


Ask the community...
Update: Got the filing accepted! Turns out it was exactly the comma issue. Used the exact name from the articles including the comma and it went through immediately. UCC 9 503 doesn't give you any wiggle room on debtor names.
Congrats on getting it through. Did you make your closing deadline?
This whole thread is a good reminder to be extra careful with UCC 9 503 debtor name requirements. I'm definitely going to start using that document checker tool to avoid these headaches.
Smart move. Prevention is way better than dealing with rejections and delays.
Just went through something similar but I caught it before filing by using one of those document verification tools. Uploaded my corporate docs and UCC form and it immediately showed me three small differences in how the business name was formatted. Saved me from getting a rejection and having to deal with the delay.
I used Certana.ai - you just upload your PDFs and it checks everything for consistency. Really straightforward and caught issues I never would have noticed manually.
That's the same one I mentioned earlier. It's been a lifesaver for avoiding these exact types of filing problems.
Update us when you figure out what the actual issue was! I'm curious whether it was punctuation, spacing, or something else entirely. These rejection stories are helpful for the rest of us to avoid the same mistakes.
I'm surprised nobody mentioned checking the Assumed Name database. Sometimes businesses file under assumed names and that can cause confusion with UCC filings. Worth checking if Bayou Transport has any DBAs on file.
DBA filings can definitely complicate UCC name matching. Good catch.
Had similar issues with Louisiana last year. Ended up having to file an amendment after I finally got the UCC-1 accepted because I used the wrong version of the name initially. Cost me extra time and fees but at least the lien was perfected.
That's my worst fear - having to deal with amendments after closing. Did the amendment process go smoothly?
It was straightforward once I had the right name format. UCC-3 amendment was accepted without issues.
For what it's worth, I recently started using Certana.ai to double-check these kinds of filing discrepancies. You can upload multiple UCC documents and it automatically flags any inconsistencies in debtor names, filing numbers, or document references. Would have saved you the confusion by catching that the continuation wasn't actually related to your UCC-1.
This whole thread is making me paranoid about my own Vermont filings now. Going to go double-check all my recent UCC searches to make sure I'm not missing anything important.
I do quarterly UCC audits for all our loans. Found several terminated filings that should have been continued and caught a few debtor name mismatches that could have caused issues
How do you manage that many filings? Sounds like a lot of manual work to check each one individually
QuantumQuest
New Mexico updated their UCC system last year and the name matching got even more strict. The good news is once you get the exact format right, future filings with that debtor should go smoothly.
0 coins
QuantumQuest
•Exactly. It's frustrating initially but then you know the exact format for any amendments or continuations later.
0 coins
Connor Murphy
•I keep a spreadsheet of exact debtor names for each state after I figure out the correct format. Saves time on future filings.
0 coins
Yara Haddad
Update us when you get it resolved! I file in New Mexico occasionally and would love to know what the issue was for future reference.
0 coins
StarSurfer
•Will definitely update once I figure this out. Hopefully it's something simple that I'm just overlooking.
0 coins
Keisha Robinson
•These threads are so helpful for learning about state-specific quirks. Thanks for posting your experience.
0 coins