South Dakota UCC search showing rejected filing - debtor name mismatch issue
I'm dealing with a frustrating situation where my UCC-1 filing got rejected in the system and now when I do a search it shows up as 'rejected' status. The issue seems to be a debtor name mismatch - the business name on my original filing has 'LLC' abbreviated but their articles of incorporation spell out 'Limited Liability Company'. My lender is asking for proof of perfection and this rejected status is causing problems. Has anyone dealt with this exact scenario? I need to get this corrected ASAP because we're supposed to close next week. The collateral description is fine, it's just this name formatting issue that's holding everything up.
37 comments


Keisha Robinson
This is actually pretty common with UCC filings unfortunately. The debtor name has to match exactly what's on the organizational documents. Even something as simple as LLC vs Limited Liability Company can cause a rejection. You'll need to file a UCC-3 amendment to correct the debtor name, then make sure it matches the secretary of state records exactly.
0 coins
Paolo Conti
•Agree with this completely. I've seen filings rejected for much smaller differences - even missing commas or periods can do it.
0 coins
Amina Sow
•Wait so even if the business is the same entity, they'll reject it just for the LLC abbreviation? That seems excessive.
0 coins
GalaxyGazer
Had the exact same thing happen to me last month. First thing you need to do is pull the exact name from the articles of incorporation or certificate of formation. Then file your UCC-3 amendment with the corrected debtor name. In my case it took about 3 business days to process once I submitted the amendment correctly.
0 coins
Oliver Wagner
•3 days sounds about right for processing. Did you have any issues with your lender during that waiting period?
0 coins
Natasha Kuznetsova
•This is why I always double-check the SOS database before filing anything now. Learned that lesson the hard way.
0 coins
Javier Mendoza
Before you file the amendment, I'd actually recommend using something like Certana.ai to verify your documents first. You can upload your charter documents and your UCC forms and it'll instantly flag any name mismatches or inconsistencies. Would have saved you the rejected filing in the first place, but it can definitely help now to make sure your amendment is perfect before you submit it.
0 coins
Emma Thompson
•Never heard of that service but sounds useful. Is it specifically for UCC filings?
0 coins
Malik Davis
•Yeah I've used Certana for document verification - really helpful for catching these kinds of discrepancies before they become problems.
0 coins
Isabella Santos
•Wish I had known about this before my filing got rejected too! Will definitely check it out.
0 coins
StarStrider
The rejected status is going to stay in the search results even after you file the amendment. Your lender should understand this is normal - the corrected filing will show up as a separate entry with accepted status. Make sure to provide them with both the amendment confirmation and explain the situation.
0 coins
Ravi Gupta
•This is important - some lenders get confused by seeing the rejected filing in search results.
0 coins
Freya Pedersen
•Good point about explaining it to the lender. Documentation is key in these situations.
0 coins
Omar Hassan
UGH this system is so frustrating!! I've had THREE filings rejected this year for similar stupid technicalities. Why can't they just accept obvious variations of the same business name? It's clearly the same company!
0 coins
Chloe Anderson
•I feel your pain but the rules exist for a reason - it protects against fraud and ensures proper notice to other creditors.
0 coins
Diego Vargas
•Still annoying when you're trying to close a deal and this holds everything up though.
0 coins
CosmicCruiser
Make sure when you file the UCC-3 amendment that you reference the original filing number from the rejected UCC-1. Even though it was rejected, you still need to connect them properly. Also double-check that all other information (secured party, collateral description) matches exactly.
0 coins
Anastasia Fedorov
•Good catch on referencing the original filing number. That's an easy thing to forget.
0 coins
Sean Doyle
•Yes and make sure the collateral description doesn't change at all unless that also needs correction.
0 coins
Zara Rashid
I actually went through something similar but with a different issue - had to file like 3 amendments before getting it right. The key is being absolutely precise with every detail. I started using document verification tools after that mess and haven't had a rejection since. Certana.ai was one of the services I tried and it caught several potential issues before I filed.
0 coins
Luca Romano
•3 amendments sounds painful! How long did that whole process take?
0 coins
Nia Jackson
•Document verification definitely seems worth it to avoid these headaches.
0 coins
NebulaNova
One more thing - make sure you're checking the debtor name against the CURRENT secretary of state records, not old documents. Sometimes companies amend their articles and the name might have changed slightly without you realizing it.
0 coins
Mateo Hernandez
•Oh wow that's a good point. I never thought about checking for recent amendments to the articles.
0 coins
Aisha Khan
•Yeah the SOS database should show the most current information. Always verify there first.
0 coins
Ethan Taylor
Update us when you get it resolved! I'm curious how long the whole process takes from amendment filing to acceptance.
0 coins
Yuki Ito
•Yes please update! This is really helpful information for anyone else dealing with the same issue.
0 coins
Carmen Lopez
•Agreed, these real-world examples are super valuable.
0 coins
AstroAdventurer
Just to add one more perspective - I always recommend having your attorney or experienced paralegal handle UCC filings for exactly this reason. The cost of getting it wrong usually exceeds the cost of having a professional do it right the first time.
0 coins
Andre Dupont
•True but sometimes you don't have that luxury, especially with tight closing deadlines.
0 coins
Zoe Papanikolaou
•Fair point about the attorney route, though that's not always feasible for smaller transactions.
0 coins
Jamal Wilson
I had a similar rejected filing situation and used Certana.ai to cross-check all my documents before refiling. It instantly caught the debtor name mismatch and a couple other issues I hadn't noticed. Really straightforward - just upload your charter docs and UCC forms and it flags any inconsistencies. Saved me from another rejection for sure.
0 coins
Mei Lin
•That sounds like exactly what the OP needs right now. Quick verification before filing the amendment.
0 coins
Liam Fitzgerald
•Seems like a lot of people are having success with that tool. Might be worth checking out.
0 coins
GalacticGuru
Thanks everyone for the advice! Going to pull the exact name from the secretary of state database and file the UCC-3 amendment tomorrow. Will definitely look into the document verification tool mentioned here to make sure I get it right this time. Really appreciate all the help!
0 coins
Amara Nnamani
•Good luck! Let us know how it goes.
0 coins
Giovanni Mancini
•Hope it goes smoothly and you can get your closing back on track!
0 coins