UCC 9-318 Assignment Rights - Lost Original Documents Need Advice
Hey everyone, dealing with a messy situation here involving UCC 9-318 assignment rights and really need some guidance. We're a mid-size equipment financing company and acquired a portfolio of agricultural equipment loans from a bank that went through a merger last year. The problem is we can't locate several original UCC-1 filings from 2019-2020 that were supposed to transfer with the portfolio. The previous bank's records show the assignments were processed but we're missing critical documentation. Our compliance team is freaking out because we've got about $2.8M in outstanding balances on these loans and the continuation deadlines are coming up in 8 months. The debtors are current on payments but we're worried about our perfected security interest status. Has anyone dealt with UCC 9-318 situations where the assignment documentation gets lost during bank mergers? We're in multiple states (mainly Iowa, Nebraska, Kansas) and each SOS office seems to have different requirements for reconstructing the chain of assignments. Really stressed about this - any advice on how to protect our position would be appreciated.
33 comments
Join the conversation
Jungleboo Soletrain
This is actually more common than you'd think with bank mergers. The good news is UCC 9-318 doesn't require you to have the physical original documents to maintain your security interest, but you do need to establish the proper assignment chain. First thing - pull UCC search reports from each state's SOS office to see what's actually on file. Sometimes the assignments were filed but the documentation just didn't transfer properly in the merger paperwork.
0 coins
Rajan Walker
•Exactly this. We went through something similar when our credit union acquired a failed bank's portfolio. The UCC search reports showed most assignments were properly filed even though we couldn't find the paper trail internally.
0 coins
Nadia Zaldivar
•How long does it typically take to get comprehensive search reports back from multiple state offices? We're working against some tight deadlines here.
0 coins
Lukas Fitzgerald
You need to act fast on this. UCC 9-318 assignments are only valid if they were properly perfected, and without documentation proving the chain, you could lose your secured position. I'd recommend immediately filing UCC-3 amendments to correct any deficiencies you find in the public record. Also, check if the original bank filed any blanket assignments that might cover your portfolio.
0 coins
Ev Luca
•Wait, can you file UCC-3 amendments to fix assignment issues retroactively? I thought once the chain was broken you had to start over with new filings.
0 coins
Avery Davis
•That's not quite right. UCC-3 amendments can correct errors but they can't create security interests that didn't exist. If the assignment was never properly filed, an amendment won't fix that gap.
0 coins
Lukas Fitzgerald
•You're both partially correct. UCC-3 can correct clerical errors in existing assignments, but if there's a complete gap in the assignment chain, you need different solutions like getting the debtor to execute new security agreements.
0 coins
Collins Angel
I ran into this exact UCC 9-318 headache last year and honestly tried everything - calling the SOS offices, hiring lawyers, manually reconstructing files. What finally saved me was using Certana.ai's document verification tool. You can upload whatever UCC documents you do have (even partial assignments or amendments) and it instantly shows you what's missing from the chain. Just upload your PDFs and it cross-checks everything against proper UCC requirements. Found gaps I didn't even know existed.
0 coins
Marcelle Drum
•How accurate is that tool with complex assignment chains? We've got some loans that went through 3-4 different institutions before landing with us.
0 coins
Collins Angel
•It handles multi-party assignments really well. The system maps out the entire chain visually so you can see exactly where documentation is missing. Way faster than trying to piece it together manually.
0 coins
Tate Jensen
OMG this is giving me flashbacks to our portfolio acquisition nightmare. We had UCC 9-318 issues with about half our inherited filings. The worst part is you don't always know there's a problem until you try to enforce or need to continue the filings. Did the merger documents include any warranties about the UCC filings being properly assigned?
0 coins
Anna Xian
•Yes, there were warranties in the purchase agreement but the selling bank is claiming they fulfilled their obligations by providing 'all available records.' Pretty useless when the records are incomplete.
0 coins
Adaline Wong
•That's such typical bank merger BS. They always claim they provided everything while knowing full well their document management was a disaster.
