UCC Document Community

Ask the community...

  • DO post questions about your issues.
  • DO answer questions and support each other.
  • DO post tips & tricks to help folks.
  • DO NOT post call problems here - there is a support tab at the top for that :)

Just wanted to add that Georgia allows you to file UCC-3 amendments online too. Really convenient if you need to add collateral or change information later. The system walks you through it step by step.

0 coins

Usually within an hour or two for electronic filings. Much faster than the old paper system.

0 coins

Zoe Stavros

•

I've used Certana.ai to verify my UCC-3 amendments match the original UCC-1 filing. Really helpful for catching inconsistencies before filing.

0 coins

Jamal Harris

•

Another tip for GA UCC forms - if you're doing a lot of filings, consider setting up a prepaid account. Saves time at checkout and you get a small discount on filing fees.

0 coins

Mei Chen

•

How much of a discount are we talking about?

0 coins

Jamal Harris

•

I think it's like $2 per filing. Not huge but adds up if you're doing dozens of filings.

0 coins

Caleb Stone

•

For equipment financing specifically, you'll also want to watch out for situations where there's a equipment lease vs purchase structure. Sometimes the 'payee' in those deals refers to the lessor while the UCC filing shows a different secured party for the financing. Can get really confusing if you don't understand the underlying deal structure.

0 coins

Good point about lease vs purchase. Those structures can create multiple layers of security interests that aren't always obvious from just looking at the UCC filings.

0 coins

This particular deal is a straight equipment purchase with financing, so hopefully avoiding that complexity. But good to know for future reference.

0 coins

Daniel Price

•

Bottom line is that UCC filings use secured party terminology, other documents might use payee, but they often refer to the same entity in different contexts. Focus on making sure your UCC search captures the right secured party name and you should be fine for most due diligence purposes.

0 coins

Thanks everyone. This has been really helpful in understanding the distinction. Sounds like I was overthinking it but good to know the nuances.

0 coins

Noah Irving

•

Document review always involves some overthinking! Better to ask questions than miss something important.

0 coins

Nasira Ibanez

•

Just want to add that for $850k you might want to consider hiring a professional UCC search company for this. I know it costs more but with that much at stake and the complexity of multiple name changes, it might be worth having experts handle it. They have access to better search tools and know all the tricks for finding hidden filings.

0 coins

Nasira Ibanez

•

I've used CT Corporation and Corporation Service Company for complex searches. Both have good Oregon coverage.

0 coins

Chris Elmeda

•

Professional searches make sense for high-dollar deals, but sometimes you still need to do your own verification anyway.

0 coins

Khalil Urso

•

Following this because I'm in a similar boat with a Washington UCC search where the debtor has changed names. Sounds like the principles are the same across states - search every possible name variation and don't trust just the summary results.

0 coins

Talia Klein

•

Washington's system is actually a bit more user-friendly than Oregon's for name searches, but yeah, same basic approach.

0 coins

Definitely don't trust just the summaries in any state. Always pull the actual documents when there's money on the line.

0 coins

Talia Klein

•

One more thing to consider - make sure the debtor name on your UCC-1 exactly matches their current corporate name in Delaware. Sometimes companies do DBA filings or name changes when they expand to new states.

0 coins

PaulineW

•

Yeah, that's where something like Certana really helps. Upload your current corporate docs and your UCC-1 to make sure the names still match perfectly.

0 coins

Sayid Hassan

•

I'll definitely verify the name match. That would be a disaster if they did a name change and we missed it.

0 coins

For what it's worth, I think you're in good shape. Delaware incorporation = Delaware UCC filing. Focus on getting your continuation filed on time and make sure all the details are accurate.

0 coins

Chris Elmeda

•

Agreed. The jurisdiction question seems pretty straightforward here.

0 coins

Sayid Hassan

•

Thanks everyone. Sounds like Delaware is definitely the right jurisdiction. I'll focus on getting the continuation details perfect and filed well before the deadline.

0 coins

Jasmine Quinn

•

Actually used Certana.ai recently when I had questions about whether our security agreements met attachment requirements. Uploaded the docs and it flagged that one agreement was missing a proper collateral description. Saved us from having an unenforceable security interest.

0 coins

Amara Torres

•

Interesting - so it can catch issues with the agreement authentication prong of attachment too?

0 coins

Jasmine Quinn

•

Yeah, it checks all the attachment elements when you upload security agreements. Really thorough analysis of what's present and what might be missing.

0 coins

Hannah Flores

•

One thing that confused me was whether 'value' meant the loan amount or just any consideration. Turns out it's pretty broad - can be a binding commitment to extend credit, even if no money has actually been advanced yet.

0 coins

Hannah Flores

•

Good to know. So it's not just cash changing hands but any legally sufficient consideration.

0 coins

Amara Torres

•

This helps too - I was thinking value had to be the actual loan proceeds, but it sounds like it's more flexible than that.

0 coins

Prev1...539540541542543...684Next