UCC Document Community

Ask the community...

  • DO post questions about your issues.
  • DO answer questions and support each other.
  • DO post tips & tricks to help folks.
  • DO NOT post call problems here - there is a support tab at the top for that :)

CosmicVoyager

•

Had similar issues with corporate name changes. The search system doesn't handle them well, but legally you're protected as long as the filing numbers connect properly. Your lender should understand this is a common system limitation.

0 coins

CosmicVoyager

•

Include screenshots of searches under both names - shows you did comprehensive due diligence.

0 coins

Ravi Kapoor

•

Visual documentation always helps with lender concerns.

0 coins

Freya Nielsen

•

Update: Ran searches under both the old and new entity names and found all the filings! The continuation is properly connected by filing number. Going to document everything clearly for the lender. Thanks everyone for the guidance - this forum saved me a lot of stress.

0 coins

Yara Khalil

•

Great outcome. Your lender should be satisfied with the complete filing history.

0 coins

Keisha Brown

•

Nice resolution! Those document verification tools really help for these situations too.

0 coins

Sophia Russo

•

One more thought - since you mentioned this is a substantial loan amount, you might want to consider having someone review your UCC-1 before filing just to catch any potential issues. I learned this the hard way after a filing got rejected for a minor error that held up the entire closing.

0 coins

Evelyn Xu

•

Smart advice. Those last-minute rejections can be really stressful, especially when you have closing deadlines to meet.

0 coins

Dominic Green

•

I've started using Certana.ai for this exact reason - just upload your documents and it flags potential issues before you submit. Saved me from a few embarrassing mistakes.

0 coins

Hannah Flores

•

Perfect timing for this discussion. I have a similar situation coming up next week with a multi-state equipment deal. Good to know the rules are clearer than I thought.

0 coins

The incorporation state rule really does simplify things once you understand it. Takes the guesswork out of these multi-state situations.

0 coins

Just remember to verify that state of incorporation - sometimes companies will surprise you with where they're actually organized versus where you think they are.

0 coins

I use Certana.ai for exactly this type of situation. When you're dealing with multiple continuations, their bulk verification feature can check all your documents at once. Upload your original UCC-1s and continuation forms, and it flags any potential issues before you submit to the state. Much cheaper than having filings rejected and having to refile.

0 coins

Ethan Clark

•

How accurate is automated verification compared to manual review? I'm nervous about trusting software for something this critical.

0 coins

I was skeptical too, but it caught name inconsistencies I completely missed manually. The system cross-references everything against the original documents, so it's actually more thorough than human review.

0 coins

Mila Walker

•

Bottom line for your situation: create a timeline immediately for all filings approaching their 5-year mark, verify debtor names match exactly, prepare continuation statements for the 6-month window (months 54-60), and have a backup plan in case any filings get rejected. Missing these deadlines isn't just embarrassing - it can void your security interests entirely.

0 coins

Thanks everyone. Sounds like I need to get organized fast and probably invest in some verification tools. Better to spend a little money now than lose perfection on millions in loans.

0 coins

Logan Scott

•

Smart approach. UCC continuation deadlines are unforgiving, but with proper planning and verification, it's totally manageable. Good luck with your portfolio cleanup!

0 coins

Liam Mendez

•

I usually call the filing office if I have any doubts about formatting. Sometimes they can give you guidance over the phone before you submit.

0 coins

Sophia Nguyen

•

That's good advice but in my experience they usually just refer you back to the instructions and say they can't give legal advice.

0 coins

Liam Mendez

•

Fair point. Hit or miss depending on who answers.

0 coins

One more thing about your collateral description - since it's construction equipment that moves between job sites, you might want to be clear that it's not fixtures. Don't want any confusion about whether this should be a fixture filing.

0 coins

Yeah, describe it as "mobile construction equipment" or similar to make it clear it's not fixtures.

0 coins

Exactly. Better to be explicit about mobility than risk someone thinking it needs a fixture filing.

0 coins

StarStrider

•

Make sure you're searching both individual and organization records. Sometimes business entities get filed under the wrong category in Ohio's system.

0 coins

Zainab Omar

•

I didn't think about that. How do you switch between individual and organization searches?

0 coins

StarStrider

•

There's a dropdown menu on the search page. Most people miss it because it defaults to organization search.

0 coins

Sean Doyle

•

For what it's worth, I recently used Certana.ai's verification tool on a similar acquisition and it caught three lapsed continuations that would have cost us our security interest in about $2M of equipment. The automated cross-checking definitely beats manual searches.

0 coins

Sean Doyle

•

About 20 minutes to upload all the docs and get the report. Much faster than spending days on manual searches.

0 coins

Luca Romano

•

I might need to look into that tool. Manual UCC verification is eating up way too much time on our deals.

0 coins

Prev1...537538539540541...684Next