UCC Filing Issues with Transmitting Utility Equipment - Debtor Name Problems
Running into major headaches with a UCC-1 filing for transmitting utility equipment. The debtor operates power transmission lines across three counties and we're securing a $2.8M equipment loan. Secretary of State rejected our initial filing because the debtor name on our UCC-1 doesn't exactly match their corporate charter - they're registered as 'Regional Power Transmission LLC' but do business as 'RPT Utilities.' Our loan docs reference both names inconsistently. The collateral description covers transformers, transmission towers, and associated equipment used in their transmitting utility operations. Need to get this refiled correctly before our funding deadline next week. Anyone dealt with transmitting utility filings where the debtor has multiple business names? What's the proper way to handle the debtor name field when they operate under a DBA?
36 comments
Join the conversation
Ellie Simpson
Utility filings are tricky because of the DBA issue. You need to file under the exact legal name from their charter - 'Regional Power Transmission LLC' in your case. The DBA doesn't matter for UCC purposes, only the registered entity name. Make sure your loan agreement references the correct legal entity name going forward.
0 coins
Arjun Kurti
•This is exactly right. I've seen so many utility equipment loans get messed up because people use the operating name instead of the chartered name. Secretary of State systems are strict about exact matches.
0 coins
Raúl Mora
•But what about the collateral description? Should we specify that it's transmitting utility equipment or just call it 'electrical equipment'? I'm worried about being too specific vs too general.
0 coins
Margot Quinn
Had this exact problem with a wind farm financing last year. The transmitting utility had three different names they used. What saved us was uploading our charter documents and UCC-1 to Certana.ai's document checker - it instantly flagged the name mismatch between our corporate docs and the UCC filing. Super helpful for catching these inconsistencies before submission.
0 coins
Evelyn Kim
•Never heard of that service but sounds useful. How does it work exactly? Do you just upload the PDFs?
0 coins
Margot Quinn
•Yeah, you upload your charter and UCC-1 as PDFs and it cross-checks all the debtor names, entity details, everything. Takes like 30 seconds and shows you exactly where the mismatches are.
0 coins
AaliyahAli
•That would have saved me so much time. I spent hours manually comparing documents. Will definitely check this out.
0 coins
Diego Fisher
Transmitting utility equipment filings are a nightmare!! The SOS systems can't handle the complexity. Half the time they reject valid filings for stupid reasons. Last month I had a transmission line project get rejected because they said 'transformers' was too vague. Had to refile with 'electrical power transformers rated at 69kV and above' to get acceptance.
0 coins
Henrietta Beasley
•Ugh tell me about it. The portal errors are the worst part. You spend days preparing everything perfectly and then get some cryptic rejection code.
0 coins
Diego Fisher
•EXACTLY! And customer service is useless. They just tell you to 'review the filing requirements' like that helps anyone.
0 coins
Lincoln Ramiro
For transmitting utility debtor names, I always recommend doing an entity search first. Pull their current registration status and use that EXACT name format. Don't trust what's on their website or business cards - only the official state records matter for UCC purposes.
0 coins
Faith Kingston
•Good point about entity search. Also worth checking if they have any recent name changes or mergers that might affect the filing.
0 coins
Emma Johnson
•How recent is recent? We're dealing with a utility that changed names 18 months ago but some of their equipment leases still reference the old entity.
0 coins
Lincoln Ramiro
•18 months should be fine as long as you're using the current legal name. The old contracts don't matter for UCC purposes - just the entity that exists now.
0 coins
Liam Brown
Be careful with transmitting utility collateral descriptions. Some states have special rules for utility equipment that crosses county lines. You might need to file in multiple jurisdictions depending on where the equipment is located.
0 coins
Olivia Garcia
•This is crucial. Transmission lines often cross state boundaries too. Make sure you're not missing any required filings.
0 coins
Liam Brown
•Right, and some utility equipment might qualify as fixtures depending on how it's attached to the property. Could need separate fixture filings.
0 coins
Noah Lee
The $2.8M amount suggests this is a pretty significant equipment loan. Make sure your continuation strategy is solid - you don't want to lose perfection on that much collateral because of a missed deadline.
0 coins
Ava Hernandez
•Good reminder. Utility equipment loans often have longer terms so continuation timing is critical.
0 coins
Noah Lee
•Exactly. Set calendar reminders for year 4.5 to start the continuation process. Don't wait until the last minute.
0 coins
Isabella Martin
I'm confused about the DBA thing. If they do business as RPT Utilities, wouldn't that be what shows up on invoices and contracts? Why doesn't that matter for UCC filings?
0 coins
Elijah Jackson
•UCC filings are about the legal entity that owns the collateral, not the trade name. Only the chartered entity name matters for perfection purposes.
0 coins
Isabella Martin
•That seems backwards to me. If everyone knows them as RPT Utilities, how would third parties know to search under the LLC name?
0 coins
Ellie Simpson
•That's exactly why the rules require the legal entity name. It creates a consistent search standard. DBAs are too variable and unofficial.
0 coins
Sophia Miller
Had to deal with transmitting utility equipment last month. The key is being super specific about voltage ratings and equipment types. Generic descriptions like 'electrical equipment' will get rejected every time.
0 coins
Mason Davis
•What level of detail do you typically include? Do you list specific manufacturer models or just general categories?
0 coins
Sophia Miller
•I go with categories but include technical specs. Like 'transmission towers rated for 138kV service' or 'power transformers with capacity exceeding 10MVA'.
0 coins
Mia Rodriguez
The document consistency issue is huge with utility filings. I started using Certana.ai after a similar name mismatch cost us a week of delays. You just upload your charter and UCC documents and it automatically flags any inconsistencies. Saved my bacon on a transmission line project.
0 coins
Jacob Lewis
•How accurate is the checking? Does it catch everything or just obvious mismatches?
0 coins
Mia Rodriguez
•It's pretty thorough. Caught some subtle differences in entity suffixes that I completely missed. Definitely worth using before any major filing.
0 coins
Amelia Martinez
For what it's worth, I've found that transmitting utility companies often have their legal departments handle UCC coordination. They're usually pretty good about providing the correct entity information if you ask.
0 coins
Ethan Clark
•That's a great tip. I always forget that utilities have specialized legal teams for this stuff.
0 coins
AaliyahAli
•Wish I'd thought of that earlier. Their counsel probably deals with UCC filings all the time and would know exactly how to format everything.
0 coins
Mila Walker
Just make sure you're not overthinking the collateral description. As long as it reasonably describes the transmitting utility equipment and includes the key identifying characteristics, you should be fine. The debtor name is way more important to get exactly right.
0 coins
Logan Scott
•Agreed. I've seen people spend hours perfecting collateral descriptions while missing basic entity name errors.
0 coins
Chloe Green
•The irony is that a slightly imperfect collateral description rarely causes problems, but a wrong debtor name kills the entire filing.
0 coins