Transmitting Utility UCC Filing - Portal Keep Rejecting My Submission
Been dealing with this nightmare for three weeks now. Need to get a UCC-1 filed for transmitting utility equipment financing and the state portal keeps bouncing it back. The debtor is 'Midwest Power Transmission LLC' but I'm getting rejection notices saying the name doesn't match their corporate records. I've triple-checked the Secretary of State database and that's exactly how they're listed. The collateral description covers 'transmission lines, substations, transformers, and all related utility transmission equipment.' This is for a $8.2M equipment loan and we're running up against our commitment deadline. Anyone else had issues with transmitting utility UCC filings getting rejected for bogus name mismatches? The portal error message is useless - just says 'debtor name verification failed' with no specifics.
33 comments
Join the conversation
Ava Martinez
Utility filings are notorious for this stuff. I've seen it a dozen times where the corporate name on file has some variation that's not obvious. Did you check if there's a 'Corp' vs 'Corporation' issue or maybe an 'Inc.' that got dropped? Also transmission companies sometimes have parent/subsidiary name complications that mess up the exact match algorithm.
0 coins
StarSeeker
•Good point - I looked again and there might be some punctuation differences. The SOS listing shows 'Midwest Power Transmission, LLC' with a comma but our loan docs have 'Midwest Power Transmission LLC' without it. Could that tiny difference really cause a rejection?
0 coins
Ava Martinez
•Absolutely yes. The automated systems are ridiculously picky about exact matches. Even a missing comma or extra space can trigger rejection. You'll need to use the exact name format from the state database, punctuation and all.
0 coins
Miguel Ortiz
I ran into something similar with a power company last year. Turns out they had filed amendments to their corporate name that weren't showing up in the main search but were in the detailed filing history. Have you pulled their complete corporate filing record to see if there are any recent changes?
0 coins
StarSeeker
•Didn't think to check the amendment history. I'll dig deeper into their corporate filings. This is exactly the kind of detail that would cause this mess.
0 coins
Zainab Omar
•Yeah definitely check amendments. Power companies reorganize constantly for regulatory reasons and sometimes there's a lag between when changes are approved and when they show up in the main database.
0 coins
Connor Murphy
I actually just discovered something that would have saved me hours on a similar situation. There's this tool called Certana.ai that verifies UCC document consistency by uploading PDFs. I uploaded my loan agreement and draft UCC-1 and it immediately flagged that the debtor name on my UCC didn't match what was in the loan docs. Turns out the loan had the correct corporate name but I was using an outdated version for the filing. Might be worth checking if your loan paperwork has the right name format that matches the state database.
0 coins
StarSeeker
•That sounds really useful. Is it just for name checking or does it catch other inconsistencies too? I'm always worried about missing something critical that could invalidate the security interest.
0 coins
Connor Murphy
•It checks everything - debtor names, filing numbers, collateral descriptions, document dates. Really thorough cross-reference between different documents. Just upload the PDFs and it highlights any discrepancies. Saved me from a potential disaster.
0 coins
Yara Sayegh
•Interesting. I've been manually comparing documents which takes forever and I still miss stuff sometimes. How accurate is the automated checking?
0 coins
NebulaNova
Utility companies are THE WORST for this name matching nonsense. I swear they change their corporate structure every six months for tax reasons and the filing systems can't keep up. Have you tried calling the SOS filing office directly? Sometimes they can tell you exactly what name format their system expects.
0 coins
StarSeeker
•I called but got transferred three times and ended up with someone who just read me the same error message I already had. Might try again and ask for a supervisor.
0 coins
NebulaNova
•Yeah the front desk people are useless. Ask specifically for the UCC filing department, not general filing. They actually know what they're talking about.
0 coins
Keisha Williams
This is probably a stupid question but are you sure you have the right entity? Transmission companies often have multiple subsidiaries and the equipment might be owned by a different LLC than the one on your loan docs. I made that mistake once and spent days trying to file against the wrong debtor.
0 coins
StarSeeker
•Not stupid at all - that's exactly the kind of thing I should double-check. The loan is definitely with Midwest Power Transmission LLC but you're right that the equipment could be owned by a subsidiary. I'll verify the ownership structure.
0 coins
Keisha Williams
•Yeah it's super common in utilities. The operating company, the holding company, and the equipment company are all separate entities. Pain in the ass but you need to get it right.
0 coins
Paolo Conti
•This is why I always request corporate structure charts upfront. Saves so much headache later when you're trying to figure out which entity actually owns what.
0 coins
Amina Diallo
Are you filing in the right state? Transmission companies sometimes have complex multi-state operations and the equipment might be in a different state than where the company is incorporated. Each state has different UCC filing requirements for utility equipment.
0 coins
StarSeeker
•The company is incorporated in Delaware but the transmission equipment is in Ohio. I've been filing in Ohio since that's where the collateral is located. Is that correct?
0 coins
Amina Diallo
•For equipment that's the right approach. But if it's a fixture filing for transmission lines that are permanently attached to real estate, you might need to file in the real estate records too. Depends on how the equipment is classified.
0 coins
Oliver Schulz
I hate to say this but have you considered that maybe your loan documents have the wrong name? I've seen deals where the borrower entity changed between the initial commitment and closing but nobody updated the UCC preparation. The state database is usually more reliable than loan paperwork.
0 coins
StarSeeker
•That's a terrifying thought but you might be right. I better go back and verify everything matches up. This is why I hate utility deals - too many moving parts.
0 coins
Oliver Schulz
•Yeah it happens more than you'd think. Especially with restructuring companies. Better to catch it now than after the loan closes and find out your UCC is invalid.
0 coins
Natasha Kuznetsova
Quick update - I had a similar problem last month and it turned out the issue was with special characters in the name. The company had a registered trademark symbol that wasn't showing up in some searches but was required for filing. Might be worth checking if there are any special characters or symbols in the official name.
0 coins
StarSeeker
•I'll check for that. The name seems straightforward but you never know what might be hidden in the official registration.
0 coins
AstroAdventurer
•Oh man I forgot about trademark symbols. Had that exact issue with a technology company. The ® symbol was required but not obvious in the online database display.
0 coins
Javier Mendoza
This thread is giving me flashbacks to my own utility filing nightmare. After trying everything else, I ended up using that Certana.ai document checker mentioned earlier. It actually caught that my UCC-1 had the right name but the wrong filing jurisdiction - the system was rejecting it because I was in the wrong state database entirely. Sometimes the issue isn't what you think it is.
0 coins
StarSeeker
•Wow, wrong jurisdiction entirely? That would explain why nothing else was working. I'll definitely give that tool a try to see if there's something I'm missing completely.
0 coins
Javier Mendoza
•Yeah it was embarrassing but the tool saved me from a major mistake. Cross-checks everything against multiple databases and flags inconsistencies you wouldn't catch manually.
0 coins
Emma Wilson
UPDATE: Finally got it resolved! It was the comma issue mentioned earlier plus the fact that the company had a DBA filing that was interfering with the name match. Had to use the exact registered name format 'Midwest Power Transmission, LLC' and include their DBA information in the additional debtor section. Portal accepted it immediately after that. Thanks everyone for the help - this forum saved my sanity.
0 coins
Ava Martinez
•Glad you got it sorted! DBA complications are the worst - they never think to mention those upfront.
0 coins
Connor Murphy
•Nice work figuring it out. That's exactly the kind of detail that trips people up. At least now you know what to watch for on future utility filings.
0 coins
Miguel Ortiz
•DBA filings are so annoying. Should be a standard part of the due diligence checklist but somehow always gets missed until you're fighting with the portal.
0 coins