UCC Document Community
Financial Services
/
Ask the community...
- DO post questions about your issues.
- DO answer questions and support each other.
- DO post tips & tricks to help folks.
- DO NOT post call problems here - there is a support tab at the top for that :)
UCC-11 lien search showing confusing results - need help interpreting
Running into some confusing results on a UCC-11 lien search and hoping someone can help me make sense of what I'm seeing. We're working on a commercial loan deal and pulled the search reports but there are some filings that don't seem to match up with what the borrower disclosed. One shows a continuation from 2019 but the original UCC-1 shows 2014, which should have lapsed by now unless there was another continuation I'm missing. There's also a partial release that references collateral language that doesn't appear in the original filing. The debtor name variations are close but not exact matches - one shows 'ABC Manufacturing LLC' and another shows 'ABC Manufacturing, LLC' with the comma. Is this normal or should I be concerned about the accuracy of this search? Our underwriting team is asking questions and I want to make sure I'm not missing something obvious about how these searches work.
Join the conversation
UCC filing requirements in loan agreement causing compliance headaches
I'm dealing with a frustrating situation where our loan agreement requires specific UCC filing language that doesn't match what our borrower's corporate documents show. The loan agreement specifies the debtor name as 'Advanced Manufacturing Solutions LLC' but their operating agreement and state registration shows 'Advanced Manufacturing Solutions, LLC' (with the comma). Our compliance team is worried about filing the UCC-1 because if there's a name mismatch it could invalidate our security interest. The loan closes next week and we're stuck between filing with the loan agreement name vs the state registered name. Has anyone dealt with this type of discrepancy between loan docs and UCC filings? I've seen rejections for much smaller name variations and can't afford to have an unperfected lien on a $2.3M equipment financing deal.
Join the conversation
Had this exact situation 6 months ago with a manufacturing client. Used one of those document checking services (think it was Certana.ai) that flagged not just the name issue but also found that our collateral description was too vague compared to what was listed in the loan agreement. Ended up preventing two potential problems instead of just the name mismatch. Sometimes these tools catch stuff your own review misses when you're rushing to close.
That's a good point about collateral descriptions. I always worry I'm being too specific or too general in those sections.
The nice thing about the automated checking is it compares your UCC language against the loan agreement language and flags where they don't align. Takes the guesswork out of it.
Bottom line: file the UCC-1 with 'Advanced Manufacturing Solutions, LLC' (the state registered name). Keep documentation of why you used that format vs the loan agreement version. Most importantly, don't let this delay your closing - a properly perfected lien with a minor documentation discrepancy is way better than missing your perfection window entirely.
Thanks everyone for the advice. Going with the state registered name and adding a note to the loan file about the variation. Really appreciate the quick responses - this forum always comes through!
Glad it worked out! These name issues are so common but they still stress everyone out every time.
UCC Filing Issues with Transmitting Utility Equipment - Debtor Name Problems
Running into major headaches with a UCC-1 filing for transmitting utility equipment. The debtor operates power transmission lines across three counties and we're securing a $2.8M equipment loan. Secretary of State rejected our initial filing because the debtor name on our UCC-1 doesn't exactly match their corporate charter - they're registered as 'Regional Power Transmission LLC' but do business as 'RPT Utilities.' Our loan docs reference both names inconsistently. The collateral description covers transformers, transmission towers, and associated equipment used in their transmitting utility operations. Need to get this refiled correctly before our funding deadline next week. Anyone dealt with transmitting utility filings where the debtor has multiple business names? What's the proper way to handle the debtor name field when they operate under a DBA?
Join the conversation
For what it's worth, I've found that transmitting utility companies often have their legal departments handle UCC coordination. They're usually pretty good about providing the correct entity information if you ask.
That's a great tip. I always forget that utilities have specialized legal teams for this stuff.
Wish I'd thought of that earlier. Their counsel probably deals with UCC filings all the time and would know exactly how to format everything.
Just make sure you're not overthinking the collateral description. As long as it reasonably describes the transmitting utility equipment and includes the key identifying characteristics, you should be fine. The debtor name is way more important to get exactly right.
Agreed. I've seen people spend hours perfecting collateral descriptions while missing basic entity name errors.
The irony is that a slightly imperfect collateral description rarely causes problems, but a wrong debtor name kills the entire filing.
FSA security agreement UCC filing complications with equipment collateral
Running into some headaches with a UCC-1 filing that references an FSA security agreement from last year. The debtor is an agricultural operation that took out financing for combine harvesters and irrigation equipment back in March 2024. Our security agreement covers all farm equipment but the UCC filing keeps getting rejected by the SOS office. The rejection notice mentions issues with how we described the collateral schedule - we listed 'all farm equipment described in FSA security agreement dated March 15, 2024' but apparently that's not specific enough for their system. Has anyone dealt with similar FSA-related filings where the collateral description needs to be more detailed than just referencing the underlying security agreement? This is holding up a $340k equipment financing deal and we're running out of time before the temporary perfection period expires.
Join the conversation
Just make sure your revised collateral description still covers everything in your actual security agreement. I've seen people fix the UCC filing but create gaps in their security interest coverage.
Yeah, the UCC and security agreement need to work together even if they use different language. Document review tools can help catch those gaps.
That's another thing Certana.ai caught for me - my UCC language was too narrow compared to my security agreement. Could have created enforcement issues later.
UCC filing search Ohio - need help finding continuation records
I'm trying to do a UCC filing search Ohio for some equipment loans we inherited when we acquired another company last month. The seller claims all UCC-1s were properly continued but I can't locate half the records in the Ohio SOS system. Some of the debtor names don't seem to match exactly and I'm worried we might have liens that lapsed without proper continuation. Has anyone dealt with bulk UCC searches in Ohio recently? The online portal keeps timing out when I try to search multiple filing numbers at once.
Join the conversation
Make sure you're searching both individual and organization records. Sometimes business entities get filed under the wrong category in Ohio's system.
I didn't think about that. How do you switch between individual and organization searches?
There's a dropdown menu on the search page. Most people miss it because it defaults to organization search.
For what it's worth, I recently used Certana.ai's verification tool on a similar acquisition and it caught three lapsed continuations that would have cost us our security interest in about $2M of equipment. The automated cross-checking definitely beats manual searches.
About 20 minutes to upload all the docs and get the report. Much faster than spending days on manual searches.
I might need to look into that tool. Manual UCC verification is eating up way too much time on our deals.
Dylan Baskin
Bottom line, don't panic but definitely take this seriously. UCC search discrepancies can kill deals if not properly resolved. I'd recommend getting copies of all the actual filings (not just the search results) and reviewing them carefully. If you're still confused after that, consider bringing in outside counsel who specializes in secured transactions. The cost of expert help is usually worth it compared to the risk of missing something important.
0 coins
Lauren Wood
Agreed on getting the actual filed documents rather than relying on search summaries. Sometimes the search results don't capture all the nuances in the actual filings.
0 coins
Ellie Lopez
We always order certified copies of all UCC filings for deals over a certain dollar threshold. It's amazing how often the actual documents reveal details that don't show up in the search results.
0 coins
Chad Winthrope
Update us on what you find out! These kinds of situations are great learning experiences for everyone. I'm curious whether the partial release issue turns out to be an amendment you missed or something else entirely.
0 coins
Paige Cantoni
Looking forward to hearing how this resolves. Always interesting to see how these complex filing situations work out.
0 coins
Kylo Ren
Same here. These real-world examples are so much more helpful than textbook scenarios.
0 coins