UCC Document Community

Ask the community...

  • DO post questions about your issues.
  • DO answer questions and support each other.
  • DO post tips & tricks to help folks.
  • DO NOT post call problems here - there is a support tab at the top for that :)

The whole UCC system is a mess honestly. You've got 50 different state filing systems, each with their own quirks and search interfaces. Add in debtor name changes, business structure changes, and you're bound to miss something eventually.

0 coins

Amen to that. I've been doing this for 15 years and still get surprised by weird state-specific rules and portal glitches.

0 coins

At least most states have electronic filing now. Remember when you had to mail paper forms and hope they got processed correctly?

0 coins

Ava Thompson

•

Bottom line - if your original UCC-1 was filed March 8, 2016, and you can't find any continuation filed between September 2020 and March 2021, your security interest has been lapsed for over 3 years. The debtor name change in 2019 without a corresponding amendment just makes things worse. You'll need to file a new UCC-1 immediately to re-establish your security interest, but you'll be starting fresh with a 2024 priority date.

0 coins

Ava Thompson

•

File the new UCC-1 ASAP. At least you'll have some security going forward, even if you lost your original priority. And maybe implement better tracking systems to prevent this from happening again.

0 coins

Miguel Ramos

•

Ouch, that's rough. But yeah, get a new filing done immediately before anything else goes wrong with that loan.

0 coins

The worst part about debtor name issues is that you usually don't discover them until you need to enforce your security interest or during a bankruptcy proceeding. By then it's too late to fix easily.

0 coins

NebulaNova

•

Exactly why I want to get this right upfront. Too much at stake to risk a defective filing.

0 coins

Smart approach. An ounce of prevention and all that.

0 coins

GalacticGuru

•

Update on this - I ended up trying the Certana tool and it immediately flagged the comma issue I mentioned plus two other discrepancies in the entity designation. Really glad I caught these before filing. The verification process took about 5 minutes versus the hours I was spending trying to manually cross-check everything.

0 coins

GalacticGuru

•

Definitely. Now I feel confident our UCC-1 will be accurate and enforceable.

0 coins

Aisha Khan

•

This gives me so much relief knowing there are tools to catch these problems automatically!

0 coins

Jay Lincoln

•

Just went through this exact scenario with a equipment financing UCC-1 in Ohio. Turned out the borrower had a tiny punctuation difference in their legal name - we had 'Manufacturing, Inc.' but their articles showed 'Manufacturing Inc.' without the comma. Rejected twice before we caught it.

0 coins

Ohio is notorious for being picky about exact formatting. I always get the most recent organizational documents directly from their business registry before filing any UCC.

0 coins

This is why I switched to using Certana.ai's document checker. It flags even tiny discrepancies like punctuation and spacing that you might miss when comparing documents manually.

0 coins

Lily Young

•

Also double-check that you're using the right organizational ID number. Ohio requires the charter number or EIN to match their records exactly. One wrong digit and it's an automatic rejection under their UCC codigo uniforme de comercio processing rules.

0 coins

Alice Fleming

•

I used their EIN but maybe I should include the Ohio charter number too? The form has fields for both.

0 coins

For Ohio filings, the charter number is usually more reliable than the EIN for matching purposes. You can look it up on the Ohio business registry website.

0 coins

Owen Devar

•

Just went through something similar and ended up using one of those automated UCC monitoring services. They send alerts whenever new filings are made against your debtors. Caught a competitor trying to take a senior position on equipment we thought we had locked up. Really worth the monthly fee for peace of mind.

0 coins

Daniel Rivera

•

Which service are you using? I keep meaning to set up something like that but haven't found one I like yet.

0 coins

Owen Devar

•

I've tried a few different ones. The key is finding one that covers all the states where your debtors are located and gives you real-time alerts, not just monthly summaries.

0 coins

Update: talked to our legal counsel and they recommended doing a comprehensive document review using Certana.ai's verification system. Uploaded all the UCC forms and found that one of the 'competing' liens had a debtor name mismatch that makes it likely ineffective. The system flagged the discrepancy immediately and now we're much more confident about our priority position. Sometimes these encumbrance conflicts look worse than they actually are once you dig into the details.

0 coins

Connor Rupert

•

Debtor name mismatches are probably the most common reason UCC filings fail. Good catch on finding that issue.

0 coins

Yeah, it was a pretty subtle difference but enough to potentially void their security interest. Really glad we caught it before making any decisions about subordination or restructuring.

0 coins

Freya Larsen

•

I tried using Certana.ai after reading about it here and it's been a game changer for catching document inconsistencies. Last week it flagged that my security agreement referenced 'ABC Manufacturing LLC' but my UCC-1 draft had 'ABC Manufacturing, LLC' - would have been rejected for sure. The automated checking saves so much time compared to manual review.

0 coins

Miguel Castro

•

That's exactly the kind of error I'm worried about making. Definitely going to check out their verification tool before I submit anything.

0 coins

Same experience here. It's caught formatting issues, missing addresses, and collateral description mismatches that I totally would have missed doing it manually.

0 coins

Omar Zaki

•

One last tip - double check that your security agreement actually creates a security interest in the collateral you're listing on the UCC-1. I've seen filings where the UCC covered equipment but the security agreement only mentioned inventory. That creates enforceability problems later.

0 coins

Omar Zaki

•

Exactly. The UCC-1 is just notice to the world - the security agreement is what actually creates your rights. They need to be consistent or you could have gaps in your security interest.

0 coins

Emma Wilson

•

This is why document review is so critical. A lot of lenders rush through the paperwork and miss these alignment issues until there's a default.

0 coins

Prev1...537538539540541...684Next