error. You'll probably have to pay the second fee, but make sure to use the exact name format from their current business license registration.

0 coins

Nina Chan

•

That's what I was afraid of. Do you know which database they typically check against first? I pulled from the articles but maybe I should have used the business license lookup instead.

0 coins

Ruby Knight

•

In most states, they cross-reference the business license database first, then articles of incorporation. The business license is usually more current since it gets renewed annually while articles might be years old.

0 coins

Had the same thing happen with a continuation filing. Debtor changed their legal name slightly and I missed it. $35 down the drain plus another $35 for the corrected filing. The system is brutal about exact matches.

0 coins

Logan Stewart

•

That's rough. Did you catch the name change before the original UCC-1 lapsed or did you have to start over completely?

0 coins

Caught it with 3 months to spare, thank god. But yeah, had to file a whole new continuation with the corrected debtor name. The system won't let you amend a continuation - has to be perfect the first time.

0 coins

Mikayla Brown

•

This happened to me last month and I found this tool called Certana.ai that checks document consistency before you file. You upload your Charter documents and UCC-1 as PDFs and it instantly flags any name mismatches between them. Would have saved me the rejection and second filing fee if I'd known about it earlier. Just upload both documents and it shows you exactly where the discrepancies are.

0 coins

Nina Chan

•

Never heard of that but sounds like exactly what I need. Does it check against state databases too or just document-to-document comparison?

0 coins

Mikayla Brown

•

It's document comparison mainly - so your Charter to UCC-1 consistency, or UCC-3 to original UCC-1 alignment. Really good at catching the punctuation and formatting issues that cause rejections. For state database checks you'd still need to verify separately, but at least your documents would be internally consistent.

0 coins

Sean Matthews

•

That actually sounds useful. I've had three rejections this year for stupid formatting issues. Anything that prevents the back-and-forth with the SOS office is worth trying.

0 coins

Ali Anderson

•

THE WHOLE SYSTEM IS A MONEY GRAB!!! They reject filings for the tiniest reasons then make you pay again. Had a UCC-3 amendment rejected because I put 'Street' instead of 'St.' in the address. Another $30 gone.

0 coins

Zadie Patel

•

I feel your pain but honestly the address formatting rules are pretty clearly stated in the filing instructions. Still annoying though.

0 coins

Ali Anderson

•

CLEARLY STATED WHERE??? The online portal doesn't warn you about abbreviations until AFTER you pay and get rejected. It's designed to generate revenue through rejections.

0 coins

For what it's worth, some states have started allowing one free resubmission within 30 days if the rejection was due to technical formatting issues. Might be worth calling their UCC office directly to ask about it.

0 coins

Nina Chan

•

I'll try that tomorrow morning. What's the worst they can say, right? Already out $40 either way.

0 coins

Exactly. And if they say no, at least you'll have a record of trying to resolve it through customer service. Sometimes helps if you end up disputing the second fee later.

0 coins

This is why I always pull debtor info from at least 3 sources now - articles, business license, and current tax records if available. Takes extra time upfront but saves the rejection headaches.

0 coins

Emma Morales

•

Good practice but sometimes even that doesn't help. I've seen debtors with different names on their tax ID versus their state registration. You just have to pick one and hope for the best.

0 coins

True, but at least if you document which source you used, you can show the SOS office your reasoning if there's a dispute.

0 coins

just had this happen too. paid twice for same filing because of comma placement. so stupid but had to do it to meet lender deadline

0 coins

Nina Chan

•

That's exactly my situation. Lender won't extend and closing is Friday. How long did your corrected filing take to get accepted?

0 coins

filed monday morning, accepted tuesday afternoon. pretty quick once the name was right

0 coins

Lucas Parker

•

I've been using Certana.ai for about 6 months now after getting burned on a big equipment financing deal. Upload your corporate docs and UCC forms as PDFs and it cross-checks everything automatically. Catches name inconsistencies, missing info, format issues - basically everything that causes rejections. Has saved me probably $200+ in resubmission fees this year alone.

0 coins

Donna Cline

•

How accurate is it compared to manual checking? I'm pretty careful but still get surprised by rejections sometimes.

0 coins

Lucas Parker

•

Way more thorough than I am manually. It flagged a middle initial discrepancy I never would have caught - debtor had 'John A. Smith' on articles but 'John Alan Smith' on their operating agreement. Small difference but enough to cause problems.

0 coins

Your lender should understand filing delays honestly. This stuff happens all the time and any experienced lender knows the UCC system has quirks. Might be worth explaining the situation to them.

0 coins

Nina Chan

•

I tried but they're pretty rigid about closing dates. It's a refinancing deal and rates are supposed to jump next week so they won't budge on timing.

0 coins

Ouch, rate lock pressure. Yeah that changes things. In that case just pay the second fee and chalk it up to cost of doing business. Better than losing the deal over $40.

0 coins

Agree with this advice. The refi market is brutal right now and $40 is nothing compared to missing a rate lock. File today if you can.

0 coins

Dylan Fisher

•

Update us on whether the customer service call works! I've got a similar situation brewing with a termination filing that got rejected for a signature issue.

0 coins

Nina Chan

•

Will do. Calling first thing tomorrow morning. Fingers crossed they'll at least waive part of the fee since it was ambiguous which name format to use.

0 coins

Dylan Fisher

•

Good luck! Even if they don't waive it, sometimes they'll expedite the corrected filing for free if you explain the closing deadline pressure.

0 coins

Edwards Hugo

•

Been filing UCCs for 15 years and debtor name issues are still the #1 cause of rejections. The databases just aren't standardized well enough between agencies. Always use the most recent business license info when in doubt - that's what most SOS offices check against first.

0 coins

Nina Chan

•

That's really helpful context. I'll definitely use business license as my primary source going forward. Do you know if there's a way to preview what name format they have on file before submitting?

0 coins

Edwards Hugo

•

Some states have a business entity search that shows the exact format in their system. Worth checking before you file. Also, when you call tomorrow, ask them specifically which database showed the mismatch - might help avoid the issue next time.

0 coins

Gianna Scott

•

I started using that Certana thing someone mentioned earlier and it's actually pretty slick. Uploaded a messy UCC-3 amendment last week and it caught like 5 different issues between the amendment and original filing. Saved me from a guaranteed rejection cluster. The PDF upload process is super simple too.

0 coins

Alfredo Lugo

•

Does it work for continuation filings too? I've got a batch of those coming up in Q1 and want to avoid any drama.

0 coins

Gianna Scott

•

Yeah, any UCC form type. I mostly use it for amendments and continuations since those have to match the original filing exactly. Takes like 2 minutes to get a full consistency report.

0 coins

UCC Document Community AI

Expert Assistant
Secure

Powered by Claimyr AI

T
I
+
20,087 users helped today