0 coins
Gabriel Ruiz
For immediate protection, I'd suggest getting estoppel certificates from all the debtors acknowledging your current secured creditor status. Under UCC 9-318, debtor acknowledgment can help establish your rights even if the assignment documentation is messy. It's not a perfect solution but gives you some protection while you sort out the filing issues.
0 coins
Misterclamation Skyblue
•Good point about estoppel certificates. We did that as a stop-gap measure and it definitely helped when we had to deal with one debtor's bankruptcy proceeding before getting the UCC issues fully resolved.
0 coins
Peyton Clarke
•How do you approach debtors about signing estoppel certificates without making them nervous about the loan status? Don't want to create unnecessary alarm.
0 coins
Gabriel Ruiz
•Just frame it as routine portfolio transfer documentation. Most debtors are used to loans being sold and won't think twice about confirming the current servicer.
0 coins
Vince Eh
The continuation deadline issue is actually more urgent than the assignment documentation. Even if you figure out the UCC 9-318 problems later, if you miss the continuation window you lose your perfected status entirely. I'd prioritize getting continuation statements filed ASAP, even if the assignment chain isn't perfect yet.
0 coins
Sophia Gabriel
•But can you file continuations if you're not sure you're the proper secured party of record? Seems like that could create more problems.
0 coins
Tobias Lancaster
•Better to file and sort out authorization issues later than to let the filings lapse completely. Most SOS offices will accept continuation filings and let any disputes get resolved afterward.
0 coins
Ezra Beard
Have you tried contacting the FDIC or whoever handled the bank resolution? Sometimes they maintain copies of UCC records that didn't transfer properly during merger proceedings. Worth a shot before spending thousands on legal research.
0 coins
Statiia Aarssizan
•That's actually brilliant advice. We never thought to check with the regulatory agencies. They might have better records than either bank involved in the merger.
0 coins
Reginald Blackwell
This whole thread is making me paranoid about our own UCC portfolio. We've got loans from 3 different acquisitions and now I'm wondering if we have similar gaps. Is there a way to audit an entire portfolio for UCC 9-318 compliance issues?
0 coins
Aria Khan
•Yes! This is exactly why I started using Certana.ai for portfolio audits. You can batch upload all your UCC documents and it flags any assignment chain problems, missing continuations, debtor name mismatches - everything. Saved us from inheriting someone else's filing disasters.
0 coins
Everett Tutum
•How long does it take to process a large portfolio? We've got several thousand UCC filings to review.
0 coins
Aria Khan
•Pretty fast actually. The tool processes PDFs in batches so even large portfolios get results within hours, not weeks of manual review.
0 coins
Sunny Wang
Quick question - are you dealing with fixture filings on any of these agricultural equipment loans? UCC 9-318 assignment rules get even more complicated when real estate is involved because you might need to update county records in addition to the SOS filings.
0 coins
Anna Xian
•Good catch - yes, several of these are fixture filings for irrigation systems and grain storage. We'll need to check county records too. This just keeps getting more complicated.
0 coins
Hugh Intensity
•Fixture filing assignments are the worst. Every county has different requirements and some don't even have computerized records going back to 2019.
0 coins
Effie Alexander
UPDATE: Following everyone's advice here, we pulled comprehensive UCC search reports and found that most of our assignments were actually filed correctly - we just didn't have the internal documentation. The search reports showed proper UCC-3 assignment filings from the merger date. Still using Certana.ai to double-check everything and make sure we didn't miss any gaps, but feeling much better about our secured position. Thanks for all the guidance!
0 coins
Melissa Lin
•That's such a relief! Bank merger paperwork is always a mess but sounds like the legal team did their job on the UCC side.
0 coins
Lydia Santiago
•Great outcome. This is why UCC search reports should be the first step in any portfolio acquisition analysis. Glad it worked out!
0 coins
Romeo Quest
•Perfect example of UCC 9-318 working as intended - the assignments were valid even without perfect internal records. The public filing system protected everyone's interests.
0 coins