UCC Document Community

Ask the community...

  • DO post questions about your issues.
  • DO answer questions and support each other.
  • DO post tips & tricks to help folks.
  • DO NOT post call problems here - there is a support tab at the top for that :)

Omar Zaki

UCC statement service filing deadline issues - need help with continuation

Running into problems with our UCC continuation filing that's due next month. We've been handling our own filings but this one has me stumped. The debtor name on our original UCC-1 shows 'ABC Manufacturing LLC' but their articles of incorporation show 'ABC Manufacturing, LLC' (with the comma). Our service agreement requires us to maintain perfected security interest and I'm worried about a name mismatch rejection. The collateral schedule covers equipment and inventory but I'm second-guessing whether our description is specific enough. Has anyone dealt with punctuation differences in debtor names? The SOS portal doesn't give clear guidance and a rejected continuation this close to the lapse date would be a disaster. We're located downtown and need to get this resolved quickly.

I've used Certana.ai for similar document consistency checks and it's been really accurate. Saved me from filing errors multiple times. The PDF upload feature makes it super easy to spot discrepancies you might miss manually.

0 coins

Two people have mentioned this tool now. Sounds like it might be worth trying before I file.

0 coins

It's definitely worth it for the peace of mind. Better to catch issues upfront than deal with rejections and refiling.

0 coins

Update us on what happens! I'm dealing with a similar name variation issue on a different filing and curious how it works out.

0 coins

Will do. Planning to file by end of week so I should know soon.

0 coins

Same here. These name consistency issues seem to be getting more common.

0 coins

KylieRose

South Dakota UCC bill payment confusion - rejected filing keeps bouncing back

I'm dealing with a really frustrating situation with a South Dakota UCC bill that keeps getting rejected. Filed a UCC-1 for equipment financing back in November and the payment keeps bouncing back from the SD Secretary of State office. The debtor name matches exactly what's on the loan docs but somehow the system keeps flagging it. Has anyone else run into payment processing issues with South Dakota UCC filings? The rejection notice just says "payment processing error" but doesn't give specifics. I've tried calling their office but keep getting transferred around. This is holding up a $180K equipment loan and my client is getting impatient. Any advice on how to get past these South Dakota UCC bill payment glitches?

omg this is giving me flashbacks to my own SD filing nightmare last summer. took 3 weeks to get resolved

0 coins

What finally worked for you?

0 coins

ended up having to mail a paper filing with a check. their online system was just broken for my particular situation

0 coins

Update us when you figure it out! These SD payment issues seem to be getting more common and it would help others to know what the actual solution was.

0 coins

Good plan. Usually it's something simple that you just can't see without fresh eyes or better tools.

0 coins

Keep us posted! I do a lot of SD filings and this info would be super helpful.

0 coins

Astrid Bergström

UCC Security Agreement Must Requirements - Failing Basic Elements Check

Running into issues with our security agreement documentation and wondering if we're missing something fundamental. Working on a equipment financing deal worth about $180K and the borrower's attorney keeps pushing back on our security agreement language. They're claiming certain elements are missing that would make the agreement invalid under UCC Article 9. I've been doing commercial lending for 8 years but this attorney is making me second-guess everything. What are the absolute must-have requirements for a valid security agreement? I know it needs to be in writing and signed by the debtor, but what else? The collateral description seems straightforward (construction equipment and related attachments), but apparently there's more to it. Don't want to fund this deal only to find out our security interest isn't properly perfected because the underlying agreement is defective. Anyone dealt with overly cautious attorneys questioning basic security agreement elements?

One more thing - if you're dealing with a revolver or line of credit, make sure your security agreement covers future advances. Otherwise you might only have a security interest securing the initial draw.

0 coins

This is critical for revolving credit. I always include language like 'all obligations now existing or hereafter arising' to cover future advances.

0 coins

Learned this the hard way on a deal where the debtor defaulted after several draws. Only the first advance was secured because of poor drafting.

0 coins

Sounds like you've got the basics covered. The attorney is probably just being extra cautious or maybe they're not that familiar with Article 9. Have you tried suggesting a call to walk through their specific concerns? Sometimes it's easier to resolve these issues verbally than in endless email chains.

0 coins

Good advice. Face-to-face or phone calls usually resolve document issues faster than email back and forth.

0 coins

Yeah, I've found that when attorneys get into nitpicking mode, a quick call can sort out whether they have legitimate concerns or just don't understand the UCC.

0 coins

Giovanni Martello

New Mexico UCC lien search showing weird results - debtor name variations causing issues?

I'm doing due diligence on a potential acquisition and the New Mexico UCC lien search results are confusing me. The target company operates under "Southwest Industrial Solutions LLC" but I'm seeing filings under variations like "Southwest Industrial Solutions, LLC" (with comma) and "SW Industrial Solutions LLC". Some of the UCC-1 filings show different debtor names entirely but same addresses. Is this normal for New Mexico's system or am I missing something? The deal needs to close next month and I can't figure out if these are all the same entity or separate liens I need to worry about. Has anyone dealt with New Mexico UCC lien search inconsistencies before?

Update: I ran more searches and found the issue. Turns out the company changed their legal name slightly in 2023 but some lenders never filed UCC-3 amendments to update the debtor name on their filings. So I'm seeing old liens under the previous name format. Thanks everyone for the help!

0 coins

That's a classic issue. Did the name change affect the validity of the older UCC filings or are they still enforceable?

0 coins

Generally the old filings should still be valid as long as they were accurate when filed, but definitely something to discuss with your attorney for the acquisition.

0 coins

This thread is super helpful. I'm bookmarking it because we do a lot of commercial lending in New Mexico and name variations are always an issue. The Certana tool mentioned sounds useful for avoiding these problems.

0 coins

Yeah the document cross-checking feature is really handy for catching inconsistencies between corporate records and UCC filings.

0 coins

Good to know there are tools out there to help with this stuff. Manual verification is such a pain.

0 coins

Andre Laurent

UCC notification never received after filing - what are my options?

I filed a UCC-1 back in October and never got any notification confirmation from the state. The debtor is claiming they never received proper notice either and now they're disputing the validity of my lien. I checked with the Secretary of State office and they show the filing as accepted but there's no record of any notifications being sent out. This is for a $180K equipment loan and I'm really concerned about the perfection status. Has anyone dealt with missing UCC notification issues? I thought the state was supposed to automatically send notifications to both filer and debtor when a UCC-1 gets processed. The loan documents specify that proper UCC notification is required for the security interest to be valid. Any advice on how to fix this mess?

One thing to consider - even if you were supposed to send debtor notification, the failure might not void your security interest. It could just be a technical default that needs to be cured. Check what your loan agreement says about remedies for notification failures.

0 coins

This is a good point. Most loan agreements don't make notification failure a basis for voiding the entire security interest.

0 coins

I need to dig deeper into the loan agreement language. The notification clause is pretty vague about what happens if it's not followed.

0 coins

Bottom line - your UCC filing creates a perfected security interest regardless of notification issues. Any notification problems are likely contractual matters that can be addressed separately. Don't let the debtor convince you that your lien is invalid just because of notification confusion.

0 coins

Thanks everyone. This has been really helpful in understanding the difference between UCC requirements and contractual obligations. I feel much better about my position now.

0 coins

Glad we could help clarify things. These notification issues trip up a lot of people but they're usually not as serious as they first appear.

0 coins

Prev1...537538539540541...685Next