Ask the community...
- DO post questions about your issues.
- DO answer questions and support each other.
- DO post tips & tricks to help folks.
- DO NOT post call problems here - there is a support tab at the top for that :)
Join the conversation
Join the conversation
One thing to consider - even if you were supposed to send debtor notification, the failure might not void your security interest. It could just be a technical default that needs to be cured. Check what your loan agreement says about remedies for notification failures.
This is a good point. Most loan agreements don't make notification failure a basis for voiding the entire security interest.
I need to dig deeper into the loan agreement language. The notification clause is pretty vague about what happens if it's not followed.
Bottom line - your UCC filing creates a perfected security interest regardless of notification issues. Any notification problems are likely contractual matters that can be addressed separately. Don't let the debtor convince you that your lien is invalid just because of notification confusion.
Thanks everyone. This has been really helpful in understanding the difference between UCC requirements and contractual obligations. I feel much better about my position now.
Glad we could help clarify things. These notification issues trip up a lot of people but they're usually not as serious as they first appear.
Join the conversation
Quick reality check - if you've been filing UCC-1s on your equipment loans, you're doing it right. The lien vs UCC confusion is just terminology. Your security agreement creates the lien, your UCC-1 filing perfects it. Both together give you a perfected security interest in the equipment. Don't overthink it - sounds like you've been protecting your lender's interests properly.
Thanks, that's what I needed to hear. All this legal terminology was making me think I'd been doing something completely wrong.
The terminology is definitely confusing at first. I still catch myself mixing up "lien" and "security interest" even though they mean basically the same thing in this context.
Here's a simple way to remember it: Lien = your claim on the equipment (created by security agreement). UCC filing = public notice of that claim (perfects the lien). You need both. The UCC-1 doesn't create the lien - it just makes it enforceable against third parties and establishes your priority. As long as you're filing UCC-1s with accurate debtor names and collateral descriptions, you're perfecting your liens properly.
Oh great, another thing to track. Do you set reminders or use a system for that?
Most lenders use a tickler system or software that tracks UCC expiration dates. You want to file continuations at least 6 months before the 5-year mark to be safe.
Join the conversation
Kansas drives me nuts but at least their continuation deadlines are straightforward. Five years from the original filing date, no weird extensions or grace periods like some states have.
True, their timing rules are simple. It's just the search function that's completely broken.
Yep, if they could fix the search algorithm they'd actually have a decent system. The documents themselves are clear and well-organized.
For what it's worth, I've started keeping a Kansas-specific checklist of search variations. Happy to share it if anyone wants it. Includes all the common abbreviation patterns and punctuation variations that trip people up.
I'll type up the main points: Always try with/without periods after abbreviations, spell out Corp/Inc/LLC vs abbreviated, try both 'Company Name, Inc.' and 'Company Name Inc.', check for middle initials in personal names, and try the name both with and without 'The' at the beginning.
This is gold, thank you! I'm copying this for my team. We do a lot of Kansas deals and this will save us tons of time.
Zainab Ali
One more thing - if you're dealing with a revolver or line of credit, make sure your security agreement covers future advances. Otherwise you might only have a security interest securing the initial draw.
0 coins
Connor Murphy
•This is critical for revolving credit. I always include language like 'all obligations now existing or hereafter arising' to cover future advances.
0 coins
Yara Nassar
•Learned this the hard way on a deal where the debtor defaulted after several draws. Only the first advance was secured because of poor drafting.
0 coins
StarGazer101
Sounds like you've got the basics covered. The attorney is probably just being extra cautious or maybe they're not that familiar with Article 9. Have you tried suggesting a call to walk through their specific concerns? Sometimes it's easier to resolve these issues verbally than in endless email chains.
0 coins
Keisha Jackson
•Good advice. Face-to-face or phone calls usually resolve document issues faster than email back and forth.
0 coins
Paolo Romano
•Yeah, I've found that when attorneys get into nitpicking mode, a quick call can sort out whether they have legitimate concerns or just don't understand the UCC.
0 coins