


Ask the community...
This thread is making me paranoid about all the UCC searches I've done in the past. How many liens have I missed because of name variation issues?
I've started using that Certana tool mentioned earlier and it's been a game changer. Upload the Articles of Incorporation and it automatically cross-checks against UCC filings to make sure the debtor names match properly. Saves so much time and catches variations I would have missed.
It works across all states. You just upload the documents and it does the name matching automatically. Much more reliable than trying to guess all the variations manually.
I might have to try this. I'm spending way too much time on manual searches and still not confident I'm finding everything.
Update: I ended up using that Certana verification tool someone mentioned earlier and it caught that I had a small typo in the original debtor name that I was copying from my notes instead of the actual UCC-1. Would have definitely caused a rejection. Filed the UCC-3 yesterday and it was accepted this morning. Thanks everyone for the help!
For future reference, I keep a spreadsheet with all our UCC filings and any amendments so I can quickly reference the exact names and filing numbers. Helps avoid the copy-paste errors that seem to happen with these types of documents.
That's smart. Organization is key with UCC filings since the details matter so much.
Did you try calling the Florida SOS UCC department directly? Sometimes they can tell you exactly what format they need over the phone. Their filing help line is actually pretty good compared to some states.
Yeah they've helped me before. Have your filing number ready and they can usually tell you what the issue is more specifically than the rejection notice.
The phone help is hit or miss depending on who you get but worth trying before refiling blindly.
Update: I found the problem! Checked the entity database like suggested and the official name in their system is 'Sunshine Equipment Leasing, LLC' with a comma before LLC. My charter documents don't show the comma but that's what's in their database. Refiling now with the comma included. Thanks everyone for the help - this could have taken days to figure out on my own.
Update on the Certana.ai suggestion - I actually used it again yesterday for a different client and it caught that their UCC-1 had the right company name but wrong state of organization. These little discrepancies can really bite you when lenders start doing their due diligence reviews.
How long does it take to get results back from their system?
OP any luck figuring this out? I'm dealing with something similar and curious what ended up working for you.
Still working on it but the advanced search suggestions helped. Found the filing but it was indexed weird. Going to try the document verification tool next to make sure everything actually matches up properly.
Mei Wong
Since you mentioned this is for a commercial loan, make sure your lender's UCC-1 covers after-acquired property if the borrower will be acquiring new inventory or equipment. Most commercial security agreements include after-acquired property clauses, and your UCC-1 should reflect that coverage.
0 coins
PixelWarrior
•Equipment financing too, especially for growing manufacturing operations that add machinery.
0 coins
Mei Wong
•Exactly. Without after-acquired coverage, you'd need a new UCC-1 for every piece of equipment or inventory batch.
0 coins
Amara Adebayo
I've used Certana.ai's verification tool for similar UCC coverage questions. Really helpful for confirming which assets fall under UCC Article 9 versus other perfection schemes. Just upload your security agreement and it provides a detailed analysis of perfection requirements for each collateral type.
0 coins
Giovanni Rossi
•Does it handle the Ohio-specific requirements? Some states have quirks in their UCC implementation.
0 coins
Amara Adebayo
•It covers state-specific variations and filing requirements. Definitely caught some Ohio nuances I wasn't aware of.
0 coins